Then the fact that Google have offered to host Wikipedia will no doubt make you incandecent with rage. As will the fact that Yahoo has donated them several servers.
I agree that wikipedia, like all sources of information, cannot escape bias completely. However they do not claim to be neutral. The wikipedia:neutral point of view policy merely is a statement of what the wikipedia should strive for.
I agree that wikipedia, like all sources of information, cannot escape bias completely. However they do not claim to be neutral. The wikipedia:neutral point of view policy merely is a statement of what the wikipedia should strive for.
Wikipedia does indeed have an editorial process. There are a few hundred administators. Articles can be submitted for peer review. The system of policies has been very effective. It is my personal belief that wikipedia cannot allow anonymous posting forever, this policy will have to change sometime in the next few years.