and you put FreeRepublic in potential legal jeopardy.
Posted on 07/17/2017 8:08:32 AM PDT by ebb tide
“Francis is more interested in leftwing politics than in Catholic theology”, George Neumayr, contributing editor of The American Spectator, states talking to Tom Woods on July 14th on tomwoods.com. Woods describes Francis as a result of John Paul II who - as he puts it - appointed "absolutely terrible people" as bishops: "Catholics have suffered under Bergoglios for decades now”.
Neumayr agrees that a lot of the liberal bishops were appointed by John Paul II and Benedict XVI. He sees Francis as the “culmination of a century” of liberalism and modernism in the Church.
For him it is "highly unlikely" that Francis, who in his theology is “more a Protestant than a Catholic” will convert to Catholicism. Instead, the realistic scenario is that Francis will produce division and chaos, "Catholics will have to decide whether they guard the faith over papolatry.”
And: “The Cardinals have to declare that Francis is a bad pope who must be resisted.”
It is foolish to repeat the nonsense that the adversary puts in your apparently willing heart.
Michael is a solid man of God, with powerful spiritual evidence to prove it. I hope you come to your senses soon.
Being a tool makes one a fool.
.
As a tool of Antichrist you should know!
"Solid" men of God would not shy away from openly declaring the gospel they preach and the basic tenets of what they hold to be the truth. All you have offered - after repeated requests for what you believe - are insults, threats and cop-outs telling everyone to go to the Rood website and listen to hours and hours of YouTube videos and buy his books. Do you get a commission?
This is what cults do. The leaders and their tools never answer direct questions, they reject Biblically sound doctrines, they castigate others who dare criticize what IS known about the cult, they compare resistance to satanic influence, they threaten with eternal damnation all those who resist and, like you have done here, they patronizingly mock outsiders and boast of their superior knowledge and piety.
Everyone who has tried to discuss this with you is praying that you will come to your senses. Don't be Rood's tool.
“Michael is a solid man of God, with powerful spiritual evidence to prove it. “
Lots of evidence, like the time he sent checks from donors back and asked them to reissue them in his personal name. That’s some powerful spiritual evidence!
Do you give him money in the name of a ministry, or do you make your checks out to him?
.
You post nothing but nonsense, and you put FreeRepublic in potential legal jeopardy.
We don’t need that.
.
Post 1203 is what cultists do.
Michael Roods testimony is posted in the hundreds of programs that have been there on YouTube for as long as YouTube has existed.
It is pure scripture in the smallest detail, unlike the “inherited lies” you constantly promote.
.
Well, who do you make checks out to when you send Rood $?
If that were so, why have you CONSTANTLY avoided answering the many questions you have been asked that try to clarify what you believe and what Rood teaches his sycophants to believe on the major tenets of the Christian faith? Time and time again you were asked and you won't do it or you try to sideline down a different rabbit hole. It's pretty weird that there is no statement of faith on Rood's website where one can go and find out quickly if further study is warranted. Again, actions of cults.
Until you can do that, don't bother posting back to me more of the same dithering attitude.
“why have you CONSTANTLY avoided answering the many questions you have been asked that try to clarify what you believe and what Rood teaches his sycophants to believe on the major tenets of the Christian faith? “
It’s a cult thing to hide what isn’t Christian and make them look normal.
No doubt they have their own version of magic underwear too.
.
Everyone on FreeRepublic knows exactly what I believe because I post it daily.
FWIW, Roods websites contain a massive compendium of his totally scriptural beliefs.
Your problem is your problem!
You post the work of the adversary constantly. Do some study and get in line with scripture; he needs no help from you.
I'm on FreeRepublic and if I knew exactly what you believe and post daily, I wouldn't have to keep asking you to state what they are. Again with the avoidance. Pretty suspicious.
How about you, AMPU, do you know EXACTLY what ES believes about the major tenets of the Christian faith?
Are you gonna eventually get around to that?
“How about you, AMPU, do you know EXACTLY what ES believes about the major tenets of the Christian faith?”
Well, please start by noting this cult follower told us *he already answered the questions*.
I asked for a link.
Turns out there isn’t a link.
That tells you all you need to know.
Who's this "we", ES? There IS no legal jeopardy for Free Republic for things outside people post and comment on. Getta grip! In fact, it might be a good idea if Michael Rood would read this thread and actually defend his beliefs instead of the poor stand-in that has been defending him with nothing but empty threats and bombast. Think he'd give a straight answer or might he also just send everyone to his YouTube videos and get them to buy his books? That DOES seem to be the SOP so far.
All of that assembly will be, by the grace of Yehova, saved at the last trump http://www.freerepublic.com/~editorsurveyor/index?U=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freerepublic.com%2Ffocus%2Fmy%2F
Oooops! Need a do-over?
.
You appear to be trying hard to become a joke.
Your video of “modern christianity” is fairly accurate though. (but you left out the ‘grace’ lever’)
.
Is your reading comprehension really that weak?
Allowing salvation at all requires the Grace of Yehova, but the grace is not what is doing the saving. It is the continuation in Torah, the “Righteousness of Yehova” that is required for entry to the wedding feast. The “Garment.”
No Garment, no salvation. “He who endures to the end; the same shall be saved.”
Do you thing Yeshua was mistaken when he uttered those words?
Was he mistaken in Matthew 7:21-23?
Was he ever mistaken?
Grace gets you to your Mikvah, and that is where it stops, and righteousness must begin.
Philippians 2:12
Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
Was Paul mistaken too?
.
.
>> “here IS no legal jeopardy for Free Republic for things outside people post and comment on.” <<
I guess you must have come after the trouble.
Fr has been in jeopardy in the past, and we don’t need it again. FR can be held accountable for things that are posted and allowed to remain.
We need for everyone to avoid posting trouble.
.
.
>> “AFTER the Rapture?” <<
After the millennial reign is over, and your “rapture” has still not come, get yourself ready for the GWT!
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.