Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Syncro

“Got it. If you post a false claim with no back up, it is correct even if it is not true.”

No, what I post is correct. It is correct because it is correct. What is true is true no matter who posts it.

“Oh my that is just what was done to me by...oops can’t say it in the RF.”

No. That was not done to you. If I cut and paste one anti-Catholic’s nonsensical statement and applied it to another anti-Catholic’s post that is a mere mistake. When someone says (as in another case) a quote did not come from a particular place when it did and he is shown this and insists, repeatedly, that it didn’t come from where it did, that is something else. And that was just once instance.

“No I didn’t. That comment is false, in error, wrong and inaccurate.”

What? Did you not say it was a South Park video (when it wasn’t)? In post 1561 you wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??” So you say it was a youtube video and you said it was a South Park video. Are you now denying that you wrote that? Seriously?

“As usual, I will not ask you for a link to where I “claimed” I watched it.”

Go back and look at #1561. I don’t see how you can deny that you wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”

“Plus you are right even when you are wrong. Got it.”

No, when I’m wrong I’m wrong - I’m just rarely wrong and almost never wrong about anything related to the religious issues discussed.

“My you certainly are on a roll with all the false, error ridden, wrong and inaccurate statements about what I did or did not do!”

Again, post # 1561: “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”

“I did NOT claim what the video was about, and I did not claim to have watched it.”

Again, post #1561: “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”

“If you want to see the truth, go back and read what I actually posted. Read slowly. You will see you fell for my wording so I could find out what the video was about. It worked quite well!”

Oh, so you’re saying you posted something that was worded in such a way that someone would believe its literal meaning when that was actually false? Is that how an honest person is supposed to act? Is that even close to Matthew 5:37?

“This bearing false witness towards me is getting old. Are you a Christian?”

Wow. What a stunning statement considering you just posted this: “You will see you fell for my wording so I could find out what the video was about. It worked quite well!”

“Well above are several of your false claims about what I posted.”

I mistakenly posted one anti-Catholic’s comment to you. But if you’re going to write statements with this basis, “you fell for my wording,” then whatever happens after I actually take you at your word is your responsibility.

“So now will you not be polite to yourself?”

I’m tougher on myself than anyone else. The difference is I never word something with this as its basis: “you fell for my wording”.

“This is also addressed to all, so if anyone out there is bored and wants to see how inaccurate vlad’s reading comprehension is, just read my post he seems to have mangled in his understanding of it...”

There’s nothing wrong with my reading comprehension. I took you at your word and I bet many here - even the anti-Catholics - would agree. You wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”

“To Protestantism False Witness is the principle of propagation.” (John Henry Newman, Lecture 4. True Testimony Insufficient for the Protestant View)


1,700 posted on 12/14/2014 6:51:41 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1628 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
**Sigh**

What? Did you not say it was a South Park video (when it wasn’t)?

[No, of course I didn't.]

In post 1561 you wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??” So you say it was a youtube video and you said it was a South Park video. Are you now denying that you wrote that? Seriously?

"“Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”

See the question marks? It was a QUESTION, not a claim. Noticing your apparent propensity for obtuse absurdity, I just took a guess and asked you a question.

Go back and look at #1561. I don’t see how you can deny that you wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”
See how I asked you a question, no making a claim there. I don't deny what I wrote, note your seemingly lack of reading comprehension.
“Plus you are right even when you are wrong. Got it.”

No, when I’m wrong I’m wrong

As in this case. You are wrong.

Again, post # 1561: “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”

Redundant, already shown to be "misunderstood." Giving you the benefit of the doubt...

“I did NOT claim what the video was about, and I did not claim to have watched it.”

Again, post #1561: “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”

Redundant X 2, explained already.

Oh, so you’re saying you posted something that was worded in such a way that someone would believe its literal meaning when that was actually false?
Nope. It wasn't false, it was a question as any rational intelligent individual could see quite easily. I think the clue was the question mark at the end.

So it's literal meaning is that it was a question.

There’s nothing wrong with my reading comprehension. I took you at your word and I bet many here - even the anti-Catholics - would agree. You wrote, “Debate via youtube?...Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”
Well let's see if anyone else doesn't know what a question mark means.

From seeing the nature of your posts, it was simple to guess that you were attempting to debate with a South Park video.

Bad guess, and I still did not watch the link you provided to apparently a Tom Hanks clip.

Go ahead and use Newman's take on False Witness, I prefer the Biblical take.

From Exodus:

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

You shall not raise a false report: put not your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.

And Proverbs 19:9

A false witness shall not be unpunished , and he that speaketh lies shall perish.

P.S. Five times you post the same quote from me, and 5 times I patiently showed you how to properly understand it.

And I wish to thank you for referencing the post # for documentation. That was very gracious of you and I thank you.

It vindicates this poster.

1,829 posted on 12/14/2014 2:25:44 PM PST by Syncro (Benghazi-LIES/CoverupIRS-LIES/CoverupDOJ-NO Justice--Etc Marxist Treason IMPEACH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1700 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson