Free Republic

“What loyalties do you have? Are they wavering?”

Can you see how you are switching, and not addressing?

“Just for example, is it OK to be white? Will you say so?”

“Why should I say it? If I don’t say it, why would you assume I don’t think it?”

Pretend if you want. You do not have the balls to say white people are OK.

IOW, a simple statement of fact challenges you. Why is that?

The name calling and stupid insults are a significant reason for the stark decline of our country.

Racist, whatever-phobe, anti-semite, all contributions to decline. We are being taught to hate, and freely accept to seem virtuous.

Pathetic that a country other than America is held blameless, with the threat of cancellation.

“Why would you ask? Have I said otherwise?”

No, you did not say otherwise. The point was otherwise.

No human being denies the atrocities.

Ask yourself, why would you even ask?

Brainwashing.

“Have you ever considered how Israel has been subservient to the US, sacrificing lives, land, allies, and deterrence for the US?”

So you are stating that Israel has sacrificed her interests?

“Do you mean men who pretend to be women and women who pretend to be men, or men who love men and women who love women ? There is a name for that.”

No. I do not mean that. Amazed you would ask.

“Huh? You wouldn’t know “thinking” (i.e. wisdom) if she snapped you on your naked ass with a wet towel.”

Name calling, again. Actual thinking is needed.

“The term Judeo-Christian does not refer to a person’s Christian beliefs. It simply refers to the Scriptural laws that our nation’s justice system are based on and some societal traditions we observe. I’ve never heard “Judeo-Christian” being used as some sort of religious denomination as you seem to interpret it.”

It refers to nonsense, but nonsense intended to manipulate.

“Judeo-Christian” is a superfluous and worthless phrase intended to manipulate. There is no meaningful definition as used by virtue signalers. Warm and fuzzy words concocted recently, to manipulate. Not clarifying.

“My loyalty to America is wavering”

What about other loyalties? Are they wavering?

“Only a wuss begrudges civilized people for lining up wit Israel with assistance against this barbaric atrocity.”

Absolutely true.

But I am not doing that.

Are you?

“We know what you are really asking.”

Think about the implications of that statement. The tone, the assumptions.

“What you are doing is called sophistry. A good and decent people were attacked in the most hideous ways imaginable. Women literally raped to death. I didn’t even know that was possible. Broke their legs out of sockets spreading them so violently. A baby baked alive in an oven. Dancing kids mowed down. Taunting messages to parents.
Only a selfish prick or a total coward refuses to ride to the aid of someone in that boat.”

You could write for the NY Post.

What the media says is baloney. How is it possible that MAGA people and white people so facilely accept the hatred directed to them?

How is it possible that race guilt and religion guilt have been so readily and eagerly been accepted? Vanity.

Are there no men?

“And he was a Jew until the moment he died.”

Yes, He was.

Relevance?

“Ah, you just want permission to be an antisemite and pretend you are saved. No sale.”

The addiction to name calling is fundamental. A substitute to actually thinking.

People like those on FR are under attack every day by this type of approach to interaction.

Some people are allowed to be themselves, and others are not. In America, we call names against those who dare to be who they are.

The astonishing thing is how brainwashed people are. Virtue signaling, not thought.

“Do you believe that the Old Testament is true?”

Yes. Do you believe Jesus is the Son of God? I do.

Paul did. He learned from Jesus personally.

Jesus is accepted by some, rejected by many.

Look at it this way.

Does it make sense to say something is rejected-accepted? Believed-not believed?

No, it is nonsense. A made-up concept intended to manipulate psychologically.

“judeo-christian

adjective

Having origins in both Judaism and Christianity; of or pertaining to Christianity.
“the Judeo-Christian tradition”
Being historically related to both Judaism and Christianity.”

Like Judeo-Islam?

Islam is more “Judeo” than Christianity.

Absurd propaganda to make people feel virtuous on a false basis.

“Loyalty can only be applied to a commitment.”

So you are not loyal to your family?

“The US has never been subservient to Israel.”

Curious whether you have actually considered the question.

“I’m loyal to the Judeo-Christian America”

There is no such thing as Judeo-Christian. This absurd phrase is brainwashing.

Jesus was the Son of God, sent to save us, crucified and resurrected. That is Christian.

Anyone who does not believe that cannot be attached to Christianity in any respect, even if it feels good and sounds virtuous. Maybe it protects from name calling.