Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EWTN TV USCCB Coverage Of The Summer Session
EWTN Television ^ | June,2002 | staff

Posted on 06/09/2002 5:16:31 PM PDT by Lady In Blue

USCCB COVERAGE OF THE SUMMER SESSION


EWTNews Director, Raymond Arroyo and his guest will provide extensive coverage of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Summer Plenary Session. Tune in for daily live coverage of the events.

PREVIEW SHOW:

Wed. June 12, 8:00 PM Live

Wed. June 12, 10:00 PM (encore)

Thursday June 13, 2:00 AM (encore)

Thursday June 13, 9:00 AM (encore)


MORNING SESSION (4 HRS) LIVE:

Thursday June 13, 2002 10:00 AM

Thursday June 13, 2002 9:00 PM (encore)

AFTERNOON SESSION (4 HRS) LIVE:

Thursday June 13, 2002 3:00 PM

Friday June 14, 2002 2:00 AM (encore)

MORNING SESSION (4 HRS) LIVE:

Friday June 14, 2002 10:00 AM

Friday June 14, 2002 8:00 PM (encore)

AFTERNOON SESSION (4 HRS)
LIVE:

Friday June 14, 2002 3:00 PM

Saturday June 15, 2002 1:00 AM (encore)

SESSION HIGHLIGHTS (60:00):

Saturday June 15, 2002 4:00 PM

Saturday June 15, 2002 10:00 PM (encore)

SESSION HIGHLIGHTS (60:00):

Sunday June 16, 2002 5:00 PM

Monday June 17, 2002 10:00 AM (encore)

Monday June 17, 2002 11:00 PM (encore)


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; gavelgavelcoverage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-477 next last
To: Lady In Blue; siobhan; american colleen
Press conference now going on.

Announcing a laity Review Board with Frank Keating, (R) of Oklahoma as the presider of that Review Board. They will hear the cases in situations to remove a priest. I am not sure of the two other announced members.

Salvation

421 posted on 06/14/2002 5:18:17 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; siobhan; american colleen
Bummers! The Press Conference just ended. Maybe they will rebroadcast it.
422 posted on 06/14/2002 5:25:43 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
William Bennett - former education tzar and author of a few very moralistic books - forget the names of them (OK!! I never bought them) and I believe the woman named is a judge.

I love Frank Keating and I love William Bennett most of all... don't know the woman, but if these two are any indication of the quality of the board, we are in business because these guys are ORTHODOX Catholics - not CINOs. In fact, Keating mentioned that he is concerned with the quality of the teachers (in the Catholic school context) who will be teaching his future grandchildren.

I have a feeling that yes, thank God, there are wonderful holy men and women amongst the laity who will "rise up" - even the orthodox Bishops and Cardinals are kind of hamstrung in a way - but the laity is not!

As Bishop Gregory explained it, I think the "bill" is very good - it is zero tolerance and I don't know what the problem is with it. I keep hearing people on the radio and tv complaining that it doesn't go far enough... I guess they want public hangings with no trial...

I believe the main complaint is that it does not punish the Cardinals and Bishops that covered up - but, how can they punish themselves? And I am sure some kind of censure or stepping down is around the corner - the past couple of days were meant to deal with victims and priests only, I believe.

423 posted on 06/14/2002 5:27:28 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
I believe the main complaint is that it does not punish the Cardinals and Bishops that covered up - but, how can they punish themselves?

Let us hope that they will do 9 months to a year of fasting and penance rather than just the one propsed day!

And I am sure some kind of censure or stepping down is around the corner - the past couple of days were meant to deal with victims and priests only, I believe.

Bishop Gallante talked to someone from the press and said that the Holy See was following everything over the wire, email, whatever. He inferred rather than outrightly stated, that the Holy See would be forthcoming with censure.

424 posted on 06/14/2002 5:34:25 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
As Bishop Gregory explained it, I think the "bill" is very good - it is zero tolerance and I don't know what the problem is with it.

Do you think that many Catholics wanted a denunciation of homesexuality to come out of this also. I do, and the one email that I sent to EWTN addressed that issue.

I keep hearing people on the radio and tv complaining that it doesn't go far enough... I guess they want public hangings with no trial...

I think the public and those who would like to do away with the Catholic Church would love seeing public hangings and/or no trials. I do believe that they are seeking accountability on the parts of the Bishops and Cardinals, however.

425 posted on 06/14/2002 5:41:00 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Bishop Gallante talked to someone from the press and said that the Holy See was following everything over the wire, email, whatever. He inferred rather than outrightly stated, that the Holy See would be forthcoming with censure.

WHOA! If the Holy See censures this document, I think all hell will break loose here. What do you think?

426 posted on 06/14/2002 5:41:14 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I'm sorry for just hopping onto this thread. I've been working all day and don't get EWTN anyway, so I haven't been able to follow things. But the summary that I heard really upset me.

