Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who are the Catholics: The Orthodox or The Romanists, or both?
Me

Posted on 01/05/2010 9:46:47 PM PST by the_conscience

I just witnessed a couple of Orthodox posters get kicked off a "Catholic Caucus" thread. I thought, despite their differences, they had a mutual understanding that each sect was considered "Catholic". Are not the Orthodox considered Catholic? Why do the Romanists get to monopolize the term "Catholic"?

I consider myself to be Catholic being a part of the universal church of Christ. Why should one sect be able to use a universal concept to identify themselves in a caucus thread while other Christian denominations need to use specific qualifiers to identify themselves in a caucus thread?


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: 1holyapostolicchurch; apostates; catholic; catholicbashing; catholicwhiners; devilworshippers; eckleburghers; greeks; heathen; orthodoxyistheone; papistcrybabies; proddiecatholic; robot; romanistispejorative; romanists; romanistwhinefest; romannamecallers; russians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,861-7,8807,881-7,9007,901-7,920 ... 12,201-12,204 next last
To: Iscool
Cronos: Just as your Mother is the Mother of Iscool, but is not the creator of Iscool's spirit or soul, Mary is the Mother of God, but had nothing whatsoever to do with Jesus' "spirit/soul creation"

Iscool: I don't see how you can have it both ways...

Have what both ways? Your mother did not create your soul or spirit, yet she's called the Mother of Iscool. Mary did not create Jesus either but she did bear Him and give birth to Him hence she was His Mother
7,881 posted on 02/01/2010 7:34:01 AM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7878 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
yea heaven forbid that we use GODS WORD as our final authority .

But what you're using as your final authority is YOUR INTERPRETATION of God's Word.

7,882 posted on 02/01/2010 7:37:07 AM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7765 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; Mad Dawg

Context left out.

MoG.. denotes an ontological oneness with that which she is the mother of, but to which aspect she contributed nothing.

But that i mean she did not biologically contribute to who Jesus essentially is and was, God. In contrast, my mother did, may God bless her, as regards me. Again, while you do not claim Mary is the mother of Jesus Divinity, the constant uncritical use of the term, in contrast to the Biblical manner, is the issue.


7,883 posted on 02/01/2010 7:37:56 AM PST by daniel1212 (Pro 25:13 As the cold of snow in the time of harvest, so is a faithful messenger [frozen chosen])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7797 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
How are the definitions wanting?

you said Humans consist of body, soul and spirit, (1Ths. 5:23) and mothers ontologically pass on humanity, however God is most essentially a spirit, (Jn. 4:24) which by definition, has not flesh and bones (Lk. 24:39).

Yup, God the Father is not a human being. However, as you say : While Jesus was made flesh, in which the two natures are understood to be somehow commingled (in the mystery of the incarnation), yet what Mary contributed to Christ was not Divinity, but humanity.

You say that Jesus was God made flesh in which God and Man commingled. You agree with Church teachings on that. "Mary contributed to Christ's humanity, not His Divinity" -- again, you agree with Church teachings.

The difference is that of being a vessel thru which God was made flesh, versus ontologically being the mother of God, which term is further problematic as God is one.

Ontologically = "relating to essence or the nature of being.". You just said that Mary contributed to Christ's humanity. That was His Nature along with His divine nature. Hence Mary, the created being was the creature that gave birth to The Christ, she was the Theotokos -- the Mother of God -- and more importantly, the term defines that God came down as man, wholly man, wholly God.

7,884 posted on 02/01/2010 7:44:50 AM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7880 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
How are the definitions wanting?

you said Humans consist of body, soul and spirit, (1Ths. 5:23) and mothers ontologically pass on humanity, however God is most essentially a spirit, (Jn. 4:24) which by definition, has not flesh and bones (Lk. 24:39).

Yup, God the Father is not a human being. However, as you say : While Jesus was made flesh, in which the two natures are understood to be somehow commingled (in the mystery of the incarnation), yet what Mary contributed to Christ was not Divinity, but humanity.

You say that Jesus was God made flesh in which God and Man commingled. You agree with Church teachings on that. "Mary contributed to Christ's humanity, not His Divinity" -- again, you agree with Church teachings.

The difference is that of being a vessel thru which God was made flesh, versus ontologically being the mother of God, which term is further problematic as God is one.

Ontologically = "relating to essence or the nature of being.". You just said that Mary contributed to Christ's humanity. That was His Nature along with His divine nature. Hence Mary, the created being was the creature that gave birth to The Christ, she was the Theotokos -- the Mother of God -- and more importantly, the term defines that God came down as man, wholly man, wholly God.

