Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic and Protestant Bibles
Evangelization Station ^ | Victor R. Claveau, MJ

Posted on 12/31/2010 3:16:25 AM PST by GonzoII

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: John Leland 1789

Thanks. That’s one of my pet peeves.


61 posted on 12/31/2010 3:20:25 PM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

The Council of Florence adhered to virtually the same list as Trent. Trent was a re-affirmation of the Scripture suitable for the liturgy.


62 posted on 01/01/2011 12:03:46 AM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Anyone? Well, many others have said the same about the book of Jonah.


63 posted on 01/01/2011 12:06:17 AM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn
I can't take seriously the scholarship of a writer who seems not to appreciate the difference in Greek between a singular noun (ἀπόκρυφος) and a plural noun (ἀπόκρυφα).

That is a supremely stupid objection.

"The apocrypha" is the typical way of referring to the aggregate of "the apocryphal" books (adjectival term) in English. When inserting a Greek term, you use the Greek. When writing English prose, you use English. Not that difficult of a concept.

For other similar uses of the term "apocrypha/apocryphal, see:

New Testament Apocrypha: Gospels and Related Writings, by Wilhelm Schneemelcher

The Apocrypha in the Irish Church, by M. McNamara

The Oxford Annotated Bible, with the Apocrypha, eds. H.G. May et al.

Introducing the Apocrypha: Message, Context, and Significance, by David A. DeSilva

The Septuagint with Apocrypha: Greek and English, ed. L.C.L Brenton

And so forth.

64 posted on 01/01/2011 9:57:36 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Charity that is not voluntary is not virtuous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

>> That is a supremely stupid objection. <<

Happy New Year to you also! May you continue to enjoy the blessings of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness!


65 posted on 01/01/2011 10:03:17 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

Same back at ya!


66 posted on 01/01/2011 10:25:04 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Charity that is not voluntary is not virtuous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: cizinec
That is incorrect. The Hebrew text was proto-Masoretic. The Masoretes did not exist until the 7th Century. Jerome’s translations appear to be near those of the Masoretes, but certainly not exact.

Yes. This group of scholars did with previously existing Hebrew sources, but with far greater rigor, what Jerome did in Latin using extant versions of Old Latin. Do you know of any instances where they used the LXX to help them decide how a certain vocalization should be done in the event of an otherwise ambiguous reading of a word?
67 posted on 01/01/2011 10:59:54 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

I’m confused at your argument.

You can’t say he used the Masoretic, but you can say proto-Masoretic. The Masoretes did not yet exist. Yes, they used a certain list of texts we call Proto-Masoretic. It was not THE Masoretic because there are differences.

“Do you know of any instances where they used the LXX to help them decide how a certain vocalization should be done in the event of an otherwise ambiguous reading of a word?”

I’m not sure to whom you are referring here. The Masoretes? Why would the Masoretes use the LXX? The whole purpose of their textual selection was to enforce Jewish scripture that was clearly pointing away from Christianity. Why would the Masoretes use the LXX? They couldn’t really use the LXX for vocalization of Hebrew words because the LXX is in Greek. As I said, they used proto-Masoretic texts and some of these were the texts Jerome used.

Maybe I’m straining at a gnat here, but Jerome can’t use what hasn’t been written. It’s not a really big deal. I’m a just a sayin it was proto-Masoretic, not Masoretic. ;)


68 posted on 01/03/2011 5:22:11 AM PST by cizinec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cizinec

Look back. I agreed with you. The people involved in preparing the Masoretic text still faced a lot of problems in dealing with ancient Hebrew. There are instances of words that can mean different things depending on the implied vowels. One way of determining what they may have meant is to look at sources closer to the origin of those scriptures. The LXX was, at least, prepared by Jewish scholars who were a. from that region, b. over 7 centuries closer to the Hebrew in the source material, c. were pre-Christian. It would be an invaluable resource in helping to determine the meanings of ambiguous readings. And, yes, the Masoretes could have used the LXX to help determine vocalization of problematic texts. If there is a word in Hebrew that could mean A or B depending on which vowels are used and scholars much closer to the source text translated it as A rather than B, then you have an indication that at least this group of people considered that the proper set of vowels. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, you would cite that as a probable reading as well as give other readings as a possibility. Being a pre-Christian document, they could feel justified in doing this. After all, they claimed that they were trying to present the OT text as it was without reference to what it meant.


69 posted on 01/03/2011 5:46:56 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; mgist; raptor22; victim soul; Isabel2010; Smokin' Joe; Michigander222; PJBankard; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

70 posted on 12/25/2012 5:42:47 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; mgist; raptor22; victim soul; Isabel2010; Smokin' Joe; Michigander222; PJBankard; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

71 posted on 12/25/2012 5:43:04 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; mgist; raptor22; victim soul; Isabel2010; Smokin' Joe; Michigander222; PJBankard; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

72 posted on 12/25/2012 5:44:07 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson