This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Posted on 05/02/2002 10:27:43 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
This is the crux of the issue. How do we find that area that exists between deism on the one hand and determinism on the other?
I think the article makes it clear that the area you speak of is not ours to find. "They desire to tread where theological license has not officiated them to travel. I suppose, then, we could say with the proverb, "Curiosity killed the cat." For Hyper-Calvinism, unwarranted curiosity in the decrees and counsel of God has caused them to enter a realm where God has not revealed Himself."
I think a big problem I have seen on these threads is that there are those who think they know that area like the back of their hands. (Both Calvinists and Arminians). They have it all mapped out. They know all the roads. Or so they think.
Amen to that!
I grew up around the Protestant Reformed Church, which was an offshoot of the denomination that I attended. Unfortunately, I see many calvinists on these threads heading in that direction, denying common grace, wanting to quote from Engelsma, all in an attempt to stake out their position instead of trying to glorify God.
Inquiring Minds want to know.
Bump.
You may find this interesting: in actual movement of beliefs, Arminianism is very close to hyper-Calvinism. Every single former hyper-Calvinist in my church is now a rather vocal Arminian, to the point of declaring that unless God gives every single person an opportunity to be saved whether they actually ever believe in Jesus or not then He is an unfair God. Notice, that God must be fair by today's American welfare standard. You will not find this standard of fair anywhere except here in America.
Actually, PM, it is more conceivable that many of the Arminians on this thread are rather hyper-Calvinistic in that they never ever share the gospel with the lost on these threads nor do they warn them nor can they even properly name the gospel (5 words BTW) or express the gospel (exactly 3 words BTW) much less actually preach the gospel.
You will find, though, that the Calvinist on these threads are very vocal in their comminication to the lost.
I stated :I will however rephrase it. HYPER Calvinists are animals, (my apologies to rational Calvinists, rhesus monkeys, small crawly things and Lorraine B.) I assume you are a "regular" calvinist.
Now you say you are a "hyper" - Geesh - I cant keep up with you, silly goose
I direct you here, to this thread for a reasonable definition
I haven't met one yet. The FreeRepublic Calvinists have proclaimed that the Gospel is to be preached to all, and that every man, everywhere is required to repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. However, we recognize that only the elect will actually repent and believe. The fact that our non-Calvinist detractors have concluded that we cannot believe the first part of the equation due to the fact that we believe the second part of the equation doesn't change the equation.
This article says that God loves EVERYONE, elect and unelect. And that God also HATES the sinful state of everyone elect and unelect. Gee I agree. What 's wrong with this picture? Is the author wrong?
So if you think God loves only the elect, then according to this author you are a Hypercalvinist. I have often quoted J. Vernon McGee as someone I agree with almost all the time. I have been told by members of the Calvinist clique here that J. Vernon McGee is not a "real" Calvinist, but some kind of Calmanian. However McGee is listed on several Calvinist sites as an example of a "famous" Calvinist along with Spurgeon and John MacArthur.
My objections to Calvinism are mostly in regard to the things I see are listed here as examples of Hyper-Calvinism. So what is it? Are you guys in agreement with the author here? Or is the author some kind of heretic like me?
That God works in our lives before salvation is evidenced by God's dealing with Jacob to wrestle him into submission. It is the goodness of God which leads men to repentance in hopes of bringing them to a place of a change of heart. That leading is not regeneration and in many cases that leading is ignored and rejected and salvation never received.
I don't think that the so-called witnessing that takes place on these threads when an occasional lurker wanders onto a thread can be proof that one is not a hyper-Calvinist, given that not witnessing is not the definition of hyper-Calvinism. (As you say, some witness just because of a command to do so.) Besides, to me, most of the so-called witnessing appears to be constant, unloving browbeating, verbal/emotional abuse, and ridicule.
Well, I have never said that God only loves the elect. In fact, I have actually said the opposite:
And I have also, if you would understand my posts, stated that God also hates us when we are in Adam as the article points out. From my meditations from the 1st:
Actually, I'm still digesting the article. Believe it or not, but much of it also applies to Arminianism as well. Go figure!
I suppose the question I would have for the author is "What is the significance of the modifier "hyper"? That is, how does his understanding of the 'historic' "Calvinisim" differ from the 'hyper' brand he identifies (and which appears to flourish here)? I suppose one would have to buy his 330-page book to find out.
I checked out his site and he claims to believe in the TULIP, so it sounds like he is smart enough to blur some of the outragiousness of the contentions of the local "Calvinists" without affecting his ability to support the TULIP. Who knows.
Since the thrust of this article is what he does not believe, what do you know about what he does assert?
You may call us "No-L" Calvinists. :))
BTW, the term "hyper" usually means "more than me" and also "what I perceive to be extreme."
Actually, I cannot even see a hair's breadth of difference between the Hyper-Calvinist and the FR Arminians as far as the actual application of their doctrine.
1 Corinthians 3:4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
I don't have that problem. You have that problem! I don't believe that God knowingly never gives enough grace to believe in a "saving way."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.