Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana

There is marriage for time (until death) and there is marriage for eternitry. (forever)

They are two different things.

This has been a great debate going on for a long time.

Trying to apply natural man knowledge to what did or didn’t take place is all specultion.


618 posted on 02/23/2008 9:51:13 AM PST by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]


To: restornu

There is marriage for time (until death) and there is marriage for eternitry. (forever)

They are two different things.

This has been a great debate going on for a long time.

Trying to apply natural man knowledge to what did or didn’t take place is all specultion.
_________________________________________________

Resty, let’s check with Jesus...

Jesus answered and said unto (Resty), “Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.” Matthew 22: 29, 30


622 posted on 02/23/2008 10:02:03 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies ]

To: restornu; Tennessee Nana
Trying to apply natural man knowledge to what did or didn’t take place is all specultion.

It seems that one must claim a conduit to UN-"natural", or perhaps SUPER-"natural" sources in order to "speak with authority".

I have seen this "natural man" term used as excuse for the supposed fallacies of posts quite often, as in the above statement.

Apparently anything that is opposed to Joseph Smith's claims is "speculation" and of "natural man" (whatever that means) while anything that buttresses them is of Holy origin...EXCEPT...the "revelations" of certain "prophets" such as Brigham Young. In that case, the "un-doctrinal" term is employed.

629 posted on 02/23/2008 10:09:40 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Bill Richardson: Billions for boondoggles; Not one red cent for Jenny Craig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies ]

To: restornu
 
Trying to apply natural man knowledge to what did or didn’t take place is all specultion.
 
That ISN'T what your book says:
 


 
THE
DOCTRINE AND COVENANTS
OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
SECTION 9
 
Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet to Oliver Cowdery, at Harmony, Pennsylvania, April 1829. HC 1: 37–38. Oliver is admonished to be patient, and is urged to be content to write, for the time being, at the dictation of the translator, rather than to attempt to translate. 1–6, Other ancient records are yet to be translated; 7–14, The Book of Mormon is translated by study and by spiritual confirmation.
 
1 Behold, I say unto you, my son, that because you did not translate according to that which you desired of me, and did commence again to write for my servant, Joseph Smith, Jun., even so I would that ye should continue until you have finished this record, which I have entrusted unto him.
2 And then, behold, other records have I, that I will give unto you power that you may assist to translate.
3 Be patient, my son, for it is wisdom in me, and it is not expedient that you should translate at this present time.
4 Behold, the work which you are called to do is to write for my servant Joseph.
5 And, behold, it is because that you did not continue as you commenced, when you began to translate, that I have taken away this privilege from you.
6 Do not murmur, my son, for it is wisdom in me that I have dealt with you after this manner.
7 Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.
8 But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must cask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.
9 But if it be not right you shall have no such feelings, but you shall have a stupor of thought that shall cause you to forget the thing which is wrong; therefore, you cannot write that which is sacred save it be given you from me.
10 Now, if you had known this you could have translated; nevertheless, it is not expedient that you should translate now.
11 Behold, it was expedient when you commenced; but you feared, and the time is past, and it is not expedient now;
12 For, do you not behold that I have given unto my servant Joseph sufficient strength, whereby it is made up? And neither of you have I condemned.
13 Do this thing which I have commanded you, and you shall prosper. Be faithful, and yield to no temptation.
14 Stand fast in the work wherewith I have called you, and a hair of your head shall not be lost, and you shall be lifted up at the last day. Amen.

722 posted on 02/23/2008 2:58:51 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson