03/08/2021 7:09:35 AM PST
· 66 of 75 Arones
to ifinnegan
These modest decreases in rate of increase were found to be statistically significant.
Which is the opposite of what GP says in the article.
It’s really junk science in its poor design (or they modified design to present results that most reflected what they wanted to find).
If Hoft wanted to argue that, he should have. Or, he could have listed the limitations that were in the report (like you did). Instead, he repeated an incorrect tweet.