Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”
Rorate Caeli ^ | November 8, 2017 | Roberto de Mattei

Posted on 11/09/2017 1:57:06 PM PST by ebb tide

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”

Roberto de Mattei
Corrispondenza Romana
November 8 2017




On October 31st 2016, Pope Francis inaugurated the year of Luther by meeting with representatives of Lutheranism from all over the world in the Swedish Cathedral of Lund. Since then, meetings and “ecumenical” celebrations ad abundantiam have followed one after the other in the Catholic Church.

A year exactly from that date, the “”Lutheran turning point ”was sealed by a symbolic act the gravity of which very few have noticed. The Vatican Post Office issued a stamp which celebrates the birth of Protestantism on October 31st 1517, the date Luther hung his 95 theses on the door of Wittenberg Cathedral.

V Centenary of the Protestant Reformationcan be read at the top of the stamp, presented on October 31st of this year by the Vatican Philatelic Office.  The official communiqué describes the stamp: It depicts Jesus Crucified in the foreground on a gold, timeless background showing Wittenberg city. In an attitude of penance, on their knees respectively on the left and the right of the the Cross, Martin Luther holds a Bible, source and point of his doctrine, while Philip Melanchthon, theologian and a friend of Martin Luther’s, one of the most important protagonists of the Reformation, holds in his hand the Augsburg Confession, Confessio Augustuana, the first official exposition of the principles of Protestantism drawn up by him.”

The substitution of Our Lady and St. John at the foot of the Cross with the  two heresiarchs, Luther and Melanchthon is a blasphemous offense that no Catholic cardinal or bishop has, to date, openly condemned. The significance of this image is explained by the joint declaration of the World Lutheran Federation and the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity, published the same day as the stamp. The note refers to the positive outcome of the dialogue between Catholics and Lutherans, endorsing the “new understanding of those XVI century events which lead to our separation” and affirms how both sides are “very grateful for the theological and spiritual gifts received through the Reformation”.


As if that weren’t enough, around the same time, La Civiltà Cattolica, the Pope’s “unofficial” voice, celebrated Luther  with  an article by Father Giancarlo Pani (Martin Luther, Five Hundred Years Later, in La Civiltà Cattolica , of October 21st – November 4th 2017, pp. 119-130)

Father Pani is the same priest who said in 2014 that the Fathers of the Council of Trent had admitted the possibility of divorce and remarriage in the case of adultery, according to the custom established in the schismatic Greek Church. Now he is sustaining that Martin Luther was in no way a heretic, but an authentic “reformer”.  In fact, “ the theses of Wittenberg are not a challenge, nor a rebellion against authority, but the proposal to renew the proclamation of the Gospel, in the sincere desire for a “reform” in the Church”. (p.128). Despite the claim “ by the Church of Rome and Luther of incarnating the truth in toto and being dispensers of it ” “ the role Luther had as a witness to the faith cannot be denied: He is “the reformer”;  he was able to initiate a process of “reform”  where the results of it  have also benefited the Catholic Church.”

If this is the case then he has been unjustly persecuted and defamed by the Catholic Church for 500 years. The time has come to rehabilitate him.  And in order to rehabilitate him we cannot limit ourselves to presenting only his prophetic side, but must make the Church accept and put into practice his demands of reform. And the Post-Synod Exhortation Amoris Laetitia represents a decisive stage on this path. They are not wrong then the authors of the Correctio filialis  (to Pope Francis) when they underlined “the affinity between Luther’s ideas on the law, justification and matrimony and those taught  or favored by Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia and elsewhere.” 

At this point it should be remembered that Pope Francis, like Father Pani, belongs to the Company of Jesus, whose Founder, St. Ignatius of Loyola, was the champion of the Faith that Divine Providence raised up in the XVI century against Lutheranism. In Germany, apostles like St. Peter Canisio and Blessed Peter Fabro, fought every inch of the way against the heretics and on the terrain of anti-Protestant controversy no-one can surpass St. Robert Bellarmino.

La Civiltà Cattolica was founded in 1850, with the support of Pius IX, and had a role of doctrinal defense against the errors of the time for a very long time. From its very first edition, on April 6th 1850, it dedicated an extensive anonymous essay (by Father Matteo Liberatore) on The Political Rationalism of the Italian Revolution, in which he saw Protestantism as the cause of all modern errors. These theses were developed, among others, by two famous Jesuit theologians: Fathers Giovanni Perrone (Protestantism and the Rule of the Faith, La Civiltà Cattolica, Rome 1853, 2 voll.), and Hartmann Grisar (Luther, Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1911/1912, 3 voll.).

But the commemoration of the Lutheran revolt made by the Jesuit journal in October 1917, the fourth centenary marking the 95 theses in Wittenberg, takes on a special meaning.  (Luther and Lutheranism, in La Civiltà Cattolica, IV (1917), pp. 207-233; 421-430). The theologian of La Civiltà Cattolica explained that “The essence of the Lutheran spirit, or rather Lutheranism, is rebellion in all of its extension and in all the force of its word. Rebellion, therefore, which is personified in Luther, was varied and profound, complex and very vast; which apparently appeared but was in fact violent, angry, trivial, obscene and diabolic; deep down it was studied, and directed according to the circumstances, focused on opportunistic ends and interests, intended and wanted with  measured, resolute determination.” (pp.208-309).

Luther, La Civiltà Cattolica continues, “initiated that contemptible parody, with which the rebel monk attributed to God, his ideas, blasphemies and the abominations of his perverted mind: he outraged the Pope in an unspeakable way in the name of Christ, he cursed Caesar in the name of Christ, he blasphemed against the Church, against bishops, against monks with absolute infernal impetuosity, in the name of Christ; he threw his religious habit onto the tree of Judas, in the name of Christ and in the name of Christ he was married sacrilegiously” (p.209). “With the very convenient pretext of following Scripture, as that which alone contains the word of God, he conducted a war on scholastic theology, tradition, canon law, all the institutions and precepts of the Church and councils: in place of these august and venerated things, he, Martin Luther, perjured monk and self-proclaimed doctor, put himself and his authority! Popes, doctors and Holy Fathers were no longer of any worth; the word of Marin Luther was worth more than all of them!  (p.212). The Lutheran theory of justification, in the end, “was born of Luther’s imagination, not by the Gospel or any other word of God revealed to the writers of the New Testament: for us, every Lutheran novelty finds its origins in the concupiscence he stimulated, and in his development of the falsification of Scripture or in formal lying” (p.214

Father Pani cannot deny that the opinion he gives of Luther is a 360 degree turnaround from the one his confreres gave in the same journal, a century ago.  In 1917,  he was censured as an apostate, a rebel, a blasphemer; today he is being praised as a reformer, a prophet, [even] holy. No Hegelian dialectic can harmonize yesterday’s judgment with today’s. Luther was either a heretic who denied some basic dogmas of Christianity, or he was a “witness to faith” who initiated  the Reformation of the Church, brought to completion by the Second Vatican Council and Pope Francis.

In short, every Catholic is called upon to choose whether to side with Pope Francis and the Jesuits of today, or be alongside the Jesuits of yesterday and the Popes of all time.

It is time for choices and to mediate precisely on St. Ignatius’ two standards (Spiritual Exercises, n. 137)* which will help us make them in these difficult times.



*Translator’s note: ”It will be here how Christ calls and wants all under His standard; and Lucifer, on the contrary, under his.” (no. 137, Spiritual Exercises).



Translation: Contributor Francesca Romana



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: francischurch; heresy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 381-393 next last
To: metmom

All nonsense. I AM subject to Bergoglio. He’s the Pope. He has not issued any orders with my name on them. If he did, I’d have to obey, provided they are in accord with natural law and canon law.

I am also free to believe, as I do, that he’s the worst Pope of all time.

The Catholic Church has a Pope. It does not have a Dear Leader.

Your problem is that you believe your anti-Catholic propaganda—that tells you that Catholics are required to obey authority blindly and to parrot every utterance coming from an authority figure.


221 posted on 11/10/2017 5:54:56 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/hj3e8cKZWiY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; ealgeone
I doubt it. If you really did, you would be Catholics.

Ah, the ole *If you REALLY understood Catholicism, you'd be Catholic* canard.

On the contrary, we really do because we compare it to Scripture and can read Catholic writings ourselves and see how unscriptural they are.

We don't reject Catholicism because we don't understand it. We reject it becasue we understand SCRIPTURE.

222 posted on 11/10/2017 5:59:26 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Because it wouldn’t let people read Scripture for themsves so they could see how unscriptural it is.

Because the brainwashing by the Catholic church is very thorough.


223 posted on 11/10/2017 6:01:44 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; ealgeone; Luircin; aMorePerfectUnion; Mark17

So are you OK with the immorality and corruption within the Catholic church that Luther was objecting to?

Ar you telling us that his grievances against the Catholic church were not valid?


224 posted on 11/10/2017 6:04:08 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Broad is the way that leads to destruction and many are there who find it.


225 posted on 11/10/2017 6:06:59 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; ebb tide

See, the Holy Spirit filled THE WHOLE HOUSE, not just a closed up upper room with only the apostles in it.

Ebb, you got proved wrong again about your recounting of Pentecost, by Scriptire of all things.


226 posted on 11/10/2017 6:09:30 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
Just like God hardened Pharaoh’s heart, so God may do to the College of Cardinals when they commit themselves to evil.

And?

That has what to do with the selection of a new pope?

227 posted on 11/10/2017 6:11:48 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; ealgeone
Your problem is that you believe your anti-Catholic propaganda—that tells you that Catholics are required to obey authority blindly and to parrot every utterance coming from an authority figure.

So Unum Sanctum and the Canons posted in post 132 by ealgeone are Catholic propaganda?

Who knew?

228 posted on 11/10/2017 6:19:17 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; daniel1212

Hey, dan.....

This one is for you.


229 posted on 11/10/2017 6:20:20 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“If that’s true, why has the Catholic Church survived over 2000 years,

Hmmmmm...

1. Killing believers who dissent - including women and children. Tens of thousands, multiple times, over total thousand years.

2. Superstitions

3. Family ties

4. Being sponsored and supported as an official religion by various nations

5. False religion has resonated in the hearts of a fallen mankind for all history. It is a perennial best-seller!

6. Syncretic paganism, that incorporates many religious ideas from other religions.

I post these because you asked and to show there are many possible answers to your question.

Best


230 posted on 11/10/2017 6:21:19 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
“Thank God for BROTHER Luther. How do you suppose all those Catholic are going to feel in Heaven, having to sit next to brother Luther forever? Won’t that be a trip? 😆🤯

Blessed Saint Luther!

231 posted on 11/10/2017 6:22:16 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Then God appointed you and me, to be official Limerick writers, to keep the Catholics honest, so they won’t harass prots who are turning to God, so that the previously mentioned prots won’t be burdened wth totally unnecessary things, like visions, apparitions, Scapulas, rosaries, sacraments, and most of all, no more holy water. Did I miss anything? 😀😆😄🤯👍
Then God commissioned other disciples, like AMPU, Caww, Luicirn, and a host of others (maybe I shouldn’t have used the word “host”) to also help the prots, who were turning to God, from idols.
232 posted on 11/10/2017 6:31:06 AM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

>>Seems like a good place to stand your ground...

Here I stand. I can do no other.


233 posted on 11/10/2017 6:59:55 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

And so if Francis demanded that you disobey Scripture and recant all your FR posts about him, or else face excommunication, would you recant?


234 posted on 11/10/2017 7:02:38 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; metmom; boatbums; aMorePerfectUnion; Luircin
Great Christian Limerick writers we are
With false religionists we do love to spar
Waiting for the day
Always having a ray
Of hope, as Jesus is watching from afar
235 posted on 11/10/2017 8:27:55 AM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“Nothing the Catholic Church teaches contradicts Holy Scripture.”

Hmm, then why not just rely on the Scripture instead of searching for some additional justification for doctrine?

“Pure hogwash. The apostles were in a closed room when then the Holy Ghost descended upon them. And they never split from each other in their own different “religions”.”

Well, that would be a collective experience, as would events like Pentacost, but the Holy Spirit doesn’t always work that way. The Holy Spirit is constantly working in each individual believer, who is having that experience individually. None of us can necessarily know what one anothers’ experience is, and it isn’t something easily demonstrated to one another.

“The Holy Ghost did not descend upon those outside the room. It was a select few. I was not there, you weren’t there and Luther wasn’t there.”

Yes, that kind of proves my point, I think. Those in the room know what they experienced, but we can only know of it from what they have written down and told us, we can never have the same direct experiential knowledge of it that they had.


236 posted on 11/10/2017 8:58:26 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“No. Otherwise it would have been a unanimous vote on the first ballot count.”

So, by that reasoning, all the popes in history who weren’t elected by unanimous votes on first ballot were essentially antipopes?


237 posted on 11/10/2017 9:04:45 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
Calling a Spade, a Spade

Best

238 posted on 11/10/2017 9:11:34 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Nothing the Catholic Church teaches contradicts Holy Scripture.

Except....

John O' Brien, Roman Catholic Priest in the Faith of Millions. Hebrews 9:24-28 Hebrews 10:11-13
When the priest pronounces the tremendous words of consecration, he reaches up into the heavens, brings Christ down from His throne, and places Him upon our altar to be offered up again as the Victim for the sins of man. It is a power greater than that of monarchs and emperors: it is greater than that of saints and angels, greater than that of Seraphim and Cherubim. Indeed it is greater even than the power of the Virgin Mary. While the Blessed Virgin was the human agency by which Christ became incarnate a single time,

the priest brings Christ down from heaven, and renders Him present on our altar as the eternal Victim for the sins of man—not once but a thousand times!

The priest speaks and lo! Christ, the eternal and omnipotent God, bows His head in humble obedience to the priest’s command.

24For Christ did not enter a holy place made with hands, a mere copy of the true one, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us; 25nor was it that He would offer Himself often, as the high priest enters the holy place year by year with blood that is not his own. 26Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself. 27And inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment,

28so Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to sin, to those who eagerly await Him.

Every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins;

12but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, SAT DOWN AT THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD,

13waiting from that time onward UNTIL HIS ENEMIES BE MADE A FOOTSTOOL FOR HIS FEET.

14For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified.


239 posted on 11/10/2017 9:11:59 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“So do you prots accept the Francis?”

We don’t pretend to be members of a church that demands we accept him as a requisite of membership.


240 posted on 11/10/2017 9:12:15 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson