Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,541-1,5601,561-1,5801,581-1,600 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: Heart-Rest; .45 Long Colt
>>Again, they cannot do that. An infallible teaching of the Church will never contradict a previous infallible teaching of the Church.<<

Must a person be subject to the authority of the pope to be saved?

1,561 posted on 07/21/2013 2:11:19 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1545 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

“I agree with you again. We can do nothing without His grace, but with it, everything is possible. And lives that honor God will be evident by their fruits. ;-)”

+1

“...the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.” (Galatians 5:22)

“May God bless you and yours aMorePerfectUnion...and may He bring all Christians to unity and ONENESS...as He and the Father are ONE.”

Back at you SumProVita!


1,562 posted on 07/21/2013 2:20:09 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacituss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1556 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest
Like I told you daniel1212, the source you used is from a dissident Jesuit priest (Father Felix) who is strongly against many of the teachings of the Catholic Church. (Please read it again.)

. First, i did read it, and what is says is "we advise users to be cautious with the links and course material, which may be unorthodox." This utterly fails to prove he is fabricating his figures.

You are guilty of the genesis fallacy, which holds that if the source is suspect, all that it says must be wrong - or wrong when you find it impugns your vision of Rome.

And again, please remember, if you get all puffed up about your self-professed superior familiarity with the (sinfully truncated) Bible,

This ignores what i wrote, and if this is the manner of argumentation you must resort to then you had best quit before you lose even more credibility. Rome is the one who engages in self-professed superiority.

You also make outlandish claims about what most Evangelicals do, and about what most Catholics do.

Prove it. It is i who provide substantiation .

Do you see these kinds of grand pronouncements which you often make, but which you have no real way of knowing or checking the veracity of, as anything but extremely dishonest, and spurrious pronouncements?

Translated, faced with the testimony which impugns Rome, from many recognized sources, you must resort to simply dismissing them as extremely dishonest, and spurious.

You also try to equate the non-unity of personal beliefs and practices with diunity in the teachings of the Catholic Church. There is really only ONE set of real, true, official Catholic teachings. Not so, but the disagreements RCs can engage in extend to what Rc teachings mean. Now suppose you tell me if the CCC is an infallible document, and if the Imprimatur and Nihil Obstat gives assurance a teaching is valid, and your understanding Lumen Gentium (how do you worship the same god as Islam, and can properly baptized Prots be saved without repenting from basic common Prot teaching. And provide a list of which of the 3 (or 4) levels of the magisterium each RC teaching falls into? Or at least a list of all infallible teachings, and if and how much dissent a RC can engage in regarding non-infallible teachings.

How individual Catholics relate to those official teachings is merely a reflection of their own choices, but does NOT reflect disunity in the Catholic teachings themselves. However, the Protestant denominations DO have major, irreconcilable differences in their actual, true, official teachings.

That is misleading, as for an RC, irreconcilable differences is defined by her, and popes can sanction torture in one century and another state it is intrinsically evil, and another can state formal submission to the pope is necessary for salvation, and another contradictions. See here .

1,563 posted on 07/21/2013 2:21:19 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

placemarker


1,564 posted on 07/21/2013 2:29:11 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacituss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1563 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
It's clear that you reject the authority of the Catholic Church to do so, so we need an alternative. What is that authority?

No, it's not WHAT it's WHO is that authority. Simple answer...GOD. Do you seriously think that He went to all the trouble to verbally inspired the writers of Scripture over thousands of years, ensuring that His word was established forever, and then leave it up to fallible, sinful men to decide what was and wasn't God's word? Here's what we are to consider about the sacred Scriptures:

    The secret things belong to the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong to us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law. (Deuteronomy 29:29)

People of God received the word of God because it WAS the word of God. He didn't need our permission to preserve and protect it. Almighty God through Paul told the Corinthians:

    Now some are puffed up, as though I would not come to you. But I will come to you shortly, if the Lord will, and will know, not the speech of them which are puffed up, but the power. For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power.(I Cor. 4:18-20)

Those who speak the words of God have the power of God behind them. The gospel is the power of God unto salvation to all who believe.

1,565 posted on 07/21/2013 2:43:35 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1502 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
It's clear that you reject the authority of the Catholic Church to do so, so we need an alternative. What is that authority?

No, it's not WHAT it's WHO is that authority. Simple answer...GOD. Do you seriously think that He went to all the trouble to verbally inspired the writers of Scripture over thousands of years, ensuring that His word was established forever, and then leave it up to fallible, sinful men to decide what was and wasn't God's word? Here's what we are to consider about the sacred Scriptures:

    The secret things belong to the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong to us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law. (Deuteronomy 29:29)

People of God received the word of God because it WAS the word of God. He didn't need our permission to preserve and protect it. Almighty God through Paul told the Corinthians:

    Now some are puffed up, as though I would not come to you. But I will come to you shortly, if the Lord will, and will know, not the speech of them which are puffed up, but the power. For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power.(I Cor. 4:18-20)

Those who speak the words of God have the power of God behind them. The gospel is the power of God unto salvation to all who believe.

1,566 posted on 07/21/2013 2:43:55 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1502 | View Replies]

To: metmom; daniel1212
In essence, non-Catholics are being criticized and condemned for not going far enough even though what they reject was never recognized as Scripture by the Jews.

Not only that but I have asked Catholics here repeatedly what those books contain that makes them SO sure they are Divinely revealed and sacred Scripture. No replies. Do any of these books contain distinct and unique prophecies that Christians NEED to know about? Are there commandments of God not found anywhere else that Christians MUST obey to be Godly men and women? Just what is in these books that convinces a Catholic that they deserve the same recognition of authority as, say, Deuteronomy or Romans? I have yet to hear any answer other than "it's what we believe" and that's not good enough. It wasn't good enough for the Jews, unto whom were given the "Oracles of God", when these books were appended to the Old Testament. Shouldn't we at least honor something they contributed to our Judeo-Christian heritage?

1,567 posted on 07/21/2013 2:53:33 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1506 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
No, it's not WHAT it's WHO is that authority.

So which canon of Scripture did God give us?

I contend that the canon of Scripture that God gave us is the Catholic Bible. God's infallible Church ("the pillar and foundation of truth") tells us so.

You contend that the abridged, Protestant canon of Scripture, is the Bible that God gave us. Your infallible authority for canonicity is... what?

1,568 posted on 07/21/2013 2:55:32 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1566 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
I contend that the canon of Scripture that God gave us is the Catholic Bible. God's infallible Church ("the pillar and foundation of truth") tells us so.

And just what gives the Catholic church that authority?

Can you do that without circular argumentation?

1,569 posted on 07/21/2013 3:04:41 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1568 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

LOL!


1,570 posted on 07/21/2013 3:04:57 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1516 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas; boatbums; CynicalBear; Iscool; count-your-change
I contend that the canon of Scripture that God gave us is the Catholic Bible.

And you are free to do so but what doesn't work is to pretend that the Apocrypha was always considered Scripture or that it was considered Scripture by the Jews.

bb asks a good question.

Also, what about the books in the Apocrypha which contain that which has been shows to be in error?

That would mean that the Catholic church recognizes error as Scripture.

How does one reconcile that in their mind?

1,571 posted on 07/21/2013 3:08:43 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1568 | View Replies]

To: metmom

In light of all of those quotes, paragraph 841 of the catechism with regard to Muslims is interesting.

#841 “The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P29.HTM


1,572 posted on 07/21/2013 3:11:20 PM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1557 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Still no answer from any Protestant regarding the authority that acted infallibly in determining the canon of Scripture.

Likewise:


Still no answer from any Catholic regarding the authority that acted infallibly in determining the canon of OLD TESTEMENT Scripture.

1,573 posted on 07/21/2013 3:15:23 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1520 | View Replies]

To: metmom
>>How does one reconcile that in their mind?<<

One doesn’t if one is truly saved and filled with the Holy Spirit.

1,574 posted on 07/21/2013 3:16:34 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1571 | View Replies]

To: verga
Actually what it shows is cowardice on the part of a certain protestant. Not mentioning anyone in particular or quoting them. But she know who she is. OOOooooh!

The Nameless Coward!!

1,575 posted on 07/21/2013 3:16:41 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1528 | View Replies]

To: verga
Actually what it shows is cowardice on the part of a certain protestant. Not mentioning anyone in particular or quoting them. But she know who she is.


...“He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.”

And again He stooped down and wrote on the ground. Then those who heard it, being convicted by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the oldest even to the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

When Jesus had raised Himself up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, “Woman, where are those accusers of yours?

1,576 posted on 07/21/2013 3:19:27 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1528 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

Yup. Muslims get a pass that Protestants don’t.


1,577 posted on 07/21/2013 3:20:28 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1572 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest
What contradictions to earlier Church teachings do you claim you see in the Counter-Reformation?

Please show the world just WHY the counter reformation took place; THEN we can get down to the nitty-gritty of WHAT took place.

1,578 posted on 07/21/2013 3:21:51 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1541 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest
Didn't many people ignore and scorn the sacred teachings directly from Jesus Christ, and didn't they also mock Him about those sacred teachings?

Some did - some didn't.


 

John 6:28-29

Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”

Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”



1,579 posted on 07/21/2013 3:24:34 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1547 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Which Bible? Can you tell me, infallibly?

What about you? Can YOU tell us infallibly?

Of course not. Christ's Church alone can.

_________________________________________________

Let me try to speed this up a bit, rather than repeating the same points endlessly.

The next logical question is, How do we know that the Catholic Church is infallible?

The Bible tells us so. The Bible calls the Catholic Church, "the pillar and foundation of truth."

But, up to this point, I have created a circular argument.

There is a way out. I can begin my argument by simply considering the Bible as a historical document.

Even non-Christians can agree that the Bible is the best attested-to historical document of its era. If we begin by treating the New Testament as a historical document, we notice that Christ claimed divinity, claimed to establish a Church, and that He made several predictions, including the prediction that the "gates of hell" would not prevail against His Church.

Simply by examining history, we see in the Catholic Church an unparalleled earthly institution, in terms of organization and continuity of leadership. Moreover, the Church possesses an unparalleled, non-contradictory body of teaching, in keeping with It being "the pillar and foundation of truth."

Additionally, countless public miracles are associated with this same Church, including extant, persistent, public miracles, that can be subjected to scientific examination (Tilma of Juan Diego, Shroud of Turin, Eucharistic Mircacle of Lanciano).

These facts, and this simple argument, demonstrate, with extreme probability, that the Catholic Church is of divine origin.

This confirms Christ's prophecy, and thus, His divinity as well, again with extreme probability.

Since we now know, again, with high probability, that Christ is Who He claimed to be, and that the Catholic Church is His Church, we can be sure that the Catholic Church has the authority to determine the canon of Scripture.

Proving Inspiration

And your alternative authority is... who? King James? Martin Luther?

1,580 posted on 07/21/2013 3:25:13 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1534 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,541-1,5601,561-1,5801,581-1,600 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson