[the_conscience]

OK, let me spell it out for you. I was contemplating whether a term that has one meaning in a theological sense might get confused with it’s normal secular meaning amongst those within the Romanist priestcraft. So while the term in the dogmatic sense might have a different meaning it may be the case that these different meanings become conflated in the mind of an individual who then applies the secular understanding in a theological sense.

So as you can clearly see I was not discussing the merits or demerits of any particular Romanist dogma but rather the psychological effects that may occur to someone who deals with a term that has multiple meanings in the course of their craft.

[Notwithstanding]

Your sect’s perversions
are written in the bbok of the devil.

Your sect’s beliefs are as spit in the face of Jesus Christ.

Your sect’s acts are abominations of abuse on the innocent.

Your sect’s members are diseased and wretched.

Your sect has no life and is a coven of death and wailing.

[WPaCon]

So as you can clearly see I was not discussing the merits or demerits of any particular Romanist dogma

I never said you were.

I was just saying that your original post was ridiculous and it was ridiculous that people actually agreed with it.