Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

I posted this as an Ecumenical thread, because I do not want to turn this into a Catholic/Protestant flame war. This topic came up the other day on another thread and it got me thinking that I understand the academics and apologetics of the topic, but as a Protestant, I don't get why Catholics hold it so close.

I am honestly seeking some insight from modern-day Catholics on the WHY of the doctrine being so important.

I have discussed this with the Religion Mod (about making it Ecumenical) and he is aware that I am posting it as Ecumenical. No antagonism is allowed.

Hopefully, I can gain some insight.

1 posted on 03/17/2012 2:30:07 PM PDT by reaganaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: reaganaut

Because Jesus is so important to Catholics.


2 posted on 03/17/2012 2:31:58 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

I think this might be down your alley...


4 posted on 03/17/2012 2:33:09 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Spoiler Alert! The secret to Terra Nova: THEY ARE ALL DEAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

Luther, Calvin and Zwingli thought that the perpetual virginity of the Blessed Virgin Mary was important too.

Google it.


6 posted on 03/17/2012 2:35:11 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

While waiting for those more versed, let me take a shot at it.

Jesus was born pure and that could only have happened with Mary being pure.

You can’t extract the Virgin Birth without extracting the Life of Christ — they are the same and inextricably linked.


7 posted on 03/17/2012 2:35:59 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Spoiler Alert! The secret to Terra Nova: THEY ARE ALL DEAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut
It really makes no difference to me as a Catholic. But I know that many have coverted to Christianity because of apparitions from the Virgin who basically reminds us to "Listen to her Son". my friend converted from Jehovahs Witness after her 5 year old daughter the Blessed Mother several times. She decided to make a pilgrimage to Lourdes, France where a little girl also had visions In the 1800's. The only reason the church validated her appararitions is because the woman (Blessed Mother) told her that her name was "the Immaculate Conception". That concept was something only the Vatican knew about and they were considering accepting that doctrine.

http://www.lourdes-france.org/index.php?goto_centre=ru&contexte=en&id=417&id_rubrique=417

My friend also saw the virgin in Lourdes, and experienced personal miracles.

Her newly found deep faith and devotion to Jesus and Mary puts my cradle Catholic faith to shame. The church has a long history of Marianic visitations like the Virgen of Guadalupe, all around the world and she continues to evangelize. Only those who have some idea of the real version of our long church history understand most concepts. Most Catholics, like myself just understand things intuitively.

17 posted on 03/17/2012 2:55:10 PM PDT by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

First, I don’t want to take the time starting an argument or getting bogged down in one in the religion forum.

So, I’ll just note that Catholics obviously don’t interpret Matthew 1:25 as necessarily meaning that Mary knew Joseph after the birth of Jesus. Someone else with the time or the will to do so could give a better explanation if they wish.

Also, are you asking why Catholics hold to the perpetual virginity of Mary or why the perpetual virginity of Mary is important to Catholics? If it’s the latter, then Matthew 1:25 and whether the doctrine is true or not is not really relevant to the question. But since you mentioned it, I’m guessing that you would like some explanation as to why Catholics believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary, not just why it is important to Catholics.


21 posted on 03/17/2012 3:04:07 PM PDT by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

If Joseph and Mary never had sexual intercourse, then their marriage was never consummated. Therefore, the marriage was invalid. On that basis, Joseph would not be Jesus’ stepfather and was just a friend.


32 posted on 03/17/2012 3:14:11 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

My thought has always been that Middle Eastern cultures put a great emphasis on virginity (look at how nowadays they actually have operations to “recreate” it, as if a physical hymen actually is that important).

To the Biblical Christian this is not important in the least. The important point for us is that Jesus was born of God, who is Spirit. A spirit does not take a woman’s virginity, but He was born of the Holy Spirit who “overshadowed” Mary. Thus Jesus is divine. Other than that, Mary remaining “perpetually” virgin has always smacked of the thought that sex is unclean and unholy, whether in or out of marriage.

I know our Catholic brethren disagree with this. It seems very obvious to me, and is one of the reasons I am not Catholic.

Mormons believe God impregnated Mary as a physical being. I obviously have great issues with this.

I hate to “hit and run” but I won’t be around for the flames for awhile, I’ll check in later for the fires!

I’ve always believed small philosophical ideas have great impact on cultures. IMHO, this is one of those “small, huge, ideas”.


33 posted on 03/17/2012 3:14:11 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut
It strikes me as a case of a lot of scholars pondering the nature of God requiring perfection in human form and just how that might be possible, extending that to Mary, and over centuries of layer upon layer of elaboration, creating doctrine of this speculation despite there being no presence of such claims in scripture.

The problem with this perfecting of Mary, the ever-virgin, the sinless, the bodily assumed, outside of the lack of scriptural validation, is that a perfect, sinless Mary would have had the same, physical issues as far as the inherited sin nature, as Jesus would have had, if all the learned and elaborate speculations and intellectualizations regarding His birth were actually the case.

Accepting that He was born of a virgin and that virgin was Mary, who was regarded as special and unique among women and therefore capable of bearing the Christ Child is as far as I'll go.

36 posted on 03/17/2012 3:15:36 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

Not to hijack, but I never understood why the notion that Jesus may have sex, something along the lines of The Da Vinci Code, is equally abhorrent. How could this dimmish what he was/is?


41 posted on 03/17/2012 3:20:13 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

I suggest you read Scott Hahn’s book for insight.

Here is the description from Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Hail-Holy-Queen-Mother-Word/dp/0385501692

Hail, Holy Queen: The Mother of God in the Word of God

A fresh and enlightening new perspective on Mary, Mother of God, and her central importance in the Christian faith, from the author of the highly successful The Lamb’s Supper.

In The Lamb’s Supper, Catholic scholar and apologist Scott Hahn explored the relationship between the Book of Revelation and the Roman Catholic Mass, deftly clarifying the most subtle of theological points with analogies and anecdotes from everyday life. In Hail, Holy Queen, he employs the same accessible, entertaining style to demonstrate Mary’s essential role in Christianity’s redemptive message.

Most Christians know that the life of Jesus is foreshadowed throughout the Old Testament. Through a close examination of the Bible, as well as the work of both Catholic and Protestant scholars and clergy, Hahn brings to light the small but significant details showing that just as Jesus is the “New Adam,” so Mary is the “New Eve.” He unveils the Marian mystery at the heart of the Book of Revelation and reveals how it is foretold in the very first pages of the Book of Genesis and in the story of King David’s monarchy, which speaks of a privileged place for the mother of the king.

Building on these scriptural and historical foundations, Hahn presents a new look at the Marian doctrines: Her Immaculate Conception, Perpetual Virginity, Assumption, and Coronation. As he guides modern-day readers through passages filled with mysteries and poetry, Hahn helps them rediscover the ancient art and science of reading the Scriptures and gain a more profound understanding of their truthfulness and relevance to faith and the practice of religion in the contemporary world.


48 posted on 03/17/2012 3:27:45 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

Because there is something vestal about it?


49 posted on 03/17/2012 3:28:47 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut
We aren't really allowed to ditch portions of the faith we think "aren't important". And the Perpetual Virginity of Mary is certainly an ancient teaching of the church. St. Jerome condemned Helvidius in no uncertain terms for rejecting it back in the 5th Century, as did the Roman Pope of the time. All Catholics, Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox Christians believe it.

Mary's Perpetual Virginity emphasizes the divinity and miraculous conception of Jesus. He was not an ordinary human child, and he was not biologically Joseph's child. Because of this, Mary was "off limits" to Joseph in sexual terms.

Remember for a moment that Mary is the Ark of the New Covenant, literally the vessel in which the flesh of the New Covenant was contained. What happened to Uzziah when he touched the ark of the old covenant without permission? He was instantly struck dead.

By the way, heos hou ("until") does not necessarily imply a reversal of the situation. Matthew is just emphasizing what happened before the birth of Jesus, because that's important to his discussion at that point.

We know that the Blessed Mother had no other biological children because Jesus consigned her to St. John's care before he died on the cross. Unless you want to take the (rather unlikely) view that Jesus had younger blood siblings who all died before he did, it would have been impossible and sinful for him to give Mary into St. John's care. It would have amounted to him doing exactly what he condemned the Pharisees for in Mt 15:5-6 -- absolving another Jew from his responsibility toward the commandments.

50 posted on 03/17/2012 3:30:00 PM PDT by Campion ("It is in the religion of ignorance that tyranny begins." -- Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut
Isaiah 7:14 "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Emmanuel." This Old Testament prophecy is quoted in the gospel of Matthew (Mt 1:23) and specifically applied to the virginal conception of Christ.

THAT is why it's so important.

51 posted on 03/17/2012 3:30:51 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

WRT purity and marital sexuality:

Based solely on publically available information, it is my opinion that Michelle Duggar is just as sexually pure as any life-long virgin.


60 posted on 03/17/2012 3:44:24 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (Islam: a transnational fascist government that demands worship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut
Douay-Rheims Bible
And he knew her not till she brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. (Matthew 1:25).

Just curious: why "firstborn son" rather than just "son" or "child" if she had no other children later?

61 posted on 03/17/2012 3:51:06 PM PDT by dorothy ( "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut
Reaganaut,

I'm thinking that it might be a “hot button” because it is connected to something that Catholics revere (Mary) but is often misstated in attacks on them. Clearly Catholics do not worship Mary in the same manner that they worship Christ. They revere her, and her relationship to Christ, but they get ready to be attacked at the mention of Mary.

As a Mormon, we have similar “hot button” topics. We don't worship Joseph Smith, but we revere him as the first prophet of the restoration. But as soon as the topic comes up, we get ready for the claim that we worship JS, and don't even talk about Christ.

That is untrue, just as the statement that Catholics worship Mary in the same manner as God is untrue.

Doctrinally, I agree with you. There is nothing scriptural that seem to require Mary remaining a virgin after Christ's birth, but clearly Catholics teach that, and are sensitive when the topic comes up.

73 posted on 03/17/2012 4:12:36 PM PDT by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

Early Church Fathers on Mary’s Perpetual Virginity - http://www.catholic.com/tracts/mary-ever-virgin

Pope Siricius I

“You had good reason to be horrified at the thought that another birth might issue from the same virginal womb from which Christ was born according to the flesh. For the Lord Jesus would never have chosen to be born of a virgin if he had ever judged that she would be so incontinent as to contaminate with the seed of human intercourse the birthplace of the Lord’s body, that court of the eternal king” (Letter to Bishop Anysius [A.D. 392]).

(see more church fathers at above link)

You can also check out:

Salza for more Church Fathers - http://www.scripturecatholic.com/blessed_virgin_mary.html#tradition-III

Hahn’s site for more - http://www.salvationhistory.com/search/results/81ef5793412e6baa02ab6980d5ddd051/

Hopefully that will keep you busy. :)
God Bless


86 posted on 03/17/2012 4:35:37 PM PDT by AnneM62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

For the same reason that her perpetual virginity was so important to Calvin, Luther and Zwingli amongst many other protestants.


98 posted on 03/17/2012 5:05:16 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut

Because it’s the truth.

Did Paul not tell unmarried Christians that they were best off remaining celebate for the desire of the kingdom, allowing sex and marriage only because people couldn’t control their desires? Well, Catholics believe Mary was sinless, so if anyone should be chaste, should it not be Mary?

Some ancients, particularly in the East supposed that Jesus’ “brothers” were half-brothers, children of Joseph from before he married Mary. But no-where in antiquity had anyone ever challenged the claim that Mary was “ever-virgin.” Because those who knew Greek understood that “until” such and such did not mean necessarily that any status changed after such and such. And they understood that “firstborn” was a title that did not imply subsequent births. (How could it? The law refers to what must be done to firstborns; If “firstborn” necessarily meant that there were later births, how could one ever know that someone was firstborn, and not only born?)

They understood the wording, “Here is THE son of you” which Jesus told Mary about John.

But it’s also important because it establishes that nearness to God is a more glorious joy than sexual gratification, that such gratification is merely an earthly metaphor for closeness to God, an echo of the spiritual realm translated into the physical realm.


101 posted on 03/17/2012 5:07:13 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson