PING = LATER
thanks a lot for the postings regarding this information. up here in the great state of Upper Peninsula Michigan, my seminary days are long gone. miss the theological debates. still have my books from seminary days - dabneys Systematic theology. and many others thanks again. look forward to the posts
I don’t think people should use such language in proper company
Excellent Gammer..
It really explains a lot about the difference in the way we read scripture..
Love Luther!!
Fascinating. Having had 4 years at RTS Charlotte, training in the grammatical-historical method of hermanuetics, I have to say its very sad how many preachers in the evangelical world, have no clue about it, and give sloppy topical, or, allegorical sermons...as a routine. Many lay people don’t know the difference either, and find REAL preaching boring—and just can’t handle the right interpretation of the word.
Way too many ear ticklers out there....and ears looking to be scratched.
In 1515 AD, Martin Luther rejected the elaborate four-fold hermeneutic that had been predominant throughout the Medieval centuries, and which led to some very far-fetched allegorizing of the bible, leaving scriptural interpretation in the hands of the experts, who alone were capable of figuring out the secret things that bible passages really meant
Does anyone know what the four-fold hermeneutic was? Just curious.