Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Look at the Early Catholic Church from the Acts of the Apostles
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 04-26-16 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 04/27/2016 8:41:02 AM PDT by Salvation

A Look at the Early Catholic Church from the Acts of the Apostles

April 26, 2016

cross

The second reading from last Sunday’s Mass (5th Sunday of Easter) is very Catholic, and too informative to merely pass up. It presents the Church as rather highly organized and possessed of some of the structures we know today in full form. Granted, some of these structures are in seminal form, but they are there.

We will also notice qualities of the original kerygma that are at variance with what some modern thinkers declare should be the methodology of the Church. The soft Christianity of those who replace the cross with a pillow and who insist on solely inclusion and affirmation is strangely absent in this early setting.

Let’s look the first reading from the Acts of the Apostles (Acts 14:21-27) and see there the true path of priests, teachers, and leaders in the Church. Four steps are prescribed for our consideration, by noting that they went forth announcing, admonishing, appointing, and accounting.

I. Announcing – The text says, After Paul and Barnabas had proclaimed the good news to that city and made a considerable number of disciples

Notice that the happiness is linked to the harvest. By proclaiming the Good News, they yield a great harvest. As Catholics, we are not sent out merely to proclaim a list of duties; we are sent to proclaim the Gospel. And the Gospel is this: God so loved the world that He sent his Son, who by dying and rising from the dead has purchased for us a whole new life, free from sin and the rebellious obsessions of this world. He is victorious over all the death-directed drives of this world. Simply put, he has triumphed over these forces and enabled us to walk in newness of life.

God save us from brands of the faith in which rules and obligations are all that is heard by sour-faced saints, dead disciples, fussy Pharisees, bored believers, and frozen chosen. Save us from Pharisaical philosophers who are obsessed with particulars not even commanded by God, who sneer at things they consider beneath than their preferences.

No, we are sent to announce a new life, a life free from the bondage of sin, rebellion, sensuality, greed, lust, domination, and revenge. We are sent to announce a life of joy, confidence, purity, chastity, generosity, and devotion to the truth rooted in Love.

Yes, here is a joyful announcement rooted in the cry Anastasis (Resurrection)! New Life! The old order of sin is gone and a new life of freedom from sin is here!

Did everyone accept this as good news? No. Some, indeed many, were offended and sought to convict Christians as “disturbers of the peace.” Some don’t like to have their sin and bondage called out as such. They prefer bondage, sin, and darkness to light, holiness, and freedom.

As Catholics, we announce what is intrinsically good news, and we ought to start sounding like it by proclaiming it with joy. We must proclaim it without the bitterness and anger that are indicative of those who are more interested in winning an argument than in joyfully announcing something wonderful, freeing, and true.

II. Admonishing – The text says, … they returned to Lystra and to Iconium and to Antioch. They strengthened the spirits of the disciples and exhorted them to persevere in the faith, saying, “It is necessary for us to undergo many hardships to enter the kingdom of God.”

Preaching/teaching is a process. You don’t just preach or teach once and then move on; you return and reiterate. Paul and Barnabas are retracing their steps back through towns they have already evangelized. They do not just come, have a tent revival, and move on. They return and, as we shall see, they establish the Church.

Notice what they do:

1. Encourage – They strengthened the spirits of the disciples.
2. Exhort – They exhorted them to persevere in the faith.
3. Explain – They explained by saying, “It is necessary for us to undergo many hardships to enter the kingdom of God.”

Let’s focus especially on the last the point. Paul and Barnabas teach that if you’re not willing to endure the cross, no crown will come your way. If you can’t stand a little disappointment, if you can’t stand being talked about, if you think you should always be up and never down, then I’ve come to remind you: No cross, no crown.

Yes, beware of “cross-less” Christianity. We do have good news to proclaim but there is also the truth that we get to the resurrection and the glory through the cross. There is a test in every testimony, a trial in every triumph. There are demands of discipleship, requirements for renewal, laws of love, and sufferings set forth for Saints.

Good preaching combines the hardship and the happiness in one message. It is a joy to follow in the footsteps of our Lord, who endured hostility, hardship, and the horrors of the cross but still triumphed and showed that the wisdom of this world is foolishness to God. Yes, He caught the wise in their craftiness and showed that the thoughts of the wise in this word are futile (cf 1 Cor 3:20). He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them (paradoxically) by the cross (cf Col 2:15).

Thus, St. Paul and Barnabas announce the cross, a stumbling block to the Jews and foolishness to the Gentiles (cf 1 Cor 1:23). Many today insist that the Church soft-pedal the cross, that she use honey, not vinegar. No can do. We joyfully announce and uphold the paradox of the cross. We must be willing to be a sign of contradiction to this world, which sees only pleasure and the indulgence of sinful drives as the way forward, which exalts freedom without truth or obedience, and which calls good what God calls sinful.

Too many so-called Christian denominations have adopted the pillow as their image and have a “give the people what they want” mentality. That is 180 degrees out of phase with the cross.

The Catholic Church does not exist to reflect the views of its members, but to reflect the views of its founder and head, Jesus Christ. As He went out to die, Jesus announced the cross without ambiguity, saying, Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out. And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to me (John 12:31-32).

And so we announce the cross not merely as suffering, but as life, power, and love. By the power of the cross, it is possible to live without sin, to overcome rebellion, pride, lust, and greed; it is possible to learn to forgive and to live the truth in love.

The world will hate us for this. But such hardships, such crosses, are necessary preludes to the hallelujah of Heaven. The Church can do no less than to point to the cross. The center of our faith is a cross not a pillow. And the cross is our only hope (Ave Crux spes unica nostra (Hail, O Cross, our only hope).

Yes, the Church announces the cross and admonishes a world obsessed with pleasure and with passing, fake happiness.

III. Appointing – The text says, They appointed presbyters for them in each church and, with prayer and fasting, commended them to the Lord in whom they had put their faith. Then they traveled through Pisidia and reached Pamphylia. After proclaiming the word at Perga they went down to Attalia.

And thus we see the ordination of priest leaders in every place. “Priest” is just an English mispronunciation of the word “presbyter.” Paul and Barnabas did not simply go about vaguely preaching and then moving on. They established local churches with a structure of authority. The whole Pauline corpus of writings indicates a need to continue oversight of these local churches and to stay in touch with the priest leaders established to lead these local parishes.

Later, St. Paul spoke of the need for this structure in other places when he wrote (to Titus),

This is why I left you in Crete, that you might amend what was defective, and appoint presbyters in every town as I directed you (Titus 1:5).

This appointment was done through the laying on of hands and is called ordination today. It was a way of establishing order and office in the Church to make sure that the work continued and that the Church was governed by order. This is why we call the sacrament involved here the “Sacrament of Holy Orders.”

Note, too, that a critical task for leaders in the Church is to develop and train new leaders. Too many parishes depend on individual charismatic and gifted leaders whose inevitable departure leaves a void, not an ongoing ministry or organization. This should not be so. Good leaders train new leaders.

IV. Accounting – The text says, From there they sailed to Antioch, where they had been commended to the grace of God for the work they had now accomplished. And when they arrived, they called the church together and reported what God had done with them and how he had opened the door of faith to the Gentiles.

Note that Paul and Barnabas are now returning to render an account for what they have done. Accountability is part of a healthy Church. Every priest should render an account to his bishop, every bishop to his metropolitan and to the Pope. Today’s ad limina visits of bishops to the Pope is the way this is done. Further, priests are accountable to their bishop through various mechanisms such as yearly reports and other meetings.

A further background to this text is that Paul and Barnabas are returning to Antioch because it was from there that they were sent forth by the local bishops and priests on this missionary task.

While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” Then after fasting and praying they laid their hands on them and sent them off (Acts 13:2).

Thus St. Paul was not the lone ranger that some think him to be. He was sent and was accountable.

But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and had called me through his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son to me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not confer with flesh and blood, nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia; and again I returned to Damascus. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas, and remained with him fifteen days (Gal 1:15-18).

Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus along with me. I went up by revelation; and I laid before them (but privately before those who were of repute) the gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, lest somehow I should be running or had run in vain (Gal 2:1).

The preacher and teacher must be accountable: For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God; for it is written, “As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall give praise to God.” So each of us shall give account of himself to God (Rom 14:10-12).

And thus we see some paths for priests, preachers, teachers, and leaders. We must announce the Gospel as good news, with joy and confidence. We must admonish a world obsessed with pleasures to embrace the cross as our only hope. We must continue to develop, train, and appoint leaders to follow after us. And we must be accountable to one another.

A nice and quick portrait of some healthy traits for the Church!


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: actsoftheapostles; catholic; earlycatholicchurch; earlychurch; msgrcharlespope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 461-466 next last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: Ransomed; ADSUM; Mrs. Don-o

It’s hilarious when non-Catholic try to tell Catholics what we as Catholics believe.

LOL!


82 posted on 04/27/2016 8:16:26 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
That illustrates a wider usage than your Greek lexicon suggests.

That's the problem! Catholicism goes beyond the meaning of the texts!

btw...it's not my lexicon. It's how the words are used in the text.

If we don't have an accurate definition of the words used in the text we miss the meaning of the text.

83 posted on 04/27/2016 8:30:10 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Laughing at correction, and yes, some non-catholics know quite well the heresies and blasphemies at the heart of your 'other religion' claiming to be true Christianity. We have your religion's catechism and the instructional books by catholic priest, like John O'Brien's 'Faith of Millions' which carries the 'nihil obstet' of your hierarchy.

I cannot know precisely what you as an individual catholic believe, but I can read the material of your religion and compare it to the Truth of The Bible. Catholiciism is a pagan lookalike, not what Jesus The Christ established that continues to add to His Kingdom daily.

84 posted on 04/27/2016 8:32:13 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

You are totally wrong.

Pleaase do some mre reading.

You might start with The Four Witnesses by Bennett.


85 posted on 04/27/2016 8:39:33 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Oh really? On what aspects of your religion am I in error?


86 posted on 04/27/2016 8:43:41 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Your posts prove it.


87 posted on 04/27/2016 8:46:27 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Now THAT is funny! Have you ever pointed out one specific aspect where I am in error on the religion of catholiciism? Can’t remember a single one. But here’s your chance!


88 posted on 04/27/2016 8:49:30 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

Mormons would also deny their understanding of Christianity is wrong. However, when compared to the Word it is found to be so.


89 posted on 04/27/2016 9:12:03 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Just say it. Catholics aren’t Christians, right? Don’t hem and haw, lay it out. It’s not that hard.

Freegards


90 posted on 04/27/2016 9:20:01 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
We must continue to develop, train, and appoint leaders to follow after us.

An unbroken chain from the First Century until this day, one holy catholic and apostolic church.

91 posted on 04/27/2016 9:20:30 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

There is a difference. If the catholic, or anyone else for that matter, is relying upon anyone other than Christ and Christ alone for their salvation they are not a Christian.


92 posted on 04/27/2016 9:37:52 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
An unbroken chain from the First Century until this day, one holy catholic and apostolic church.

Another myth just like the one the author of this OP tries to pass off by saying we can look at the early Catholic Church from the Acts of the Apostles.

93 posted on 04/27/2016 10:19:16 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Due to her erroneous understanding of the Lord's Supper (“Eucharist”), Catholicism (by the end of the 2nd century or later) came to consider NT pastors to be a distinctive sacerdotal class of clergy, distinctively called “priests” (which the RC Douay Rheims Bible inconsistently calls them: Acts 20:17; Titus 1:5), and sometimes “episkopos,”), but which the Holy Spirit never does

One must never forget that the non-RCC denominations proceeding out of the Reformation continue to further this "lying sophistry" simply by folding it back on themselves where their "pastors" (elders) or "ministers" (a confusion of elders an deacons properly so-called) are simply re-titled "priests" with sacerdotal function, thus doubly misbranding the term "prebuteros" (simply a comparative of the adjective 'presbutos' meaning 'elderly' or 'old' or 'aged'; figuratively, endowed with experiential wisdom befitting spiritual maturity).

If you really want to know what the administration of the "Eucharist" in the PRESBYTERIAN Church is:

https://www.presbyterianmission.org/ministries/today/communion/

Excerpt:

"For Presbyterians this divinely initiated meal is one of two sacraments of the church, instituted by God and commended by Christ. We are following in the tradition of the early church when we affirm three primal material elements of life--water, bread and wine--as the primary symbols of offering life to God. Being washed with the water of baptism, we receive new life in Christ. In eating the bread and drinking the cup offered by God, our memory of the promises are made present by the Holy Spirit."

The elements are dispensed only under an officiating (ordained, sacerdotal) "pastor" (click here), thus preserving the two-class, Nicolaitan (nikao = overwhelm, laoi = common "lay" people) caste system. It's just a subcutaneous injection of residual faith-destroying catholicism.

And this has not really been eliminated from the typical modern Baptist paradigm either, though they will adamantly and vigorously claim otherwise.

In contrast, one compares the manifestation of the Remembrance as observed by the brethren assemblies typified by the Darbyite "Plymouth"-type local associations whose polity is by a plurality of elders, and the Supper is weekly observed at considerable, thoughtful length, culminated by a distribution of the tokens of the Lord's Passion by any of the brethren who feel moved to do so. The bread and wine are not seen to be sacramental, but rather as literal aids assisting participant to envision the Last Supper venue, and pointing to the manner and meaning of the Cross-death of Jesus of Nazareth. These assemblies have essentially extirpated the "pastor-lay people" paradigm from their vocabulary of community in Christ.

This Scriptural New Testament setting is the one which contradicts the controlling manipulation of the credulity of unwarned "believers." Such local assemblies are non-denominational and exhibit no active reaching out for any kind of ecumenism with Catholics or the episcopacies derived therefrom.

Thank you for apprising me of this discussion.

94 posted on 04/28/2016 12:45:18 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
Catholics are in a better position to know what they mean by their actions than those who observe those actions. If you want to know what we mean by our actions, ask us. But don’t tell us we are worshiping Mary when we know in our hearts that we are not worshiping Mary. You cannot possibly know.

I don't think so...Doesn't matter what's in your heart...You have been conditioned to worship Mary while calling it something else...

95 posted on 04/28/2016 3:05:44 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Ransomed; don-o

A fellow FReeper told my husband that she had been received into the Catholic Church last year (Easter 2015) partly under my small influence. I knew nothing about at at the time, but it gave me reason to be rather wonderingly happy heartwise, all the same.


Something similar happened to a friend of mine; I’ll call him John. John was travelling in a car on a business trip with three co-workers when one of them engaged John in a lengthy conversation about religion. They disagreed on many things, and John questioned himself on why he let himself get roped into such a fruitless conversation. Years later, one of the co-workers who was not part of the conversation told John that he went through the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA) and was received into the Church, and that John’s strong defense of the faith was a contributing factor as to why he became a Catholic.

Peace,
Rich


96 posted on 04/28/2016 3:06:05 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
A Look at the Early Catholic Church from the Acts of the Apostles

Well; the early church fathers wrote a detailed letter; outling ALL of the things that were VERY important to them;

and to the HOLY GHOST as well:

 22 Then the apostles and elders, with the whole church, decided to choose some of their own men and send them to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas. They chose Judas (called Barsabbas) and Silas, men who were leaders among the believers. 23 With them they sent the following letter:

   The apostles and elders, your brothers,

   To the Gentile believers in Antioch, Syria and Cilicia:

   Greetings.

 24 We have heard that some went out from us without our authorization and disturbed you, troubling your minds by what they said. 25 So we all agreed to choose some men and send them to you with our dear friends Barnabas and Paul— 26 men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 27 Therefore we are sending Judas and Silas to confirm by word of mouth what we are writing. 28 It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: 29 You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things.

   Farewell.

 30 So the men were sent off and went down to Antioch, where they gathered the church together and delivered the letter. 31 The people read it and were glad for its encouraging message. 32 Judas and Silas, who themselves were prophets, said much to encourage and strengthen the believers. 33 After spending some time there, they were sent off by the believers with the blessing of peace to return to those who had sent them. [34] 35 But Paul and Barnabas remained in Antioch, where they and many others taught and preached the word of the Lord.

Do ANYONE notice ANY of the Catholic present day REQUIREMENTS in it??

97 posted on 04/28/2016 3:19:53 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Monsignor Pope got up to Acts 14.

Perhaps in your next installment he'll address Acts 15!

98 posted on 04/28/2016 3:21:45 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Yer not ‘sposed to notice!


99 posted on 04/28/2016 3:22:49 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM
Ah the protestors again! Perhaps they only accept the Bad news!

Ah the Catholics again! Perhaps they only accept the news that Rome says is acceptable.

100 posted on 04/28/2016 3:23:50 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 461-466 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson