Free Republic

What was the actual question that you asked to get your deep-dive? You can PM me with the answer.

-PJ

I tried one of my three free deep researches per day on Perplexity to create a profile on me and it totally messed it up, attributing to me posts made by others, and otherwise being very superficial in its analysis.

Were you using Grok.com to generate your analysis?

-PJ

I got 12 out of 15.

-PJ

Boston judge could face brutal punishment

-PJ

Wow. Pretty insightful stuff, especially about the areas it chose to highlight. Thanks for doing this!

If I had to pick my most impactful series of posts, it would be me being the first to: 1) recognize that the RFK Jr. Presidential campaign was taking more votes away from President Trump than from Kamala Harris, and 2) calling for RFK, Jr. to drop out and endorse President Trump. I did that on August 4, 2024. The Trump campaign issued its memorandum on this trend on August 23, 2024.

I do have some quibbles with what Grok found:

He even started a 2023 vanity thread titled “Has FreeRepublic Been Hacked? Have I Been Targeted?” exploring why a link in his old Jan‐6 post was altered​... in the “hacked link” thread, a couple of users initially argued that he had simply made an HTML mistake​. Political Junkie Too stood his ground and walked them through why he believed it was not user error, reasserting his evidence​.

Actually, I'm quite embarrassed about this now. I do think it was a copy/paste error on my part that I discovered later after posting this. Seeing it come back in a profile about me and then drawing inferences from it bothers me a bit. I think I'll seek out this thread and ask the mods to remove it.

lighter political pieces (like a humorous Fox News piece imagining a “Gutfeld! Cabinet”)​... Another example: his posting of a Fox News article listing a mock “Trump Gutfeld Cabinet” in late 2024...

That was REAL!!! There was no mockery about it! It was based on the list of nominees that the Trump transition team released after he was elected.

he bluntly rebutted another user’s criticism of Trump, saying “I am damn tired of idiots with no understanding of life and leadership… Go peddle your thoughts somewhere else.”

I never said this. I just paged through all of my posts (with martini in hand) going back to 2006 and nothing came up. I've tried very hard over the years to cultivate a posting style that was respectful and neutral in tone. Calling someone an "idiot" and making claims about their life experiences is not in my vernacular.

I've also been paging through posts to me (I think it's something once posted to me in anger), but going as far back as October 2020 yields nothing (and my fingers are getting tired).

he once joked about Shepard Smith only having his “hands in chapstick and Vaseline” in a thread poking at Fox News bias

This doesn't sound like me at all. This doesn't sound like anything that I would say. I don't make sexual references about other people in my posts.

Other than those few items that I called out, this is a pretty interesting diagnosis of my posting history.

Thanks again for doing this.

-PJ

Life imitates art?

Did anyone recognize the similarity of this story with the second episode of the defunct CBS TV drama All Rise from 2019?

In the second episode titled Long Day's Journey into ICE, an ICE agent enters the courtroom of series leading character Judge Lola Carmichael's courtroom (played by actress Simone Missick) to apprehend an illegal alien defendant. Judge Carmichael helps the defendant to escape from the ICE agent by guiding him out of a back door of the courtroom.

-PJ

Cool! Thanks!

-PJ

Here is what Grok says about me:

The Free Republic user "Political Junkie Too" is an active participant on the conservative news discussion forum FreeRepublic.com, a platform founded in 1996 by James C. "Jim" Robinson to discuss political topics from a grassroots, conservative perspective. Based on available information, here’s what can be inferred about Political Junkie Too: Activity and Content: Political Junkie Too has been posting on Free Republic since at least 2018, with contributions focusing on political analysis, often from a conservative viewpoint. Their posts cover topics like elections, impeachment discussions, and critiques of political figures and media. For example, in a 2019 post, they analyzed a Fox News poll about Trump’s impeachment, highlighting perceived biases in the poll’s demographic sampling and emphasizing support for Trump among independents. Another post from 2021 critiques Biden’s decision-making, reflecting a critical stance toward Democratic leadership.[](https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3785178/posts)[](https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3985270/replies?c=1) Posting Style and Views: Political Junkie Too’s commentary often aligns with Free Republic’s conservative ethos, advocating for limited government and constitutional principles. They emphasize the importance of public perception in politics, as seen in posts from an earlier period (circa 2009) where they argue that conservatives should adopt aggressive messaging tactics similar to those used by Democrats, focusing on shaping public opinion through accusations and innuendo rather than waiting for definitive proof. They express frustration with traditional conservative strategies, suggesting a more combative approach to challenge political opponents.[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkietoo/)[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkietoo/index) Engagement: The user actively engages with other Free Republic members, responding to comments and participating in threaded discussions. For instance, their posts often prompt replies from other users, indicating they are part of the community’s broader conversations. They also reference specific political events, such as Obama’s legitimacy, the Jack Abramoff scandal, and media bias, showing a deep interest in political strategy and media dynamics.[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkietoo/)[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkietoo/index)[](https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3785178/posts) Profile Details: There is no explicit "about" page for Political Junkie Too, and Free Republic’s structure does not typically provide detailed public profiles for users. However, another user alias, "politicaljunkienewbi," is noted as an alternative name, suggesting they may have used different handles or been associated with similar accounts.[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkienewbi/contact) Context on Free Republic: The platform itself is known for its conservative activism, with topics tagged in Political Junkie Too’s posts including SCOTUS, ProLife, Corruption, Taxes, MediaBias, and Trump, reflecting the forum’s focus on issues like government overreach, constitutional rights, and conservative political figures. The site has a history of grassroots organizing, notably during the Clinton impeachment era, and Political Junkie Too’s contributions fit within this tradition of political commentary and activism.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic)[](https://freerepublic.com/about.htm)[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeRepublic.com) No personal details (e.g., real name, location, or occupation) are available, as Free Republic users typically operate under pseudonyms, and the platform emphasizes anonymity for its members. Political Junkie Too appears to be a dedicated, opinionated contributor to Free Republic’s conservative discourse, focusing on political strategy and media critique. If you’d like me to dig deeper into specific posts or analyze related content, let me know!

For the record, I have used only one screen name during my entire tenure here.

-PJ

Google, et. al., stopped indexing Free Republic long ago to make it harder to go back and find archived or scrubbed articles.

-PJ

On the other hand, I tried this one:

Q: If you read User:"JoesBucks" comments on site:freerepublic.com, how would you describe this person? Based on the available comments and posts by User:"JoesBucks" on Free Republic, this person can be described as a strongly conservative, pro-Trump commentator who is highly critical of illegal immigration and skeptical of mainstream media narratives. Key Characteristics: Conservative and Pro-Trump: JoesBucks frequently supports Donald Trump’s policies and rhetoric, often defending Trump’s actions, such as in discussions about immigration enforcement and media controversies[5]. Hardline on Immigration: The user expresses a strict stance on illegal immigration, arguing that deportation should occur regardless of gang affiliation and criticizing any perceived leniency or administrative mistakes in immigration enforcement[5]. Distrust of Media and Political Opponents: JoesBucks shows skepticism toward media reporting, suggesting that media and political adversaries manipulate facts or distract from core issues. The user accuses others of being "Never Trumpers" if they question Trump’s narrative[5]. Direct and Blunt Communication Style: The language used is blunt and sometimes abrasive, using strong terms to describe those they disagree with (e.g., "These people are f%#^ing idiots")[5]. Engaged in Site Culture: The user participates in ongoing site activities, donation drives, and community discussions, indicating a regular and invested presence on Free Republic[2][3]. Overall, JoesBucks is a vocal, uncompromising conservative voice, especially on immigration and support for Trump, with a confrontational style toward opposing viewpoints[5]. Citations: [1] https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:joesbucks/index?tab=comments%3Bbrevity%3Dfull%3Boptions%3Dno-change [2] https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:joesbucks/index?more=133024436 [3] https://freerepublic.com/~joesbucks/ [4] https://www.freerepublic.com [5] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4311959/posts [6] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4228724/replies?c=1&q=1&%3Bpage=21 [7] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4303309/posts [8] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4308859/posts

Clearly, this is an imperfect science. It looks like it's mixing up comments made by a user with comments made to the user.

-PJ

Here is what it said about me. I rephrased the query to help isolate its searches.

Q: If you read User:"Political Junkie Too" comments on site:freerepublic.com, how would you describe this person? Based on the available search results, User "Political Junkie Too" on FreeRepublic.com appears to be a well-informed, articulate, and opinionated conservative commentator with a strong interest in U.S. politics, economics, and legal issues. Key Characteristics: Conservative Perspective: The user consistently expresses views aligned with the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement and supports Donald Trump, emphasizing policies like tariffs for economic security and criticizing Wall Street's focus on inflation and short-term gains[1][2]. Analytical and Detailed: Comments often analyze political and economic strategies, referencing factors like interest rates, inflation, and the broader impact of manufacturing policies on American communities[1]. Direct and Persuasive: The tone is direct, sometimes challenging other conservatives to consider the historical significance of their actions, such as urging House Republicans not to "stop MAGA"[2]. Engaged and Knowledgeable: The user is active in live political discussions, such as election night threads, and brings a depth of knowledge to debates about U.S. policy and global strategy (e.g., the strategic value of Greenland)[3][4]. Signature Style: Posts are often signed with "-PJ," indicating a recognizable and consistent presence within the Free Republic community[1][2][4]. Background and Reputation: While the search results do not explicitly confirm the real identity of "Political Junkie Too," there is a profile in Dartmouth Alumni Magazine of Brian Buckley, a conservative Republican and self-described "political junkie" who became active on Free Republic under the handle "Clarity." Buckley is described as an L.A. attorney with a reputation for explaining legal and constitutional matters to other users, serving as a "house lawyer" and providing educational commentary on complex issues[5]. While it is not confirmed that Buckley is "Political Junkie Too," both share a similar approach: correcting misinformation, valuing integrity, and engaging deeply with political discourse. Summary Table Attribute: Description Political Leaning: Conservative, pro-MAGA Communication Style: Analytical, direct, sometimes humorous Areas of Focus: U.S. politics, economics, legal/constitutional issues Community Role: Regular, recognizable contributor; sometimes persuasive or corrective Reputation: Knowledgeable, respected for depth and clarity of commentary In summary, "Political Junkie Too" is best described as a committed, knowledgeable, and persuasive conservative voice on Free Republic, known for thoughtful analysis and a willingness to engage in substantive debate on political and economic issues[1][2][4]. Citations https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4303776/posts https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4309593/posts?q=1&%3Bpage=30 https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4275976/posts?page=23 https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4286002/posts?q=1&%3Bpage=21 https://archive.dartmouthalumnimagazine.com/article/2000/11/1/political-junkie

For the record, I am not this "Brian Buckley" person.

-PJ

Here is what Perplexity AI says about you:

Q: If you read jonty30 comments on free republic, how would you describe this person? Based on Jonty30's comments on Free Republic, this person comes across as curious, playful, and engaged with both technology and internet culture. Jonty30 experiments with AI chatbots like Grok, asking a range of questions from the technical (differences between stamina and endurance) to the humorous (“do farts have lumps?”), and even references pop culture and memes such as the “Holiday Inn Express” advertising campaign[1][2]. This suggests a sense of humor and familiarity with internet in-jokes. Jonty30 also demonstrates an interest in international events and historical topics, as seen in their detailed recounting of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, referencing various sources and estimates, which indicates a willingness to discuss serious subjects and a capacity for nuanced understanding[1]. The comments show a critical but open-minded approach to technology, as Jonty30 evaluates the thoroughness and balance of AI responses and expresses caution about privacy when prompted for personal data[1]. Overall, Jonty30 appears to be: Inquisitive and willing to explore new technologies. Possessing a playful, sometimes irreverent sense of humor. Knowledgeable about both pop culture and historical events. Skeptical and privacy-conscious when it comes to sharing personal information online. Engaged in thoughtful discussion, balancing lighthearted banter with more substantive commentary[1][2]. Citations: [1] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4308438/posts [2] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4308438/posts?page=44 [3] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4313858/posts [4] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4313498/posts [5] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4313925/posts [6] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4313713/posts [7] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4313697/posts [8] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4313533/posts [9] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4313863/posts [10] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4309761/posts

-PJ

They act like they’ve never seen a tech sector downturn before...

It's called sector rotation.

We've seen it with retail, with airlines, with autos, with steel, with coal...

What's more interesting is the sectors we HAVEN'T seen rotation... teaching, government, health care...

-PJ

The questions become the news, not the answers.

-PJ

From the list, I've been to:

• 5. Narita International Airport, Tokyo, Japan

  I was there on a layover from midnight to 3:00am and never saw anything except the United lounge.

• 7. Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport, France

  The only thing I recall is the long escalators (also the cover of the album I Robot by The Alan Parsons Project).

• 13. Vancouver International Airport, Canada

  Went home from there after a cruise from Anchorage. I don't remember a thing about this airport except that a bus took us from the cruise port to the airport and parked in a back lot until a shuttle could take us the rest of the way.

• 19. Amsterdam Airport Schipol, The Netherlands

  This one I remember. I was impressed by the outdoor mall that surrounded the airport. I was surprised that the airport was like a city center with an open air grocery, shops, and restaurants. The airport security was located at each individual gate instead of having a "secure zone" that everyone had to pass through before going to the gates.

-PJ

Life imitates art?

Did anyone recognize the similarity of this story with the second episode of the defunct CBS TV drama All Rise from 2019?

In the second episode titled Long Day's Journey into ICE, an ICE agent enters the courtroom of series leading character Judge Lola Carmichael's courtroom (played by actress Simone Missick) to apprehend an illegal alien defendant. Judge Carmichael helps the defendant to escape from the ICE agent by guiding him out of a back door of the courtroom.

-PJ

It's Easter, and the Democrats are chanting "We want Barabbas!"

-PJ

It turns out that the 45 hours reference was bad reporting from Gateway Pundit.

-PJ

The prosecutors can argue that the statute of limits resets if the crime is ongoing. In the Trump case, James argued that the transactions continued from 2011 through 2021, reaching inside the statute of limitations.

In the James case, prosecutors would have to argue something like a refinance of the property that was based on the original fraudulent documents or some recent transaction that relies on the older documents. I'm not aware of such a thing right now.

-PJ

I don't think New York will ever see a trial on the Brooklyn property because the 2001 loan documents are beyond the statute of limitations. Lowell is trying to create a narrative with those documents to try to claim "cherry picking" of documents to undermine the entire case.

I think they know there is no case in New York because the mortgage was so long ago.

-PJ