Skip to comments.
Could I ask a serious question of some Mormons? (Please?)
today
| me
Posted on 01/19/2003 12:18:35 PM PST by Jael
No man who rejects the testimony of Joseph Smith can enter the kingdom of God"
Doctrines of Salvation, vol. I, p. 190).
My question:
Is that what Mormons believe?
If so, how was anyone saved before 1830.
TOPICS: Apologetics; General Discusssion; History; Other Christian
KEYWORDS: mormonbeliefs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-390 next last
To: Jael
I'll answer your questions the best I can..
Anyone who hears and rejects the testimony of Joseph, rejects what he is stating. That Jesus is the Christ,and that The True church of Jesus Christ is restored.
To: Delphinium
Your Idea of what Mormons believe is totally wrong. It is the same old roetoric that has been retold lies for years. It seems that (like the Clintons) if a lie is told enough sheeple will believe it. The LDS Church is open for investigation, look for yourself, go there and see for yourself, take the discusions, talk to the missionaries, but most importantly, PRAY to Your Father in Heaven and ASk with a sincere Heart, and He will Testify to you by the power of the Holy Ghost that it is ALL TRUE!
To: Ron Gordy; Jael
Yes or no please.
Lots of parsing of words in your answer. It really is a easy question to answer
43
posted on
01/20/2003 5:33:49 AM PST
by
Wrigley
To: Ron Gordy; Wrigley; CARepubGal; computerjunkie; CCWoody; Bat_Chemist
***The LDS Church is open for investigation, look for yourself, go there and see for yourself, take the discusions, talk to the missionaries, but most importantly, PRAY to Your Father in Heaven and ASk with a sincere Heart, and He will Testify to you by the power of the Holy Ghost that it is ALL TRUE!***
Ron, this doesn't pass the giggle test. You really think BYU offers academic freedom to teachers who question the party line history of Mormonism?
I note you much prefer a subjective burning bosom confirmation of Mormonism, this is understandable given the major historical problems of Mormon "scriptures" and the character of Mormon "prophets." And we certainly don't want to take seriously Paul's recommendation that we search the Scriptures to see if Mormonism is true.
Much easier to decieve people via a subjective thorasic glow. Subjective proof is much more useful than dealing with those inconvenient inconsistencies in Mormonism.
44
posted on
01/20/2003 5:46:31 AM PST
by
drstevej
(Rolaids cures heartburn.)
To: Jolly Green; Delphinium
That's an outrageous lie. You might want to spell out your agenda, since you clearly have one. A woman can not even GET into the Celestial Kingdom unless HER HUSBAND (not God) calls her..tell the truth..If he does not call she is a servent
45
posted on
01/20/2003 7:50:26 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: wai-ming; Jael
Not only MUST they be "temple worthy" Mormons to get into the celestial Kingdom but Joseph Smith is one of the Judges that decides who gets in..
46
posted on
01/20/2003 8:32:15 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: Ron Gordy
Ron if she is lying please tell us what you believe do not just call her a liar
47
posted on
01/20/2003 8:33:41 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
Not just "calls her", but by her secret temple name.
48
posted on
01/20/2003 9:02:35 AM PST
by
bonfire
To: RnMomof7
You are upset about quotes from the LDS "Journal of Discourses" Don't call me a liar, check it out by going to the online "Journal of Discourses" that the LDS church provides.
To: Delphinium
You posted to the wrong person...I was not the one that was upset
50
posted on
01/20/2003 9:57:54 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: Ron Gordy
Its the history of the LDS church. I challenge you to check it out yourself. It is repeated because it is documented history. Most of what I have posted are quotes from the LDS "Journal of Discourses". Your choice whether to believe it or not.
To: bonfire
The Mormon wedding is interesting God calls the man through the veil (into the celestial Kingdom) and then the Husband calls the wife..that is VERY symbolic and points to the fact the woman does not rely on God to be saved..but her husband.
At one time the Husband took the temple 'wedding vows' to God and the wife to the husband...
52
posted on
01/20/2003 10:01:40 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
Just adding to your info.
53
posted on
01/20/2003 10:07:26 AM PST
by
bonfire
To: Grig
The Prophet Joseph Smith was obviously reflecting on the question of whether polygamy was right or wrong when he wrote the Book of Mormon. He ended up taking a very strong stand against it. In Jacob 2:23-24 we read:
"But the word of God burdens me because of your grosser crimes. For behold, thus saith the Lord: This people begin to wax in iniquity; they understand not the scriptures, for they seek to excuse themselves in committing whoredoms, because of the things which were written concerning David, and Solomon his son.
"Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the Lord."
Gen 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Mat 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Mar 10:7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife;
You will never convince me that God commanded any man to go against his word. Plural marriage was a very hurtful part of early Mormonism. Brigham Young had 48 wives. Some lived in complete poverty. He had one that he loved the most, and treated her much better than the rest. You can't tell me that it was a wonderful thing for a 60 year old man to marry a 14 year old? Or to marry a mother, and daughter.
To: Grig
Another question? How do you answer the source I quoted from was The Journal of Discourses? How could this be taken out of context?
To: RnMomof7
Wonder how I did that? Sorry, just trying to answer these guys. I didn't mean to get so involved with this topic.
To: RnMomof7; All
I was never clear on what happens to the woman if the husband doesn't call her name? Anyone?
57
posted on
01/20/2003 10:17:41 AM PST
by
bonfire
To: Delphinium
Thats ok it is called 'friendfly fire" I ducked:>)
58
posted on
01/20/2003 10:22:03 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: Jael
The day the GOV. steps in and keeps a bunch of old men from "taking innocent young women to wife when the other one wears out is the day I get a bit more pro GOV."
So you think the government should pass a law saying that all marriage partners have to have an age difference below some set number even though both of them consent to the marriage? What should that number be IYHO? If you are not going to put that restriction on monogamous marriages, what right is there to put it on plural ones?
But the government didn't come out saying that there had to be some age difference restriction, they didn't care that there was consent by both for the marriage, they outlawed it totaly. If prayer becomes unpopular enough, would the government have the right to ban it too?
59
posted on
01/20/2003 10:22:37 AM PST
by
Grig
To: bonfire
I was never clear on what happens to the woman if the husband doesn't call her name? Anyone?She becomes a "servent".noooo godess status
60
posted on
01/20/2003 10:23:04 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-390 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson