Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Reason Benedict Resigned
CE.com ^ | February 15, 2013 | William Fahey

Posted on 02/17/2013 7:06:13 PM PST by Salvation

The Reason Benedict Resigned

William Fahey

by William Fahey on February 15, 2013 · 

The Catholic world is largely shocked by the publication of Pope Benedict XVI’s letter of resignation this morning.  The secular world assumes the worst—no, it desires the worst, and by insinuation worms doubts into the minds of even the faithful.

The secular world will tear through the brief letter and fixate upon the line about a “world, subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by questions of deep relevance for the life of faith.”  It will weave from these deconstructed words an existential tale of despair, scandal, and an authority which realizes it is no longer in touch with reality.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Benedict’s resignation is utterly consistent with his character.  It is traditional—he brings from our history and our law a fact and feature of the Papal Office: one can and—under certain circumstance—should put aside that office.

His resignation demonstrates once again the firm mark of a father and a teacher.   A father knows that his role is to provide example, instruction, and discipline, and ultimately put himself aside for the good of his own. The Petrine ministry is not exercised for a man, or for bishops and priests, or even for Catholics alone.  It is a ministry exercised for all those seeking God and for all those towards whom God’s mercy is extended.  It is a demanding office.

As with every text published by Benedict, this letter of resignation has no imbalance, flab, impression, or vagueness.  Not a word goes astray.  It is shot through with paternal love and professorial clarity.

An honest reading of this document can only lead to profound gratitude and sympathy for a suffering father who must understand each act and decision he makes as having “great importance for the life the Church.”

No one could doubt that this Holy Father has meditated profoundly, and I expect repeatedly, on The Pastoral Rule of St. Gregory the Great—that sixth-century handbook for those who hold the highest spiritual authority, what Benedict and others have called the ars artium (“the art of arts”).  Much of the book is a warning against the wrong reasons for grasping or holding on to power, followed by an outline of the virtues needed to exercise leadership well.  In the first book of The Pastoral Rule we find this line, which I believe has quietly echoed for some weeks in the Holy Father’s thoughts:  “He must be a man whose aims are not thwarted by the frailty of his body.”  The office of Peter is not a spiritual thing which discounts human nature.  That sacred ministry resides with a person, but that person must have the nature to exercise its rigors.

Benedict XVI has marked his pontificate by humility.  If anything, he has tried to depersonalize the use of authority, even that uniquely personal authority, the Petrine Office.  Yet we must always remember that the “person” of the Papal ministry is St. Peter, who with his successors acts in the person of Christ.  The papacy is a lived authority and a living authority and one that must respond to the needs of the Age.  It is natural that we love the concrete that we know, and love the particular character of our popes.  And we must do our best to accept that like a humble and adored teacher, Benedict now forces on his students a hard lesson: that the teacher should never be the focus of our final attention and love.

Our age has become overly focused on a model of “leadership” which is nothing short of superficial, for whom the shallow gilt of charisma and “personality” have blinded everyone to questions of duty and responsibility.  Benedict’s resignation teaches us once again that leadership—while exercised by a person—is not about that person. Benedict has set before our eyes the old Roman sense of officium—duty, office, responsibility.  Benedict’s embrace of the Petrine office has always been a reluctant one, and that reluctance is born of clear self-knowledge and deep understanding of the history and purpose of papal authority.

The following words are taken from one of the Holy Father’s General Audience in 2008.  He spoke on St. Gregory the Great and his reluctance to sit on the throne of St. Peter, reluctance that gave way to grace, prayer, and action:

Recognizing the will of God in what had happened, the new Pontiff immediately and enthusiastically set to work. From the beginning he showed a singular enlightened vision of the reality with which he had to deal, an extra-ordinary capacity for work confronting both ecclesial and civil affairs, a constant and even balance in making decisions, at times with courage, imposed on him by his office.

These are not words set down in a theoretical fashion. They rise from the Holy Father’s lips with experience behind them.

More moving are Benedict’s closing words from the following day’s audience.  Again, speaking on St. Gregory and his lonely pontificate, he ends:

Gregory remained a simple monk in his heart and therefore was decidedly opposed to great titles.  He wanted to be—and this is his expression—servus servorum Dei. Coined by him, this phrase was not just a pious formula on his lips but a true manifestation of his way of living and acting. He was intimately struck by the humility of God, who in Christ made himself our servant. He washed and washes our dirty feet. Therefore, he was convinced that a Bishop, above all, should imitate this humility of God and follow Christ in this way.  His desire was to live truly as a monk, in permanent contact with the Word of God, but for love of God he knew how to make himself the servant of all in a time full of tribulation and suffering. He knew how to make himself the “servant of the servants.”  Precisely because he was this, he is great and also shows us the measure of true greatness.

The Holy Father’s reasons for resignation spring from a grave sense of office and a faithful belief in what that office truly is. He has remained through his pontificate faithful and true to his vocation of father and teacher. Both father and teacher must daily put aside themselves to be true to their calling.

The papacy is not a mere person, it is not a great man, it is certainly not a bloodline or earthly principality. It is the ministry of the Bishop of Rome, Successor of St. Peter. It is a sacred office entrusted to the entire Church. It is an enduring stewardship through time.  Behind the Vicar stand the Kingship of Christ and the enduring nature of His Church, yesterday, today, and forever.

By the grace of the Holy Spirit, Pope Benedict XVI has resigned. His Holiness has resigned because he understands his office and he wishes with firm resolve to help us to understand this and deepen our faith by remembering him for what he is and by lifting up our hearts and minds to the eternal Father and His Son, Our Supreme Pastor and Lord, Jesus Christ.

 

This article was originally published  at Crisis.



TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; popebenedictxvi; poperesigns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: highpockets

You just looking for an out?...


21 posted on 02/17/2013 8:39:49 PM PST by oust the louse (You need your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: livius

Great response.


22 posted on 02/17/2013 8:40:11 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; Salvation; highpockets; marshmallow
I am shocked and saddened by the Pope stepping down. Non-Catholics have complained in the past that the Pope was "too old" and should call it quits. For years I told non-Catholics that a Catholic Pope would NEVER "retire", and this week I have egg on my face. I'm at a loss to explain it. The Catholic Church has always valued church tradition and precedent and abides by it.

While it's true that Pope have resigned in the past, and there's no question whether it's possible for a Pope to step down (probably at least 5 or 6 have done) -- there is NO record of ANY Pope -- in the 2000 year history of the church, stepping down because of advanced age or fatigue. It's simply NOT done. (For similar reasons, the Queen of England, who is older than Benedict XVI, will never "retire" and will remain in office until she dies)

The last Pope to resign did so 600 years ago, and that was because there was a major crisis in the church and he needed to do so in order to end a schism and have a new Pope elected that all the warring factions would accept.

The Papacy is considered a lifetime job for the obvious reason that it would create a serious problem in the church if the "former" Pope and the "current" Pope were alive simultaneously and made conflicting statements about a current issue. I believe that's partially the reason the last Pope who stepped down because a voluntary prisoner of the Vatican and never made public appearances after stepping down. The Pope physically deteriorating or becoming very old and slow to respond has never been grounds for a Pope to "leave office". John Paul II suffered from advanced stages of Parkinson's and was in much worse physical shape than Benedict XVI towards the end of his reign, and never "retired" despite repeated calls from the secular media to do so. One pope in the 1700s continued to reign even though he was physically bedridden and blind for the last 10 years of his papacy.

If the Pope had suffered an extreme medical condition that left him completed unable to function (say a major stroke), THAT might be grounds to break with tradition and have him resign because the office would be defacto vacant as long as he remained alive, but that hasn't happened in this case. Benedict XVI's mind is fully functional, he is not an invalid, and has not been diagnosed with dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, etc., and there is claim from the Vatican or speculation that he's "dying" (and if he was "dying", he wouldn't resign but would rather inform the Cardinals of the situations so they could stand by to arrange a conclave once he did pass away). The only statement from the Vatican is he feels too old and fatigued to carry on.

I think this sets a very bad precedent for future Popes, if they can just "retire" because they're past 65 and feel tired, future Popes could treat the "job" the same they would a secular institution.

23 posted on 02/17/2013 8:47:04 PM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

There’s a disease that eats away at one’s body. A person at our church had it. He was fine and could walk. Next time I saw him he was on crutches.

Then he was using a walker and eventually ended up in a wheelchair before his body was totally riddled by this disease.

Could something like this be happening. If I remember correctly, this disease eats away at either the muscles or the nerves.

As I said above, the tailors were having a difficult time downsizing his vestments and keeping up with his loss of weight.

Puzzling.

Anyone know what it is called?


24 posted on 02/17/2013 8:55:06 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: highpockets

As far as I can tell he was the 5th oldest Pope at his election in 2005, the fourth oldest one was elected in 1730. If he passed today he would be the fourth oldest Pope ever. Out of 265.

Freegards


26 posted on 02/17/2013 9:00:54 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I stand by my statement: The Pope physically deteriorating has NEVER been grounds for a Pope to "leave office".

Why the Pope certainly CAN leave step down, stepping down under these circumstances is a huge break with the 2000 tradition of the Catholic Church and the understanding that the papacy is a lifetime job in all but the most extreme of circumstances. Many Popes is far worst physical shape than Benedict XVI continued to reign.

27 posted on 02/17/2013 9:03:43 PM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: highpockets

The Pope has that much influence on your faith?

That’s like saying you won’t use a product you’ve used for 50 years, because the current CEO left before his contract was up.

The product is the same.

Your local Bishop has more say about what goes on in your church than the guy in Rome.


28 posted on 02/17/2013 9:03:48 PM PST by Vermont Lt (Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anybody really care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I stand by my statement: The Pope physically deteriorating has NEVER been grounds for a Pope to "leave office".

While the Pope certainly CAN leave step down, stepping down under these circumstances is a huge break with the 2000 year old tradition of the Catholic Church and the understanding that the papacy is a lifetime job in all but the most extreme of circumstances. Many Popes is far worse physical shape than Benedict XVI continued to reign.

29 posted on 02/17/2013 9:05:27 PM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

I’m not arguing with you. I just think there is a lot we don’t know.


30 posted on 02/17/2013 9:07:05 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ; Salvation; highpockets
It was a selfLESS decision, not a selfish one.

I totally agree, SuziQ...

31 posted on 02/17/2013 9:07:44 PM PST by nutmeg (Who and WHERE are the Benghazi survivors??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I agree. I think there is more to this story behind the scenes. I am troubled by Catholics who are so casual to applaud the Pope’s resignation and dismiss it as “oh well, he was getting older, let him enjoy his retirement”. Tradition should not be taken lightly in the Catholic Church and dismissed on a whim.


32 posted on 02/17/2013 9:11:45 PM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: highpockets

((((Hugs))))Easy to say but look to The eternal Christ.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/17/us-pope-resignation-appearance-idUSBRE91G04J20130217”Peter Seewald, a German journalist who wrote a book with the pope in 2010 in which Benedict first floated the possibility of resigning, visited him again about 10 weeks ago.

“His hearing had deteriorated. He couldn’t see with his left eye. His body had become so thin that the tailors had difficulty in keeping up with newly fitted clothes ... I’d never seen him so exhausted-looking, so worn down,” Seewald said.”


33 posted on 02/17/2013 9:21:01 PM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AU72

((((Hugs))))


34 posted on 02/17/2013 9:27:16 PM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Your right BillyBoy,
but he said he was under spiritual attack too and asking for our prayers.
“The pope has said his physical and spiritual forces are no longer strong enough to sustain him in the job of leading the world’s 1.2 billion Roman Catholics at a time of crisis for the Church in a fast-changing world.”
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/17/us-pope-resignation-appearance-idUSBRE91G04J20130217


35 posted on 02/17/2013 9:38:07 PM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
The Pope physically deteriorating has NEVER been grounds for a Pope to "leave office".

There is no written rule about the length of a Pope's term in the office. That most of the Popes in history have stayed in the office until their deaths doesn't mean that is the requirement for everyone who serves. The Pope is not the Church, he is simply the servant who happens to be the head of the world's Catholics. Pope Benedict realized that his health was failing and that being the leader would require much more strength than he had, and staying in the office would be detrimental to the work of the Church.

36 posted on 02/17/2013 9:44:16 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ; Salvation
>> There is no written rule about the length of a Pope's term in the office. <<

You are correct. There is also no written rule that the Pope must come from the college of Cardinals (it's simply been an unbroken tradition since the 1300s) or even that the Pope must be ordained clergy (it's simply been an unbroken tradition for 2000 years). In theory, they could name me, a lay Catholic, as the next Pontiff. But even though it's totally permissible under the code of canon law to do so, that would create outrage, since it would be a total disregard for Catholic tradition.

In short, just because the Church or a Pope CAN do something, doesn't mean they should. I don't like to see an old man struggling to carry on his duties as Pope anymore than you do. It's unfortunate than many Popes physically deteriorate. But Christ bore the cross for hours, and JP II bore the papacy under much greater physical detriment than Benedict. It is a testament to Popes who carried on this tradition.

I accept Benedict XVI's right to step down, but I disagree with it and I am deeply saddened to see him to do so. The seat of Peter is not like a secular job where one just "retires"

37 posted on 02/17/2013 10:02:57 PM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: highpockets
Never not once did I think the Pope would resign.

Consider for a moment that perhaps Pope Benedict is wiser than you or I and that his judgement is better than yours or mine.

I don't think that requires too great a stretch.

38 posted on 02/17/2013 10:06:39 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Do you think he’s being selfish, that he doesn’t care as much for the Church as you do, that he doesn’t appreciate the importance of his actions as much as you do, that he doesn’t understand tradition and the office of Peter as well as you, or that he’s just not smart enough to see it as you do?

I know, these are rhetorical questions. Aren’t they?


39 posted on 02/17/2013 10:10:39 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

The Papacy is only an office, it is not a Sacrament. When one accepts the office, one acquires all of the authority that comes with it, including the ability to teach infallibly on matters of Faith and Morals. If one relinquishes the office, the authority goes to the next bishop who accepts the office. The Holy Spirit will never be confused about who rightly holds the office.

This is highly unusual to be sure, but not unprecedented. Things regarding the “end of days” seem to be happening with more frequency. If the next bishop to take the Chair of Peter has “Peter” as a first or last name, or as his papal name, we will all be wondering if St. Malachy’s prophecy is complete.


40 posted on 02/17/2013 10:14:02 PM PST by blackpacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson