Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martin Luther was a ‘teacher of the faith’, say [Catholic] German bishops
Catholic Herald ^ | August 12, 2016 | Jonathan Luxmoore

Posted on 08/12/2016 3:59:59 PM PDT by ebb tide

Germany’s Catholic bishops have praised Martin Luther as a “Gospel witness and teacher of the faith” and called for closer ties with Protestants.

In a 206-page report, “The Reformation in Ecumenical Perspective”, Bishop Gerhard Feige of Magdeburg, chairman of the German bishops’ ecumenical commission, said the “history of the Reformation has encountered a changeable reception in the Catholic Church, where its events and protagonists were long seen in a negative, derogatory light”.

“While the wounds are still felt to the present day, it is gratifying that Catholic theology has succeeded, in the meantime, in soberly reconsidering the events of the 16th century,” he said in the report, published this week by Germany’s Bonn-based bishops’ conference.

Bishop Feige said the “history and consequences” of the Reformation would be debated during its upcoming 500th anniversary, but added that there was consensus that previous mutual condemnations were invalid.

“Memories of the Reformation and the subsequent separation of Western Christianity are not free from pain,” Bishop Feige said. “But through lengthy ecumenical dialogue, the theological differences rooted in the period have been re-evaluated – as is documented in the work presented by our ecumenical commission.”

Martin Lazar, the Magdeburg diocesan spokesman, told Catholic News Service on Wednesday that the Reformation still caused tensions in Germany, especially “in religiously separated families.”

The bishops’ report said the “Catholic Church may recognise today what was important in the Reformation – namely, that Sacred Scripture is the centre and standard for all Christian life.

“Connected with this is Martin Luther’s fundamental insight that God’s self-revelation in Jesus Christ for the salvation of the people is proclaimed in the Gospel – that Jesus Christ is the centre of Scripture and the only mediator.”

The Reformation is traditionally dated from the October 1517 publication of Luther’s 95 Theses, questioning the sale of indulgences and the Gospel foundations of papal authority.

Luther was excommunicated by Pope Leo X in January 1521 and outlawed by Holy Roman Emperor Charles V.

The German bishops describe Luther as “a religious pathfinder, Gospel witness and teacher of the faith,” whose “concern for renewal in repentance and conversion” had not received an “adequate hearing” in Rome.

They said the reformer’s work still posed a “theological and spiritual challenge” and had “ecclesial and political implications for understanding the Church and the Magisterium.”

The report said a joint Catholic-Lutheran statement in 1980 commemorating the Augsburg Confession, which set out the new Lutheran faith, had been crucial in bringing churches closer, while another ecumenical statement in 1983, on the 500th anniversary of Luther’s birth, had started an “intensive engagement” with the reformer’s work.

A historic 1999 joint declaration on the doctrine of justification was a “milestone in ecumenical dialogue,” the report said, by recognising that remaining differences should “no longer have a church-dividing effect.”

The bishops’ report includes June 2015 conciliatory letters between the German bishops’ conference president, Cardinal Reinhard Marx, and Lutheran Bishop Heinrich Strohm, president of the Evangelical Church of Germany, outlining plans for a 2017 ecumenical pilgrimage to the Holy Land and a Lent service devoted to “healing memories.”

In an interview with CNS, the ecumenical commission’s deputy chairman, Bishop Heinz Algermissen of Fulda, said Catholic-Lutheran ties had improved since the Second Vatican Council, but that churches must work for “visible unity, not just reconciled diversity.”

“This means not only praying together, but meeting the challenge of speaking with one voice as Christians when we are all challenged by aggressive atheism and secularism, as well as by [radicalised] Islam. Otherwise we will lose more and more ground,” he said.

“In commemorating the Reformation, we cannot just see it as a jubilee, but should also admit our guilt for past errors and repent on both sides for the past 500 years,” he added.

Catholics make up 29 per cent of Germany’s 82 million inhabitants, with the Evangelical Church of Germany accounting for 27 per cent, although all denominations have faced declining membership.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: ecumania; francischurch; heresy; luther
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-299 next last
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
Think harder. You'll get it, I imagine.

You have; evidently; a great imagination.

Why not put it to work and show any proof you might have for any of the claims you've made instead of trying to get me to search around in the haystack of your mind for the possibly non-existant needle.

101 posted on 08/13/2016 5:24:14 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
This as you can see refers to the virginity of Mary as it relates to Christ's birth, not going forward. Matt 1:25.

Is not the Catholic position that Mary remained a virgin for life? That is not scriptural. The Lutheran perspective is that the focus of God's plan, the Bible, everything is about Jesus Christ. The position you posted is from a Solid Declaration on Christ, not His mother. We confess the Apostle's and Nicene Creeds, they and the Bible acknowledge the Virgin birth..

Catholics Mariology ascribes more to the faithful Mary than what is written.

102 posted on 08/13/2016 5:25:05 AM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

BE SAFE!!!

Get yer own TODAY!!!

http://www.theopendoor.ie/BROWN-SCAPULAR.html


103 posted on 08/13/2016 5:28:43 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: xone
Catholics Mariology ascribes more to the faithful Mary than what is written.

Ya THINK???



The way it's written:
 
Galatians 4:4-5
But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship.
 
The way Rome teaches it:
 
Galatians 4:4-5
But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a....
 
Ark of the Covenant,
Cause of Our Joy,
Cause of our Salvation ,
Comfort of the Afflicted,
Co-Redemptrix, 
Destroyer of Heresy,
Ever-virgin ,
Favoured Daughter of the Father,
Gate of Heaven,
God-bearer,
Health of the Sick,
Help of Christians,
Holy Mary,
Holy Mother of God,
Holy Virgin of Virgins,
House of Gold,
Joy of the Just,
Majesty,
Mirror of Justice,
Morning Star,
Most Holy,
Mother Admirable,
Mother Inviolate,
Mother Most Amiable,
Mother Most Chaste,
Mother Most Pure,
Mother of Christ,
Mother of Divine Grace,
Mother of God,
Mother of Good Counsel,
Mother of Mercy,
Mother of Orphans,
Mother of Our Creator,
Mother of Our Redeemer,
Mother of Sorrows,
Mother of the Church,
Mother of the Poor,
Mother of the Word,
Mother Thrice Admirable,
Mother Undefiled,
Mystical Rose,
Nova Eva (the New Eve),
Our Lady of Compassion,
Our Lady of Confidence,
Our Lady of Victory,
Our Lady, Star of the Sea,
Our Mother of Perpetual Help,
Queen Assumed Into Heaven,
Queen Conceived Without Original Sin,
Queen of All Saints,
Queen of Angels,
Queen of Apostles,
Queen of Confessors,
Queen of Families,
Queen of Heaven,
Queen of Martyrs,
Queen of Patriarchs,
Queen of Peace,
Queen of Prophets,
Queen of the Most Holy Rosary,
Queen of Virgins,
Ravisher of Hearts,
Refuge of Sinners,
Seat of Wisdom,
She Who Shows the Way,
Singular Vessel of Devotion,
Spiritual Vessel,
Spouse of the Holy Spirit,
Tabernacle of the Lord,
Temple of the Most Holy Trinity,
Throne of Wisdom,
Tower of David,
Tower of Ivory,
Treasure House of God's Graces,
Untier of Knots,
Vessel of Honor,
Virgin God-bearer,
Virgin Most Faithful,
Virgin Most Merciful,
Virgin Most Powerful,
Virgin Most Prudent,
Virgin Most Renowned,
Virgin Most Venerable          born under the law, to HELP redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship; sooner or later; and not spend TOO much time in Purgatory.
 


104 posted on 08/13/2016 5:31:53 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
I wore one of those when I was a Catholic. Obviously, I don't do that anymore. 😀
105 posted on 08/13/2016 5:32:06 AM PDT by Mark17 (The love of God, how rich and pure, how measureless and strong. It shall forevermore endure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

We have a poster at church that has the names ascribed to Jesus from scripture. This list looks longer, now you have made me want to count. These I have no problem with, except for the idea that Mary the mother of our Lord has need of a title: God-bearer, Mother of Christ, Virgin God-bearer, Mother of Our Redeemer.


106 posted on 08/13/2016 5:49:21 AM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; aMorePerfectUnion

Amen I say to this post. If I were to post the same as you did here I would have only worded the last sentence you wrote to say “Now you probably can’t claim invincible ignorance as an excuse”. Since we are not God we can’t judge if AMPU (or anyone who read the words of your post yet still rejects them) has some mental defect or perhaps some other impediment that isn’t his fault that prevents him from truly understanding and still rejecting the message. IMO. But as a Catholic I can not nor will not disagree with what you wrote. All are in serious danger, even with “invincible ignorance” if they reject the Church.

After reading the rest of this thread it becomes apparent to me once again there is little left to do than pray for our separated brethren. Would you join me in entrusting their souls to the kind mercies of Our Lady, as I pray the Rosary now (and you do, when you do)? None who have fled to her protection have ever been left without her tender mercies.

Today is Saturday, so we have the Joyful Mysteries upon which to reflect. Perhaps a joyful mystery of heartfelt conversion for at least one reading or participating in this thread may be a result.

Again I say Amen to your post. It’s serious business, rejecting the Church. It is good to remind of this fact on occasion.


107 posted on 08/13/2016 5:53:35 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

Traditionally, today are the Glorious Mysteries.


108 posted on 08/13/2016 6:32:28 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: piusv

http://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/d018rpLuminousMysteries.html


109 posted on 08/13/2016 7:05:56 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
All who reject Christ are in danger. Without faith in Christ there is no eternal life. You can join a hundred churches and that won't help you at all.

Do you believe His promise in John 5:24?

110 posted on 08/13/2016 7:19:54 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
>>I'll tell you this....I don't place my eternal life in the wearing of a piece of cloth.<<

That is not an answer to the questions I posed. Dodging again I see.

No dodge needed. The sad issue is someone placing their faith in an idol when the Word tells us not to do so. Whether it be a piece of cloth, statue, etc.

111 posted on 08/13/2016 7:50:54 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

How pathetic, that anyone would put their hope for eternal life in a piece of cloth, based upon a made up story... That can never save.

When they could have eternal life today and the assurance that comes with it.


112 posted on 08/13/2016 8:04:07 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

“It’s serious business, rejecting the Church.”

No true believer rejects Christ’s assemble. They cannot. They are sealed by the Holy Spirit and baptized by Him into The Body of Christ - a guarantee of glory to come.

The Roman Catholic Church is simply a denomination that lost its way when it became Syncretic paganism. These very pagan beliefs now bind and blind her to God’s revealed Scriptures. The Word of God is now rejected, for the sake of tradition - the very thing Christ condemned the Pharisees for doing.

It is noted you did not provide any legitimate Scriptural basis for any claim you make.


113 posted on 08/13/2016 8:13:03 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Are you familiar with the Fatima prayer?


114 posted on 08/13/2016 8:27:27 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: xone; raygunfan

This as you can see refers to the virginity of Mary as it relates to Christ’s birth, not going forward. Matt 1:25.


I should have included raygunfan in my response to you.

raygunfan mentioned that protestants are very quiet on Luther’s words on Mary as ever virgin.

You stated that it isn’t Lutheran doctrine.

I was agreeing with both of your statements.

It is true that Luther did mention several times in his writings that Mary remained a virgin after Christ was born, that Mary bore no other children, and that Joseph never did know Mary carnally.

See

http://www.catholicbridge.com/catholic/martin_luther_on_mary.php

It is also true that protestants, even Lutherans, are very quiet on Luther’s words. Lutherans include it as doctrine in neither the Augsburg Confession nor the Large Confession. It is only mentioned incidentally in the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod’s declaration on the Person of Christ that Mary nevertheless remained a virgin.

See Section VIII (24) at

file:///C:/Users/Rich/Downloads/Solid%20Declaration%20(2).pdf


115 posted on 08/13/2016 9:25:19 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

I no more worship a scapular or a rosary than one does of a framed photograph of his spouse or another family member.


116 posted on 08/13/2016 9:29:12 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

Thanks. I agree with your improved wording and I do include heretics and schismatics in my rosary intentions.


117 posted on 08/13/2016 9:30:59 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
I no more worship a scapular or a rosary than one does of a framed photograph of his spouse or another family member.

Here is where your attempt to defend the false catholic worship/idolatry of these items falls apart.

No Christian is appealing to the picture of the family member for their salvation.

No Christian is relying upon the family member for their salvation.

No Christian prays to the picture of the family member for their salvation or other requests.

No Christian bows before the picture.

You admit you wear the scapular as instructed by the apparition at Fatima to which you have yet to be able to offer any Scriptural support in favor of.

For those following this thread: The "promise" of the apparition was: " Whosoever dies clothed in this Scapular shall not suffer eternal fire.”

If anyone believes this they are making this an idol. An idol is a false substitute for God.

The Bible does tell us however how we can have salvation and eternal life.

24“Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. John 5:24 NASB

35Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me will not hunger, and he who believes in Me will never thirst. 36“But I said to you that you have seen Me, and yet do not believe. 37“All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out. 38“For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. 39“This is the will of Him who sent Me, that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing, but raise it up on the last day. 40“For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day.” John 6:35-40 NASB

For anyone willing to believe what John has recorded Jesus saying, forgiveness and eternal life in Heaven awaits.

However, if anyone rejects what Christ has said there is no forgiveness and eternal life in Hell awaits.

The Christian's hope is that everyone will heed the words of Christ and come and follow Him.

118 posted on 08/13/2016 9:49:45 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
You admit you wear the scapular as instructed by the apparition at Fatima to which you have yet to be able to offer any Scriptural support in favor of.

For those following this thread: The "promise" of the apparition was: " Whosoever dies clothed in this Scapular shall not suffer eternal fire.”

Once again, you have shown your ignorance of the One, True Church. The brown scapular was revealed by the Blessed Mother to St. Simon Stock in 1251 A.D. The Fatima apparitions did not start until 1917 A.D.

Protestants cherry-pick the Bible, i.e. John 20;23, they cherry-pick the saints whom they do acknowledge, i.e. St. Augustine about no salvation outside the Catholic Church, and they reject any other saints they don't personally agree with. Why do you think they are proud of that very name, "protestant"?

For them, it's a personal Church of Me, from Luther on down.

119 posted on 08/13/2016 10:19:32 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Once again, you have shown your ignorance of the One, True Church. The brown scapular was revealed by the Blessed Mother to St. Simon Stock in 1251 A.D. The Fatima apparitions did not start until 1917 A.D.

Same apparition catholics claim to be "Mary".

http://www.fatima.org/apostolate/pdf/brown_scapular.pdf

You place your faith in an idolatrous piece of cloth based on the words of a false apparition to which you've yet been able to offer any support from the New Testament to justify this belief.

And you won't be able to as it is counter to the message of the New Testament that faith in Christ and Christ alone is what saves us.

Belief in the scapular for your salvation is idolatry.

120 posted on 08/13/2016 10:54:53 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson