Posted on 01/27/2008 7:56:14 PM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg
And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have [thy] cloke also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more [than others]? do not even the publicans so?
Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. - Matthew 5:38-48
To God be the glory!
Thank you. Beautifully put.
Well K-man... they didnt have any christian seminary's in those days{cough}.. I have a friend that (proverbially) tears his clothes and throws dust in the air over God demanding the Israelites comit genocide with the Amalikites and other times and places in degrees.. Yet he knows nothing about the Amalikites.. and their heinous cultural practices.. And the Israelites themselves were fairly "raw' in humanity themselves..
Its easy to "accuse" the Apostles of ugh!.. dullness in becoming comfortable with a spiritual life even with the Holy Spirit as guide.. My experience and many I fellowship with have had the same kind problems with deep spiritual "truths".. (concepts).. Example; John ch 10 just opened up to me in a new deeper way recently.. than ever before.. No doubt the Apostles had some of the same problems.. You see... having the Holy Spirit as guide and listening with "both ears" can be tough.. Its wonderful that John was not Luke was not Paul was not Mark was not Matthew was not Moses etc.. We all see darkly as I beleive we are supposed to.. Each of our lives is unique in a thousand individual way.. What a plan that God would test his plan(s) though millions of different iterations..
What a strange thing to say.. A demon?.. Alamo-girl testifies to the blood of christ with the words of her testimony.. and speaks of not loveing her "soul life" unto the death of it.. You know; like in Revelation(Philadephia).. Shes in danger of being an overcomer.. Not only that but she displays a grace and class that is worthy of it.. to most that know her..
Surely you are trying to "warn" her or expose the alleged demon..
I hope you are not accusing her, if so, thats adds to her credendials.. For thats what overcomers are told to expect.. As many of the scriptures she testifies to/with display.
I'm not a religionist.. Not a religious bone in my body..
Jesus came to make ALL religion obsolete, and DID..
Christianity according to Jesus is not supposed to be a religion..
And its not, its a family.. that you MUST be born into..
You are either part of the family or NOT..
Ping to 3065... sorry..
So, how do you draw the line between ethical and unethical. If lies boost the sales, long live America?
I don't put taste in the arena of ethics. When she told the gay joke about Edwards I think that crossed the line simply because it was pointless and not funny. However, since that falsehood was in no way intended to actually convince ANYONE that Edwards was gay she did not breach any ethics, imo.
It is unethical to tell a knowing lie for the purpose of convincing others of the truth of it. I happen to be on the FR Ann Coulter ping list and have been reading her columns every week for several months now. I have not yet detected a single lie. When she uses humor, there is a certain license there. So, when she makes some "outrageous" comparison, that is her opinion and cannot be considered a lie.
How is that different from businesses hiring illegal aliens out of greed and not caring what that does to America's security?
It is completely different, for the reasons above and also that the businesses are in direct violation of the law. If Annie was breaking the law, you don't think there are a million prosecutors out there who would stand in line to get her? :) ............ As far as security goes, I think Ann does a service to the country for pointing out the hypocrisy of liberals, and McCain (and Bush, whom I generally support) in their rhetoric on protecting the borders versus their actions.
I guess as long as we make a sale, the path doesn't matter. Truly revealing.
If you have sourced examples of Ann lying, or being unethical, I will be happy to try to respond to them. I certainly haven't read all of her work, but I do see a pattern from what I have read that is perfectly fine ethically and truthfully.
Yes, that's exactly right. When God tests, it is with the EXPECTATION that the person will succeed. The man of God should turn towards Him and God will help him. When satan tempts, it is with the EXPECTATION of failure. We all know how that goes, unfortunately. But even when we are tempted, God still provides a way out:
1 Cor 10:13 : No temptation has seized you except what is common to man. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can stand up under it.
If my above is right, then it looks like all men are tempted, but only the elect are tested.
Kosta, from our conversations and now here, this timing problem of yours is getting way out of hand. :) From your above, it sounds like you are saying that Christians didn't believe that Christ was God until John was written 60 or 70 years after the fact. Is that right? When I brought this type of thing up before you said, in effect, that nobody else heard it so it didn't exist until it was written in the Gospels. IOW, nothing COUNTS until it was written later (an ironic view from an Orthodox perspective :). Anyway, what do you say was taught orally until the Gospels were written? If nothing counts until it is written then there was nothing to teach!! :)
“The term “Lord” does not exclusively mean God in the Bible. The Son of God is a title given to angels and kings. It does not have the Christian meaning.
The thief on the cross could have been pulling Pascal’s wager, since he had nothing to lose.”
The centurian was a Roman soldier. What would he know of the special language of the despised Jewish faith?
Following your logic, Jesus was wrong when he said that the thief would be with him in paradise since the thief didn’t believe in him as Jesus said was a requirement for eternal life. He would not be in paradise as a thief.
Luke, as a historian, was being accurate in his description of the witnesses reporting of the events so he would mention paradise, even if he didn’t use that term.
“...Alamo-girl testifies to the blood of christ with the words of her testimony.. and speaks of not loveing her “soul life” unto the death of it....”
This is the standard? We all know the Evil One can quote scripture, hp.
EEEEEW!
Here are a few things for you to read
Christ Loves His Bride, the Church by Pope John Paul ll
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/alpha/data/aud19911218en.html
A few Excerpts from the Catechism
http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p123a9p2.htm
“Christ is the Head of this Body”
792 Christ “is the head of the body, the Church.”225 He is the principle of creation and redemption. Raised to the Father’s glory, “in everything he [is] preeminent,”226 especially in the Church, through whom he extends his reign over all things.
793 Christ unites us with his Passover: all his members must strive to resemble him, “until Christ be formed” in them.227 “For this reason we . . . are taken up into the mysteries of his life, . . . associated with his sufferings as the body with its head, suffering with him, that with him we may be glorified.”228
794 Christ provides for our growth: to make us grow toward him, our head,229 he provides in his Body, the Church, the gifts and assistance by which we help one another along the way of salvation.
795 Christ and his Church thus together make up the “whole Christ” (Christus totus). The Church is one with Christ. The saints are acutely aware of this unity:
The Church is the Bride of Christ
796 The unity of Christ and the Church, head and members of one Body, also implies the distinction of the two within a personal relationship. This aspect is often expressed by the image of bridegroom and bride. The theme of Christ as Bridegroom of the Church was prepared for by the prophets and announced by John the Baptist.234 The Lord referred to himself as the “bridegroom.”235 The Apostle speaks of the whole Church and of each of the faithful, members of his Body, as a bride “betrothed” to Christ the Lord so as to become but one spirit with him.236 The Church is the spotless bride of the spotless Lamb.237 “Christ loved the Church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her.”238 He has joined her with himself in an everlasting covenant and never stops caring for her as for his own body:239
This is the whole Christ, head and body, one formed from many . . . whether the head or members speak, it is Christ who speaks. He speaks in his role as the head (ex persona capitis) and in his role as body (ex persona corporis). What does this mean? “The two will become one flesh. This is a great mystery, and I am applying it to Christ and the Church.”240 And the Lord himself says in the Gospel: “So they are no longer two, but one flesh.”241 They are, in fact, two different persons, yet they are one in the conjugal union, . . . as head, he calls himself the bridegroom, as body, he calls himself “bride.”242
III. THE CHURCH IS THE TEMPLE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
797 “What the soul is to the human body, the Holy Spirit is to the Body of Christ, which is the Church.”243 “To this Spirit of Christ, as an invisible principle, is to be ascribed the fact that all the parts of the body are joined one with the other and with their exalted head; for the whole Spirit of Christ is in the head, the whole Spirit is in the body, and the whole Spirit is in each of the members.”244 The Holy Spirit makes the Church “the temple of the living God”:245
I wish you a Blessed Day!
For the which cause I also suffer these things: nevertheless I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day. – 2 Timothy 1:12 Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God. And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus. – Philippians 4:7-8
INDEED!
It is interesting, how, in our era, we CAN see clearer and clearer . . . how many will kill Believers . . . thinking they do God a favor.
Truly, it seems far too often . . . the flesh doesn't learn.
The letter of the law is brutality, death, horror.
The SPIRIT brings LIFE, LIBERTY, FREEDOM IN OBEDIENCE, LOVE, INTIMACY, HOPE, FAITH, JOY . . . PROVISION, SAFETY . . . ALL things good and lasting.
Which word is hard to understand? . . .
Hereby know you the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesses not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of anti-christ, whereof you have heard that it should come; and even now already is in the world. You are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is He that is in you than he that is in the world. I John 4:1-4
NOT some lock-step, idolatrous, slavish, Pied-Piper marching to ANY magicsterical group's edicts and ponfitications.
Dear Sister in Christ . . . I have probably gone overboard in my grieving for souls in our era . . . so much mindless blindness on every hand in and out of The Church Universal.
There are not a lot of options.
And Churchianity, Churchiolatry, IDOLIZING--SUBMITTING TO--REVERING beyond honor to whom honor is due--all such are serious hazards to anyone's walk with God in any Christian group or club.
This Control Freaque Doctrine of Christianity AND RELIGION was not popular with Jesus 2000 years ago and it's likely less popular with Him, now. AUTHORITY IN THE FLESH will ALWAYS demand submission, compliance, kowtowing to ITS EDICTS, ENCYCLICALS, PONTIFICATIONS . . . STATUS, ROLE, POSITION, TITLES . . . constructions on reality.
And the Truth of Christ and The Gospel and of God's Word will eternally slice straight through, straight across all such deceptive deadliness.
WHY?
Because God The Father has been calling for a FACE TO FACE RELATIONSHIP WITH EVERY INDIVIDUAL from the TENT OF MEETING on, if not before. And CHRIST RESTORED such an option and carried it higher, more accessibly to all WHO WOULD COME.
But NOOOOooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo!
There's this hoop and that hoop and then a dozen hoops in this category and a dozen hoops in that category . . . and another three dozen hoops over there . . .
And Brother Snot says then that these hoops are absolute requirements but Sister Silly disagrees. And Brother Contentious has a long list that only he believes in. Then there's the dozen or so hoops from the Vice Pontificator's office. And another dozen from the Jr Vice Pontificator's office. And another dozen from the Jr Vice Pontificator's Son-in-Law's cubicle . . .
God have mercy on us.
Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world. James 1:26, 27
The Biblical DADDY standard is:
HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME.
But humans won't have it God's way. They refused to meet with Him at the tent of meeting out of fear. And they refuse to be accountable to Him in direct ongoing Spirit-led dialogue now--preferring to buffer themselves with hired RELIGIOUS EXPERTS . . . to do the "God-thing" for them.
Doesn't work that way. The veil has been torn asunder. And all the magicstericals in the world cannot put it back together.
We all stand daily before Daddy naked . . . whether we think so, or not. He searches the toughts and intents of our hearts far better and more meticulously than any MRI or PET scan.
No ritual; No governing magicsterical; NO !!!!TRADITIONS!!!!; No yesterday's righteousness; No customs; No mindless habits; NO IDOLATRIES; No rationalizations; . . . NOTHING BUT THE BLOOD OF JESUS will suffice to clothe our nakedness.
We can't buy it with money nor slavish compliance with man's enless rules and ammendments to rules.
Christ already bought the intimacy, the freedom and us . . . FOR DADDY. We are His. NO ONE ELSE'S.
We are not of Paul or Appolos . . . nor this magicsterical's nor that magicsterical's.
We are CHRIST'S ALONE; GOD'S ALONE.
OR WE ARE NOT.
And those who are truly HIS know one another by a very precious wireless connection. Sometimes it is subtle, sometimes intense. It is always online and available to the sensitive hearing hearts and spirits of authentic believers in every remotely Biblical group, denomination, club . . . as well as . . . a surprising number of 'pygmies in the jungle' without the plaguing 'benefit' of seminaries/cemetaries.
God will be doing some new things in coming months and years in our era. But they will be keyed to and based on old priorities as outlined and touched on above.
Worshipping and following Him must be in SPIRIT vs the letter of the law.
Worshipping and following HIM must be focused ON HIM ALONE.
When the confusions and convolutions multiply like flies . . . the magicstericals will, at best, be far too late with anything useful . . . and usually will be about as messed up on truth and reality as the world.
We must be able to hear in our inner man the still small voice of DADDY saying . . . THIS IS THE WAY, WALK IN IT--NOW!
Of course, for those too timid to relate to Daddy DIRECTLY in Jesus' Blood--there will always be 'buffering' magicstericals happy to take one's submission, one's coin, one's worship . . . as they knowingly or unwittingly escort one to hell.
What a blessing to read this excellent post of yours . . . such an affirming set of Biblical truths so consistent with the Biblical truths I just posted.
PTL!
Surely you are trying to “warn” her or expose the alleged demon..
I hope you are not accusing her, if so, thats adds to her credendials.. For thats what overcomers are told to expect.. As many of the scriptures she testifies to/with display.
= =
INDEED.
And its not, its a family.. that you MUST be born into.. You are either part of the family or NOT..
INDEED. Thanks, Dear Bro.
This is the standard? We all know the Evil One can quote scripture, hp.
This line of
untrue, UnBiblical, assaultive hideousness is beginning to grate on my patience.
Perhaps I should begin to pray for a speedy reaping of that sown so that the sowers shall still have a chance to learn something.
Of course satan quotes Scripture. And that relates, how?
Which part of I John 4:1-4 is hard to understand?
Oh, that’s right . . . magicstericals and !!!!TRADITION!!!! trump Scripture. /sar
My take on Dominus Iesus And on the Catechism is that Baptism (intention to baptize + water + trinitarian words) is the ordinary means of becoming a member of the Church. It is "ordinarily necessary" — but not absolutely necessary.
But there are "degrees" of membership of the church, and words like "bene" and "plene" ("well" and "fully") are often used in an attempt to characterize those degrees.
So I have no conceptual difficulty in calling all the Baptized brothers and sister, and I will try to be alert for those who were grafted in by extraordinary means. (In this connection, the word about turning the other cheek includes the protasis,"If your brother strikes you ... .")
And I would also distinguish between "heresy" and "error", even though I would immediately say that we may never see either in the "pure" form. Most heresy probably has some inadvertent "misbelief" in it and most error, I'd guess, has its willful aspect. Certainly, I am rife with error (and not just those errors which lead me to be a Papist rather than Orthodox, brother K.)
Coming at it from another POV, since Alamo-Girl says that when she speaks as the Spirit leads her she does not necessarily abide by the strictures of logic, then the conversation with her must be of a particular kind, or, at least, cannot be of a particular kind.
I mean that once someone says, "In this discourse I will ignore the law of non-contradiction," then garden variety dialectics won't apply. What must follow (I think) will be less of a dialogue and more like a "poetry slam." in which inspired utterance is met with inspired utterance.
Or, if we stipulate the inspiration of A-G's discourse, then possibly, following the Corinthian model, we could hope for an interpreter.. If not, then Regensberg goes out the window and we are left with contending mantic proclamations at which those of us whose gift (or burden) if of the more analytic kind can only gaze in respectful silence - or turn away.
"No one can say Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit." But does this mean that every subsequent utterance is similarly inspired? That can hardly be so.
We have all been encouraged, and most have succumbed, to be temporally and culturally provincial, even chauvinist. We have difficulty imagining the poverty of Europe and of the Mediterranean littoral after the dissolution of the Empire and before the rise of cities. This is one reason the ancient Churches are so misunderstood and despised. We have little understanding of being a person to whom it was not only natural but joyful to say to a human ruler, "Have mercy on us!" because we have been largely spared the chaos and slaughter and ignorance of an age when waking every morning was a blessing, when surviving a meal was an uncertain gift, when making it to nightfall without having one's home burned and one's family slaughtered by thugs calling themselves knights or by barbarians from the sea was bit at all taken for granted. And so the idea of a "saving" war-lord is almost unthinkable to us.
Consequently, in our ignorance and in this solipsistic culture it is not surprising that many cannot imagine that allegiance to the cumbersome "edifice" of Catholicism or the ancient glory of Orthodoxy would seem not so much repellent and repugnant as simply unthinkable.
Yes, there is pride in there, I think. But it is, I'd suggest, a pride of which the one so prideful can scarcely be aware, since it seems so much like "common sense."
A-G, this may seem unbearably condescending of me. I don't know what to do about that except to ask God to amend what can be amended and to redeem what cannot. But I think if you were ever to become a Catholic or to join an Orthodox body, you would shine like the sun and know a joy that would almost eclipse the joy you already show so clearly.
But, though there is this huge and important difference in our thought, I am already happy to think of you as one to whom I am blessed to be a brother.
Just remember, I am a former WASP AND a former Episcopalian, and I don't DO emotion. It isn't decent and leads to crimes and disgraces like confusing the salad fork with the dinner fork.
“My take on Dominus Iesus And on the Catechism is that Baptism (intention to baptize + water + trinitarian words) is the ordinary means of becoming a member of the Church. It is “ordinarily necessary” — but not absolutely necessary.”
That’s loose theology, MD. Baptism, and Rome and the East understand the sacrament differently, at least along the margins, may very well signify a dedication of a person to God, but done outside The Church (and it is a point that there is absolutely no such thing as an “invisible” Church)and though the person may thereby become a Christian, that person is not ipso facto a member of The Church. As we know, they may be members of “ecclesial bodies” or “para-ecclesial groups” as we have sometimes called them, but not The Church. If they espouse heresy, they are not members of The Church but rather, as +John Chrysostomos calls them, “enemies of God”, perhaps lead there by the Evil One, but to the extent that they see The Church, to the extent that the teachings of The Church are known to them and nevertheless they reject them for heretical teachings like, for example, forms of universalism, they are cut off from The Church and the sacraments instituted by God for our Theosis.
The tough case, and we all know that tough cases make bad law, are those where by reason of delusion brought about by demonic influences, Christians reject The Church in a true and sincere belief that they are doing God’s will instead of the Evil One’s. I suppose we have to trust to God’s mercy there, as we do for ourselves and our own. My personal opinion is that the overwhelming majority of members of those eccesial groups are sincere, but resolutely refuse to undertake the sort of “self examination” in light of the teachings of The Church which might lead to that point where a choice must be made.
Easy for me to say, I suppose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.