Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Mary Have Other Children?
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry ^ | Unknown | Matt Slick

Posted on 06/13/2011 3:57:07 PM PDT by HarleyD

One of the more controversial teachings of the Catholic church deals with the perpetual virginity of Mary. This doctrine maintains that Mary remained a virgin after the birth of Jesus and that biblical references suggesting Jesus had siblings are really references to cousins (Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 510).

As the veneration of Mary increased throughout the centuries, the vehicle of Sacred Tradition became the means of promoting new doctrines not explicitly taught in the Bible. The virginity of Mary is clearly taught in scripture when describing the birth of Jesus. But is the doctrine of her continued virginity supported by the Bible? Did Mary lose her virginity after Jesus was born? Does the Bible reveal that Mary had other children, that Jesus had brothers and sisters?

The Bible does not come out and declare that Mary remained a virgin and that she had no children. In fact, the Bible seems to state otherwise: (All quotes are from the NASB.)

An initial reading of these biblical texts seems to clear up the issue: Jesus had brothers and sisters. But such obvious scriptures are not without their response from Catholic Theologians. The primary argument against these biblical texts is as follows:

In Greek, the word for brother is adelphos and sister is adelphe. This word is used in different contexts: of children of the same parents (Matt. 1:2; 14:3), descendants of parents (Acts 7:23, 26; Heb. 7:5), the Jews as a whole (Acts 3:17, 22), etc. Therefore, the term brother (and sister) can and does refer to the cousins of Jesus.

There is certainly merit in this argument, However, different contexts give different meanings to words. It is not legitimate to say that because a word has a wide scope of meaning, that you may then transfer any part of that range of meaning to any other text that uses the word. In other words, just because the word brother means fellow Jews or cousin in one place, does not mean it has the same meaning in another. Therefore, each verse should be looked at in context to see what it means.

Lets briefly analyze a couple of verses dealing with the brothers of Jesus.

In both of these verses, if the brothers of Jesus are not brothers, but His cousins, then who is His mother and who is the carpenters father? In other words, mother here refers to Mary. The carpenter in Matt. 13:55, refers to Joseph. These are literal. Yet, the Catholic theologian will then stop there and say, "Though carpenters son refers to Joseph, and mother refers to Mary, brothers does not mean brothers, but "cousins." This does not seem to be a legitimate assertion. You cannot simply switch contextual meanings in the middle of a sentence unless it is obviously required. The context is clear. This verse is speaking of Joseph, Mary, and Jesus brothers. The whole context is of familial relationship: father, mother, and brothers.

Psalm 69, A Messianic Psalm

There are many arguments pro and con concerning Jesus siblings. But the issue cannot be settled without examining Psalm 69, a Messianic Psalm. Jesus quotes Psalm 69:4 in John 15:25, "But they have done this in order that the word may be fulfilled that is written in their Law, they hated Me without a cause."

He also quotes Psalm 69:9 in John 2:16-17, "and to those who were selling the doves He said, "Take these things away; stop making My Fathers house a house of merchandise." His disciples remembered that it was written, "Zeal for Thy house will consume me."

Clearly, Psalm 69 is a Messianic Psalm since Jesus quoted it in reference to Himself two times. The reason this is important is because of what is written between the verses that Jesus quoted.

To get the whole context, here is Psalm 69:4-9, "Those who hate me without a cause are more than the hairs of my head; Those who would destroy me are powerful, being wrongfully my enemies, What I did not steal, I then have to restore. 5O God, it is Thou who dost know my folly, And my wrongs are not hidden from Thee. 6May those who wait for Thee not be ashamed through me, O Lord God of hosts; May those who seek Thee not be dishonored through me, O God of Israel, 7Because for Thy sake I have borne reproach; Dishonor has covered my face. 8I have become estranged from my brothers, and an alien to my mothers sons. 9For zeal for Thy house has consumed me, And the reproaches of those who reproach Thee have fallen on me."

This messianic Psalm clearly shows that Jesus has brothers. As Amos 3:7 says, "Surely the Lord God does nothing unless He reveals His secret counsel to His servants the prophets." Gods will has been revealed plainly in the New Testament and prophetically in the Old. Psalm 69 shows us that Jesus had brothers.

Did Mary have other children? The Bible seems to suggest yes. Catholic Tradition says no. Which will you trust?

Of course, the Catholic will simply state that even this phrase "my mother's sons" is in reference not to his siblings, but to cousins and other relatives. This is a necessary thing for the Catholic to say, otherwise, the perpetual virginity of Mary is threatened and since that contradicts Roman Catholic tradition, an interpretation that is consistent with that tradition must be adopted.

The question is, "Was Jesus estranged by His brothers?". Yes, He was. John 7:5 says "For not even His brothers were believing in Him." Furthermore, Psalm 69:8 says both "my brothers" and "my mother's sons." Are these both to be understood as not referring to His siblings? Hardly. The Catholics are fond of saying that "brothers" must mean "cousins." But, if that is the case, then when we read "an alien to my mother's sons" we can see that the writer is adding a further distinction and narrowing the scope of meaning. In other words, Jesus was alienated by his siblings, His very half-brothers begotten from Mary.

It is sad to see the Roman Catholic church go to such lengths to maintain Mary's virginity, something that is a violation of biblical law to be married and fill the earth.


TOPICS: General Discusssion; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: brothers; cousins; mary; nameonebrother; relatives; stepchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,021-1,026 next last
To: Quix

Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!


181 posted on 06/14/2011 7:23:16 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; dartuser; HarleyD; Rashputin; narses
It's not surprising that the newest generation of reformatters reformat the beliefs of even the first gen of reformatters

John Calvin (Sermon on Matthew)

"There have been certain folk who have wished to suggest from this passage [Matt 1:25] that the Virgin Mary had other children than the Son of God, and that Joseph had then dwelt with her later; but what folly this is! For the gospel writer did not wish to record what happened afterwards; he simply wished to make clear Joseph's obedience and to show also that Joseph had been well and truly assured that it was God who had sent His angel to Mary. He had therefore never dwelt with her nor had he shared her company... And besides this Our Lord Jesus Christ is called the first born. This is not because there was a second or a third, but because the gospel writer is paying regard to precedence. Scripture speaks thus of naming the first-born whether or not there was any question of the second."
Now that's one thing I can agree with Calvin about....
182 posted on 06/14/2011 7:23:48 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
why did Jesus tell John to take care of His mother?

You're making it harder than it is ...

Because His brothers weren't there (at the crucifixion) ... they didn't believe in Him ... John did, and he was there.

183 posted on 06/14/2011 7:29:30 AM PDT by dartuser ("Dealing with preterists is like cleaning the litter box ... but at least none of the cats are big.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: dartuser
Dart -- you're making it harder than it was Because His brothers weren't there (at the crucifixion) ... they didn't believe in Him ... John did, and he was there. is incorrect -- Jesus was condemned to die, right? If Mary had other kids, they would be there to take care of her at the least. If not, then they would be expected to take care of her, their mother, after the eldest son dies, right?

But He gives custody of their mother to someone else? What? That would be a major insult in those times and not something a believing Jew like Jesus would do.

The Eldest Son takes care of the mother, then the next eldest son, etc. then the daughters -- in order. To bypass this is not something Jesus would do. Ergo, he had no other brothers or sister by Mary.

184 posted on 06/14/2011 7:34:40 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: narses
Matthew 13:55 - "Is not this the carpenters son? Is not His mother called Mary, and His brothers, James and Joseph and Simon and Judas?"

Thanks for this great post, Narses. It clearly illustrates how these brothers, as quoted in Scripture and posted in the above article, were not children given birth by the Virgin Mary. It really shows how the word "brother" can mean something different than how the word is commonly today - at least by English speakers in America.

Let's hope this article is not ignored.

185 posted on 06/14/2011 7:36:04 AM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Hoping the lights come on ...

His ... brothers ... were ... not ... there.

Jesus gave John the job because His brothers were not there, Jesus was the oldest, it was His responsibility to ensure His mother was cared for. He chose someone He trusted, someone who believed in Him, someone who was there ... that was John.

186 posted on 06/14/2011 7:46:38 AM PDT by dartuser ("Dealing with preterists is like cleaning the litter box ... but at least none of the cats are big.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: dartuser
If He had brothers it would be far more likely that those who did not believe in him would show up than those who did. After all, they would have been right all along and now that would be clear. They'd be there to show everyone else who didn't believe in Christ that even though they were related they were "doing the right thing" by being there to help their mother. Obviously, staying in the good graces of the community they had chosen over their own brother would be important to them.

Of course, that's speculation just like what you posted. And personally, speculation isn't squat when it comes to Scriptures. Isn't it those who don't agree with the Catholic Church that are always talking about never adding to Scriptures? Then why should your speculations be any different?

No offense, but they're not, your speculations are simply "comfort food" for your preconceptions and nothing more. I have a lot more reason to believe what has been handed down as oral tradition for over two thousand years from those who personally knew both Christ and Mary than I have to believe anything those who decided to leave the Church Christ founded several hundred years ago have to say.

Regards

187 posted on 06/14/2011 7:54:54 AM PDT by Rashputin (Obama is insane but kept medicated and on golf courses to hide it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Not so much contact as intercourse.

Now you are prefacing your typology ... and you are equating tabernacle and ark ...

My jaw remains open in observing your interpretation of Ezekiel 44, what kind of special sauce you are applying here?

If you were to bother to continue in Ez 44, you would read ...

3 As for the prince, he shall sit in it as prince to eat bread before the LORD; he shall enter by way of the porch of the gate and shall go out by the same way.

If I was to apply the same hermeneutic as you suggest, I would be forced to claim that the prince got in after the gate was shut via the porch; which imples Mary DID have intercourse after giving birth to Jesus.

You see how silly this interpretation is? ... Doesn't it makes sense that Ezekiel is not talking about Marys body here, but rather an actual gate, an actual porch, an actual temple?

You are making, what should be, straightforward Biblical interpretation much harder than it is. Typology run amuck.

188 posted on 06/14/2011 8:05:24 AM PDT by dartuser ("Dealing with preterists is like cleaning the litter box ... but at least none of the cats are big.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Craftmore
"Im looking for scriptural basis for these beliefs,"

See my post #24.

189 posted on 06/14/2011 8:11:51 AM PDT by Natural Law (For God so loved the world He did not send a book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin
No offense, but they're not, your speculations are simply "comfort food" for your preconceptions and nothing more

Perhaps so, but your speculations are an integral part of your doctrine. You REQUIRE your speculations to be so or your theology crumbles. If Mary had other children your Maryology goes up in smoke. If Mary didn't have other children, my theology changes naught.

190 posted on 06/14/2011 8:31:41 AM PDT by dartuser ("Dealing with preterists is like cleaning the litter box ... but at least none of the cats are big.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Quix
"Vatican Cult...Vatican Cult...Vatican Cult...Vatican Cult...Vatican Cult..."

The continued use of that inflammatory phrase suggests that constructive dialog is not your goal. Am I wrong? If so what exactly is your purpose for its repeated use?

191 posted on 06/14/2011 8:42:25 AM PDT by Natural Law (For God so loved the world He did not send a book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

i dont see any scriptures in posting 24,therefore i must conclude that you hve no scriptural basis for your beliefs


192 posted on 06/14/2011 8:42:45 AM PDT by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Craftmore
"i dont see any scriptures in posting 24,therefore i must conclude that you hve no scriptural basis for your beliefs"

Scriptural Exclusivity, the doctrine that the only source of the revealed Word is contained in the canon of Scripture is a modern theological construct that goes way beyond the argument of the Reformation of Scriptural Sufficiency. I don't hold to it and do not believe that I am obligated to support all Catholic doctrine exclusively from Scripture.

There has been ample Scriptural argument for the perpetual virginity of Mary posted throughout these threads, but even conceding that the Holy Scripture is ambiguous on this issue, the Holy Tradition holds that Mary was otherwise childless and that is good enough for me.

Now go in peace to love and serve the Lord.

193 posted on 06/14/2011 8:57:08 AM PDT by Natural Law (For God so loved the world He did not send a book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
One of the more controversial teachings of the Catholic church deals with the perpetual virginity of Mary.

There's no controversy to it...Mary had other children...

In Greek, the word for brother is adelphos and sister is adelphe. This word is used in different contexts: of children of the same parents (Matt. 1:2; 14:3), descendants of parents (Acts 7:23, 26; Heb. 7:5), the Jews as a whole (Acts 3:17, 22), etc. Therefore, the term brother (and sister) can and does refer to the cousins of Jesus.

This doesn't border on absurd, it is absurd...

ἀδελφός
adelphos
ad-el-fos'
From G1 (as a connective particle) and δελφύς delphus (the womb); a brother (literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like [H1]): - brother.

Adelphos means BROTHER, near or far...It doesn not mean cousin...It does not mean kin...It does not mean relative...There are specific Greek words for those terms...

ἀδελφή
adelphē
ad-el-fay'
Feminine of G80; a sister (natural or ecclesiastical): - sister.

Adelphe means sister...It does not mean cousin...It does not mean kin...It does not mean relative...

In the contexts of the scriptures that the opposition (to the scripture) cites, the context is always brother, not cousin...Whether it's a natural brother, a brother Jew, a brother in Jesus Christ, a brother as in the seed of Abraham, it's aways brother...Cousin wouldn't even work in most of their mis-interpretations...

Just throw their invalid perversion out with the dirty bathwater and thank God he gave us His words to believe...

194 posted on 06/14/2011 8:58:51 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
One of the more controversial teachings of the Catholic church deals with the perpetual virginity of Mary.

There's no controversy to it...Mary had other children...

In Greek, the word for brother is adelphos and sister is adelphe. This word is used in different contexts: of children of the same parents (Matt. 1:2; 14:3), descendants of parents (Acts 7:23, 26; Heb. 7:5), the Jews as a whole (Acts 3:17, 22), etc. Therefore, the term brother (and sister) can and does refer to the cousins of Jesus.

This doesn't border on absurd, it is absurd...

ἀδελφός
adelphos
ad-el-fos'
From G1 (as a connective particle) and δελφύς delphus (the womb); a brother (literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like [H1]): - brother.

Adelphos means BROTHER, near or far...It doesn not mean cousin...It does not mean kin...It does not mean relative...There are specific Greek words for those terms...

ἀδελφή
adelphē
ad-el-fay'
Feminine of G80; a sister (natural or ecclesiastical): - sister.

Adelphe means sister...It does not mean cousin...It does not mean kin...It does not mean relative...

In the contexts of the scriptures that the opposition (to the scripture) cites, the context is always brother, not cousin...Whether it's a natural brother, a brother Jew, a brother in Jesus Christ, a brother as in the seed of Abraham, it's aways brother...Cousin wouldn't even work in most of their mis-interpretations...

Just throw their invalid perversion out with the dirty bathwater and thank God he gave us His words to believe...And I say that with love, of course...

195 posted on 06/14/2011 8:59:29 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal
“How is this to be since I do not know man?” Luke 1:34

Notice the perfect tense. “I do not know man” means I will not be having sexual intimacy today, tomorrow or any time in the future.

NAsbU Luke 1:34 Mary said to the angel,
"How can this be,
since I am a virgin?"

34 “How can this be,” asked Miryam of the angel,
“since I am a virgin?”
35 The angel answered her,
“The Ruach HaKodesh will come over you,
the power of Ha‛Elyon will cover you.
Therefore the holy child born to you
will be called the Son of God.
Stern, D. H. (1989). Jewish New Testament : A translation of the New Testament that expresses its Jewishness (1st ed.) (Lk 1:34-35). Jerusalem, Israel; Clarksville, Md., USA: Jewish New Testament Publications.

Never use Eisegesis on the Holy WORD.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
196 posted on 06/14/2011 9:00:32 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: HossB86
Scripture that states this?

What? They don't need no scripture...

197 posted on 06/14/2011 9:16:04 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
The Perpetual Virginity of Mary - Brothers and Sisters of Christ?

198 posted on 06/14/2011 9:16:36 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
If the author had read the New Testament in the original Greek, he would see that his interpretations/translations are clearly incorrect.

There's about 30 Greek Lexicons out there...Which one is the original???

199 posted on 06/14/2011 9:20:28 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal
I am always puzzled by the Protestant view that the Bible can be trusted, but the Church which safeguarded it from the beginning, and which received the Lord’s Great Commission is unworthy of the same trust.

Because they disagree with each other in far too many places...So we are left with a choice...Believe the inspired words of God, or believe your religion...That's easy for me...God always wins...

200 posted on 06/14/2011 9:28:43 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,021-1,026 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson