Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who are the Catholics: The Orthodox or The Romanists, or both?
Me

Posted on 01/05/2010 9:46:47 PM PST by the_conscience

I just witnessed a couple of Orthodox posters get kicked off a "Catholic Caucus" thread. I thought, despite their differences, they had a mutual understanding that each sect was considered "Catholic". Are not the Orthodox considered Catholic? Why do the Romanists get to monopolize the term "Catholic"?

I consider myself to be Catholic being a part of the universal church of Christ. Why should one sect be able to use a universal concept to identify themselves in a caucus thread while other Christian denominations need to use specific qualifiers to identify themselves in a caucus thread?


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: 1holyapostolicchurch; apostates; catholic; catholicbashing; catholicwhiners; devilworshippers; eckleburghers; greeks; heathen; orthodoxyistheone; papistcrybabies; proddiecatholic; robot; romanistispejorative; romanists; romanistwhinefest; romannamecallers; russians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,141-7,1607,161-7,1807,181-7,200 ... 12,201-12,204 next last
To: HarleyD; blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; xzins; Forest Keeper
Either they act upon their own volition or they act upon God changing their hearts. There isn't a middle ground...

...the scriptures tell us that we are born again not by our will but by the Father (John 1:12-13). The scriptures tell us God has a plan that He is inacting (Acts 2:23, Eph 1:10). The scriptures also tell us that man is bound to sin, a automated slave to it (Rom 1)

Amen! Harley, your responses are razor-sharp and perfectly aligned to Scripture.

"O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." -- Jeremiah 10:23

An oldie from the great Italian reformer, but it hardly gets any better...

THE DOCTRINE OF ABSOLUTE PREDESTINATION
by Jerome Zanchius

"...Those who are ordained unto eternal life were not so ordained on account of any worthiness foreseen in them, or of any good works to be wrought by them, nor yet for their future faith, but purely and solely of free, sovereign grace, and according to the mere pleasure of God. This is evident, among other considerations, from this: that faith, repentance and holiness are no less the free gifts of God than eternal life itself. "Faith is not of yourselves, it is the gift of God" (Eph. ii 8). "Unto you it is given to believe" (Phil. i. 29). "Him hath God exalted with His right hand for to give repentance" (Acts v.31). "Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life" (Acts xi. 18). In like manner holiness is called the sanctification of the Spirit (2 Thess. ii. 13), because the Divine Spirit is the efficient of it in the soul, and, of unholy, makes us holy. Now, if repentance and faith are the gifts, and sanctification is the work of God, then these are not the fruits of man's free-will, nor what he acquires of himself, and so can neither be motives to, nor conditions of his election, which is an act of the Divine mind, antecedent to, and irrespective of all qualities whatever in the persons elected. Besides, the apostle asserts expressly that election is not of works, but of Him that calleth, and that it passed before the persons concerned had done either good or evil (Rom. ix. 11).

Again, if faith or works were the cause of election, God could not be said to choose us, but we to choose Him, contrary to the whole tenor of Scripture "Ye have not chosen Me, but I have chosen you" (John xv. 16). "Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us. We love Him because He first loved us" (1 John iv. 10, 19).

Election is everywhere asserted to be God's act, and not man's (Mark xiii. 20; Rom. ix. 17; Eph. i. 4; 1 Thess. v.9; 2 Thess. ii. 13). Once more, we are chosen that we might be holy, not because it was foreseen we would be so (Eph. i. 4), therefore to represent holiness as the reason why we were elected is to make the effect antecedent to the cause. The apostle adds (ver. 5), "having predestinated us according to the good pleasure of His will," most evidently implying that God saw nothing extra se, had no motive from without, why He should either choose any at all or this man before another. In a word, the elect were freely loved (Hosea xiv. 4), freely chosen (Rom. xi. 5, 6), and freely redeemed (Isa. iii. 3), they are freely called (2 Tim. i. 9), freely justified (Rom. iii. 24), and shall be freely glorified (Rom. vi. 23). The great Augustine, in his book of Retractations, ingenuously acknowledges his error in having once thought that faith foreseen was a condition of election; he owns that that opinion is equally impious and absurd, and proves that faith is one of the fruits of election, and consequently could not be, in any sense, a cause of it. "I could never have asserted," says he, "that God in choosing men to life had any respect to their faith, had I duly considered that faith itself is His own gift." And, in another treatise of his, he has these words: Since Christ says, 'Ye have not chosen Me,' etc., I would fain ask whether it be Scriptural to say we must have faith before we are elected, and not, rather, that we are elected in order to our having faith?"...

Who can read these words and not see the Scriptures in them and His merciful assurance that He will never leave us because our faith comes from Him and not from our own corrupted desires?

Those who call us "God's automatons" should realize what an unearned privilege that title really is. Please, God, continue to guide our every move and thank you for never letting us go. For outside of you we are lost; we cease to breath.

7,161 posted on 01/29/2010 8:29:18 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7128 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1; MarkBsnr
flat, up here

I traveled cross-country along Rte 40 five years ago in the summer, and last month I drove the same pedal-sticking elderly Toyota through Rte 80 from Sac to Kansas.

Wow. That was a gorgeous trip.

7,162 posted on 01/29/2010 8:29:54 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7156 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

You can find blogs on Orthodox Presbyterian Cult too that talk about their salvation through Machen, their God.


7,163 posted on 01/29/2010 8:32:12 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7061 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
No, God is not the Father of all men..that is a fallacy. God is the one that created all men, but He is not their father.

And, of course you would believe that Jesus did not come to save all men, then, correct?
7,164 posted on 01/29/2010 8:34:22 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7063 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
More words from the website (note: not the BLOG you said was an "official Vatican website", but a real website that you lit upon, run by wayoflife). This can be more words for the OPC's next cauldron meet:

The following is from Pastor Chris Matthews, Smoky Valley Independent Baptist Church --

“3. Another possibility is that many want to have an excuse to live like the devil and blame the fact that their kids turned out like hellions on ‘my children were not of the elect.’ I don't see this as a conscious decision but a possible reason none the less.

“4. Most have not heard a clear cut presentation on the errors of Calvinism from their pastors and/or church leaders. Nor have they heard the biblical definitions of biblical words that Calvinists pervert.

“5. Many look at Charles Spurgeon as next in line after the trinity and want to be like him. It would be better in my opinion if they would just smoke his cigars instead of choking on his Calvinism.

“6. It is a status symbol to say I am of the elect.

“7. Calvinism's cohorts seem to think that they have a better understanding of God than anybody else.

“8. Possibly the biggest reason is the infiltration of churches by Calvinists. Every now and then you hear about a church into which a family comes and secretly spreads the lie of Calvinism among the people and then leads a church split. This is not just happening in Baptist or fundamental churches, either.

======

Having studied the Bible earnestly and prayerfully for 34 years and having studied both sides of this issue, I am convinced that neither Calvinism nor Quick Prayerism is Scriptural.

7,165 posted on 01/29/2010 8:37:46 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7066 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi; Mad Dawg; wagglebee; Dr. Eckleburg; wmfights
Do you, Doc and WMfights have anything to do with this link to a WEBSITE (not a BLOG like the one you said was an, ahem "Official Vatican website):

“”Actually Scripture clearly says that the earth is flat...So, flat earth. Go for it.””

There actually is a protestant group who believes this still

http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm

From Their mission statement...

“”Then, in the year of our Lord fourteen-hundred and ninety-two, it all changed. For decades a small band of self-proclaimed “enlightened” individuals had been spouting their heretical nonsense that the Earth was in fact round.””

Or is this related to the view of the OPC or APC or BPC whatever cult is the latest in Fashion

7,166 posted on 01/29/2010 8:40:35 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7065 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; xzins; Forest Keeper
I generally liked that passage. One cannot just decide to have faith, intellectually. This is why, by the way, no scripture reading, by itself, gets one anywhere.

Now, if repentance and faith are the gifts, and sanctification is the work of God, then these are not the fruits of man's free-will

This is the only part that is not Catholic and quite false.

This is a logical non-sequitiur. Faith is a gift but you don't have it? Rependance is a gift but you don't do it?

Faith and repentance are things that I do. They are predicated on the gift of free will or else they are not what is on the gift label.

7,167 posted on 01/29/2010 8:42:01 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7161 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; xzins; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; Forest Keeper; wmfights; RnMomof7; Gamecock
No, we don't make a choice. That connotates that we see God's path on one side and Satan on the other. What the scriptures states is that we are "led". We are either guided by the Spirit or guided by our desires and lust. It's not a choice.

Amen!

My husband says he became aware of the accurate presupposition of the Calvinist perspective on Scripture when he held our first child in the delivery room only to realize nothing he had ever done in his entire life merited the unearned gift of our son. At that moment he understood merciful and free grace.

It's all a gift. Everything. And none of it comes from us. It's all by Christ, through Christ, for Christ. "And by Him all things consist."

"All things."

7,168 posted on 01/29/2010 8:44:50 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7137 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; wagglebee; wmfights; HarleyD; Forest Keeper; Quix; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; ...
The blog I linked to is a member of the Vatican-sanctioned Legion of Mary.

Ah, so:
1. you take BACK your earlier point that the BLOG was an "official Vatican approved website"
2. You now seem to take back the statement that the BLOG was somehow "Vatican approved" (Strange, do you believe that the Vatican trolls websites and launches cyberwar on non-approved ones?? :-P
3. And you state that the BLOG you linked to is a member of the Legion of Mary (I didn't know the Legion of MAry takes cyber life as well) -- but assuming that error was due to lack of finesse with the English language, you say that this is somehow "Vatican approved doctrine" posted on a BLOG? -- so, your personal BLOG has to get vetted by the OPC? Does the OPC patrol it's members so closely?
7,169 posted on 01/29/2010 8:47:42 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7073 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; Dr. Eckleburg
Dr E: The blog I linked to is a member of the Vatican-sanctioned Legion of Mary.

Petro: That blog is a member of what? The Legion of Mary permits blogs to be members?

YEs, whodda thunk!? And that BLOG is supposedly a "Vatican approved website"!! Perhaps the good doctor thinks that The Church now takes in websites as members too -- hence the suspicions that FR is a Vatican-approved website run by Cardinal Jim Robinson...

It must be due to the paranoia spread by Calvin when he ran a police state in Geneva. So, now paranoia is the P in Calvin's TULIP
7,170 posted on 01/29/2010 8:50:36 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7075 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Mr Rogers; Forest Keeper; wmfights; blue-duncan; HarleyD; Petronski; wagglebee; ...
Mr R: maybe Warfield doesn't even have the brains of a doorknob.

Dr E: What doorknob is sitting on the oft-posted horse?

Ah, now the insults. the final stages of a lost argument. Are you, Dr. E, infering in that post that Mr R is a doorknob? that's a wrong direction in any argument to insult or pull up random blog statements about a person.
7,171 posted on 01/29/2010 8:55:39 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6931 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Surgeon was a dear.

Met me at his office at 17:00 [closed at 12:00] as seemed like the last tea bag was soaked in blood, some newish.

Turned out he didn’t want to mess with the sutures already done and it has worked out.

He was happy to give me a scrip for hydrocodone. Working much better.

Leaves me drowsy which is good. Hurts like the dickens to swallow . . . movement of denture against shredded cheek and gums when I swallow. UNfun.

Thanks tons for your prayers.


7,172 posted on 01/29/2010 8:56:51 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7155 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Silly BB, my head already hurts sufficiently without trying to think about that sort of thing! LOL.


7,173 posted on 01/29/2010 8:58:35 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7157 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
If - then. What must the jailer DO? Believe.

That's a key point -- we are not blameless. We cannot stand before God on Judgement Day and argue "you predestined me to do this, it wasn't my fault, it was YOURS". While we cannot possibly save ourselves, we can accept, in humility, God's grace that will save us
7,174 posted on 01/29/2010 8:58:37 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7077 | View Replies]

To: annalex; Iscool; Dr. Eckleburg; Mad Dawg
Christ has fully and completely atoned for any sin anyone has committed or will commit, big or small, confessed and absolved or not, cleansed in Purgatory or not. Is that clearer?

Yes, and you are right that my question had nothing whatsoever to do with purgatory.

Any penitential action one can do does not add to the atonement worked by Christ. That includes simple inward sorrow for a sin, outward sorrow expressed to others in words, restitution of material harm done, physical self-punishment or self-humiliation, prayers, pilgrimages and Bible studies, sacramental confession, reception of absolution, purgatorial cleansing, -- none of that makes the sin in question any better atoned for than it was atoned at Golgotha near 2,000 years ago. What these acts of penance do is apply the atonement to your soul.

That would appear to mean that Christ's atonement attaches on a step by step basis as mortal sins occur throughout life. Is there any scriptural basis for this? We would call this justification by faith, a one time event. How would you interpret these scriptures which we think support this view:

Rom. 3:21-26 : 21 But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. 22 This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. 25 God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— 26 he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.

Rom. 5:18-19 : 18 Consequently, just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men, so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that brings life for all men. 19 For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.

If one act brings life then how could attachment be a partial and repeated process? Wouldn't you really have to say that it was the penance that brings life because THAT is what makes the atonement of any value to the individual? The passage shows a match but there is no match with the process view. Jesus' saving sacrifice was a one time event, not a process.

FK: why in the normal course is someone required to confess a mortal sin and then be absolved by a priest in order to get into Heaven?

For the same reason a Christian would nevertheless do the penitential works enumerated above: sorrow for the sin and love for Christ. If you convinced yourself that since Christ has atoned for whatever you do, you can let your conscience atrophy, -- then you eliminated yourself from the Elect, not because Christ did not give you the atonement, but because you did not take it. Christ gave you Heaven and you chose Hell.

Do you see a grammatical problem with the idea of election being on again, off again, and on again, etc.? If election means chosen by God then how can it go back and forth since God doesn't change His mind?

It is by what you do that you will be saved; not alone for what Christ did.

I suppose in the overall scheme of things there's something more I do not understand. In the OT the focus was on the physical (physical deeds), many of which were only symbolic, like the sacrifices. With the coming of Christ the focus shifted to the spiritual, we were no longer under the Law. Why then, would Catholicism refocus the attention back to the physical both in this life with the sacraments being salvific, and at the end times at judgment? This seems like a reversion to me. The bigger problem is that we know that the physical in the OT was symbolic, but here the physical is taken in the literal sense.

7,175 posted on 01/29/2010 9:01:41 PM PST by Forest Keeper ((It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6168 | View Replies]

To: annalex
[...] through Rte 80 from Sac to Kansas.

Kansas=corn...corn...corn...corn...corn...corn...corn...corn...milo!...corn...corn...corn...corn... But the biggest two-handed beefsteak tomatoes in the road-side stands... that and a saltshaker make a meal...

Been through Iowa a bunch of times too... Good folks all over the plains... While I once was a flatlander (Chicago, Illinois, Olathe/KC, Kansas), I wouldn't go back for a million bucks now.

Next time, you are on 80, head north from Missoula MT up 93... When you hit Flathead Lake, you're in my back yard... Glacier National Park is worth a peek...

7,176 posted on 01/29/2010 9:01:48 PM PST by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7162 | View Replies]

To: annalex
This is why, by the way, no scripture reading, by itself, gets one anywhere.

I agree. Without the illuminating work of the Holy Spirit to guide our understanding, the Bible is just words on a page.

We must be born again by God's free gift of the indwelling Holy Spirit in order to know the things of God.

Faith and repentance are things that I do.

And you do them because God has given you eyes to see and ears to hear and a renewed mind and a heart of flesh in place of your heart of stone which was alien to God until you were born again not by blood, but by the will and purpose of God alone.

They are predicated on the gift of free will

"Free will" is an oxymoron. Our will is not "free." Our will is either a slave to sin or a slave to righteousness. Everything in life is dependent on the God which created it and continues to animate it, by His will, for His glory. .

7,177 posted on 01/29/2010 9:05:12 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7167 | View Replies]

To: Quix

So glad to hear you got something better. NOW GO TO SLEEP YOUNG MAN!!!

I can’t believe you have the dentures IN right after the pulling??? Do they not let that area heal first? Sounds very ouchy.


7,178 posted on 01/29/2010 9:07:28 PM PST by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7172 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; Mr Rogers
While we cannot possibly save ourselves, we can accept, in humility, God's grace that will save us

Amen, preach it brother!!!

When you think about it, why would the word or concept used be "gift" if it could not be accepted? I have given a gift that was rejected in the past, didn't make me feel very good, but it was given freely and could be accepted freely, or not. I can't MAKE someone take a gift.

7,179 posted on 01/29/2010 9:14:10 PM PST by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7174 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Yup. IMMEDIATELY after the last suture was tied.

To keep swelling in check and help make better fit, as I understood it.

Course trying to stem the blood flow . . . had me take them out at home on a phone call and put tea bag over troublesome spot . . . tanin in the tea helps clot the blood.

So then swelling worsened.

When went back at 1700 . . . he put them back in. owwweeeyyyy big time.

AM SLEEPING in this LazYBoy frequently. Meds help a lot and need to keep head elevated anyway.

Sure appreciate your caring.

God be with you and yours.


7,180 posted on 01/29/2010 9:18:44 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,141-7,1607,161-7,1807,181-7,200 ... 12,201-12,204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson