Fourteen Easy Ways to Improve the Liturgy

ic ^ | August 18, 2009 | Arlene Oost-Zinner and Jeffrey Tucker

[NYer]

Boredom during the liturgy is something all Catholics have felt from time to time, and it's never justifiable. No matter how mundane the architecture, how dull the homily, or how bad the music, what's taking place on the altar is a miraculous sacrifice that gives us the grace for salvation. That reality should be enough to keep our attention.

 

And yet boredom is a reality that good liturgy can help fight. Many parishes try to do so by inventing every manner of new enticement: brighter and larger banners, forced attempts to create an upbeat environment of friendliness and community, big bowls of incense carried by special ministers, and Donahue-style homiletics.

 

The attempt to jazz up the liturgy usually takes the form of musical enhancements and nearly always means more instruments and rhythms drawn from popular music. The rationale isn't complicated. Liturgists are frustrated that people don't get as excited about religion as they do about the pop divas and music videos, and they conclude that they need ever more musical pyrotechnics to make the difference.

 

But these approaches often backfire since the argument for them is flawed at its root. Community feeling and fun are fine, but if the liturgy doesn't offer a setting conducive to prayer and the contemplation of eternal mysteries, it has failed its first aesthetic aim.

 

In any case, Catholics can't compete with the local evangelical community centers for inspiring a toe-tapping community feeling. A recent Gallup poll of Catholics shows that weekly Mass attendance (45 percent do so) continues to slip, and for the first time has slipped behind Protestant churches (48 percent). The defectors from the Roman rite include those who flee to indults and Eastern liturgies or just drop out.

 

There are many reasons for this (demographic, cultural, and theological) and liturgists don't deserve all the blame. Yet the decline in the desire to attend Mass coincides with the de-emphasis on solemnity and the advance of mundane art forms in liturgy -- the popularization of music being the most conspicuous shift. People may say they love to hold hands, dance, and tap their toes at Mass, but this wears thin over time and eventually undermines the rationale for steady devotion. In fact, a 1981-1989 Notre Dame Study of Catholic Parish Life concluded that unrelenting attempts to get people to sing -- especially attempts that employ guitars -- actually increase boredom.

 

There are, however, ways to break with routine and inspire steadfastness and personal attachment to the liturgy. What follows are 14 very simple steps for repairing the weaknesses that mar many U.S. Catholic liturgies. Professional liturgists resist them because of the prevailing bias against anything that smacks of a pre-Vatican II sensibility. Nonetheless, the following suggestions are born of experience and a conviction that the first aim of liturgy is to aid inner reflection.

 

The suggestions below are simple and costless. They need not be implemented all at once. Small changes week by week will make a huge difference over time.

 

 

1. Turn down the volume.

 

It's hard to imagine this today, but Christian liturgy thrived for 1,950 years without microphones, electronic keyboards, amplifiers, mixers, sound technicians, and surround-sound speakers. These days, conventional guidebooks on liturgy emphasize "proclaiming" and broadcasting one's voice. Cantors use microphones as if they're music-video performers.

 

Beyond just being heard, the goal of all these contraptions and behaviors is to make the liturgy ever louder. The results are more often than not earsplitting, creating a sort of stupor. People feel that they're being imposed upon. Most of this, of course, comes about in reaction against the traditional use of the sotto voce -- the under voice -- which has been derided by modern liturgists as silence or whispering so that the people couldn't hear what was going on. Ironically, experts in the advertising world have found that the low voice actually draws out the attention of the listener.

 

The virtue of silence has been rediscovered in recent years, with numerous statements by the late Pope John Paul II and Vatican officials praising its ability to convey meaning in a noisy world. The musical counterpart to silence is not in-your-face pop but distant sounds of contemplation. Turn down the mikes and sing as if the human voice alone is responsible for filling the space. This will diminish the electronic presence in the liturgy and increase the God-given one as a means through which we are worshiping Him.

 

 

2. Chant for a prelude.

 

If you've ever been to an evangelical service, you know that the ten minutes prior to the service are social time. For Catholics, on the other hand, it's a time for prayer and preparation. Keyboard music is common during this time, but imagine something different: simple Latin chant, sung calmly, without affectation, with silence between verses. The simple sounds inspire prayer. A common objection is that people can't understand the words. Yet this isn't the time for pedagogy. It is a time for reflection, to begin to hear the voice of angels who speak in an unfamiliar tongue. The meaning is conveyed in the line of notes. The holy sounds remind people entering the church that they're in a holy place.

 

 

3. Curb the announcements.

 

In an age when the secular world lays claim to most of our time, making a few announcements has become a pastoral necessity. Sunday Mass is often the only opportunity a pastor has to inform his flock concerning parish and community life. Few are lucky enough to have schedules that permit them to go to daily Mass, much less have their children attend Catholic schools, and gone are the days where the parish or church plays a central role in the life of the village.

 

That being the reality, it's wise to adhere closely to the General Instruction of the Roman Missal's directive, inserting announcements after the liturgy of the Eucharist and before the dismissal, where they have the least chance of interrupting the framework of prayer set up by the liturgy. Welcoming statements from cantors or others before the procession even begins have nothing to do with the rite itself and are most likely utterances contrived for the purpose of artificially engaging the attention of the congregation. Announcements should not be made before Mass begins, save concerning matters absolutely necessary to the people's understanding of that particular Mass itself or other issues prudentially suggested by the pastor.

 

Mass doesn't begin because a cantor gets up and proclaims when, where, and how it is to happen. Mass begins when the priest enters the church, with or without a cross bearer, book bearer, lector, or deacon.

 

 

4. Choose plain, traditional hymns for the processional.

 

The first Christian hymns were Psalms, the text of which was already 500 years old when first used, and the melodies handed down from Jewish and Greek traditions. The principle then is the same today: Hymns should bespeak the long tradition of the faith, whether in Latin or in English, in form or in style. Liturgical music that mimics the sound of secular music should be left outside the church.

 

Singable hymns with familiar meters and cadences will tie members of the congregation together in adoration and prayer and to the experience of the whole body of Christ, in all times and all places. Liturgical music exclusively tied to current times and styles cannot accomplish this. More importantly, the sights and sounds of the Mass, although communal in one sense, must ultimately point the individual conscience to the mystery unfolding on the altar.

 

Processional music can also employ the choir alone, a stately piece of polyphony that lets people put down their hymnbooks and watch as the celebrant and altar servers walk forward carrying the crucifix. People should not be so busy with their hands and eyes that they don't notice this beautiful sight. In any case, liturgists make a great mistake in believing that people come to Mass only because they want to sing or that active participation can only take one form.

 

 

5. Sing the Kyrie.

 

One of the earliest and most recognizable parts of the Mass is not in Latin but Greek: the Kyrie. It has long been a living symbol of the unity of Eastern and Western Christendom. And yet for all the bits of music in the Roman Rite, the "Lord, Have Mercy" is most often said, not sung, by the priest and answered by the people. This beautiful passage of the penitential rite begins and is over in less than a few seconds.

 

The Kyrie seems to have taken on a diminished role in the liturgy, but is it too much to ask that a bit more time be taken in this beautiful expression of penance? If active participation in singing is what we desire, the Kyrie can be easily sung by even the least-musical priest or cantor and answered by the faithful. It can be sung in the original Greek. Everyone knows the words. By introducing new music settings according to the liturgical season, variation can be brought to the Mass. It serves at the outset as a reminder of why we have gathered at Mass as a community.

 

 

6. Choose a plainer Gloria.

 

So many thousands of settings of the Gloria are available today that it's a wonder that most parishes use pop versions filled with frippery and faux exuberance. An about-face is in order toward the simpler settings that can be easily learned and sung by all. A simple, English version can tap into traditional, chant-like sensibilities and do much to restore dignity and beauty to this song of praise.

 

A timeless Latin Gloria remains unmatched for the purpose of praising God in the liturgy. If your parish is one where a Latin ordinary is feared, as is the case in many parishes across the country, there's still something that can be done. Attempting the Gloria in Latin can be part of your reformist plan, but it's best to start on a small scale. Congregations can be easily overwhelmed when faced with something the length of the Gloria. The Latin will come in time, should you choose to keep working toward it.

 

An English Gloria may well fit the needs of the congregation on most occasions. Not to be forgotten, however, is that the General Instruction does permit a Gloria sung by the choir alone. You might want to exercise this option and do a plain Latin Gloria on certain feast days only, or perhaps even pull out all of the stops and do a polyphonic version, if rehearsal time and resources permit.

 

 

7. Fix the Psalm.

 

St. John Chrysostom reports that the Christians sang the Psalms unceasingly, and it was the earliest part of Scripture translated into Latin. Their centrality in Christian worship cannot be overestimated. The development of the sung Psalter is central to the development of all Christian music and music itself. What has happened to the Psalms today? Many settings published today sound like miniature versions of jazz ballads, and they're preprinted in the missalettes, giving the impression that these are an ecclesiastical requirement (they're not).

 

The goal might be the restoration of the Latin Psalter (via the Graduale or the Simplex), but that simply isn't viable at most parishes today, nor is any English rendering of the elaborate Gregorian chant readily available. What is possible is that they be done in radically reduced melodic form, without strange intervals or leaps. A simple line consisting of just a few notes is a fitting transition to using psalm tones or something more elaborate. At first, it might seem intimidating, even downright frightening, to abandon the printed line of music. The method is to sense the need for solemnity, and let the ear guide you.

 

The Psalm should begin not with an instrument but a confident single voice. His or her line of notes should be simple enough to be repeated by the people. The verses themselves should not be sung by the entire choir (which makes them sound muddy) but, again, by a single voice, who should think of it as a sung text. That means the singer must enunciate clearly and modulate the voice in a way that uses the space well.

 

 

8. The Offertory should be a time of preparation.

 

During the offertory, the bread and wine are brought forward to prepare us for the Eucharistic Prayer and the Consecration. The music therefore should not overshadow what follows but rather point to the coming sacrifice and prepare us mentally and spiritually.

 

Something quiet and beautiful (again, employing the human voice) is the way. Have the congregation sing a simple hymn, beginning with accompaniment if necessary, allowing the final verse or two to be sung a capella. The keyboard might be of assistance in getting people to sing, but in the long run, the congregation will become more confident if allowed to experience the beauty and mystery of their own voices joining together in preparation for the feast.

 

The offertory is also a good time to familiarize people with the great Latin hymns of the faith. Over the course of a year, the goal can be to cover only a modest number: Ave Maria, Jesu Dulcis, Ave Maris Stella, Ubi Caritas, Attende Domine, Ave Verum, and seasonal chants like Veni Creator and Regina Caeli. With enough repetition, these can be learned by anyone. They really should become part of the life of faith again.

 

 

9. Reduce and simplify the 'Mystery of Faith' and the 'Great Amen.'

 

The settings of these used in parishes are most commonly those put out by the big publishing houses. They tend to have Broadway-type orchestration, to be overdrawn, and to appear suddenly and without warning. Jarring at best, their drama, distilled into five seconds, can compete with the mystery of the Consecration itself. Simple chants sung by the people in a manner that extends from silent prayer are more appropriate.

 

The "Mystery of Faith" was never separate from the Consecration in the "old" Mass, so there is no authentic precedent to light our way. What can be done, however, is to reduce the "Mystery of Faith" to a single, unrepeated line without accompaniment. For that matter, the Amen need not be "great" but rather just two notes.

 

 

10. Shorten the Sign of Peace.

 

Let's be frank: This part of the liturgy, once very formal and reserved to the deacons and subdeacons, can be disconcerting. The minutes after the consecration just seem like a bad time to be required to greet people with a friendly hello or a kiss. The choir can do something about this. Don't let the Sign of Peace go on and on. Just begin the "Lamb of God" right away. Most people will be grateful.

 

 

11. Begin the communion chant (a simple Latin hymn will do) after the priest receives.

 

What to do while waiting for Communion? In parishes, there is no choice: watch in silence as the celebrant gives Communion to the elite laypeople who have been selected as official "eucharistic ministers." That is just not a pleasant sight, so it's best to introduce some music as a way of diverting attention and turning toward inward prayer. The General Instruction recommends that the communion song begin when the priest receives. So it should. And by the choir alone.

 

 

12. Don't force people to sing during communion.

 

Various attempts have been made over the years to get people to sing while they're standing in line or receiving. But these have been a failure. It is a simple fact that people don't want to sing during communion. Here's the archetype when active participation means something other than singing a song. It means receiving the Body of Christ. This is the perfect time for the choir to develop a sense of singing in a sacred manner, quietly and beautifully. Again, chant and polyphony are best, but don't overlook the possibility of a quiet organ piece as well. It should be prayerful, not boisterous. Mostly, people will be glad just to be left alone.

 

 

13. Allow for silence after communion.

 

One of the remarkable aesthetic aspects of the Roman rite is how quickly and suddenly it ends. Only a few minutes pass between the reception of Communion and the time of departure. This is a wonderful time for silence: no music, announcements, children's blessings, or anything. Just prayer.

 

 

14. Don't attempt a rousing good-bye.

 

Mass ends with the words "The Mass is ended," so nothing that happens after that should upstage what came before. The recessional, which is not mandatory, can be exuberant, of course. But many parishes have the problem of a great deal of talking and saying hello taking place after Mass, and upbeat recessionals can only make the problem worse. If the goal is to send people out into the world with a sense of what just took place, a recessional that recalls the quiet power of the whole liturgy is best.

 

 

More Elaborate Suggestions

 

There are other methods for enhancing the sense of solemnity, which really means creating sights and sounds that remind people they're in church. The choir can be in an inauspicious place. Carpet can be pulled up to eliminate the deadness in a room that compels the use of microphones. Traditional polyphony is a great way to add texture to a liturgy dominated by chant. Starting a children's choir is an investment in the future generation of singers and can dispel the impression that Latin is anachronistic or unsingable. Tacky banners can be taken down and replaced with beautiful art and statues from Christian history.

 

All of these changes help a liturgy become rooted in the broad range of Christian experience through the ages and convey the sense that the individual is part of something far larger than one parish or one age.

 

Catholic liturgy, by its nature and structure, cannot provide an imitation form of popular entertainment any more than the rock concert can suitably provide a good medium to encourage a sense of penance and the presence of the sacred. The unrelenting attempt to try and try again can have the unintended effect of causing people to feel manipulated. What's more, the clamor for ever more innovative liturgical enticements is wholly unnecessary.

 

The General Instruction is a worthy guide for achieving solemnity at Mass, and 2,000 years of tradition provide experience enough to prove it. Further proof comes when the liturgy again begins to spark the spiritual imagination and reminds us why we're there.

 

 

---

 

Musical Reminders from the General Instruction Purpose

 

The Christian faithful who gather together as one to await the Lord's coming are instructed by the Apostle Paul to sing together Psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs (cf. Col 3:16). Singing is the sign of the heart's joy (cf. Acts 2:46). Thus Saint Augustine says rightly, "Singing is for one who loves." There is also the ancient proverb: "One who sings well prays twice."

 

 

Goal

 

[All elements of the Mass] should form a complete and organic unity, clearly expressive of the unity of the entire holy people. The character and beauty of the place and all its appointments should foster devotion and show the holiness of the mysteries celebrated there.

 

 

Style

 

All other things being equal, Gregorian chant holds pride of place because it is proper to the Roman liturgy. Other types of sacred music, in particular polyphony, are in no way excluded, provided that they correspond to the spirit of the liturgical action and that they foster the participation of all the faithful.

 

 

Assembly

 

Since the faithful from different countries come together ever more frequently, it is fitting that they know how to sing together at least some parts of the Ordinary of the Mass in Latin…

 

 

Choir/Cantor

 

Among the faithful, the schola cantorum or choir exercises its own liturgical function, ensuring that the parts proper to it, in keeping with the different types of chants, are properly carried out and fostering the active participation of the faithful through the singing. It is fitting that there be a cantor or a choir director to lead and sustain the people's singing. When in fact there is no choir, it is up to the cantor to lead the different chants, with the people taking part.

 

 

Mass Parts

 

The singing at the entrance is done either alternately by the choir and the people or in a similar way by the cantor and the people, or entirely by the people, or by the choir alone. Since the Kyrie is a chant by which the faithful acclaim the Lord and implore his mercy, it is ordinarily done by all, that is, by the people and with the choir or cantor having a part in it. The Gloria is intoned by the priest or, if appropriate, by a cantor or by the choir; but it is sung either by everyone together, or by the people alternately with the choir, or by the choir alone. It is preferable that the responsorial Psalm be sung, at least as far as the people's response is concerned. The Alleluia constitutes a rite or act in itself. It is sung by all while standing, and led by the choir or cantor. The supplication Agnus Dei is, as a rule, sung by the choir or cantor with the congregation responding. While the priest is receiving the Sacrament, the Communion chant is begun. The singing is continued for as long as the Sacrament is being administered to the faithful. This is sung either by the choir alone or by the choir or cantor with the people.

[redhead]

"In parishes, there is no choice: watch in silence as the celebrant gives Communion to the elite laypeople who have been selected as official "eucharistic ministers."

Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist should be used in extraordinary circumstances. Not every Mass every Sunday. How about waiting to "receive" Holy Communion rather than running up to "take" Holy Communion. This is creating the appearance of a privileged class of the laity."

In the Byzantine Rite, there are NO Eucharistic Ministers. Not even the deacon ministers the Holy Eucharist to the people. Before V II Father did it all. If people wish for time for recollection and thanksgiving after reception of Holy Eucharist, this is the perfect way to accomplish it. Give Father time to minister to the entire congregation.

[Tax-chick]

I’m delighted that those who want to attend Mass using the Missal of 1962 are able to. However, I do not have the slightest desire to do it myself. If our Bishop or the Pope were to assign this as the standard for everyone, we would say, “Yes sir!” and still be grateful to have the Mass at all, of course.

[Biggirl]

My parish’s music director, who bases a lot of the music from a local Passionist Fathers retreat house, during the Holy Week/Easter time, had the choir do at least one or two verses on the Latin. Also at that same retreat house there was at a music minister’s conference before the liturgy, a chanting in Latin of one verse in Latin.

[lupie]

Why is this in the Evangelical Christian sidebar? You do this frequently.

[Desdemona]

I wish I could have gotten to the computer last night, but, alas, it's peach season and I have at least five batches of preserves to go.

Great article. We do most of this, which comes as a bit of a shock to the tourists.

I will say, though, that depending on the room, amplification can be a necessary evil. In a smaller church built before about 1960, you can get away with no mikes if you have a choir that can project and has decent diction. Part of the problem is to really make the music thing work, you have to have musicians who are trained to know what they are doing.

I do think that the peace and silence needs to be stressed. Mass is for worship, not a social hour. That's for coffee and donuts afterward.

[AKA Elena]

I'm sure this will offend the entire Catholic folks here, but I was raised in the old "Traditions", have had a dialogue Mass since I was a child ... in Latin then in English, before there was permission, in fact. Oh those awful Carmelite priests of my parish.

I am a Novus Ordo person ... perhaps a VERY OCCASIONAL return to the past would be OK -- but to say all of the negative things I read here as universal faults is pretty "Phariseetic" of many.

Of course, I would OBEY what is dictated by the Magesterium, but to condemn all music that is not a drag as being distracting is a pretty broad brush.

We have three ethnic languages in our Parish, English, Spanish and Tagalog ... all get attention at different Masses. The music goes in hand with the ethnicity of the Mass.

Our "guitars", etc. are respectful and inspire cohesive participation. I love most of it ... I know all of the old Latin Standards as well and understand them ... I'll take the new, particularly those based on the psalms.

I skip most of these threads, but feeling angry and dissassociated is pretty sad for a practicing Catholic to have to feel about those who look down their holy noses at me and those like me.

To insinuate that people are leaving for evangelical type religions is not a reflection on the Services differences, it is more likely the lack of anything but the nicey-nicey babble that is coming from the pulpit in the Catholic Church and the wishy washy Bishops and hierarchy in the Catholic Church in this country.

In no way am I associated or otherwise sympathetic or connected with the new wave schisms in the Church (the rebel sisters, etc), I am just who I am proud to be ... a living, breathing, active participant with all of you in our roles in the Mystical Body of Christ.

[A.A. Cunningham]

Eucharistic ministers (sic)

extraordinary minister of Holy Communion.

The only Eucharistic Minister at Mass is the celebrant.

1. The Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion

[154.] As has already been recalled, “the only minister who can confect the Sacrament of the Eucharist in persona Christi is a validly ordained Priest”.[254] Hence the name “minister of the Eucharist” belongs properly to the Priest alone. Moreover, also by reason of their sacred Ordination, the ordinary ministers of Holy Communion are the Bishop, the Priest and the Deacon,[255] to whom it belongs therefore to administer Holy Communion to the lay members of Christ’s faithful during the celebration of Mass. In this way their ministerial office in the Church is fully and accurately brought to light, and the sign value of the Sacrament is made complete.

[155.] In addition to the ordinary ministers there is the formally instituted acolyte, who by virtue of his institution is an extraordinary minister of Holy Communion even outside the celebration of Mass. If, moreover, reasons of real necessity prompt it, another lay member of Christ’s faithful may also be delegated by the diocesan Bishop, in accordance with the norm of law,[256] for one occasion or for a specified time, and an appropriate formula of blessing may be used for the occasion. This act of appointment, however, does not necessarily take a liturgical form, nor, if it does take a liturgical form, should it resemble sacred Ordination in any way. Finally, in special cases of an unforeseen nature, permission can be given for a single occasion by the Priest who presides at the celebration of the Eucharist.[257]

[156.] This function is to be understood strictly according to the name by which it is known, that is to say, that of extraordinary minister of Holy Communion, and not “special minister of Holy Communion” nor “extraordinary minister of the Eucharist” nor “special minister of the Eucharist”, by which names the meaning of this function is unnecessarily and improperly broadened.

[157.] If there is usually present a sufficient number of sacred ministers for the distribution of Holy Communion, extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion may not be appointed. Indeed, in such circumstances, those who may have already been appointed to this ministry should not exercise it. The practice of those Priests is reprobated who, even though present at the celebration, abstain from distributing Communion and hand this function over to laypersons.[258]

[158.] Indeed, the extraordinary minister of Holy Communion may administer Communion only when the Priest and Deacon are lacking, when the Priest is prevented by weakness or advanced age or some other genuine reason, or when the number of faithful coming to Communion is so great that the very celebration of Mass would be unduly prolonged.[259] This, however, is to be understood in such a way that a brief prolongation, considering the circumstances and culture of the place, is not at all a sufficient reason.

[159.] It is never allowed for the extraordinary minister of Holy Communion to delegate anyone else to administer the Eucharist, as for example a parent or spouse or child of the sick person who is the communicant.

[160.] Let the diocesan Bishop give renewed consideration to the practice in recent years regarding this matter, and if circumstances call for it, let him correct it or define it more precisely. Where such extraordinary ministers are appointed in a widespread manner out of true necessity, the diocesan Bishop should issue special norms by which he determines the manner in which this function is to be carried out in accordance with the law, bearing in mind the tradition of the Church.

[Romulus]

The only Eucharistic Minister at Mass is the celebrant.

Or the deacon, in a more limited sense. But thanks for calling attention to this abuse of terms. It's important.

[AnAmericanMother]

If it is respectful, and consistent with the ethnic culture of your parish, then of course it is no problem.

The problem is not being 'holier than thou' - and you might hesitate before accusing others of that, isn't that itself 'holier than thou'? (you can go round and round with that one - relativism in disguise) - but being aware of abuses of the liturgy.

It's one thing to have music that is familiar and consistent with the traditions of the congregation -- quite another to have innovation just for the sake of innovation. Rome has made it quite clear that things that are appropriate culturally are one thing (dancing in Africa for example), while adopting things that are inappropriate culturally is wrong.

What we have seen in ordinary suburban American parishes is an almost frantic adoption of multi-culti, exhibitionist practices that are not holy or conducive to worship but completely foreign to the tradition. Many times they come straight from Hollywood and Broadway and pop or rock music.

Many of us call for a turning back to the older traditions of a quiet, reverent Mass, chant, Renaissance polyphony and traditional hymns as a counterweight to what Kipling called "The Lust for Newness". It's not holier than thou, but a desire for holiness that drives this.

It's a real shame when the Sacrifice of the Mass and the Real Presence are hidden by raucous pop music, glad-handing, and failure to abide by the norms.

Music and reverent celebration by themselves mean nothing, of course. As I said before, the Episcopalians are a bunch of screaming heretics, but in some quarters they retain the knowledge of good music and even reverent celebration.

Still, it seems to me a real shame when the Episcopalians 'get it', but Catholics don't abide by the Holy Father's explicit directions for reverence in music and liturgy, and even worse don't abide by the actual instructions of VCII but some goofy idea of the 'spirit of VCII' which is just their own inclinations.

[NYer]

I truly appreciate and agree with your commentary. Thanks for the post and ping.

[NYer]

Why is this in the Evangelical Christian sidebar? You do this frequently.

The author makes specific references to the Evangelical Church.

[Salvation]

This is one of my pet peeves. I always address them as Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion. It was funny at first, because even the staff thought I was mistaken, but the priest said I was right! LOL!

[Carolina]

Here's something radical. Why not actually chant the Propers of the Mass? You know, the Introit, the Gradual and Alleluia, the Offertory Verse and the Communion Verse.

For example, instead of a "gathering song" (gag) have the choir chant the Introit. For this coming Sunday (unfortunate minimalist translation): Listen, Lord, and answer me. Save your servant who trusts in you. I call to you all day long, have mercy on me, O Lord.

The Anglican Use Gradual (which we use in our Novus Ordo Masses): Bow down, O Lord, thine ear to me and hear me: O my God, save Thy servant that trusteth in Thee; have mercy upon me. O Lord, for I have called daily upon Thee.

How many parishes' music directors ever consider the Propers? They're mostly ignored and yet they should be primary in the music of the Mass. They're integral to the structure of each Sunday's Mass. Yet hardly any parish uses this most proper option.

Instead we have the four-hymn sandwich. A hymn, however dignified and stately and beautiful is no match for the actual Proper that belongs to those parts we've been accustomed to hearing and singing a liturgical song.

The structure of the Mass is compromised when all we rely on are the hymns. To recover what is truly Catholic, recover the Propers. Plain and simple. Then you get away from this debate on stylistic choices.

Fr. Columba Kelly has been writing them for years in a hermeneutic of continuity with tradition. They're simply breathtaking and in the vernacular. The Arbogast Complete English Propers has them. And Richard Rice has just complete the Simple Choral Gradual for the whole church year that is accessible for choirs and parishes that are not yet able to do Gregorian chant.

These are free! No longer does your parish have to be slaves to the OCP/GIA monopoly on church music. These people are offering this to the church for free. And the music is gorgeous.

And no, I do not work for the CMAA. Just an ordinary and obscure musician working in the hermeneutic of continuity and for the reform of the reform.

Sancta Cecilia, ora pro nobis.

[AnAmericanMother]

Hurrah! Couldn't agree more.

We sometimes chant the Proper as a prelude. Our two young Parochial Vicars are intensely interested in bringing back chant, and the music director and choir are happy to oblige....

[AnAmericanMother]

And how great that you have the AU. Still trying to convince our
man to try Anglican chant .

[steve86]

Interesting how many novus ordo types judge the value of a Mass by its entertainment quotient and essentially its resemblance to a Hannah Montana concert (complete with hugs and kisses and liberal social commentary).

[AKA Elena]

Many years ago, three other girls in the seventh and I believe, four in the eighth grade in my Parish, were chosen to chant the prayers that make up the Proper of the Mass every Sunday.

We were in practice every lunch hour and there were four endings to each sentence (or pause, or change) in rotation for each prayer, that was all. It was actual chanting without flourish with the endings consecutively sung.

We were also the basis of all the Liturgical singing during Eastertide. It was said that we were very good, I would never have known from where I stood.

I remember we were always asked by Sister Ellen Dolores, O.P., to please refrain from any milk or ice cream with our lunches.I remember the endings also, and am sometimes surprised at the variation of today, especially in the Alleluia.

I'd still not "gag" at the "gathering song", but do find the Hidden in another room Tabernacle offensive and particularly find the use of glass for Consecration of the Eucharist a far cry from the precious metals that would Honor Him.

I will repeat, I believe that the difference in how we worship and are holy is one thing ... how the hierarchy ducks the most important teachings of morality is what we should be talking and acting about.

When people complain of Communion in the Hand (I have never done this, myself) and don't stop to remember the mores of Christ's time, there is a disconnect for me.

FR just does not strike me as a place to air liturgical disgust and serves the Church in no responsible manner, IMOHO.

Fighting the evils of the world such as Abortion and Homosexuality seems a more fitting type of Activism.

I won't crash this thread again, I promise. I hate giving the idea to anyone that I am ignorant of my Faith or share no understanding (even if I do not agree with their liturgical fervor) of some of the current disaffection that many have with rites and practices.

I just feel an activist Forum would more rightly be served without airing Liturgical dissatisfaction, by a concerted effort to fight against the lack of real teaching we should be receiving from the pulpit, but are not.

[Nikas777]

How about just standing through like (most) the Orthodox do rather than sit in pews?

[Carolina]

Lex orandi, lex credendi.

[lupie]

If the author doew mention evangelicals, it is not easily seen. Glancing through it three times, I saw the word Protestant, but not evangelical. That is because it really has nothing to do with evangelical beliefs and probably does not belong in the evangelical sideabar.