Posted on 04/12/2011 7:55:27 AM PDT by bkaycee
ABSOLUTELY INDEED.
That’s one reason I have a lot of respect for denominations with no titled clergy office holders.
AMEN! AMEN! AMEN!
I think your suggestion of discussing Ignorance—Invincible and Vincible - is a good one.
I give most people lots of GRACE because I need lots of GRACE.
I give closer friends and Christian Brothers LOTS MORE GRACE . . . just ‘cause.
It grieves me to experience even hindrances in better relationships—much more so harshness and great discord.
Given the bent of so many RC’s recently in their intolerance of FR’s Rel Forum as a more level playing field, I should not have been surprised. I was and am, however.
LUB
Sola scriptura is anti-biblical.
Indeed it is.
Am deeply humbled by your kind words.
God’s best to you.
It’s such a treasure to be understood by someone of your discernment, knowledge and perceptiveness.
Blessings Big time.
This is instructive as to the collectivist mindset of Romanists. For Collectivists there is no differentiation between individual parts and the general class. All individual aspects are merely in relation to the class and those individual aspects must submit to the dictatorship of the proletariat. It is no wonder then that a majority of Romanists have an affinity for socialistic political ideologies.
Observing the perverted sects in this forum provides us with a subject group of the ignorant.
Minding our P’s, and Q’s, we can place into the invincible category those who will likely cling to perversions no matter what, even as they are dying and traipsing the path to hell.
We can go ahead and predestinate them. Why not, if the Spirit of the Word convicts us?
AMEN, Brother!
It really is something to look at these future superstars and see their humble sincerity. Please keep Movein.to in your prayers.
THX THX.
INDEED.
AMEN! AMEN!
THX THX.
You were saying that since some term (or many terms) used by the Catholic Church can also be used as a sexual term, that may have something to do with the sex abuse scandals. Here is what you said again so that people may see it in its full luncacy:
This is fascinating. Thanks to nws for enlightening us on Romanist terminology.
Quix- I’m thinking this goes a long ways to explaining the pedophile problem that exists amongst Romanists. If their theological language is coterminous with sexual language this association can lead to actions in which a person believes that the act in the natural sphere somehow relates to a theological goodness. This would be especially prevalent amongst those involved in priestcraft because they are always working in both spheres.
What say you?
Here is what you said just now:
This is instructive as to the collectivist mindset of Romanists. For Collectivists there is no differentiation between individual parts and the general class. All individual aspects are merely in relation to the class and those individual aspects must submit to the dictatorship of the proletariat. It is no wonder then that a majority of Romanists have an affinity for socialistic political ideologies.
Are you bringing up a new topic, or is this supposed to have anything to do with what has been previously said in our conversation?
LOL!
What the Popes Have to Say About Socialism (Ecumenical)
You even commented on that thread!
They make it clear that deeds alone aren't what they are being called to do. They are preaching The Gospel to the lost. They are some impressive young men and women.
Check out their website movein.to (no com or org on the end)
OK, let me spell it out for you. I was contemplating whether a term that has one meaning in a theological sense might get confused with it’s normal secular meaning amongst those within the Romanist priestcraft. So while the term in the dogmatic sense might have a different meaning it may be the case that these different meanings become conflated in the mind of an individual who then applies the secular understanding in a theological sense.
So as you can clearly see I was not discussing the merits or demerits of any particular Romanist dogma but rather the psychological effects that may occur to someone who deals with a term that has multiple meanings in the course of their craft.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.