Now you are prefacing your typology ... and you are equating tabernacle and ark ...
My jaw remains open in observing your interpretation of Ezekiel 44, what kind of special sauce you are applying here?
If you were to bother to continue in Ez 44, you would read ...
3 As for the prince, he shall sit in it as prince to eat bread before the LORD; he shall enter by way of the porch of the gate and shall go out by the same way.
If I was to apply the same hermeneutic as you suggest, I would be forced to claim that the prince got in after the gate was shut via the porch; which imples Mary DID have intercourse after giving birth to Jesus.
You see how silly this interpretation is? ... Doesn't it makes sense that Ezekiel is not talking about Marys body here, but rather an actual gate, an actual porch, an actual temple?
You are making, what should be, straightforward Biblical interpretation much harder than it is. Typology run amuck.
Ezekiel 44 indicates the prince which is Jesus, so not intercourse with him..