“Yes, and no back up for false claims, they are just right because you post them. Got it.”Got it. If you post a false claim with no back up, it is correct even if it is not true.What I post is correct because it is correct.
they were outright, indisputably, unquestionably, objectively lying.
Oh my that is just what was done to me by...oops can't say it in the RF.
you were wrong about the contents of the video so I can’t see how you watched it, but you claimed you did.
No I didn't. That comment is false, in error, wrong and inaccurate.
As usual, I will not ask you for a link to where I "claimed" I watched it.
Plus you are right even when you are wrong. Got it.
... in regard to you falsely claiming what the video was about while you claim to have watched it.
My you certainly are on a roll with all the false, error ridden, wrong and inaccurate statements about what I did or did not do!
I did NOT claim what the video was about, and I did not claim to have watched it.
If you want to see the truth, go back and read what I actually posted. Read slowly. You will see you fell for my wording so I could find out what the video was about. It worked quite well!
This bearing false witness towards me is getting old. Are you a Christian?
I have no particular interest in being polite to people who make false claims.
Well above are several of your false claims about what I posted.
So now will you not be polite to yourself?
This is also addressed to all, so if anyone out there is bored and wants to see how inaccurate vlad's reading comprehension is, just read my post he seems to have mangled in his understanding of it...
“Got it. If you post a false claim with no back up, it is correct even if it is not true.”
No, what I post is correct. It is correct because it is correct. What is true is true no matter who posts it.
“Oh my that is just what was done to me by...oops can’t say it in the RF.”
No. That was not done to you. If I cut and paste one anti-Catholic’s nonsensical statement and applied it to another anti-Catholic’s post that is a mere mistake. When someone says (as in another case) a quote did not come from a particular place when it did and he is shown this and insists, repeatedly, that it didn’t come from where it did, that is something else. And that was just once instance.
“No I didn’t. That comment is false, in error, wrong and inaccurate.”
What? Did you not say it was a South Park video (when it wasn’t)? In post 1561 you wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??” So you say it was a youtube video and you said it was a South Park video. Are you now denying that you wrote that? Seriously?
“As usual, I will not ask you for a link to where I “claimed” I watched it.”
Go back and look at #1561. I don’t see how you can deny that you wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”
“Plus you are right even when you are wrong. Got it.”
No, when I’m wrong I’m wrong - I’m just rarely wrong and almost never wrong about anything related to the religious issues discussed.
“My you certainly are on a roll with all the false, error ridden, wrong and inaccurate statements about what I did or did not do!”
Again, post # 1561: “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”
“I did NOT claim what the video was about, and I did not claim to have watched it.”
Again, post #1561: “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”
“If you want to see the truth, go back and read what I actually posted. Read slowly. You will see you fell for my wording so I could find out what the video was about. It worked quite well!”
Oh, so you’re saying you posted something that was worded in such a way that someone would believe its literal meaning when that was actually false? Is that how an honest person is supposed to act? Is that even close to Matthew 5:37?
“This bearing false witness towards me is getting old. Are you a Christian?”
Wow. What a stunning statement considering you just posted this: “You will see you fell for my wording so I could find out what the video was about. It worked quite well!”
“Well above are several of your false claims about what I posted.”
I mistakenly posted one anti-Catholic’s comment to you. But if you’re going to write statements with this basis, “you fell for my wording,” then whatever happens after I actually take you at your word is your responsibility.
“So now will you not be polite to yourself?”
I’m tougher on myself than anyone else. The difference is I never word something with this as its basis: “you fell for my wording”.
“This is also addressed to all, so if anyone out there is bored and wants to see how inaccurate vlad’s reading comprehension is, just read my post he seems to have mangled in his understanding of it...”
There’s nothing wrong with my reading comprehension. I took you at your word and I bet many here - even the anti-Catholics - would agree. You wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”
“To Protestantism False Witness is the principle of propagation.” (John Henry Newman, Lecture 4. True Testimony Insufficient for the Protestant View)