Posted on 07/28/2024 5:13:33 PM PDT by patriot torch
Excellent Scripture based teaching videos based on prophecy.
Robert Breaker presents his videos in an easy to follow format using timelines and charts.
I don’t think so.
I’m glad you posted. How many times has a “born again” Evangelical told you something along the lines of “From here on DO NOT POST TO ME AGAIN!” or tried to get you banned?
Has Patriot Torch ever told you “From here on DO NOT POST TO ME AGAIN!”??
Saturn Day keepers aren’t exclusive Saturn day Adventists.
There are Sacred Name Saturn Day Keepers.
Messianic Saturn Day Keepers
And of course Antichrist Judaism Saturn Day Keepers
All of those Saturn Day Keepers have one thing in common.
They accept Daniel’s 4th Beast as their authority in all things ‘time’ and ‘law’..
That’s a red flag to me,but that’s what testing and proving all things can accomplish..
The whore that sits upon the seven hills. That seems to infuriate roman catholics whenever that is pointed out to them.
The Scrriptures point to roman catholicism, which explains why roman catholics are so offended.
Read for yourself:
Revelation 17:1-3
King James Version
17 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
Revelation 17:14-16
King James Version
14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.
15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.
16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.
Revelation 19:1-3
King James Version
19 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God:
2 For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.
3 And again they said, Alleluia And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.
So despite what you roman catholic preterists and replacement theorists believe, the seven hills is Rome and the whore is her religious seat at the vatican.
The geographical location this speaks of is not Jerusalem, nor was the destruction of the Temple in 70AD the fulfillment of these Scriptures.
The references to the great whore spoken of in Revelation is the roman catholic church. She is current, and her destruction is prophesied.
Perhaps a reminder is in order....
Revelation 2:18-23
King James Version
18 And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire, and his feet are like fine brass;
19 I know thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works; and the last to be more than the first.
20 Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.
21 And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not.
22 Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.
23 And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.
Quote:
“The Pilgrims were the big witch-burners. Witch burning never caught on in Catholic countries.”
____________________
Why would roman catholics object to Witchcraft when they themselves are fellow sorcerers calling upon the souls of the dead with their sorcery chants using idolic beads called “rosary”.
Quote:
for the written Word.
The Word of God is Jesus.
Unlike Mohammedans we Christians aren’t “people of the book” we are “people of the Word of God: Jesus”
_____________________
Too bad your religious cult doesn’t reflect that Truth, but rather seeks to overule and object the WRITTEN WORD!
Quote:
delco - are you calling Philsword a “Saturn day keeper”?
_______________________
As they say, if the shoe fits .....
Colossians 2:15-17
King James Version
15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.
Quote:
I always say that if someone doesn’t like a poster just because of what they believe, just ignore them.
_____________________
Which most have chosen to do with you!
Quote:
SDA’s base their faith in the bible and blood of Jesus Christ. Robert “commandment” Breaker/hater groupies are ignorant of this fact.
____________________
sda’s place their faith in their own self righteousness. And since we recognize the Gospel of Grace we are not under Law. You and your fellow hypocrites in the rcc wouldn’t understand that since your faith is not in the Finished Works of Jesus Christ and Him Crucified!
Quote:
Why take the low road and try to get them banned or tell them, as an example...”From here on DO NOT POST TO ME AGAIN!” because they feel they have zero understanding of scriptures or prophetic understanding?
______________________
Sounds like a question you should pose to your shadow ebbtide!
Quote:
Has Patriot Torch ever told you “From here on DO NOT POST TO ME AGAIN!”??
_________<______
THE REASON I TOLD THE HYPOCRITE EBBTIDE TO NOT POST TO ME IS BECAUSE HE DOES THAT REPEATEDLY TO THOSE HE DISAGREES WITH, AND THEN RUNS TO THE MODERATOR FOR REFUGE SEEKING TO GET THE MEMBER BANNED. AND WHEN THAT FAILS HE HIDES BEHIND A SECRET CONCLAVE CALLED CAUCUS WHILE FEW IF ANY OF HIS OWN FOLLOWERS EVER RESPOND TO HIM. Understand now?
Quote: “sda’s place their faith in their own self righteousness. And since we recognize the Gospel of Grace we are not under Law.”
Every human who will be saved, will have been saved by Grace. Those who aren’t saved will have either rejected Christ, or professed Christians continuing in their LAWlessness.
SDA’s are saved by Grace, AND THEN they keep God’s law out of love for what He did for them on the cross.
Robert “commandment” Breaker/hater groupies REJECT God’s law as morally binding and think they are OSAS/OJAJ at the microsecond of grace, forever, no matter how they live their lives from that point on. I wonder if RCB has a picture of Ravi hanging in his house?
https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4787&context=pubs
Conclusion
This background helps us to understand that what Paul attacks is not the value of the law as a guide to Christian conduct. On the contrary, he emphatically affirms that Christ came “in order that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us” (chap. 8:4). Paul criticizes not the moral but the soteriological understanding of the law, that is, the law viewed as a document of election that includes the Jews and excludes the Gentiles.
The mounting pressure of Judaizers who were urging circumcision upon the Gentiles made it necessary for Paul to attack the exclusive-covenant concept of the law.
The failure to distinguish in Paul’s writings between his moral and soteriological usages of the law, and the failure to recognize that his criticism of the law is directed not toward Jewish Christians but toward Gentile Judaizers, has led many to conclude erroneously that Paul was an antinomian who rejected the validity of the law as a whole. Such a view is totally unwarranted because, as we have shown, Paul rejects the law as a method of salvation but upholds it as a moral standard of Christian conduct.
Since you posted to me, I will do the same to you until you tell me otherwise. Just say when.
You’ve every right to continue to practice your cult of self righteousness and worship of new moons and holy days. Those of us who are saved by Grace reject your cult! Go knock on the doors of Jehovah Witnesses and leave us who accept Divine Salvation alone!
How do you feel about a caucus poster that actually changed the name of the caucus to EXCLUDE SDA’S, me in particular?
Since you’ve chosen to run to the moderator, I’m done with you. Thanks for proving our point.
I have copied this post for future use.
Good day!
Nope, just giving the Mod a heads up THAT YOU POSTED TO ME after asking me NOT TO POST TO YOU.
I’ll ask you the same question:
How do you feel about a caucus poster that actually changed the name of the caucus to EXCLUDE SDA’S, me in particular?
Maybe Elsie knows. It was his question that set it in motion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.