While Catholicism claims to make this distinction,

The Church not only claims this distinction, it is our dogma, our basic theology -- NEVER in 2000 years has anyone even hinted that they believe Mary to be in any way divine. We reiterate that she was a created being. Do you have anything from the Catechism which states otherwise?

its incessant uncritical use of the term, in contrast to the Biblical manner,

You say that Mother of God is in contrast to Biblical manner, yet in Luke 1:23, Elizabeth calls Mary, Mother of her Lord.

How is the term Mother in any way a creator -- did not your Mother bear you and not create your soul?

The Church's terminology exalts GOD. By using the term Theotokos, Mother of GOD, we emphasise that God is one and yet Jesus was 100% man and 100% God in one "person".

7,885 posted on 02/01/2010 7:49:52 AM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7880 | View Replies]

ph


7,886 posted on 02/01/2010 7:51:43 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7885 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Except that the term Mother of God doesn’t exalt God, it exalts Mary as before God.


7,887 posted on 02/01/2010 7:57:12 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7885 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

>I don’t consider Mary a demi-goddess in any way.<

I appreciate the contrast, but Rome gives those who go to extremes pretty much a free reign, yet even praying to Mary is not Biblical. Please find one place where any true believer anywhere in Scripture prayed to anyone else in Heaven but God, or where the Bible exalts anyone else to be a heavenly object of prayers. Considering the sufficiency the Holy Spirit ascribes to Him, there is no need, or warrant, nor for attributing to Mary powers of Deity or functions that belong to Him, such as,

“The power thus put into her (Mary’s) hands is all but unlimited. How unerringly right, then, are Christian souls when they turn to Mary for help...How rightly, too, has every nation and every liturgy without exception acclaimed her great renown, which has grown greater with the voice of each succeeding century. Among her many other titles we find her hailed as ‘our Lady, our Mediatrix,’ (St. Bernard, Serm.II in Adv. 4) ‘the Reparatrix of the whole world,’ (St. Tharasius, Orat. in Praesentatione) ‘the Dispenser of all heavenly gifts.’ (On Off. Graec., 8 Dec.).” Pope Leo XIII, in Adiutricem (On the Rosary), Encyclical promulgated on September 5, 1895, #8.
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13adiut.htm

‘O Virgin most holy, none abounds in the knowledge of God except through thee; none, O Mother of God, attains salvation except through thee; none receives a gift from the throne of mercy except through thee.’” Pope Leo XIII, in Adiutricem (On the Rosary), Encyclical promulgated on September 5, 1895, #9.
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13adiut.htm

.When therefore we read in the writings of Saint Bernard, Saint Bernardine, Saint Bonaventure, and others that all in heaven and on earth, even God himself, is subject to the Blessed Virgin, they mean that the authority which God was pleased to give her is so great that she seems to have the same power as God. Her prayers and requests are so powerful with him that he accepts them as commands in the sense that he never resists his dear mother’s prayer because it is always humble and conformed to his will.... St. Louis de Montfort, in Treatise on True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin, #27, 246. http://www.ewtn.com/library/Montfort/TRUEDEVO.HTM

With equal truth may it be also affirmed that, by the will of God, Mary is the intermediary through whom is distributed unto us this immense treasure of mercies gathered by God, for mercy and truth were created by Jesus Christ. Thus as no man goeth to the Father but by the Son, so no man goeth to Christ but by His Mother....Mary is this glorious intermediary...” Pope Leo XIII, in Octobri Mense (On the Rosary), Encyclical promulgated on September 22, 1891, # 4.
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13ro1.htm

Thus is confirmed that law of merciful meditation of which We have spoken, and which St. Bernardine of Siena thus expresses: ‘Every grace granted to man has three degrees in order; for by God it is communicated to Christ, from Christ it passes to the Virgin, and from the Virgin it descends to us.’”Pope Leo XIII, in Iucunda Semper Expectatione (On the Rosary), Encyclical promulgated on September 8, 1894, #5.
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13ro5.htm

All gifts which the Author of all good (God) has deigned to communicate to the unhappy posterity of Adam, are, according to the loving resolve of His Divine Providence, dispensed by the hands of the Most Holy Virgin.” Pope Benedict XV (AAS 9, 1917, 266) (quoted in “About Our Lady, our Blessed Mother”, by Our Lady’s Warriors).
http://www.ourladyswarriors.org/abtmary.htm

“The foundation of all Our confidence, as you know well, Venerable Brethren, is found in the Blessed Virgin Mary. For, God has committed to Mary the treasury of all good things, in order that everyone may know that through her are obtained every hope, every grace, and all salvation. For this is His will, that we obtain everything through Mary.” Pope Pius IX, in Ubi Primum (On the Immaculate Conception), Encyclical promulgated on February 2, 1849, #5.
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9ubipr2.htm

“The power thus put into her (Mary’s) hands is all but unlimited. How unerringly right, then, are Christian souls when they turn to Mary for help...How rightly, too, has every nation and every liturgy without exception acclaimed her great renown, which has grown greater with the voice of each succeeding century. Among her many other titles we find her hailed as ‘our Lady, our Mediatrix,’ (St. Bernard, Serm.II in Adv. 4) ‘the Reparatrix of the whole world,’ (St. Tharasius, Orat. in Praesentatione) ‘the Dispenser of all heavenly gifts.’ (On Off. Graec., 8 Dec.).” Pope Leo XIII, in Adiutricem (On the Rosary), Encyclical promulgated on September 5, 1895, #8.
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13adiut.htm

“In conclusion: we may say that, in virtue of the divine salvific counsels ordaining a most perfect redemption, our Lady as Coredemptrix is included with Christ, the One Mediator.” Rev. Fr. Peter Damian M. Fehlner, F.F.I., professor of Catholic Theology, in Immaculata Mediatrix — Toward a Dogmatic Definition of the Coredemption.
http://www.voxpopuli.org/book_2_10.php

“Pope Pius XII explains in an address on the Queenship of Mary, ‘when the glorious Virgin Mary entered triumphantly into heaven and was elevated above the choirs of angels to the throne of the Most Holy Trinity.’ And then Christ ‘placed a triple crown of glory on her head, presented her to the heavenly court, seated her at his right hand and pronounced her Queen of the Universe.’...Opus Sanctorum Angelorum, Formation Letter, “Mary - ‘Regina Angelorum’”, April, 2000.
http://www.opusangelorum.org/Formation/Maryregina.html


7,888 posted on 02/01/2010 7:57:21 AM PST by daniel1212 (Pro 25:13 As the cold of snow in the time of harvest, so is a faithful messenger [frozen chosen])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7658 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; Mad Dawg
MoG.. denotes an ontological oneness with that which she is the mother of, but to which aspect she contributed nothing.

Ontological - the branch of metaphysics that studies the nature of existence or being as such.

What context left out?

But that i mean she did not biologically contribute to who Jesus essentially is and was, God. In contrast, my mother did, may God bless her, as regards me. Again, while you do not claim Mary is the mother of Jesus Divinity, the constant uncritical use of the term, in contrast to the Biblical manner, is the issue.

The Biblical manner IS to call Her Mother of the Lord (Luke 1:43)
7,889 posted on 02/01/2010 8:04:11 AM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7883 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

See post 7,788. “anything but?” What a creature! Not even Michael the archangel or the mighty apostle Paul has such powers and functions ascribed to them in the heavenly realm. “All but unlimited power” “Dispenser of all gifts?” Chapter and verse please.


7,890 posted on 02/01/2010 8:04:58 AM PST by daniel1212 (Pro 25:13 As the cold of snow in the time of harvest, so is a faithful messenger [frozen chosen])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7870 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Presbyterians = wmfights

Actually I'm a Baptist. :)

7,891 posted on 02/01/2010 8:10:11 AM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7859 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek; Mad Dawg; wmfights; Quix
I believe the Church leaders were making the religion more palatable to more people.

No question about it. The growth of this heresy really took off after the Roman Church emerged as the dominant state church in the Roman Empire. The god like status for Mary made it an easier process for assimilation of masses of goddess worshipers. It seems to have died down in the middle ages and then resurfaced as the Reformation approached. Now it seems to be at the forefront of this church and it's main tool for evangelizing in the southern hemisphere.

7,892 posted on 02/01/2010 8:19:51 AM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7872 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

It’s an important point. I don’t think it’s the point of critical difference between our perspectives.


7,893 posted on 02/01/2010 8:29:20 AM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7873 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
MoG.. denotes an ontological oneness with that which she is the mother of, but to which aspect she contributed nothing.

But that i mean she did not biologically contribute to who Jesus essentially is and was, God. In contrast, my mother did, may God bless her, as regards me. Again, while you do not claim Mary is the mother of Jesus Divinity, the constant uncritical use of the term, in contrast to the Biblical manner, is the issue.

VERY WELL PUT, imho. Thanks.

7,894 posted on 02/01/2010 8:34:41 AM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7883 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
Except that the term Mother of God doesn’t exalt God, it exalts Mary as before God

Let's go over it again --

the term Theotokos was emphasised when?
At the council of Ephesus 431.

Why?
To emphasise that Christ was 100% God and 100% man.

Who does it exalt?
God

Why
because it is impossible to use the term without acknowledging that the Man Jesus was also God and yet also Man. it exalts a God that can come in something so small and fragile as a human baby.
7,895 posted on 02/01/2010 8:41:17 AM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7887 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers; Forest Keeper; blue-duncan; Alamo-Girl; RnMomof7; HarleyD
Except it never says, "If you are elect, you will be given belief".

"And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed." -- Acts 13:48


"In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth" -- 2 Timothy 2:25


"Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light" -- Colossians 1:12


"For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ" -- 1 Thess. 5:9


"(Christ) in whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will" -- Ephesians 1:11


"But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you." -- John 10:26

The bottom line is that we do not make ourselves saints and "partakers of the inheritence of the saints." That's an error of Rome. God names and numbers His family, from beginning to end, having declared the end from the beginning. And mercifully and marvelously, that adoption includes you and me, wretched sinners who cannot save ourselves, who cannot even want to save ourselves, but for the grace freely given to us by the gift of the Holy Spirit.

The reformers were correct: grace alone saves and saves completely because it is founded and carried out by the Triune God alone, "according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will."

"All things."

7,896 posted on 02/01/2010 8:41:17 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7855 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; Mad Dawg
I appreciate the contrast, but Rome gives those who go to extremes pretty much a free reign,

Let me also say The Church doesn't consider Mary a demi-goddess in any way. She as per Church teachings was a created being, a creature.
7,897 posted on 02/01/2010 8:42:57 AM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7888 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; Amityschild; Blogger; Brad's Gramma; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; ...
NEVER in 2000 years has anyone even hinted that they believe Mary to be in any way divine. We reiterate that she was a created being. Do you have anything from the Catechism which states otherwise?

I believe the "Catechism" issue is overwhelmingly a STRAW DOG on this issue.

1. I suspect it will turn out to be incorrect that it's NEVER been hinted at even in the Catechism. Lord willing and I have time, I'll see.

2. HOWEVER, THERE'S TONS OF OTHER WRITINGS OF MORE THAN SLIGHTLY OFFICIAL, MORE THAN SEMI-OFFICIAL QUALITY AND NATURE--BY VIRTUE OF THE FOLKS AUTHORING SUCH--SOCIAL STAR CARDINALS--VATICAN OFFICES--LONG OFFICIALLY VATICAN APPROVED, RECOGNIZED PUBLISHING HOUSES ETC.WHICH HAVE MUCH MORE THAN HINTED AT MARY'S QUASI-DEITY STATUS.

This is the elephant in the living room which Vatican associates hereon seem to be unwilling and/or unable to see at all--or admit at all.

This allows the vast Vatican machine to have it both ways--a nice trick it is expert at with many hundreds of years of practice.

Personally, I find the outrageous amount of publishing OTHERWISE to be wholesale over the line into blasphemous UNBIBLICAL assertions, connotations, out-right statements, out-right appelations, out-right bowing and scraping, out-right fawning overwhelmingly and routinely beyond that which accures to Christ in the same organization . . . one could go on and on.

And unless and until some Responsible, balanced, Vatican associates hereon admit that status quo and begin to discuss it candidly, then I'll know that we are still dealing in straw dogs and that no real dialogue is possible on this matter.

7,898 posted on 02/01/2010 8:47:41 AM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7885 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Except that the term Mother of God doesn’t exalt God, it exalts Mary as before God.

###

ABSOLUTELY.


7,899 posted on 02/01/2010 8:48:39 AM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7887 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Matthew 1:18-25
Luke 1:26-38n ... 2:1-7

What a creature!

John 3:2

Not even Michael the archangel or the mighty apostle Paul has such powers and functions ascribed to them in the heavenly realm.Of course Michael doesn't have such powers. He's an angel. In Christ we are raised above angels. About Paul we could dicker, but She certainly spent more time with Jesus and in contact with Jesus and in Faith in Jesus than Paul did.

7,900 posted on 02/01/2010 8:49:59 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7890 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,861-7,8807,881-7,9007,901-7,920 ... 12,201-12,204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson