Posted on 01/17/2016 6:42:01 AM PST by Salvation
In the gospel today of the wedding feast at Cana, there is a theological portrait of both Mother Mary and of prayer. Let's look at the Gospel along five lines:
I. The place that Mary has - The text says, There was a wedding at Cana in Galilee and the mother of Jesus was there. Jesus and his disciples were also invited to the wedding.
A fascinating thing about these opening verses is that Mary almost seems to dominate the scene; the presence of Jesus is mentioned secondarily. St. Thomas Aquinas notes that at Cana, Mary acts as the "go-between" in arranging a mystical marriage (Commentary on John, 98; and 2, 1, n.336, 338, and 343, 151-152). Once the marriage is arranged she steps back; her final words to us are, "Do whatever he tells you."
How many of us has Mary helped to find her Son and to find our place at the wedding feast of the Lamb? I know that it was Mary who drew me back to her Son when I had strayed.
II. The prayer that Mary makes - The text says, When the wine ran short, the mother of Jesus said to him, "They have no wine."
Notice another central role that Mary has: intercessor. She is praying for others to her Son. There are three qualities to her prayer:
Discernment -- She notices the problem, probably even before the groom and bride do. Indeed, mothers often notice the needs of their children before they do. But why didn't Jesus notice? Perhaps He did; surely, as God, He knew. But He waits for us to ask. Yes, God waits for us; He expects us to ask. In part this is respect; not all of us are ready to receive all of His gifts. This expectation that we ask is also rooted in God's teaching that we must learn to depend on Him and to take our many needs to Him. The Book of James says, You have not because You ask not (James 4:2).
Diligence -- Simply put, Mary actually prays. Rather than merely fret and be anxious, she goes directly to her Son out of love for the couple (us) and trust in her Son. She sees the need and gets right to the work of praying, of beseeching her Son.
Deference -- She does not tell Jesus what to do, says simply notes the need: "They have no wine." Mary is not directive, as if to say, "Here is my solution for this problem. Follow my plans exactly. Just sign here at the bottom of my plan for action." Rather, she simply observes the problem and places it before her Son in confidence. He knows what to do and will decide the best way to handle things.
In this way Mary models prayer for us. What wine are you lacking now? What wine do your children and grandchildren lack? Do you notice your needs and the needs of others and consistently pray? Or must things get critical for you to notice or pray? And when you pray do you go to the Lord with trust or with your own agenda?
So the Scriptures teach that Mary is the quintessential woman of prayer, a paragon of prayer. Not only does she intercede for us, she teaches us how to pray.
III. The portrait of Mary - The text says, Woman, how does this concern of yours affect me? My hour has not yet come. His mother said to the servers, "Do whatever he tells you." Notice three things about this brief dialogue:
The title of Mary -- Jesus calls her "woman." In Jewish culture this was a respectful way for a man to address a woman, but it was unheard of for a son to address his mother that way.
Hence this text stands out as unusual and signals that Jesus is speaking at a deeper level. In the Johannine texts Jesus always calls his Mother, "Woman." This is in fulfillment of Genesis 3:15, which says, I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; he shall crush your head, while you strike at his heel. And thus Jesus is saying that Mary is this woman who was prophesied.
Far from being disrespectful to Mary, Jesus is actually exalting her by saying that she is the woman who was prophesied; she is the woman from whose "seed" comes forth the Son destined to destroy the power of Satan.
In this sense Mary is also the new Eve. For Jesus also calls her "Woman" at the foot of the Cross; He is the new Adam, Mary is the new Eve, and the tree is the Cross. And thus, just as humans got into trouble by a man, a woman, and a tree, so now we get out of trouble through the same path. Adam's no is reversed by Jesus, who saves us by his yes. Eve's no is reversed by Mary's yes.
The tenacity of Mary - In Greek, Jesus' words to his mother are, τί á¼Î¼Î¿á½¶ καὶ σοί, γÏναι - ti emoi kai soi, gunai (What to me and to thee, Woman?). When this phrase appears elsewhere in the Scriptures (e.g., Gen 23:15; 1 Kings 19:20) it usually indicates some kind of tension between the interlocutors. On the surface, it would seem that Jesus is expressing resistance to the fact that His mother striving to involve Him in this matter. What makes this interpretation odd, though, is that Mary doesn't seem to interpret Jesus' response as resistance.
Perhaps there was something in the tone of voice that Jesus used, or perhaps there was a look between them that resolved the tension, and evoked Jesus' sympathy for the situation. Whatever the case, Mary stays in the conversation with Jesus and overcomes whatever tension or resistance existed. In this we surely see her tenacity.
This tenacity comports well with the tenacity she showed at other times. Though startled by the presence of the angel Gabriel, she engaged him in a respectful but pointed conversation in which she sought greater detail. Mary also hastened to visit her cousin Elizabeth, and in the dialogue that followed she proclaimed a Magnificat that was anything but a shy and retiring prayer. She joyfully acknowledged the Lord's power in her life, and all but proclaimed a revolutionary new world order.
To be tenacious means to hold fast in spite of obstacles or discouragements. However we interpret Jesus' initial resistance to Mary's concern, it is clear that Mother Mary does not give up; she expects the Lord to answer her favorably. This is made clear by her confident departure from the conversation, when she turns to the stewards with the instruction, "Do whatever he tells you."
The trust of Mary - She simply departs, telling the stewards, "Do whatever he tells you." She does not hover. She does not come back and check on the progress of things. She does not seek to control or manipulate the outcome. She simply departs and leaves it all to Jesus.
IV. The power of Mary's prayer - Whatever his initial concerns regarding Mary's request, Jesus goes to work. Now there were six stone water jars there for Jewish ceremonial washings, each holding twenty to thirty gallons. Jesus told them, "Fill the jars with water." So they filled them to the brim. Then he told them, "Draw some out now and take it to the headwaiter." So they took it. And when the headwaiter tasted the water that had become wine, without knowing where it came from--although the servers who had drawn the water knew--the headwaiter called the bridegroom and said to him, "Everyone serves good wine first, and then when people have drunk freely, an inferior one; but you have kept the good wine until now."
If we do the math, we may confidently presume that Jesus produced almost 150 gallons of the best wine. Mary's prayer and tenacity produced abundant results.
Sometimes the Lord tells us to wait so that He can grant further abundance. Scripture says, But they who wait for the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings like eagles; they shall run and not be weary; they shall walk and not faint (Isaiah 40:31).
The Catholic tradition of turning to Mary and regarding her as a special intercessor with particular power is rooted in this passage. But Mary is not merely an intercessor for us; she is also a model for us. Following her example, we should persevere in prayer and go to the Lord with confident expectation of His abundant response. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much (James 5:16).
V. The product of Mary's prayer - The text says, Jesus did this as the beginning of his signs at Cana in Galilee and so revealed his glory and his disciples began to believe in him.
At the conclusion of this gospel is the significant result that many began to believe in the Lord on account of this miracle. This is Mary's essential role with reference to Jesus, that she should lead many souls to a deeper union with her Son. And having done so, she leaves us with this instruction, "Do whatever he tells you."
Mary's role is to hold up Christ for us to see, as she did at Bethlehem for the shepherds (and later the Wise Men) and as she did for Simeon and Anna at the Temple. Her role is to point to His glory as she does here at Cana. And ultimately her role is to hold His body in her arms at the foot of the cross after He is taken down.
As a mother, Mary has a special role in the beginnings of our faith, in the infancy and childhood of our faith. The text says that many "began to believe." In Greek grammar, this phrase is an example of an inceptive aorist, often used to stress the beginning of an action or the entrance into a state. Thus Mary has a special role in helping to initiate our faith, in helping (by God's grace) to birth Christ in us. As St. Thomas Aquinas say, she is the "go-between," the great matchmaker in the mystical marriage of Christ and the soul. Having done that her final words are, "Do whatever he tells you." And while she may draw back a bit, she continues to pray for us.
Here, then, are some biblical basics about Mother Mary, from this gospel of the wedding feast at Cana.
By "biblical basics" I assume he means "allegorized the crap out of 'em."
Preach it, brother.
Just because Monsignor Pope’s interpretation doesn’t agree with many protestant’s interpretation?
Probably not. More because he’s reading way more into the text than is warranted by what the text actually says.
Protestants don’t *interpret* Scripture.
They read it and tell people what it says.
We’re not trying to change what it says, so we don’t *interpret* it so we can tell people that it means something different than what it says.
The facts about the wedding at Cana.
Mary and Jesus and His brothers were there. They ran out of wine. Mary told Jesus. Then Mary told the servants to do what Jesus told them to do. They did it. Jesus changed the water into wine.
The servants knew what happened.
It was His first recorded miracle.
His earthly ministry began shortly after that.
Simple.
All the rest of it, the reading into it of motives and speculation about what someone was doing and why is irrelevant and meaningless.
It is interesting that when I suggested a reason for the Bible to refer to ‘the sons of Alpheus’ and names James and John as brothers of Jesus, my suggestion -NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE- is rejected because it is not in the Bible yet many of the dogmas of catholiciism are not found in the Bible either! [Mary could have had a second husband and children by him if Joseph died while Mary was still of child bearing age.]
Beautiful!
No, because Tonsignor Pope's interpretation imports external ideas into the text as key to its interpretation. One would not find all that drivel in John 2 about Mary arranging a "mystical marriage" or "they have no wine" being an intercessory prayer, unless those things were already assumed to be true of Mary.
That's the problem with much allegory. The key to interpreting the allegory is external to it. Tonsignor Pope is begging the question in a big way.
Explains the utter hatred one sees directed toward Our Lady. Sad. Prayers up.
.
What is the Bible worth against the wisdom of Luther, Zwingli and Calvin...
.
Those were cousins.
LOL! I can almost hear that song from Fiddler On The Roof singing ‘Tradition’.
LOL, what about sisters? were they Catholic nuns?
“Just because Monsignor Pope’s interpretation doesn’t agree with many protestant’s interpretation?”
You used the word “interpretation”, but we are pointing out not interpretation, but the things he made up and then pretended were in the passage. That isn’t a matter of interpretation. It is adding things that are not true as eisogesis.
Not per the Greek and texts.....if read in context. For the umpteenth time there is a word for cousins and is used only once in the NT and it’s in Colossians.
The text does not say that. The Holy Spirit inspired the use of the words for *brother* and *sister* and did not use the word for cousin as He did for Elizabeth.
Strong's Concordance
http://biblehub.com/greek/80.htm
adelphos: a brother
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: adelphos
Phonetic Spelling: (ad-el-fos')
Short Definition: a brother
Definition: a brother, member of the same religious community, especially a fellow-Christian.
Here is a link to the occurrences of the Greek word *adelphos*.
http://biblehub.com/greek/80.htm
The word *sister* (adelphe) in the Greek is the same.
http://biblehub.com/greek/79.htm
The word used is *brother* not *cousin*.
It can't mean a member of the same religious community in the context in which they occur, because then that would mean every man in Israel could be identified as Jesus' brother. So that would not identify Jesus as anyone in particular's brother.
It's not going to mean *brother in Christ* as that concept was not yet in place and the Jews, who knew Jesus as a Jew and knew His brothers as Jews, would not even begin to understand the new birth and what being in Christ meant.
They didn't even understand who JESUS was, much less being a *brother in Christ*.
The only definition left then, is to mean physical brother.
And it would not be *cousin*.
The word for *relative* that is used for Elizabeth is *suggenes*, not *adelphe*.
http://biblehub.com/greek/4773.htm
Strong's Concordance
suggenes: akin, a relative
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: suggenes
Phonetic Spelling: (soong-ghen-ace')
Short Definition: akin, a relative
Definition: akin to, related; subst: fellow countryman, kinsman.
What utter hatred?
Is it utter hatred simply to stick true to what Scripture states someone and not embellish it?
Cries of *hatred* are the last resort of one losing an debate, FWIW.
.
Its “catholic on the roof” now!
The Momronism apologists who frequented FR for years like to close off discussion by calling anyone who was exposing the heresies and blasphemies in their ism. Are all cults given to that same methodology? seems to be ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.