Free Republic

Gotta get one!

There is more to the story as reported in The Scotsman http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/international.cfm?id=754922002 .  Here are some more examples of his churlishness.

1. This week the US tabloid National Enquirer, reported that he was being asked to take a DNA test to determine if he is the father of 20-year-old Anthony Pearson, the son of an alleged former lover.
2. last month, it was claimed that Mr Clinton is dragging his feet on a $12 million deal to publish his memoirs. A report said that he was suffering from writer’s block and was in danger of missing an agreed deadline.
3. the Clintons were accused on inappropriate dealings with their lawyers
4. The Daily News claimed he owes $1 million to Robert Bennett, his attorney for the Paula Jones case, adding that Mr Bennett "hasn’t seen a nickel in nearly a year".

 

This guy is a complete fraud, in my opinion. He had no scruples against using his eight year old daughter to further his own personal ambitions, which I already knew. Now it turns out that he deliberately misrepresented the facts concerning his daughter's "injury" during the pledge of allegiance.

I really doubt it's $92 million

Oops!  Would 9.2 million sound more reasonable?

I heard this property is going to cost 92 million dollars.

I just finished downloading and browsing the Climate Action Report for 2002. It's a 268 page document including appendices and bibliographies.  The body of the report contains a lot of data and a little (too little) on technical methodologies.  It is very intimidating for the lay reader.

However, to help gain a perspective on this report, it is a good idea to read the opposing scientific viewpoints and for this I am very appreciative of the trouble you went through to provide these links.

Especially helpful is the  http://www.co2science.org  web site for their short summaries of technical documents.  I recommend going to  http://www.co2science.org/search.htm and type in "climate change" without the quotation marks.  Then select "Return link only if all keywords are matched."  Then select the areas of interest and you'll find credible documents with internal links that will give you the ability to credibly refute the assertions made in the Climate Action Report for 2002.  They are bite sized and very digestible.
 

I just finished downloading and browsing the Climate Action Report for 2002. It's a 268 page document including appendices and bibliographies.  The body of the report contains a lot of data and a little (too little) on technical methodologies.  It is very intimidating for the lay reader.

However, to help gain a perspective on this report, it is a good idea to read the opposing scientific viewpoints and for this I am very appreciative of the trouble you went through to provide these links.

Especially helpful is the  http://www.co2science.org  web site for their short summaries of technical documents.  I recommend going to  http://www.co2science.org/search.htm and type in "climate change" without the quotation marks.  Then select "Return link only if all keywords are matched."  Then select the areas of interest and you'll find credible documents with internal links that will give you the ability to credibly refute the assertions made in the Climate Action Report for 2002.  They are bite sized and very digestible.
 

I just finished downloading and browsing the Climate Action Report for 2002. It's a 268 page document including appendices and bibliographies.  The body of the report contains a lot of data and a little (too little) on technical methodologies.  It is very intimidating for the lay reader.

However, to help gain a perspective on this report, it is a good idea to read the opposing scientific viewpoints and for this I am very appreciative of the trouble you went through to provide these links.

Especially helpful is the  http://www.co2science.org  web site for their short summaries of technical documents.  I recommend going to  http://www.co2science.org/search.htm and type in "climate change" without the quotation marks.  Then select "Return link only if all keywords are matched."  Then select the areas of interest and you'll find credible documents with internal links that will give you the ability to credibly refute the assertions made in the Climate Action Report for 2002.  They are bite sized and very digestible.
 

I just finished downloading and browsing the Climate Action Report for 2002. It's a 268 page document including appendices and bibliographies.  The body of the report contains a lot of data and a little (too little) on technical methodologies.  It is very intimidating for the lay reader.

However, to help gain a perspective on this report, it is a good idea to read the opposing scientific viewpoints and for this I am very appreciative of the trouble you went through to provide these links.

Especially helpful is the  http://www.co2science.org  web site for their short summaries of technical documents.  I recommend going to  http://www.co2science.org/search.htm and type in "climate change" without the quotation marks.  Then select "Return link only if all keywords are matched."  Then select the areas of interest and you'll find credible documents with internal links that will give you the ability to credibly refute the assertions made in the Climate Action Report for 2002.  They are bite sized and very digestible.
 

It is not possible for a private person to violate the establishment clause of the first amendment.

Drudge had fun with this one. Personally I think it's a yawn. However, I wonder how Bush's team let this one out.

Why?