Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

God was behind Big Bang, universe no accident: Pope Benedict
Yahoo News ^ | 01/06/2011 | Philip Pullella

Posted on 01/06/2011 12:57:47 PM PST by SeekAndFind

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – God's mind was behind complex scientific theories such as the Big Bang, and Christians should reject the idea that the universe came into being by accident, Pope Benedict said on Thursday.

"The universe is not the result of chance, as some would want to make us believe," Benedict said on the day Christians mark the Epiphany, the day the Bible says the three kings reached the site where Jesus was born by following a star.

"Contemplating it (the universe) we are invited to read something profound into it: the wisdom of the creator, the inexhaustible creativity of God," he said in a sermon to some 10,000 people in St Peter's Basilica on the feast day.

While the pope has spoken before about evolution, he has rarely delved back in time to discuss specific concepts such as the Big Bang, which scientists believe led to the formation of the universe some 13.7 billion years ago.

Researchers at CERN, the nuclear research center in Geneva, have been smashing protons together at near the speed of light to simulate conditions that they believe brought into existence the primordial universe from which stars, planets and life on earth -- and perhaps elsewhere -- eventually emerged.

Some atheists say science can prove that God does not exist, but Benedict said that some scientific theories were "mind limiting" because "they only arrive at a certain point ... and do not manage to explain the ultimate sense of reality ..."

He said scientific theories on the origin and development of the universe and humans, while not in conflict with faith, left many questions unanswered.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Culture; Religion & Science; Theology
KEYWORDS: bigbang; creation; pope; popebenedict
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: Cronos; Zionist Conspirator
ZC, I failed to ping you to 74.

Cronos, ZC's tone troubles me at times as well.

But he is also very angry with the generic response of many urban Catholics to look down on Bible Christians from the rural US and mock them - just as the mainstream media mocks them - for their insistence on the literal truth of the Scriptures.

That being said, many of these same rural Bible Christians are also bitterly anti-Catholic and like to start arguments as well.

As a result, Catholics, Orthodox, Reformed and Jews spend a lot of time playing into the adversary's hands.

81 posted on 01/07/2011 12:14:19 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

“Juan Diago’s Tilma”...sounds like a great name for a mariachi band...keep up the good fight ZC ! ...magritte


82 posted on 01/07/2011 12:23:05 PM PST by magritte ("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; wideawake
You have on numerous occasions accused me of making false statements. I have done no such thing. You plainly do not accept the chronology of Genesis. Thus it is not history to you, but rather didactic mythology.

Widey, I am sorry if my tone offends you, but look at this guy--beating his chest and screaming that the chronology of Genesis cannot possibly be literal history because "science" has pontificated that there are cities older than that. Is he not a perfect illustration of the phenomenon you have described? On what grounds does this hypocrite, who refuses to allow science to tell him that virgins can't give birth, hit me or anyone else over the head with that same "science" because he is afraid of Genesis? And why is he boasting about how "Catholic" the "big bang" theory is when the "big bang" does not deal with cosmogonic ex-nihilation at all but is a mere theoretical theory of how the universe would have taken its current shape given the uniformitarian assumption???

We both know there is one and only one reason. Genesis is for "trailer trash," and G-d doesn't love "trailer trash." He loves Aztecs and Maya and Poles and illiterate Italians who wrap snakes around statues and American Indians with their totem poles, but Genesis has got to go and anyone who believes in its historicity is inherently un-Catholic and to be scorned. In other words, "trailer trash" must either cease being "trailer trash" and change their ethnicity to something else or else be forever excluded as the enemies of G-d--Catholicism's version of `Amaleq.

I hope I don't have to justify my anger to you when I myself was told to vacate the Catholic Church simply because I would not relinquish Genesis. All the talk about "universality" in the Catholic Church is nothing but hooey, and I know that from personal experience.

How you manage to stay loyal to a religion that takes every single opportunity it finds to exclude what you yourself believe is beyond me. It isn't worthy of you.

83 posted on 01/07/2011 12:54:52 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vayhi be`etzem hayom hazeh; hotzi' HaShem 'et-Benei Yisra'el me'Eretz Mitzrayim `al-tziv'otam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: magritte
keep up the good fight ZC !

Thank you. I'm glad somebody appreciates it.

Unfortunately, board rules forbid my stating just what I think of these miserable hypocrites who eviscerate Genesis with "science" but won't even let "science" tell them that all babies require a physical human father.

It's nothing but "the Catholic Church rejects white trash miracles and the white trash that believes them." There is nothing more to it.

"Universal!"

84 posted on 01/07/2011 1:01:24 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vayhi be`etzem hayom hazeh; hotzi' HaShem 'et-Benei Yisra'el me'Eretz Mitzrayim `al-tziv'otam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; Zionist Conspirator
From ZC's post I don't get But he is also very angry with the generic response of many urban Catholics -- what I read are basically false lies repeated and false inferences. If he was angry with the response of urban Catholics, then go attack them, don't make up false statements and tell me that is my doctrine.

And, if he wants to believe the literal scriptures then the literal scriptures include the foretelling of a Messiah and the literal scriptures in John 1:1-14 pretty much tell us Christ is God, the Word of God.
85 posted on 01/07/2011 4:03:03 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: magritte
Sir, trousers always matter :-P

My fav is code of the Woosters -- though I am surprised, I always thought that Plum was unknown in the Americas (he's forgotten in the UK) and only highly regarded now in the Indian sub-continent
86 posted on 01/07/2011 4:04:45 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; wideawake
I'm not accusing you, I'm saying you ARE making false statements when you accuse me of saying ".since Genesis' only purpose to you is to teach "spiritual" or "theological" truths and contains no historical facts."

Yet you persist in making false inferences.

Firstly, did you read what I wrote above about Church doctrine being silent on this? Now stop making repeating lies about what the Catholics as a group do or do not believe.

What an individual may hold is individual opinion.

Secondly, you go into an hysterical fit and make false inferences of what I say based on your own wild assertions is no better than those who believe in the Protocols of the Elders -- do you believe in that too?

Finally I asked you a simple question -- what about Sumerian cities dating to 5400 BC, what about Jericho dating to earlier than that?

Now answer that -- and don't make inferences on what I believe based on my question because your inferences are false.
87 posted on 01/07/2011 4:11:53 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; wideawake
So why are you afraid of Genesis and of the virgin birth of Christ?

Don't you believe in Genesis and Christ being God?
88 posted on 01/07/2011 4:12:50 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; wideawake
Zionist Conspirator G-d doesn't love "trailer trash."

You really do jump to conclusions!!

Genesis is part of the infallible bible and it infallibly tells us in Genesis 2:15 where it prophesises Christ, the Son of God coming to save us I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.

Christ, the SEED of a woman but not of a man, crushed the serpent Satan

So, Genesis, as you see, prophesies Christ who is GOD!

Jesus was / is GOD -- that's clearly there in the Bible and that is Catholic belief. you need proof?
>For example, in John 5:18 we are told that Jesus’ opponents sought to kill him because he "called God his Father, making himself equal with God."

In John 8:58, when quizzed about how he has special knowledge of Abraham, Jesus replies, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I Am"—invoking and applying to himself the personal name of God—"I Am" (Ex. 3:14). His audience understood exactly what he was claiming about himself. "So they took up stones to throw at him; but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple" (John 8:59).

In John 20:28, Thomas falls at Jesus’ feet, exclaiming, "My Lord and my God!" (Greek: Ho Kurios mou kai ho Theos mou—literally, "The Lord of me and the God of me!")

In Philippians 2:6, Paul tells us that Christ Jesus "[w]ho, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be g.asped" (New International Version). So Jesus chose to be born in humble, human form though he could have simply remained in equal glory with the Father for he was "in very nature God."

Also significant are passages that apply the title "the First and the Last" to Jesus. This is one of the Old Testament titles of Yahweh: "Thus says Yahweh, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, Yahweh of armies: ‘I am the First and I am the Last; besides me there is no god’" (Is. 44:6; cf. 41:4, 48:12).

This title is directly applied to Jesus three times in the book of Revelation: "When I saw him [Christ], I fell at his feet as though dead. But he laid his right hand upon me, saying, ‘Fear not, I am the First and the Last’" (Rev. 1:17). "And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write: ‘The words of the First and the Last, who died and came to life’" (Rev. 2:8). "Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense, to repay every one for what he has done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the beginning and the end" (Rev. 22:12–13).

This last quote is especially significant since it applies to Jesus the parallel title "the Alpha and the Omega," which Revelation earlier applied to the Lord God: "‘I am the Alpha and the Omega,’ says the Lord God, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty" (Rev. 1:8).
So why do you, Zionist Conspirator, deny that Christ is God?
89 posted on 01/07/2011 4:17:27 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; wideawake
Hysterically screaming about Aztecs and Mayas doesn't make your false inferences any less false. What you have just stated are your own fevered misinterpretations.

unless you really do believe that G-d doesn't love "trailer trash." Why do you believe that G-d doesn't love "trailer trash." ? that's a most un-Christian attitude
90 posted on 01/07/2011 4:21:56 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; wideawake
Furthermore, whoever denied that the big bang was a theoretical theory of how the universe would have taken its current shape given the uniformitarian assumption??

Don't think that pushing fancy words together confounds me, boy.
91 posted on 01/07/2011 4:25:20 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: bibletruth
God supernaturally created the heaven and earth in six literal 24-hour days.

Says who? You? The Bible does not say 24 hour (as we define it now) days. And we know that the Earth's spin changes (which changes the days). If the Earth was formed from rocky debris, then its initial rotation was very slow; like a figure skater who starts with arms wide and then pulls them in, the rotation increases. What was the Earth's rotation over the course of its formation? The Bible does not say. It only says that God formed it and gave the time period for each stage of one day. The Jews count day from sundown to sundown. If the rotation equalled the revolution about the sun exactly, the day would be infinitely long.

Or do you have a direct line to God who told you exactly what He did?

92 posted on 01/07/2011 4:46:59 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I have had the good fortune to own a bookstore for a lot of my adult life ... we got in a copy of “Jeeves Takes Charge” some years back and fell in love with his use of language...the slang mixed with the more proper language of London...you are correct though...haven’t found another person in Southeast Missouri that’s read a word of “Plum’s” work...magritte


93 posted on 01/07/2011 5:54:55 PM PST by magritte ("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

RE: Man with their human senses cannot understand the Supernatural

Except for you, who have it all figured out through your God-given superior intellect.

Should I be on my knees?

< /sarcasm>


94 posted on 01/07/2011 6:16:29 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("[T]here is nothing so aggravating [in life] as being condescended to by an idiot" ~ Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Man with their human senses cannot understand the Supernatural.....Except for you, who have it all figured out through your God-given superior intellect.

Superior intellect? Try God's Word...

1 Corinthians 2:14 "The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned".
95 posted on 01/07/2011 8:53:23 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: magritte
What I find amazing about Plum is that most authors are lucky if they can come up with one memorable "saga", but Plum had
  1. Jeeves and Wooster (right from 'Extricating Young Gussie')
  2. Blandings Castle (Lord Emsworth MAKES this series, probably more than Gally!)
  3. Psmith
  4. Mike and various school books (his early books were set in English boarding schools
  5. Mulliners Tales
  6. Uncle Fred (Uncle Dynamite!)
  7. The Ukridge stories
And besides this the numerous shorts and one-offs.

There's no one who has managed to use the English language quite as well.

Do you remember this one from "Jeeves and the Old School Chum"
Miss Pyke's criticisms will have been instrumental in moving the hitherto unformulated dissatisfaction from the subconscious to the conscious mind
:)
96 posted on 01/07/2011 10:23:12 PM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: bibletruth
"Either you believe what man 'thinks' or what the LORD GOD created!"

So where are the pillars that hold up the heavens?

97 posted on 01/08/2011 4:52:04 PM PST by Natural Law (Grant that we may be one flock and one shepherd!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
You have attempted to "prove" chr*stianity by quoting chr*stian scripture. Of course chr*stian scripture "proves" chr*stianity! Duh! And moslem scripture "proves" islam and mormon scripture "proves" mormonism!

I have explained to you numerous times (and you have not listened or didn't understand) that my Bible doesn't have a "new testament" in it at all. When you send me to the "new testament" to "prove" something you are behaving no differently than a mormon or a moslem sending me to their own scriptures. I could invent a new religion and write "scripture" for it and those "scriptures" would prove my religion as well!

You on the other hand have Genesis in your Bible, yet you deny its historicity. Why do you acknowledge as scripture something you think is false?

As to G-d not loving trailer trash, the True G-d does indeed love them. The Catholic "gxd," however, does not. The Catholic "gxd" loves only scientists and intellectuals, though, like the Democrat party, it seems to find space in its heart for illiterates of every other ethno-culture under the sun. Only "white trash" are excluded. I know, because I am white trash, and I was run out of the Catholic Church.

Talk to the hand.

98 posted on 01/09/2011 2:37:08 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator ('Ashirah leHaShem ki-ga'oh ga'ah, sus verokhevo ramah vayam!i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
You have attempted to "prove" chr*stianity by quoting chr*stian scripture. Of course chr*stian scripture "proves" chr*stianity! Duh! And moslem scripture "proves" islam and mormon scripture "proves" mormonism!

I have explained to you numerous times (and you have not listened or didn't understand) that my Bible doesn't have a "new testament" in it at all. When you send me to the "new testament" to "prove" something you are behaving no differently than a mormon or a moslem sending me to their own scriptures. I could invent a new religion and write "scripture" for it and those "scriptures" would prove my religion as well!

You on the other hand have Genesis in your Bible, yet you deny its historicity. Why do you acknowledge as scripture something you think is false?

As to G-d not loving trailer trash, the True G-d does indeed love them. The Catholic "gxd," however, does not. The Catholic "gxd" loves only scientists and intellectuals, though, like the Democrat party, it seems to find space in its heart for illiterates of every other ethno-culture under the sun. Only "white trash" are excluded. I know, because I am white trash, and I was run out of the Catholic Church.

Talk to the hand.

99 posted on 01/09/2011 2:37:30 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator ('Ashirah leHaShem ki-ga'oh ga'ah, sus verokhevo ramah vayam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
You say that you do not believe that Christ is God.

As a goyim, that's kind of rich.

Beyond which, the false inferences made in your earlier posts are exactly similar to the false lies made in the Protocols of the Elders -- do you believe in that too?
100 posted on 01/09/2011 9:27:43 PM PST by Cronos (Bobby Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson