Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds press megachurch to return $300K donated by Michigan's largest Ponzi schemer
M Live ^ | April 04, 2015 | John Agar

Posted on 04/06/2015 6:20:25 AM PDT by Gamecock

GRAND RAPIDS, MI -- As he gave generously to Resurrection Life Church in Grandville, David McQueen was fond of saying he was "blessed to be a blessing."

Trouble is, McQueen, the mastermind of a $46 million Ponzi scheme, donated others' money. By the government's tally, it was $300,000.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Borgula sought its return as part of an ongoing effort to reimburse victims, in a small way, with some of the money taken by McQueen.

The church rejected the request.

"Resurrection Life Church had no knowledge of the source of the funds, nor was it in any way complicit with this donor," The Rev. Bernard Blauwkamp, secretary of the church's Board of Elders, wrote in a letter obtained by MLive and The Grand Rapids Press.

The letter, addressed to Borgula, said elders "have read and considered the detailed information contained in your email of November 26, 2014, regarding the tithe monies and gifts given to the church by Mr. David McQueen. We were saddened to hear the news of his wrongdoing, and pray that God will work in his heart and life and bring repentance.

"We have prayerfully considered your request that the Church return all or part of this donor's gifts and tithe monies, and must respectfully decline to do so."

The U.S. Attorney's Office, the FBI and IRS are working to find assets that can be used to pay restitution. The government has already seized cash, boats, vehicles and a Florida condominium, which represent a "small fraction of the total loss," the government said in a letter to the victims.

The federal agencies have asked third parties to voluntarily contribute to pay restitution.

"For instance, the government has asked that Resurrection Life Church, which received over $300,000 in stolen funds from David McQueen in the form of donations, return the money to pay restitution," a victim-witness assistant wrote in a notice to victims.

Blauwkamp said inclusion of the church's letter in the notice was "grossly inappropriate" and unfairly singled out the church in an attempt to make it look bad.

"It's unprofessional to include that letter, like we're to blame," he said. "The guy to blame is in jail."

The church has received several calls from victims who received the emailed information via a victims' services e-mail.

Blauwkamp said the church, which opened its books to the FBI, had only minor disagreement with the figures provided by the government. He said that McQueen's donations came in a three-year period, beginning in 2006, when the church was involved in a building project.

"That was six years ago. You don't have money laying around that long. We feel for the victims. It's not like we have a pile (of money) to be distributed," he said.

The church spends its money as it comes in, providing families with food and help with utilities, aiding various agencies in the area and furthering "our Church's mission to help spread the gospel of Jesus Christ locally, nationally and around the world," Blauwkamp said.

Noting McQueen was ordered to pay $32 million in restitution, Blauwkamp wondered if others who benefited - from the dealership that sold McQueen a Land Rover, to the IRS for collecting taxes on his ill-gotten gains - would also be asked to ante up.

"What about the $31,700,000? Do they have a list of the other people that did business with him?"

Blauwkamp said the federal government "painted us in a bad light, and I believe unjustly."

McQueen joined the church in 1997 but by 1999 was no longer active. Blauwkamp didn't know him, but that's not unusual in a megachurch.

McQueen said in a biography he was "blessed to be a blessing" -- before anyone realized he was actually robbing investors. He operated perhaps the state's largest Ponzi scheme.

Borgula has called him "one of the worst kinds of financial predators. He's so arrogant he thinks he's infallible."

McQueen, 44, was sentenced to 30 years in federal prison. He is in a medium-security facility in Oxford, Wisc.

Borgula declined to comment Friday.

U.S. Attorney Patrick Miles Jr., in a statement to MLive and The Press, said: "The U.S. Attorney's Office must try to return assets stolen from innocent investors as restitution. We requested that various third parties voluntarily reimburse or return funds from David McQueen. We will continue our objective to keep victims apprised of our efforts."

Earlier, Borgula said McQueen left over 800 victims. People mortgaged houses, cashed in IRAs and handed over retirement savings.

McQueen had enlisted legitimate insurance salesmen to invest in his company. Many victims trusted their insurance agents.

McQueen was convicted in a six-week jury trial of multiple mail-fraud and money-laundering charges.

Several others were convicted, too. Trent Francke, who, like McQueen, lived in Byron Center, held the second-highest position in the organization. He took a plea deal and is serving seven years in prison after testifying against McQueen.


TOPICS: Current Events
KEYWORDS: ybpdln
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: .45 Long Colt
I agree with you. Even if not legally obligated, they should give it back. God doesn’t need stolen money. If they are really about enlarging His kingdom, they should consider what keeping the money does to their testimony. They should consider how they appear to the victims. I am certain my congregation would not keep the money and we are a tiny group of only 100-120 people. Even so, we would find a way to repay every penny.

I tend to agree with this. What would Love do? Be a Light to the world, set an example for others. There's a higher Law and purpose at work in this situation. I would give it directly to identified and verified victims, not to any government agency. And I would do it quietly, without media mention.

61 posted on 04/06/2015 10:47:14 AM PDT by Kandy Atz ("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
I think it's inappropriate to ask the church to return these funds.

However, that being said, I agree with “b”. It would certainly be a great testimony from the church to help those who lost their savings and now are in desperate straits. After all, isn't church giving meant to relieve suffering?

62 posted on 04/06/2015 1:56:11 PM PDT by HarleyD ("... letters are weighty, but his .. presence is weak, and his speech of no account.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
30 years in federal prison. He is in a medium-security facility

I thought 30 years would usually buy you a ticket to something more than medium security.

The ABA seems to agree. "Sentence Length. Unless the PSF has been waived, a male offender with more than ten years remaining to serve will be housed in at least a low security facility; a male offender with more than eighteen years remaining to serve will be housed in at least a medium security facility; a male offender with more than twenty-five years remaining to serve (including nonparolable life sentences) will be housed in a high security facility."

http://www.americanbar.org/newsletter/publications/gp_solo_magazine_home/gp_solo_magazine_index/1997_spring_bos_ellis.html

He must have spread his money wisely.

63 posted on 04/06/2015 4:57:43 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Although not directly applicable, I’d draw an analogy from the Bankruptcy Code:

Section 548(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code dealing with fraudulent transfers provides:

” (2) A transfer of a charitable contribution to a qualified religious or charitable entity or organization shall not be considered to be a transfer covered under paragraph (1)(B) in any case in which—

(A) the amount of that contribution does not exceed 15 percent of the gross annual income of the debtor for the year in which the transfer of the contribution is made; or

(B) the contribution made by a debtor exceeded the percentage amount of gross annual income specified in subparagraph (A), if the transfer was consistent with the practices of the debtor in making charitable contributions.”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/11/548


64 posted on 04/06/2015 5:13:44 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson