Frothing Fingers. FROTHING FINGERS!
UNMITIGATED DUPLICITOUS NONSENSE.
Roman Catholics et al/ Vatican associates et al
WAIL TO THE MAX,
WHINE TO THE MAX,
REND THEIR CLOTHES AND THROW DUST IN THE AIR TO THE MAX
IF
an Protty so much as says that they think Mary’s finger nails are a little long in this or that painting . . .
or that
Mary had a hair or two a little out of place in this or that painting
or that
Mary’s hanky in this or that painting was not bleached quite white enough.
Why then there’s all manner of horrendously rabidly hostile uproar
about all the “ROMAN CATHOLIC HATE MONGERS” saying such
“HORRENDOUSLY BLASPHEMOUS THINGS”
about REVERED/ADORED/VENERATED [but NEVER worshipped /s]
Heavenly Jr goddess/MOTHER OF GAWD Mary.
Yet when a very super rationial; super courteous; super prayerful; super authentic Christian like Angel-Gal
merely asserts that her spirit is grieved, her spirit is troubled, her heart/ mind are aghast . . . or the like
when ANYONE OR ANYTHING is placed on a CROSS vs THE ONE WHO RODE THE CROSS FOR ALL MANKIND AND ALL CREATION . . .
THEN THERE’S STILL HOSTILITY, irrational hogwash to the max; irrational hostile accusation to the max; insufferable haughty wording to the max etc.
Leaves one kind of with the impression that all Roman Catholic/Vatican Parochial schools must automatically grant at least Masters’ degrees in
“PRISSY, NARROW, RIGID, HAUGHTY, SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS TO THE MAX”
Check out post 5591 before you go any further...
Oh, look another rant from Quix.
Doesn’t actually refute anything we posted because we apparently know more than he does (as per usual) so he just rants.
Quix, now let’s settle down. There is no talking about hankies or bleaching or finger nails and you know it. It’s not even about Alamo-girl. It is about the reverence for the Christian Faith and the lack of it displayed by so many.
I know that she did not post it and allege the things about it that another poster did. Where there is no guilt, no explanation is required. I do not think that her explanation was called for since another was the one who made the allegations. If she made allegations, then by all means, an explanation is called for. But I do not recall her making allegations that the picture was of the Virgin Mary, nor that there was anything more to the picture than, well, a simple photograph taken at an odd angle.
Frothing Fingers. FROTHING FINGERS!
If you're trying out your new tagline, I vote a wholehearted YES.
