A woman judge.
Women have fostered the entire growth of the pervert parade in this country, and they continue to do so.
Anthony Kennedy. The gift that keeps on giving.
A lot of people owe Rick Santorum a lot of apologies.
Oh, the lawyers are salivating over this.
Remember how the liberals laughed at all of us who questioned homosexual marriage leading to polygamy, or group marriage?? In true Alinsky style, we were all ridiculed. It may happen that monogamy itself will be ruled to be discrimination.
Couldn’t see that one coming , could we?
Like Robert Bork wrote, we’re slouching toward Gomorrah.
Big words, majoritarian animus...
It’s because the majority agreed that marriage WOULD consist of a dyad.
Words have specific meanings or they have no meaning.
It was stupid enough when the courts decided that queers could legally marry....now you get this crap.
Next: Woman wants to marry a jar of kosher dills and change her name to Vlasic. Court says why not...except for majoritarian animus, of course.
Here we go.
“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer, How Shall We Then Live? (Old Tappan NJ: Fleming H Revell Company, 1976), p. 224.
Even today, lineage and inheritance are much clearer in monogamous relationships.
-PJ
“Is there really any legal basis for limiting my power at all?”
Bong-huffing judge KAREN May Bacdayan . . .
Sure, KAREN, go on and support state-sanctioned adultery.
‘Mixed race’ who apparently calls herself ‘Filipino-American’…
Gee, no one saw this coming.
This will be a bridge too far for the government. Not on the basis of any ethics, but purely for the economic benefit of government. If multiple partners were allowed, families could effectively be perpetual, “robbing” the State of it’s ability to confiscate the wealth as there would always be one or more surviving spouses.
Polygamy ,,, next stop child marriage ,, last stop pedosexualism.
Deviant States of America.
And they wonder why putin says those awful things about our nation.
Next thing you know, Democrats will want to stop limiting marriage to people. There are plenty of people who would marry their dogs.
Lots of people love their animals. It’s just a matter of time....
This exactly what Justice Scalia predicted in his dissent in the Defence of Marriage act ruling by the Supreme Court back in 2013.
So, are we getting to the stage that a horse thief is defined as someone stole someone else’s wife?