” I did not write that.”
What you did just before this last post was say: “I guess the two websites I posted aren’t to be trusted then by Roman Catholics??”
And then I showed that the websites you linked to - all of them - showed exactly what the commandment text in question says in full in Exodus and in the Traditional Catechetical Formula or, as was true in one case, linked to the CCC which shows the full wording from Exodus and Deuteronomy as well as the Traditional Catechetical Formula.
Thus, all the websites you linked to could be trusted. And you can’t be.
So what did you do next? You wrote, “You do realize that statement is from their website....they wrote it...Roman Catholics. I copied it word for word. I did not write that.”
It doesn’t matter who wrote it. It is still false. There is no real difference between how Exodus 20 reads in a Catholic Bible (and in the CCC and in the Catechism of Trent) and how it reads in a Protestant Bible. The difference is not in the Ten Commandments. The difference only appears only in the Traditional Catechetical Formula which was a summary made for easy memorization.
I made no error whatsoever.
“Wow...you jumped amoreperfectunion for an alleged spelling error (which was spelled correctly) and you make this blunder??”
Sirach. That is the correct spelling.
Sriracha. That is the correct spelling.
“amoreperfectunion” - which is spelled correctly as aMorePerfectUnion by the way - used neither correct spelling.
You can’t seem to get anything right. With you it’s just one error after another.
Uh...yes, it does matter who wrote it. Your issue is with the owners of the website. Take it up with them.
You're compounding your growing list of errors on this thread.
You insinuated in your prior post that I had written the words that were from the website in question.
If that was not your intent then I apologize. However, with you it fits your style.
I never denied catholicbible101.com did not publish the entirety of the verses in Exodus. In fact I made it clear I was trying to be fair and not mis-represent what the website said....because some arrogant Roman Catholic would immediately post the rest and claim I was trying to misrepresent the website. Yet somehow you glossed over that admission.
That's what you do vlad(hey notice the spelling!)...you take things out of context in a futile attempt to show someone up. When you do you don't realize how petty you look doing so. Hence Vlad's Rules for Internet Debate #5...omit what others have posted or twist it in an attempt to show them wrong and #4.
Beginningcatholic.com does have the link to the Catechism...never said it didn't.
What those two sites do though is list what they are saying are the Ten Commandments. To the uninitiated they might read just those and stop there. That's the problem. What they have in their list of the 10 Commandments misrepresents the Ten Commandments in that it leaves out the one about not having idols nor serving or worshiping them.
That's the real issue that Rome wants to avoid due to the idols of Mary ya'll have and bow before and serve.
So again...the question remains...which you've yet to answer...Are they taught the full verses...or just the Formula?
“amoreperfectunion” - which is spelled correctly as aMorePerfectUnion by the way - used neither correct spelling.
I don't think he will be "triggered" by it like you are some things.
Some posters call me E1 in their posts. Big deal. I call you vlad. Big deal. It's not a misspelling.
Wow....Rule #4 dwell in the minors trying to make a point.
Regarding the spelling of the sauce in question.
AMPU (hey notice the spelling)>>: “I love the Siracha sauce Vlad! Good recommendation.”<<
You mean Sriracha sauce. You couldn’t even get that right. Par for the course.
See how you are? AMPU (spelling!) throws you a nice comment and you act like the south end of a north bound mule...hence Vlad's Rule of Internet Debate #1...always use ad hominem attacks.
Yet you persist in your error.
Sirach. That is the correct spelling.
Sriracha. That is the correct spelling.
It can sometimes also be spelled Siracha...just as AMPU (spelling!) did. You can go look it up.
Vlad's Rules of Internet Debate #6…He will ignore his errors when pointed out to him and dismiss them...even when confronted with them.
|
You mean Sriracha sauce. You couldn’t even get that right. Par for the course. 437 posted on 12/1/2017 12:23:06 AM by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
|