Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jan_Sobieski

So why is the Second Coming mentioned first then this Rapture thing? Doesn’t make any sense.


14 posted on 01/31/2021 3:42:46 PM PST by SkyDancer (Remember Ashli Babbitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: SkyDancer
Not sure what the question is. The scriptures refer to two parts to the Second coming.

1. His coming as a thief in the night where only true Christians are "caught up" by the Bride Groom (1 Thess 4:16 - 5:2). We go up!

2. His coming to the Mt. of Olives where every eye shall see him! Jesus comes down with us!(Revelation 19, Zechariah 14)
23 posted on 01/31/2021 4:13:54 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: SkyDancer
exactly. The reason Paul doesn't mention this 19th century rapture idea as occuring before the appearance of the antichrist and before the second coming is simple: it never entered into his mind that anyone would believe Christ would rapture His Church before the final Eschaton

In the apocalypse, that is referred to as the battle with Gog and Magog, Christians will participate in that confrontation because there will be no secret rapture before it. Our comfort rests in Him who will emerge from that confrontation as the Victor.

THAT is the reassurance Paul offers, not the promise of an escape from the great Tribulation.

57 posted on 02/02/2021 2:02:43 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson