Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Jesus a Socialist?
Post Scripts ^ | 5/3/09 | OneVike

Posted on 05/03/2009 9:53:16 AM PDT by OneVike

It has been the aim of the Democrat party since they lost the Presidential election in 2004 to subvert the Christian doctrine with the claim that Jesus was a socialist. Their goal is to convince Christians that their Social agenda is morally equivalent with the teachings and life of Jesus Christ. Considering the lack of historical and Biblical knowledge most Americans have, it is not surprising that many have fallen for the misinformation on what Jesus taught (and for whom the teachings were given). These Biblical revisionists have become especially adept at cherry picking Scripture to suit their agenda. Hence, many have come to misunderstand the gospel of Christ by equating it with modern day Socialism.

My first point of contention with the idea that Christ was a socialist, is His teachings and the example of His life. Throughout the time that Christ lived with His disciples, He never worked. Instead he was dependent upon the charity and good hearts of those who surrounded Him. Now that is not to say Jesus was lazy or a bum either. Jesus was always about His Fathers business, and that business was the salvation of mankind. Nowhere in the Scriptures will you find Jesus telling His followers to rely upon anyone except those who were willing to hear the gospel and share what they had. If the people refused to hear the gospel or be charitable, Jesus told His disciples to rebuke them and go to others who were willing to hear the teachings, as when He sent them out by pairs. (Matthew chapter 10)

(Excerpt) Read more at norcalblogs.com ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Religion & Politics; Theology
KEYWORDS: acts; compassion; jesus; no; religiousleft; socialism; wwjd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last
To: SecAmndmt

“Any attempt to place civil government over church, family and individual in the manner advocated by the socialists (ie. secular humanists) will lead to tyranny and the destruction of Christian civilization. All forms of socialism are a denial of God, Chrisitanity and the rule of law.” ~ SecAmndmt

Robert Frost wrote, “Most of the change we think we see in life is due to truths being in and out of favor.” bttt

Liberals tend to view human being as basically good, which is why they are so naive about human evil and impervious to real-world feedback about the failure of their ideas.

For most liberal programs to be effective—say, pre-reform welfare—you must assume at the outset that people are basically good and won’t abuse the system. But liberal programs typically put in place a structure of incentives that encourages people to act out their greed and selfishness in antisocial ways.

The whole point of free market capitalism is that it acknowledges self-interest and greed at the outset, providing it a with pro-social outlet without anyone having to force the issue from on high.

Yes, tinkering at the edges of capitalism is fine, so long as you think things through and realize that most of your tinkering will make matters worse, not better (which was true of the vast majority of FDR’s counterproductive ideas—not to mention LBJ).

Excerpted from:

What is a Conservative, Really?
http://tinyurl.com/2b3j69

<>

The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot by Russell Kirk (Author) “THE STUPID PARTY: this is John Stuart Mill’s description of conservatives...” (more)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0895261715/onecosmos-20?creative=0&camp=0&adid=16E97Y2BZ6FKD30T07ZJ&link_code=as1

Russell Kirk summarized the six canons of conservative thought as

1. Belief in a transcendent order; and that most political problems are moral problems resulting from bad values. (To cite an obvious example, if Hispanic or Black Americans adopted Asian American values, they would be just as successful—unless you are a liberal who believes that intelligence is a function of race.)

2. Appreciation of the mystery of existence, and with it, opposition to the tedious uniformity, egalitarianism, and utilitarian aims of of most radical systems.

3. An understanding that liberty and equality are contradictory aims; a belief that there are distinctions between men and that classes will emerge naturally and spontaneously in a free society. “If natural distinctions are effaced among men, oligarchs fill the vacuum.”

4. A belief that property and freedom are intimately linked. “Economic leveling... is not economic progress.”

5. Distrust of radical schemes by liberal intellectuals “who would reconstruct society upon abstract designs” that simply mask the intellectual’s lust for power.

6. Recognition that change and reform are not synonymous, and that “prudent change is the means of social preservation.”

Contemporary liberalism has entirely different assumptions and attacks the social order on the following grounds:

1. “The perfectibility of man”; the belief that education, environment or legislation “can produce men like gods; they deny that humanity has a natural proclivity towards violence and sin.”

2. Contempt for tradition. “Formal religion is rejected and various ideologies are presented as substitutes.”

3. Political leveling: “Order and privilege are condemned,” accompanied by “an eagerness for centralization and consolidation.”

4. Economic leveling: “The ancient rights of property... are suspect to almost all radicals.”


101 posted on 05/03/2009 5:47:07 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (The worst of the pirates are in D.C. We must send them AND the permanent "staffers" back home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: metmom

When Jesus says “Woe unto you who are rich..”, that sure is a condemnation for just being rich. Then there’s babble that follows about “the meek” (read: the poor) inheriting the earth (”the earth” in this case is all that’s in it, including the property owned and earned by others). Notice the use of the word “inherit” - it’s by design. Wealth is created. And it has to be created before it can be “inherited”. But “inherit” is at the direction of those that own the riches. If he says the meek shall inherit the earth and all it’s riches (none of which he owns himself), then you cannot say he doesn’t condemn the rich for being rich. He says explicitly that those who have are to be shamed for that sake of those that haven’t. This is pure collectivism, plain and simple. All laughter aside, you’re correct. If it wasn’t taken so seriously today, it truly would be funny. The fact that many do take Jesus seriously means those who do are as altruistic as any Marxist. They too believe “woe unto you who are rich..”. Meaning all those who think religion has a place in shaping the moral code of everyone is the same as any Marxist, who also openly claims private property is to be “inherited” (read: re-distributed) to “the meek”. The Religionist and The Marxist are both kindred-spirit altruists, believing there are some who deserve a share of that which is earned by others. And those who make the loudest pronouncements about such “fairness” are the ones who want to be either The Church or The State.


102 posted on 05/03/2009 5:48:00 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
Was Jesus a Socialist?

No, the Son of G-d doesn't concern himself with such petty labels/things.

5.56mm

103 posted on 05/03/2009 5:51:49 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

ping


104 posted on 05/03/2009 5:57:40 PM PDT by cdchik123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Good post.. although Jesus was not a socialist, would it not be fair, however, to state that many of his early followers were? In the time after Jesus’s death, did not many set up communes to await his reappearence?


105 posted on 05/03/2009 6:01:34 PM PDT by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma

busybodies.

Can't think of a better word for legislators who sit in state capitols and Washington, DC and make laws designed to control another persons life.

106 posted on 05/03/2009 6:22:32 PM PDT by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

Personally I don't have that level of faith in God, so I going to work tomorrow to make sure I have food, clothing and shelter.

Paul obviously felt the same way because he wrote to the Thessalonians, "This should be your ambition: to live a quiet life, minding your own business, and working with your hands, just as we commanded you before. As a result, peple who are not Christians will respect the way you live, and you will not need to depend on others to meet your financial needs." I Thessalonians 4:11,12 NLT

107 posted on 05/03/2009 6:36:40 PM PDT by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

Why? Didn’t He come to save the thieves, prostitutes and other misfits? DC would probably be His first destination.


108 posted on 05/03/2009 6:38:00 PM PDT by Boiling Pots (Barack Obama: The final turd George W. Bush laid on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

I think he could walk across the Tidal Basin and it still wouldn’t disrupt business as usual.


109 posted on 05/03/2009 6:41:38 PM PDT by Winstons Julia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

However, it might be a moot point, since we’re no longer a Christian nation according to Obama.


110 posted on 05/03/2009 6:42:35 PM PDT by Winstons Julia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy
Good post.. although Jesus was not a socialist, would it not be fair, however, to state that many of his early followers were? In the time after Jesus’s death, did not many set up communes to await his reappearence?

A commune in its strictest definition is not socialism.

Com-mune n. - A relatively small, often rural community whose members share common interests, work, and income and often own property collectively. (The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2006 by Houghton Mifflin Company).

socialism n. - A political theory advocating state ownership of industry. An economic system in which the production and distribution of goods are controlled substantially by the government rather than by private enterprise. (Ibid...see above).

In a commune everyone works. This was the biblical admonition in II Thess. 3:10, 'if no one works, he doesn't eat'. In socialism property and wealth is redistributed equally from those who produce (work) to those who don't produce (non-workers). In addition this 'wealth' or property is not controlled by the people of the commune, it is controlled by the government or 'state'.

My husband had a cousin back in the 70's who lived in a commune with her husband and children. We all kind of shook our heads at her 'hippie' ways but we tried to just stay quiet whenever she was around. I won't go into any more details other than to say that in this particular commune....anybody that didn't pull their share of the work load was kicked out. PERIOD. No questions asked. There were no moochers living off the work of others that you see very frequently in all socialist countries.

You might have a point that a commune is akin to socialism IF socialism didn't take half the wealth of the state's producers and re-distribute it to those who sit around on their butts collecting goodies from the state for nothing in return. As long as you have the non-producers taking from the producers its not a commune. Its just insanity.

111 posted on 05/03/2009 6:50:40 PM PDT by conservativegramma ((No taxation without constitutional representation!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy
Did you read the article? I specifically explane the reason for most of the communal living at least in Jerusalem.

Now it it is true however that from time to time many thought Jesus would return in their lifetime, so they gave all away. Unfortunately they counted upon others to tell them what His teachings were. Even after the disciples wrote the letters and then the cannon was put together, they counted on others to read and interpret what the letters meant. But history shows they were wrong because we are still waiting, Jesus knew He would not return anytime soon, and we are talking about Jesus and His teachings here.

God is the same yesterday, today and forever. He never changes and He never goes back on his word. What Jesus taught was no different then what Moses taught with the exception that Christ would fulfill all the ceremonial laws, and become our Sabbath rest. Look at His teachings, He reiterated what God had already expected man to do.

However the religious leaders had bastardized God's commandments. Study the Scriptures, you will see Christ not asking the disciples to do anything the Israelites were not already told to do. Like I said accept for the ceremonial laws that He would fulfill.

To accumulate money for the purpose of taking care of one's family and future or to hire employees by creating jobs is what God intended man to do. Christ did not abolish man's right to earn and make a living or to accumulate wealth. Christ pointed us to what God always wanted us to do with the wealth we accumulated, and that is to take care of our loved ones and those who are less fortunate then us.

When you look at the parables Jesus used you will see He always used examples of what men do and what men should or should not do. He only corrects the actions of those who do wrong, He does not always openly tell those who are doing things right that they are. He expected men who knew what was right to do what was right. We see Him rebuking the wrong and using these moments to teach those who do not know what is right.

As for money itself, Christ did say that where your treasure is so too is your heart, but that again speaks of where your treasure is. A wealthy man can still treasure God over his wealth while a poor man can treasure his small paycheck over God. It matters not how much you have but how much you treasure what you have. It does mean that it is harder to keep focused on God with great wealth but not impossible.

Christ did not tell every man who came to Him to give what he had away, only the one who's heart He knew already loved his wealth. Each person is different and Christ went directly to each individuals heart matter. After all, the heart of all our problems is the problem with all our hearts.

The Sermon on the Mount mentioned many sins of men, and Christ points out that all sin leads to death and that we need to stop sinning. Looking down upon the wealthy just because they have more then you is the sin of coveting and hate. Today's man suffers greatly from covertness and that is something this generation will have to answer for.

Another thing is that money in one form or another is mentioned more than almost anything else in the Bible. That includes more then the word love, and forgiveness. God was concerned about man's weakness for wealth, but He never, ever stood in the way of man getting it. God wanted us to be wise with it ,not greedy. Also, no where does God say the market economy is evil or bad. The majority of the men God used throughout history have themselves used the market system to prosper or to survive. In 2 Kings 4:1-8 Elisha multiplied a woman's oil and told her to sell it to pay her debtors. Elisha could have produced the money from God if the market economy was evil, or prayed to God to touch the hearts of her debtors to make them forgive her debt, but instead he told her to use market economy, and sell the increase he produced by Gods miracle and pay her debtors.

Throughout the Scriptures God used and allowed for the market economy to work and bless His people, why pray tell would He change things if He knew the world was going to last over 2000 more years and His children would have to survive in this world? He would want us as Christians to use the system that best allows men to be truly free and giving, that is capitalism. No other form of monetary system even allows for Christians to be generous with their own money that God blesses them with. Forgive me if I came off sounding condescending to you. That was not my intention, but I am also answering questions on the blog I have this article posted and it has been a long day.
112 posted on 05/03/2009 7:17:20 PM PDT by OneVike (Just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: WKB

There’s no equal distribution in heaven:-)


113 posted on 05/03/2009 7:19:40 PM PDT by jer33 3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jer33 3

Good point!


114 posted on 05/03/2009 7:28:50 PM PDT by OneVike (Just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: OneVike; Ron Jeremy

Excellent response. I would like to suggest another passage of Scripture that clearly shows capitalism in action Proverbs 31:10-31. The classic text of the godly wife. Some examples:

16She considers a field and buys it; From her earnings she plants a vineyard.

She works (v. 10-15), saves, then buys a field and plants a vineyard - yet more work and more earnings. Says nothing about the state coming in and taking over her vineyard, taxing half her earnings, and then giving those earnings to the lazy able bodied bum sitting around at the village gate waiting for a handout.

Another one:

v. 17-19 more work from the godly wife again and in verse 20:

20She extends her hand to the poor, And she stretches out her hands to the needy.

From the earnings from her hard work she has surplus to take care of those truly in need. The state does not come in and decide for her who is in need and then takes half or more of her wealth from her. SHE decides.

In verses 21 - 23 - again - MORE work that she does so that her husband praises her. What does she do?

24She makes linen garments and sells them, And supplies belts to the tradesmen.

She sells what she makes, she is running a business here. She is SELLING what she is PRODUCING. And she’s doing so without state interference. Again, that’s capitalism. The state isn’t running her business for her, she is producing without the state telling her what to produce, how much to produce, and what is to be charged, or how much she can keep of her earnings from what she produces. Nor is she facing such high taxation that she can no longer afford to produce anything let alone sell it!

Just my 2 cents.


115 posted on 05/03/2009 7:51:51 PM PDT by conservativegramma ((No taxation without constitutional representation!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma

I like your two cents, I would bet that conservativegrandpa is one blessed man to have you as his bride.


116 posted on 05/03/2009 7:56:11 PM PDT by OneVike (Just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Thanks for the ping OneVike.


117 posted on 05/03/2009 8:31:12 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Was Jesus a Socialist?,
_______________________________________

For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat. 2 Thessalonians 3:10

But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. 1 Timothy 5:8


118 posted on 05/03/2009 8:43:08 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
Thank you for sharing your insights, dear OneVike!
119 posted on 05/03/2009 9:16:09 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

Actually I’ve thought about that a lot lately. Basic conclusion if He returns: There will be Hell to pay.


120 posted on 05/03/2009 9:19:40 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson