Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Every Christian, Not Just Catholics, Should Be Very Worried About The Catholic Sex Scandal
The Federalist ^ | 09/17/2018 | By Willis L. Krumholz and Robert Delahunty

Posted on 09/17/2018 11:01:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The rapidly unfolding crisis in the Roman Catholic Church is not a matter of concern to Catholics alone. Its true dimensions have yet to be measured, but we think it will prove to be a crisis on the scale of the Protestant Reformation, which began just over 500 years ago — an earthquake of 9.5 on the Richter scale. If so, resolution of the crisis will take decades to work through.

Resolution and absolution will require serious effort, and most likely require deep, structural reforms. Even if we are mistaken, the Catholic crisis is of such a magnitude that Christians of all denominations must take a serious interest in it.

We are both evangelical Christians with strong ties to the Catholic Church and deep respect for it. One of us was raised as a Catholic, was educated at Catholic primary and secondary schools, and has taught for the past 14 years at a Catholic law school; the other is a graduate of the law school and the business school of that Catholic university, and has many Catholic family members.

We also care deeply about our many Catholic friends, and the health of the Roman Catholic Church, which is an enormous force for good in this world. We also believe that what happens with the Catholic Church will affect Christianity worldwide. In other words, we have a stake in the matter.

Non-Catholics Should Pay Attention

Some Catholics may regard the crisis in their church as a purely internal matter, and consider outside commentary unwelcome and intrusive, even if it is well-meant. Likewise, many non-Catholic Christians may assume the Catholic crisis does not affect them at all, and perhaps even find in that crisis confirmation for their darkest views of Catholicism.

We do not accept that position. Non-Catholic Christians should take an active part in the conversation about the Catholic crisis. While they must be unfailingly tactful and sympathetic, they should also be as critical as is necessary given what is at stake. The well-known writer Rod Dreher, formerly a Catholic and now Eastern Orthodox, has posted frequently on the Catholic crisis, and is a magnificent model for other non-Catholic Christians to follow.

Among many reasons for non-Catholic interventions, three stand out in our minds.

1. The Victims

First, every Christian has a compelling obligation to protect the weak and vulnerable to the greatest extent possible. The victims of clerical sex abuse in the Catholic Church (as elsewhere) have often been children. While many victims have been compensated — if “compensation” for such injuries is really possible — and the Catholic Church in many places has instituted practices to guard against future abuse, it remains necessary to speak on behalf of those who have been victimized and those who may still be at risk.

All Christians, especially Catholics, should be angry. It is unbearable to think of what has been done “to the least of these” by those claiming to speak in the name of Christ. Many of the children targeted and abused came from broken and dysfunctional homes. Many are fatherless.

The church is charged with mending the emptiness that a broken family brings, not violently shattering a child’s world. God is the father to the fatherless. What would Christ, who overturned tables at the temple and chased out the moneychangers with a whip, do to those who sexually molest his children?

Far too many in the church hierarchy, including the pope, are not sufficiently angry. For example, this coming January, Cardinal Barbarin, the archbishop of Lyons in France, will be standing trial for allegedly covering up the crimes of a local priest who, in the 1980s, sexually abused Boy Scouts. A local priest has gathered more than 100,000 signatures to petition the pope to remove this cardinal.

Thus far, however, Pope Francis seems not to have responded to that petition. However, in 2016, despite knowing of the allegations against the cardinal, and apparently without meeting or hearing the victims of the priest’s abuse, Pope Francis praised Barbarin as “brave.” He also has not ordered a canonical proceeding against him.

We are not prejudging Barbarin’s guilt or innocence: that depends on the outcome of his case in January. But we think it is fair to say that Pope Francis’ handling of the affair indicates that he is — at best — over-eager to defend his hierarchy and insufficiently attentive to those who have suffered at their hands.

The pope is not the only member of the Catholic hierarchy who seems simply unable to register the severity of the injuries they cause to their victims, and others at risk from them. Recently, on a visit to a seminary, Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich, a Francis appointee, answered one anguished young candidate for the priesthood by saying, “While the church’s ‘agenda’ certainly involves protecting kids from harm, ‘we have a bigger agenda than to be distracted by all of this.’” His audience was reportedly dumbfounded: Surely the problem of sexual abuse of seminaries and children is more than a “distraction?”

In a similar vein, Cardinal Oscar Maradiaga of Honduras has excoriated a group of 50 Honduran seminarians for petitioning the Vatican to correct homosexual abuses going on in their seminary. We apparently are to believe that 50 seminaries are spreading malicious lies, while Madariaga, whose top aide resigned last July in the wake of charges of sexual and financial misconduct, is only speaking the truth.

Moreover, the victims of clerical abuse and the hierarchical concealment of them are not limited to those who have personally suffered sexual affronts. The financial costs to the Catholic Church of litigating and settling abuse cases have been staggering, and are now likely to escalate much higher. In 2015, the National Catholic Reporter found that the church had incurred $4 billion since 1950 in costs related to clerical sex abuse.

Research has also found that the church lost about $2.3 billion annually over the last 30 years due to scandal-related consequences, in the form of lost membership, and diverted giving. Specifically, there is a notable drop in giving in areas rocked by abuse. This makes sense. Why should good people give to pay for bad things?

Abuse litigation in the Los Angeles Archdiocese alone cost $740 million. Yet the former archbishop of Los Angeles, Cardinal Roger Mahony, under whose tenure (1985-2011) there were 500 alleged victims, is still considered a “priest in good standing” and has not been demoted by the pope.

These amounts will likely rise significantly in the wake of the recent report by a Pennsylvania grand jury detailing abuse in most (but not all) of that state’s Catholic dioceses, the overwhelming likelihood that similar investigations will occur in other states, and the risk that statutes of limitations will be amended to expose the Catholic Church to greater liability.

That means the American Catholic Church has had, and will have, far fewer resources to help the poor, to care for the sick, to shelter the homeless, and to educate children. These are victims too.

2. Concern for Fellow Christians

Second, even if you happen not to be a Catholic, surely you have Catholic family members, spouses, close friends, or colleagues who are Catholics. Almost half of the U.S. population has a “strong” connection to the Catholic Church. We have often found the Catholics closest to us to be dismayed by the situation in their church — angry, stunned, confused, or even in denial. Fellow Christians should share their agony.

The other Christian churches should want a healthy, robust Catholic Church, not the gravely weakened one of the present. American Catholicism was losing members alarmingly even before the current phase of the Catholic crisis. It is said that the second largest American denomination, after the Catholic Church, is ex-Catholics.

Not all of that decline is due to the clerical scandals; the general re-paganization of American society has surely played its part. But it seems likely that many former Catholics have abandoned their church (or at least are boycotting it) because of the scandals. The abuse scandals may also be playing a role in this re-paganization — after all, abuse of young boys was a pagan practice that early Christianity condemned and sought to stamp out.

In light of all this, non-Catholic Christians may be increasingly tempted to view Catholicism as a kind of pariah church within global Christianity. But that would not only be uncharitable; it would be unwise. To a great extent, the reputation of the Christian faith itself is besmirched when a large Christian denomination is engulfed in continuing scandals.

3. The Risk to Religious Liberty

When a large corporate body proves unable to govern itself, the chances are high that the government will step in. We saw this when financial institutions considered “too big to fail” were either shuttered by the government or subjected to deeply intrusive government regulation. The Catholic Church is heading towards the same predicament. Unless it can prove, very rapidly, that it is capable of managing its own affairs, it will come under increasing governmental scrutiny and control. Thereby it will pose a danger to the religious liberties of us all.

Already, the American Catholic Church is under the regulatory microscope. We’ve mentioned the stunning grand jury report from Pennsylvania. Attorneys general in five other states — Illinois, New York, Nebraska, New Mexico, Missouri, and now Kentucky — have been quick to take the cue.

These investigations may well reveal problems as deep, intractable, and serious as those discovered in Pennsylvania. That is, the systematic abuse of children was known to be occurring, and no one did anything about it.

Federal and state courts have already been involved, e.g., in diocesan bankruptcy cases. They are now likely to be trying larger numbers of criminal cases related to the abuse scandals, including some against ranking Catholic prelates. There is even a possibility that the Department of Justice may launch an anti-racketeering suit against the American Catholic Church.

Yes, there is a sturdy tradition of religious liberty in this country, and it enjoys constitutional protection in the First Amendment. But in the past several years, that tradition has been weakening, and government has asserted broader power to control decisions that churches once considered their own.

The Obama administration’s “contraception mandate” is a case in point. Given that growing numbers of Americans have severed their affiliations to any religion or church, the public (and the courts) may grow increasingly indifferent to arguments of behalf of religious liberty, and come to regard governmental regulation of all churches with greater acceptance. These trends will be aggravated if the largest American denomination seems scandal-ridden and unable to right itself. That makes the problems of the Catholic Church a matter of the highest concern for us all.

Gazing Into the Abyss

It is absolutely essential that Catholics grasp the depth of this crisis. As we have said, we think it will become as severe and as comprehensive as the crisis of the Protestant Reformation 500 years ago. With remarkable swiftness, Catholicism simply collapsed in what had been Catholic strongholds — most of Germany, Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, England, Scotland, and very nearly France. In recent decades, Catholicism has likewise lost its grip in what had been bastions — like French Canada, Spain, Ireland, and Brazil.

Forty years ago, virtually the entire population of southern Ireland turned out to welcome Pope John Paul II. A few weeks ago, the Irish population essentially shunned the visiting Pope Francis, and the Irish prime minister gave him a stern lecture on his church’s reduced place in that country. What would St. Patrick, who, despite just escaping from slavery in pagan Ireland, returned to the island after hearing the screams of the damned in his dreams, think of the church today?

As goes Ireland, so will go the rest of Roman Catholic Christendom. The church in Germany has been rocked by scandal and there are thousands of known-victims. Already, the hierarchy of the Catholic Church is under judgment in Chile, the United States, Australia, France, and Honduras. The crisis has long since gone global.

In fact, as the Catholic scholar Benjamin Wiker has argued, the current crisis is more threatening for the Catholic Church than the Protestant Reformation 500 years ago. For one thing, the Reformation began in a society that was still overwhelmingly Christian. Some historians of the pre-Reformation period even argue that Christian piety was deepening and broadening in the run-up to the Reformation, and that the Christian laity was already assuming a more prominent role in managing church affairs (a development greatly accelerated by Lutherans and Calvinists). But the contemporary Western world seems rapidly to be losing whatever residual Christianity was left in it. That makes a Catholic recovery more problematic.

Second, the internet spreads news of the Catholic crisis within seconds into every house. Everyone knows everything. Pope Francis, who seems to prefer talking about plastics in our oceans over the systemic problem of child abuse, may count on a friendly and collaborative media to ignore or downplay the charges Archbishop Vigano recently brought personally against him. But even if information leaks out drip by drip, the Catholic hierarchy and the Vatican can no longer safely rely on secrecy and on silence to cover their misdeeds.

Just as the printing press was a major force in the spread of the Reformation in Martin Luther’s Germany, so internet journalism (and, who knows, even the mainstream media when the pope is no longer useful to their agenda) will sooner or later force the disclosure of the facts. So it will not do for Catholics simply to say, “We have been through this before. We will make it through again.” In the end, that belief may be vindicated. We sincerely hope it is. But in the meanwhile, they must be energetically fashioning responses that are truly commensurate to this crisis.

Willis L. Krumholz lives in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He is a JD/MBA graduate from the University of St. Thomas, and works in the financial services industry. Robert J. Delahunty is a professor of law at the University of St Thomas and has taught Constitutional Law there for a decade.


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholics; catholicsexscandal; popesexscandal; sexscandal; sexualabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-353 next last
To: MeganC

The homosexual cabal comes right from the pope.

I too pray for all true Catholic faithful in turmoil over the state of their Church.


101 posted on 09/17/2018 6:46:04 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Yes. I go one step further:

There is no such thing as homosexuality. Sexuality is inherently about reproduction, and in humans is, in reproductive terms, binary and monogamous: one male gamete (sperm) + one female gamete (ovum) = one zygote (proto-embryo). A fertile woman may have actual sexual congress with fifty men in one orgy; she will neither have fifty zygotes with fifty fathers nor one zygote with fifty fathers.

The accurate term for this aberration is homoeroticism: the narcissistic fetishization of a person of the same sex (not gender!).


102 posted on 09/17/2018 7:09:16 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have been in ministry - and I have been concerned for decades.

It is primarily about homoeroticism, which has infiltrated all denominations.


103 posted on 09/17/2018 7:11:08 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
The question then becomes...do Roman Catholics believe this?

Yes

But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed. If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain. Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

James, Catholic chapter one, Protestant verses twenty two to twenty seven,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James

104 posted on 09/17/2018 7:37:58 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry; Mrs. Don-o
You must be on a different religion forum than I’ve been on, or perhaps outrageous statements only register for you when coming from outside your particular sect, because Protestants have been being called heretics for the entire 13 years I’ve been here, on the religion forum with which I’m familiar. Am I going to go back and name every single one? No, I’m not going to spend days looking for it, but do me a favor and police your own going forward, since you’ve made the offer. It will be much appreciated.

Agree! I've seen this "challenge" put out there before and I doubt the sincerity. We could probably all show comments from various and assorted RCs on these threads that have said EXACTLY that "Protestants" or non-Catholics are not Christians and are bound for hell unless they "come home to Rome". I could name five such offenders just from memory.

The problem, like you said, would be the time it would take to comb through threads and pick them out only to be accused after all that work of "dragging disputes across threads" or "playing the martyr". They are there and they know who "they" are. Here's one:

“And you my friend, and the rest of this heretics that deny God’s Pilgrim Church on Earth will bust hell wide open one day.” (I'll Freepmail you the commenter's name and thread if you really want it.)

105 posted on 09/17/2018 7:39:12 PM PDT by boatbums (Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to His mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
>>The question then becomes...do Roman Catholics believe this?<<

Yes

If you do believe this then so much of Roman Catholicism is voided and unnecessary.

106 posted on 09/17/2018 7:45:59 PM PDT by ealgeone (SCRIPTURE DOES NOT CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
The problem, like you said, would be the time it would take to comb through threads and pick them out only to be accused after all that work of "dragging disputes across threads" or "playing the martyr". They are there and they know who "they" are. Here's one:

It really doesn't matter what individual Roman Catholics say....they're just lay people with no ability to interpret their denomination's teachings.

What does matter are the official positions of Rome which say non-Roman Catholics are heretics.

107 posted on 09/17/2018 7:48:09 PM PDT by ealgeone (SCRIPTURE DOES NOT CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
If you do believe this then so much of Roman Catholicism is voided and unnecessary.

The one holy catholic and apostolic Church has believed thus since the days of the apostles.
108 posted on 09/17/2018 7:53:18 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Forty years ago, virtually the entire population of southern Ireland turned out to welcome Pope John Paul II. A few weeks ago, the Irish population essentially shunned the visiting Pope Francis

I see a variable there that's not being held constant. Is it the cause of the change, or just correlated to it?

109 posted on 09/17/2018 8:26:47 PM PDT by Campion ((marine dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
What does matter are the official positions of Rome which say non-Roman Catholics are heretics.

It's funny how the very same people who accuse us of holding that all Protestants are going to hell also accuse us of being soft on Muslims. As if Protestants were more in error than Muslims are ... LOL !! Can't have it both ways, folks. Pick a story and stick to it.

Now, non-Roman Catholics can hold to objectively heretical doctrines, but a "heretic" can only be a person who obstinately rejects Catholic doctrine after being a Catholic ("obstinate post-baptismal denial of a truth to be believed with divine and Catholic faith" to use the formal terminology).

Persons born and raised outside the Church aren't eligible. Sorry.

I'm getting this from (a) the CCC, (b) Vatican II, (c) the response of the Holy Office in the Feeney case in 1949, which quotes Pope Pius XII, among others, and (d) the allocution Singulari Quadam of Pope Pius IX (1854). I know what I'm talking about.

110 posted on 09/17/2018 8:39:20 PM PDT by Campion ((marine dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
By the way, do you realize the utter insanity of what you write?

I'm talking about this:

they're just lay people with no ability to interpret their denomination's teachings

Catholic lay people have no ability to interpret their "denomination's" [sic] teachings, but you do ??????

You are not an authoritative interpreter of Catholic doctrine. Not in any sense. Not on any day of the week. Never. Not at all. By the grace of my confirmation (and by dint of about 15 years of amateur study), I am far, far, far better able to interpret my "denomination's" teachings than you are.

111 posted on 09/17/2018 8:43:29 PM PDT by Campion ((marine dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Unless you’re a priest you only have an opinion. You’re just one of millions of lay people without the ability to read nor understand Scripture or your dogmas unless your priest tells you what they mean. That’s been the clear message your fellow Roman Catholics have told us.

Truth is rough isn’t it?

112 posted on 09/17/2018 8:50:32 PM PDT by ealgeone (SCRIPTURE DOES NOT CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Campion; ealgeone; metmom; daniel1212; aMorePerfectUnion; Mark17
Now, non-Roman Catholics can hold to objectively heretical doctrines, but a "heretic" can only be a person who obstinately rejects Catholic doctrine after being a Catholic ("obstinate post-baptismal denial of a truth to be believed with divine and Catholic faith" to use the formal terminology). Persons born and raised outside the Church aren't eligible. Sorry. I'm getting this from (a) the CCC, (b) Vatican II, (c) the response of the Holy Office in the Feeney case in 1949, which quotes Pope Pius XII, among others, and (d) the allocution Singulari Quadam of Pope Pius IX (1854). I know what I'm talking about.

So, I take it you include all us FORMER Roman Catholics in this definition of "formal heretics" and condemn us to hell if we remain outside of the RCC? I strongly reject many doctrines of Roman Catholicism and that is why I remain a non-Catholic Christian. I find that my relationship with Christ and my walk with Him is now MORE holy, MORE faithful, MORE righteous and closer to the Biblical standard than I ever experienced as a Roman Catholic. That is one thing this article seems to have missed. Many became genuine Christians when we left the Catholic church - I never left Jesus Christ or Christianity.

113 posted on 09/17/2018 9:29:02 PM PDT by boatbums (Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to His mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

BTTT!


114 posted on 09/17/2018 9:33:12 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Rome has been pushing tribalism ever since the split with Eastern Orthodox. Roman Catholic: Good. Everyone else: Bad. Just pay and obey, and praying is optional.

But now the cognitive dissonance is just too much to handle, apparently. But the tribalism is still ingrained enough that they have to blame the Protestant boogeyman instead.


115 posted on 09/17/2018 9:33:53 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Campion; ealgeone

The only reason someone needs to *interpret* something is because they don’t like what it clearly and plainly says and want to change it’s meaning to make it say something other than what is stated.

Simply reading something and stating what it says is not hard in the least.

So, for example, when ealgeone posts Unum sanctum, Catholics tie themselves into knots trying to explain how it doesn’t apply to them and mean what it says.


116 posted on 09/17/2018 9:57:18 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.

Call no man father kinda turns it on it's ear; doesn't it.

117 posted on 09/17/2018 10:06:47 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
The one holy catholic and apostolic Church has believed thus since the days of the apostles. ; plus a HELL of a lot more!!
118 posted on 09/17/2018 10:07:53 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Now, non-Roman Catholics can hold to objectively heretical doctrines, but a "heretic" can only be a person who obstinately rejects Catholic doctrine after being a Catholic ("obstinate post-baptismal denial of a truth to be believed with divine and Catholic faith" to use the formal terminology).

Am I safe to assume that a CATHOLIC who BELIEVES things NOT part of 'official Catholic doctrine' is allowed to do so with impunity?

119 posted on 09/17/2018 10:11:58 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Campion
I am far, far, far better able to interpret my "denomination's" teachings than you are.

Probably so; but are you able to do it better than the folks in charge?

Why so many schisms in Catholicism?

Why the EO??

Why Vatican II versus the other guys?

Why the SSPX guys?

Why such amity against your own pope?

120 posted on 09/17/2018 10:18:04 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-353 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson