Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did St. Jerome's Vulgate (containing the Masoretic Text) provide correct quotes for the NT?
9/22/2014 | Laissez-Faire Capitalist

Posted on 09/22/2014 8:25:59 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Jerome's Vulgate was the first translation of the Old Testament into Latin --- directly from the Masoretic Text.

Given that, was Jerome's Version, the Vulgate, inspired by God if Jesus did not quote from the Masoretic Text?

If Jesus Christ did not quote from the Masoretic Text, what authoritative power(s) could the original Vulgate have contained, and what authentic inspiration did Jerome possess at that time of his translation?

At the time its translation the Vulgate was considered to be authoritative, but how correct were any at this time to declare the Vulgate to be authoritative and/or inspired? If it was not considered to be either authoritative or inspired, then why was it given undue prominence at that time?


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; History; Judaism; Orthodox Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: bible; catholic; codexalexandrinus; codexsinaiticus; evangelical; masora; masorah; masoretictext; newtestament; oldtestament; orthodox; uncials
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Fester Chugabrew

One need not be lacking to any extent to proffer this question (which I again shall proffer in another way):

Looking back to times past, we have the luxury of hindsight, but at the time Jerome originally translated the Masoretic Text into Latin, he erroneously provided an inclusion into his work -— a work that was written around 3 1/2 to 4 centuries after Christ walked the face of the Earth.

Ergo, then (as now, too) they should not have said to any extent that Jerome’s Vulgate was the authoritative, correct Translation to go by.

And yet people keep saying this and acting like they have got it all “down-pat”. And this tendency to do so has occurred and is still occurring now for over two thousand years (and that is just for the NT!)


21 posted on 09/22/2014 9:58:53 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

Bingo! I noticed that right away too. Some deep confusion there.


22 posted on 09/22/2014 10:00:26 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

What do you think was first written 3.5-4 centuries after Christ that was “erroneously” used by Jerome?


23 posted on 09/22/2014 10:00:37 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Where did you get the idea that the Masoretic Text was a translation? Give me an authority for this statement, please.


24 posted on 09/22/2014 10:04:54 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

No it does not date to at least 500 years after Jerome.

It received prominence in the 7th to 10th century AD, but even the proto-Masoretic text date back to at least 150 B.C. with some arguing a date before that.

I WILL provide the quote (I have to look for it) from a professor at a Jesuit university, who himself said that Jerome used the 4th century Masoretic Text. This professor said that it was in use during the 4th century, and he isn’t the only one, either.


25 posted on 09/22/2014 10:05:00 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer
Bingo! I noticed that right away too. Some deep confusion there.

And, it is interesting to note (IIRC), the Apocryphal books were sourced elsewhere by Jerome...

26 posted on 09/22/2014 10:05:11 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

false.


27 posted on 09/22/2014 10:05:24 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

This is the second post I’ve personally seen you write on the subject in question.

What gives? What are you getting at, exactly? What are you trying to convince people of, or dissuade them from?


28 posted on 09/22/2014 10:06:19 AM PDT by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
What do you think was first written 3.5-4 centuries after Christ that was “erroneously” used by Jerome?

false.

What? Please answer my question.

29 posted on 09/22/2014 10:07:13 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Jesus quoted from memory.............

Although He, as Jehovah, did cause Moses to write down His Words, it was to that written Word that He referred to in reproving Satan, thus authorizing its standing alone as irrefutable and eternal. Mt. 4:4 in Gk, "It is written" is in the perfect tense, not "It was written." Most certainly Jesus did quote from memory, of what He had caused to be written. He also referred to the Word as the "hrema" the spoken word, as having come out of the mouth of God (that is, of His Own mouth), IIRC.

30 posted on 09/22/2014 10:21:10 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
No it does not date to at least 500 years after Jerome.

Note that I said extant.

It received prominence in the 7th to 10th century AD [...]

Another neat trick, since the Masoretes (largely Karaite Jews, of largely two schools, ben Nephtali and ben Asher) are not found before c.600/650 CE (again, IIRC). So your thought of a deep history of the Masoretes is not accurate. Rather, they, once formed, carried on the accuracy of transmission that the Jews have always declared.

[...] but even the proto-Masoretic text date back to at least 150 B.C. with some arguing a date before that.

That is quite defensible.

I WILL provide the quote (I have to look for it) from a professor at a Jesuit university, who himself said that Jerome used the 4th century Masoretic Text. This professor said that it was in use during the 4th century, and he isn’t the only one, either.

I think where you and I are cross-threaded is in the use of 'Masoretic'. - It has long been known that the Masoretic text(s) contain the majority Jewish tradition - That is, the Jews will agree that the Masoretic text is the closest to historically accurate. And I have no argument with that. But the Masoretes themselves do not date that far back, albeit that they did their work properly. Hence, proto-Masoretic v. Masoretic.

31 posted on 09/22/2014 10:23:02 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

By “enclision” do you mean a book or two? This would have to do with formation of the canon, over which there has been, and still is, much dispute.


32 posted on 09/22/2014 10:25:16 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

Matthew 5:18
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.


33 posted on 09/22/2014 10:33:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
As such, he may have made a mistake or two, here and there.

This is where you've gone way, way wrong. Jesus was completely, but perfectly human, and also fully Deity in substance. He was never, ever wrong. In any matter. And by this statement you have reviled His Nature and Name almost inexcusably.

34 posted on 09/22/2014 10:33:45 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

I was speaking of Jerome, not Jesus.......................


35 posted on 09/22/2014 10:37:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
God inspired the original authors of the book of the Bible.

Wrong. It is the writings that were and are inspired (= God-breathed), not the writers. The writers were not the authors. The Holy Spirit was the author of the Scriptures at the time they were written.

The substance was recorded in the personal mode (sometimes using an amanuensis), style, and language utilized by the writer, as directed by the Holy Ghost.

36 posted on 09/22/2014 10:48:41 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Jerome's Vulgate was the first translation of the Old Testament into Latin --- directly from the Masoretic Text.

The Vulgate was not the first translation into Latin. And it was not from Masoretic Text.

At the time its translation the Vulgate was considered to be authoritative,

The New Testament thought it was perfectly fine to make use of a then current translation of the OT (the Septuagent), and it is authoritative. I'm not sure what your point is.

37 posted on 09/22/2014 10:49:29 AM PDT by Lee N. Field ("And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" Gal 3:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
If the Masoretic Text is a translated work (and it is) that appeared around the 4th century, (barring any earlier Masoretic Text that preceded it yet did not survive at the time Jerome’s Vulgate was completed), how could Jesus have quoted from it?

Do you know what the Masoretic Text is?

38 posted on 09/22/2014 10:50:22 AM PDT by Lee N. Field ("And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" Gal 3:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Sewing doubt still ... so obvious for whom you are striving.


39 posted on 09/22/2014 10:50:36 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

No, I am afraid you are wrong. I am, of course, not saying that the authors of Scripture were inspired in all of their writings. When they wrote a grocery list or a love poem, they weren’t inspired.

But neither were they passive vessels of an overtaking Spirit.

God inspired the authors to write His Word.


40 posted on 09/22/2014 10:57:30 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson