Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

....Cromwell was not merely exceptionally religious. He belonged to a particular religious group — the Puritans — who believed that the frivolous Charles I, with his stubborn faith in the Divine Right of Kings and his fondness for elaborate Catholic-style church ceremonies, was betraying the Protestant Reformation.
1 posted on 12/31/2010 10:16:58 PM PST by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Alex Murphy

He was a frickin’ murdering a**hat.


2 posted on 12/31/2010 10:22:51 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Alex, yours is the very first FR thread of 2011. Congratulations and Happy New Year!


3 posted on 12/31/2010 10:26:02 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

I kinda prefer Patrick MacNee (Steed of The Avengers)


4 posted on 12/31/2010 10:30:19 PM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Didn’t he kill more of his own people while trying to kill the Irish off?


5 posted on 12/31/2010 10:36:15 PM PST by o-n-money
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy
I think Arthur is the most famous Britisher, specifically because his existence is in question.

Oliver Cromwell... No one today knows or cares about him.

8 posted on 12/31/2010 10:43:46 PM PST by mmercier (Kings and Queens and guillotines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

There was a war, started by King Charles I, against Scotland, in which he tried to force Catholicism upon the Scottish Puritans. Presumably, since it was a war, many innocent Scottish people were killed for the crime of not being Roman Catholic.

To blame Cromwell for leading the Puritans in fighting back is hardly fair. This does not mean I don’t feel sorry for any innocent Roman Catholics who may have died.

‘In 1630-42, when he governed without calling a parliament, King Charles I multiplied his enemies by imposing irritating financial exactions upon various classes of the community, using prerogative powers exercised by the king in centuries past. He demanded “ship money” from the towns, fined country gentlemen (including Cromwell) for refusing to accept knighthood, raised “forced loans,” and increased customs duties. He did all this because he had no right to levy fresh taxes without the consent of Parliament; indeed, his broad aim was to secure the financial independence of the monarchy, and to fasten uniformity upon the Church. Thus the king antagonized the Puritan reformers as well as many of the country gentry and townspeople. In 1638 he became involved in a war against his Scottish subjects (he was hereditary king of Scotland as well as of England) when he tried to force upon them a prayer book similar to that in use in the English Church. They rebelled, and he was compelled to call a parliament at Westminster to ask for money to pursue the war. The accumulation of grievances against the king over eleven years made the leaders of the House of Commons aggressive and uncooperative. Cromwell at once showed himself to be a staunch Puritan, and as such gave steady support to the critics of church and government.’

It would seem Charles I started it. Whether Cromwell’s response was perfect in every respect is hardly likely. But who’s response to hostilities is always perfect in every respect. War is awful for all involved.


10 posted on 12/31/2010 10:47:40 PM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Benny hill


11 posted on 12/31/2010 10:51:17 PM PST by Weird Tolkienish Figure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy; fabian

ping


13 posted on 12/31/2010 10:56:41 PM PST by abigail2 (Rebuilding the family by rebuilding the man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy
Was Oliver Cromwell - founder of the British empire - the greatest ever Englishman?

Let's ask the Irish
17 posted on 12/31/2010 11:00:36 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Cromwell was a bloodthirsty jackass. He destroyed the Church of England.


19 posted on 12/31/2010 11:02:09 PM PST by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy
Cromwell was Hitler before there was Hitler. He belongs in the same category of individuals as Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, and Saddam Hussein.

Too bad Ireland wasn't united in his invasion, or he could have been take out much earlier than he was.

20 posted on 12/31/2010 11:08:35 PM PST by Darren McCarty (We should lead ourselves instead of looking for leaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

I don’t know if you would consider him the greatest, but William’s little excursion in 1066 is most profound event in Anglo history.


26 posted on 12/31/2010 11:17:57 PM PST by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Didn’t Cromwell try to ban Christmas??

figures.


28 posted on 12/31/2010 11:23:26 PM PST by GeronL (#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Sure. If greatness is measured by how many people you killed.


31 posted on 12/31/2010 11:28:03 PM PST by Antoninus (Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Cromwell was one of the predecessors of our American founding fathers for religious freedom. And (seeing some of the commentary) during the mid-1800s in the USA, maybe American Protestants were right about the immigration problem at that time after all.


36 posted on 12/31/2010 11:43:18 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy
I don't know much about Cromwell, but if the following quote is in fact his, I wish he was alive today so that he could deal with our "Congress".

Oliver Cromwell's Speech on the Dissolution of the Long Parliament
Given to the English House of Commons

20 April 1653

It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, 
which you have dishonoured by your contempt of all virtue,
and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew,
and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches,
and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage,
and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.
Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you?
Is there one vice you do not possess?
Ye have no more religion than my horse;
gold is your God;
which of you have not barter'd your conscience for bribes?
Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?
Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil'd this sacred place,
and turn'd the Lord's temple into a den of thieves,
by your immoral principles and wicked practices?
Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation;
you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress'd,
are yourselves gone!
So!
Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors.
In the name of God, go!


38 posted on 12/31/2010 11:50:21 PM PST by skeptoid (The road to serfdom is being paved by RINOs, and Lisa Murkowski is their mascot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

What about William Wilberforce.


42 posted on 01/01/2011 12:01:47 AM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy
Cromwell was the man who couldn't climb down. A good man, a strong man who became the very monster against which he originally rebelled. A fascinating, tragic study of the Great Man in history. What he did in Ireland puts him, I think, well outside the bounds of common human decency, and after him the British found themselves grateful for the return of the crown he had banished. I'm not sure one could conjure a more ambiguous judgment.

For me, Churchill.

43 posted on 01/01/2011 12:13:42 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy
They took the gold off the walls and put it into their bank accounts while the poor remained poor.
52 posted on 01/01/2011 1:46:09 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (Stupid Obama still lacks the experience needed to be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Cromwell murdered Charles I. When Charles II finally resumed the throne of England, he had Cromwell executed and Cromwell’s body was left hanging in public for a very long time.


55 posted on 01/01/2011 2:32:29 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority (What this country needs is an enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson