[GiovannaNicoletta]

If there is an attack on Iran which involves the United States, Israel will most probably be blamed.

This may be the trigger which sets off the Psalm 83 war.

[MrLee]

Psalm 83 is next (and soon) according to the way I read things, too.

[nuconvert]

Radio Farda (the Iranian branch of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty) reports that Kuwait, UAE and Germany have begun refusing refueling Iranian owned passenger planes as of 2 days ago.

[Jeff Head]

IMHO, Israel will probably strike deep into Iran. Our carrier forces are there to support them with data, and to use their AEGIS vessels (2 AEGIS destroyers and one AEGIS cruiser with each carrier, all capable of having the anti-ballistic missiles loaded) to intercept any Iranian ballistic missiles and to make sure Iran doesn’t try any attacks of their own with their air force or navy.

[varon]

Weather Clears for a US Strike on Iran

That action would be a boost for Obama's Socialists in the mid-term elections and perhaps assure him a second term.

[FrankR]

Insofar as democrats know that "war" is good politics when an election nears, or when they need to hide something (i.e. clinton's aspirin factory bombing), this may be just obama flexing his anorexic biceps...postering...sabre rattling.

Everything he touches is falling apart, his base abhors war, so why would he start, or become involved in, another war?

I am admittedly no middle east expert, but I can' see obama getting involved unless there is political gain in it for him.

[Dallas59]

Obammy? Commander and Chief? LOL!

[2harddrive]

MAYBE Hussein will instead order the 3 carriers to attack, to knock out, ISRAEL! What then???

[BobS]

Every ME country has been sophisticated military hardware from us for a while. Guidance Enhanced Missiles, Standard Missile-3s and PAC-3s. And the ground/ship based control systems for those.

This is a war where the Arabs and Israelis are going to work together on.

It won't take very many to destroy Iran's economy. What are Iran's military trucks going to run on? Piss?

[GiovannaNicoletta]

Ping!

[GiovannaNicoletta]

Ping!

[PaleoBob]

The article concedes WAY too much competence and good intention to Obamsky and his crew. They prosper by having a disruptive, mouthy Iran on the premises of the region. They won’t do anything to take it down.

[Quix]

THX THX.

[Cold Heat]

Rats always bite when backed into a corner, and Obama needs a distraction really bad right now.

[Lancey Howard]

Ubama won’t attack until about a month before the election.
Everything is about getting elected with that narcissistic scumbag.

[RonDog]

Psalm 83

[stevie_d_64]

Obama is absolutely not going to initiate a single pre-emptive military action on Iran dispite all of these coincidences of world leaders and officials jetting around all over the place pulling their hair out about the problem...

[Darnright]

I guess there’s no worries about that failed old cliche, “loose lips sink ships” anymore.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Hell, I wouldn’t doubt that Obastard’s reason for putting three carrier groups in the Gulf was to defend Iran against an attack from Israel.

[TomasUSMC]

ICBMs DON’T NEED NO STINKING GOOD WEATHER

[ichabod1]

He maketh them also to skip like a calf; Lebanon and Sirion like an young unicorn.