[Salvation]

They were cousins. Read your footnotes and stop believing what someone tells you. There was no Aramaic word for cousin, so the word ‘brother’ was used.

[CraigEsq]

But the New Testament was written in Greek... where there IS a word for cousin...

[Iscool]

They were cousins. Read your footnotes and stop believing what someone tells you. There was no Aramaic word for cousin, so the word ‘brother’ was used.

Forget footnotes...Who cares about footnotes???' They were brothers and sisters just as the bible says...

[roamer_1]

They were cousins. Read your footnotes and stop believing what someone tells you.

ROTFLMAO!!!! Do you see what you did there? LOL!

There was no Aramaic word for cousin, so the word ‘brother’ was used.

That is not true... and besides, they spoke Hebrew.

[boatbums]

Read your footnotes and stop believing what someone tells you.

LOL! What do you think footnotes are? Something "someone" is telling you about the passage.

[The_Republic_Of_Maine]

I’m sorry, but I am convinced it is translated correctly. But, let me ask, why are you so adamant that it is cousins and not brethren?

[bkaycee]

They were cousins. Read your footnotes and stop believing what someone tells you. There was no Aramaic word for cousin, so the word ‘brother’ was used.

Messianic verse
Psalm 69:7
7 For I endure scorn for your sake, and shame covers my face.
8 I am a foreigner to my own family, a stranger to my own mother’s children;,
9 for zeal for your house consumes me,

[Elsie]

Read your footnotes and stop believing what someone tells you.

You guys gots FOOTNOTES??

The MORMONs have links!!!