What if doubt is your “source”? It is a forum for conversation and I believe no Alex Jones conspiracy crap, I never ever go to his site and haven’t now. But I personally wondered why someone of Scalia’s profession and stature would not have an investigation into his death, no matter how “natural” it was immediately stated to be. The thing stinks to high heaven; my “source”: my own intelligence, where’s yours?
EXACTLY!! That’s what I thought, immediately! So so fishy! We are not “clay eaters”, we are thinkers! The man was too important to let this just so quickly be deemed any kind of death without an investigation! It’s like some comedic spy movie, but no, it’s real life.
How old are you? Twenties or thirties? You’d have to be with a comment like that. 79 is Not considered old anymore, life expectancy is long now, even for men. 79 is young! Was he in ill health? If so, why did we never hear of it? Ginsburg is ancient yes, Scalia, no. However, he was the oldest, and most likely to “die of natural causes”, connservative justice. It. Is. Suspicious.
The lack of outrage and info is very strange! Like it’s not even possible that he could’ve been MURDERED?? This isn’t just sad, it could be suspicious! No investigation?? Just on to the memorial, that’s it??
Exactly. The fruit of their ideology bites them in the butt eventually, then it’s too late. Here she’s trying to rally men to protect the women and children, but that is a “civilized”, “Western” concept from back in the day; starting w/but not limited to opening the door for a woman. How about the adage, “never hit a woman!”, now, every single movie has women hitting men and men hitting women! Women don’t need to be protected, right?? Women are all empowered and stuff. Ya, right.
Yes, she doesn’t want to appear “xenophobic” yet displays why fear of these apes is appropriate. She should understand how we got here: LIBERALISM, especially in Europe. She’s young, doesn’t understand “free speech” (guess Germany doesn’t have that anyway), doesn’t understand that the Europeans did the same to other cultures back in the day (Just saying what they and our students have been taught in schools since the 60’s), blah blah. At least she’s making distinctions, that’s a good sign.
âIt canât be that the rich get access to the entire Internet and the poor get access only to Facebook.â So what? At least they’ll get free access to something rather than nothing. Weird. I guess they’re saying that the poor must be given free stuff by everyone, not just Zuckerberg. Of course, the internet is a right, just like housing, health care, and food.