Forget SCOTUS. Forrester has to go out and hammer Lautenberg. Remember, Torricelli's integrity problems are what did him in. But with Lautenberg allowing his name to be put on the ballot he now opens himself to the same problem. The NJ Supreme Court clearly went beyond its authority--the law is clear. So if Lautenberg wants to play Forrester must make him deal with the integrity issue before moving on to something else. I was listening to Lautenberg's acceptance speech lastweek. For him the issues are environment, gun laws and the economy. The economy is a bogus issue in the first place, but Bush was right to force a "back to work" order on the West Coast docks. With Iraq war coming soon any patter from the Dems about his interfering with will be lost in the noise of battle. Anyway, beside the economy issue Lautenberg sounded more like a product of the late 70s or early 80s. Furthermore, I'm not sure he'll have the stomach for a really dirty campaign. He is not being received well by commuters when he shows up in all the usual places on Mon-Fri mornings. By the way, is there a Freeper or Freepers in NJ who is organizing some harassment for Mr. Lautenberg? I would be happy to sign up. Chuckd
be patient apillar. Can't really know the truth from these early polls. In any case, if it becomes clear Forrester is losing all he needs to do is bow out and the gop can throw in a pinch hitter--Even right up to election day. I'm thing Tom Kean. Was a popular governor and honest. If the dems want to live by the sword they can die by the sword.