This means that (a) the bishops and, presumably, the Cardinals are home free; and (b) we're still paying the salaries for dysfunctional gay men who, after putting the make on a young teenage boy (young enough so he counts as a victim of pedophilia - otherwise, there's no points at all), get to go off and spend the rest of their lives buggering others of their pursuasion in a "monastery" - like St. John's, where one of the monks is, if I recall correctly, under investigation in a homosexual murder.

Somehow, I'm just not impressed.

427 posted on 06/14/2002 5:43:45 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Do you think that many Catholics wanted a denunciation of homesexuality to come out of this also. I do, and the one email that I sent to EWTN addressed that issue.

I think that can of worms was publicly opened by Bishop B. Those Bishops and Cardinals are on notice that the laity and some of them are concerned with dissention and one of the fruits of dissention, homosexual prevelance in the seminaries/priesthood. That said, I think the whole meeting was meant only to address the welfare and safety of the children (boys) and other issues will be addressed at another time - it would have watered down the entire meeting to bring in anything else, IMO. But they cannot tarry too long on the other issues or they will have big problems - the laity is really fired up on both sides, I think.

428 posted on 06/14/2002 5:46:34 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: livius
The whole meeting is being rebroadcasted now on cspan-2 if you want to catch it.
429 posted on 06/14/2002 5:47:13 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
What did you finally do with your letter?
430 posted on 06/14/2002 5:48:39 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: livius
Like Colleen said above, I think the priests took care of the abuse and the priests who caused the abuse at this time. I truly believe that they will continue in this direction and will deal with homesexuality in future USCCB conferences.

This abomination did not happen overnight in the Catholic Church overnight, and it will not be cured or taken care of in one Conference.

I am delighted with the laity board that will review the cases of offending priests, aren't you? I trying to find a story about it right now to start a new discussion thread.

Continue to pray for the Church.

431 posted on 06/14/2002 5:49:29 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: livius
This means that (a) the bishops and, presumably, the Cardinals are home free; and (b) we're still paying the salaries for dysfunctional gay men who, after putting the make on a young teenage boy (young enough so he counts as a victim of pedophilia - otherwise, there's no points at all), get to go off and spend the rest of their lives buggering others of their pursuasion in a "monastery" - like St. John's, where one of the monks is, if I recall correctly, under investigation in a homosexual murder.

The Cardinals cannot discipline themselves as a body, can they? I mean, that would be sort of odd. Who knows what went on behind the scenes... we will know soon enough. Plus, do you know what hell Cardinal Law's life has been like here in Boston? It might be worse for him if he stays on.

Good point about us supporting the offending priests... however - they can't let them out on the streets and the guilty ones will presumably be in jail anyway.

Do you have a better idea of where the priests should go?

432 posted on 06/14/2002 5:50:57 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Is it merely coincidence that the National Association of Catholic Diocesan Lesbian and Gay Ministries is being held in Ohio in September?

Likely no more of a coincidence than that the USCCB conference is being held in Dallas, home of the nation's largest gay/lesbian church.

433 posted on 06/14/2002 5:51:30 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
Bishop Gallante talked to someone from the press and said that the Holy See was following everything over the wire, email, whatever. He inferred rather than outrightly stated, that the Holy See would be forthcoming with censure.

WHOA! If the Holy See censures this document, I think all hell will break loose here. What do you think?

Possibly censure for the Cardinals and Bishops?

434 posted on 06/14/2002 5:52:49 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
but, how can they punish themselves?

Have they never heard of hairshirts, for starters? I'm sure they could think of something if they wanted to.

435 posted on 06/14/2002 5:53:28 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Ohhh, I misunderstood you. I thought you meant that Bishop Galante thought/sort of said that the Holy See would be forthcoming with a censure for the document itself.

Censure for the Bishops and Cardinals? Hmmm. Boy, that is one to think about.

436 posted on 06/14/2002 5:55:02 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: maryz
LOL. Aren't you supposed to be in bed? You get up a few hours after I go to bed!

Hairshirts would be good for a start. Do they make those anymore? Hey! They could have the victims make the hairshirts for the Bishops.

437 posted on 06/14/2002 5:56:18 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
I am going to go watch it to see if I got the part about the Holy See correct. Bye!
438 posted on 06/14/2002 5:57:29 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; american colleen
Do you think that many Catholics wanted a denunciation of homesexuality to come out of this also. I do, and the one email that I sent to EWTN addressed that issue.

I e-mailed Bishop Bruskewitz (ok, the Diocese of Lincoln, which was the only option) to praise him for his attempt to get that into the final statement. American colleen said she intended to.

I would love to see him get so many e-mail commendations for his stand that they'll "have to weigh 'em, not count 'em," as a local Boston pol once said about the votes he got.

439 posted on 06/14/2002 5:59:53 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
LOL. Aren't you supposed to be in bed?

I am indeed. But my addiction to FR has passed the early, relatively innocent stages.

440 posted on 06/14/2002 6:02:53 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-477 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson