I think it's this guy
Posted on 09/14/2007 8:08:41 AM PDT by Balt
09:49 AM 9/14/2007 - First, read this press release from the USCCB web site (hat-tip to the ever-vigilant Diogenes):
WASHINGTON (September 13, 2007)—Kathy Saile, a church advocate with a decade of experience in Catholic social ministry and Washington policy work, has been named Director of Domestic Policy for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). She starts her new position in October.
Since August 2004, Saile has been Associate Director of Public Policy for Lutheran Services in America (USA), in Washington. Previous positions include Director of the Office of Peace and Justice, Catholic Social Service of Central and Northern Arizona and director of the Archdiocese of Phoenix Catholic Campaign for Human Development, 2001-2004; and Coordinator of Social Justice and Outreach Ministries, Franciscan Renewal Center in Scottsdale, Arizona, 1997-2001. She also served as a Loaned Executive to Catholic Charities USA, May-July 2003.
... Msgr. David Malloy, USCCB General Secretary announced the appointment September 13. “Kathy Saile brings to this important position strong commitment to the Catholic Church and its social teaching, impressive knowledge of key domestic issues and extensive policy and advocacy experience. Her service in diocesan social ministry and here in the nation’s capital will be great assets in helping the bishops articulate and advance the Church’s principles and policies seeking economic and social justice in our nation.”
I'm interested in the line: "...brings to this important position strong commitment to the Catholic Church..." Oh, really? Now read this, from the web site of WIN, which promotes itself as "Washington’s premier professional, political, and social network dedicated to empowering young, Democratic, pro-choice women." It's an old promo for a dinner the organization held in 2006...
Did the Left Cede Heaven? The Intersection of Faith and Politics: Throughout American history religion has shaped US politics. Recent history has focused on the efforts and effects of Conservative Christians in the Republican Party, but the Left continues to be a party of people of faith. This dinner will highlight the way liberal people of faith organize to further progressive causes.
Planners: Maggie Rosenbloom & Ellen Banakis.
Host: Shannon Hughs, Account Executive, Stones’ Phones Consulting.
Speaker: Sammie Moshenberg, Director of Washington Operations, National Council of Jewish Women; Kathy Saile, Associate Director of Public Policy, Lutheran Services.
Msgr. Malloy has obviously come up with a definition of "commitment to the Catholic Church" of which I was personally unaware.
"How could such a mistake happen?" you may ask. And there's your problem: you're assuming it's a mistake. Your Priestly Pugilist understands. You want to presume that the Catholic bishops of the United States, whatever their faults may be, believe in the Catholic Faith. So does your Priestly Pugilist (want to believe they do, that is). But wanting it doesn't make it so; and the presumption is naive.
So, how can Msgr. Malloy claim that this pro-abortion woman has a strong commitment to the Catholic Church? There are two dynamics at work here. The first is simple moral relativism, usually based on a misinterpretation (or diliberate mis-reading) of the Church's teaching about conscience - read your Priestly Pugilist's unusally lucid explaination of it in the 04:31 PM 5/24/2007 post. But more to the point is a new heresy (which your Priestly Pugilist just invented) called "administrationism." Administrationism manifests itself when a bishop of the Catholic Church views himself less as a priest, teacher of the faith and shepherd of souls, and more as the CEO of some sort of eccesiastical corporation. When this heresy is embraced, the bishop in question (or in this case, a whole country full of 'em) no longer asks, "What would Christ do?" and asks instead, "What would Bill Gates do?" When a priest, for example, succumbs to a moral indiscretion, his first concern is not the state of the priest's soul or the effect this will have on the priest's flock, but what kind of damage control can be wrought to cushion the public fallout. When asked how his diocese is doing, he automatically assumes he's being asked for the balance sheet, not whether he feels the souls entrusted to his care are hearing the truth preached to them, receiving the sacraments worthily and growing in grace.
This is why the bishops of the US can appoint an advocate for abortion to what amounts to a marketing position (we'll leave out the question of why the Church would need someone in a marketing position), and not bother about such details as to whether she's a believer. As to her alledged "commitment to the Catholic Church," look at the choice of words. It's not her commitment to the Catholic Faith that was cited, but her commitment to the institution, i.e., the corporation. In other words, she'll make a good employee.
Back in the late '80s, the future pope, Cardinal Ratzinger, who had not long been in Rome at that time, said in an interview that many bishops in the world are burying the faith under a mountain of programs and initiatives, thinking that this, somehow, furthers the cause of Christ. "What the Church needs," he said, "is holiness, not management."
By the way, here's a PP predition: once the word gets around that the bishops' new Director of Domestic Policy once lent her skills to a group dedicated to "empowering pro-choice women," look for the press release on her appointment to be pulled from the USCCB web site. Do not, however, look for her appointment to be recinded.
Is there a proper Pontifical Commission to bring this up with?
I thought the Pope was planning to “quash” at least the worst excesses of the bishops conferences.
Very interesting points, particularly the last.
**. Do not, however, look for her appointment to be recinded.**
We can ask.
At the bottom of the USCCB page:
Email us at nabquestion@usccb.org
New American Bible | 3211 4th Street, N.E., Washington DC 20017-1194 | (202) 541-3000 © USCCB. All rights reserved.
(I know it is the email for the daily readings, nevertheless, we can snow them. Also phone contact.
I forgot to mention: links to the two web sites cited work on the original post at Priestly Pugilist. I just didn’t know how to make them work here.
remember today’s senior church leaders of all denominations formed their values in the late 60’s, early 70’s. Most church and university notables came from the “hippie” side of the fence whereas others from the more structured side.
I, too come from that era but was involved as a teacher/ coach and then law enforcement. I thought those guys were bad news then, and still do!!!
Ping! Why is this woman being named to this post? Is she even Catholic, or Lutheran?
Then as now, one word from the Pope, and everyone does exactly as he pleases! *sigh*
By the way, here's a PP prediction: once the word gets around that the bishops' new Director of Domestic Policy once lent her skills to a group dedicated to "empowering pro-choice women," look for the press release on her appointment to be pulled from the USCCB web site. Do not, however, look for her appointment to be recinded. Another prediction: look for Msgr. Malloy to explain to us that Ms. Saile's speaking engagement with a pro-abortion group doesn't prove she buys into their agenda. Correct. And, if that's the case, it merely proves her completely mind-boggling lack of good judgement. She ought to fit right in at the USCCB.
Who nominates these people?!
And the local bookie says, "No, but that's the way to bet!" ;-)
I think it's this guy
ELCA, perhaps?
To Whom It May Concern:Their reply will take 4 to 6 weeks. I'm sure it will be hilarious.I'm confused. First, by your press release of 14 September, 2007:
"Kathy Saile, a church advocate with a decade of experience in Catholic social ministry and Washington policy work, has been named Director of Domestic Policy for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). She starts her new position in October. Since August 2004, Saile has been Associate Director of Public Policy for Lutheran Services in America (USA), in Washington."
Adding to my confusion, USCCB General Secretary Msgr. David Malloy spoke to the press yesterday regarding Ms. Saile's appointment:
“Kathy Saile brings to this important position strong commitment to the Catholic Church and its social teaching,.. Her service in diocesan social ministry and here in the nation’s capital will be great assets in helping the bishops articulate and advance the Church’s principles and policies seeking economic and social justice in our nation.”
As I am certain you are aware, Ms Saile last year delivered a dinner address to WIN, which promotes itself as "Washington’s premier professional, political, and social network dedicated to empowering young, Democratic, pro-choice women."
With these perplexing statements in mind, I feel compelled to respectfully ask: How can a "young pro-choice woman" have a "strong commitment to the Catholic Church and its social teaching"? The Church teaches that abortion is a mortal sin under any circumstances. This would seem to conflict with Ms. Sailes' job of "helping the bishops articulate and advance the Church’s principles and policies seeking economic and social justice in our nation".
To sum up: WTF?
I eagerly await your announcement of Ms. Saile's' conversion to the pro-life cause. Barring that, I await your announcement of her dismissal.
Yours in Christian Fraternity,
[B-chan]
She certainly gets around.
Very good letter, by the way, B-Chan. Do NOT neglect to let us know if you get an answer.
Well done, B-Chan.
ROFL!!!!!!
Well, make a note of everyone on this thread, so you can ping us when you post it!
Glad you liked it...
Geez, I didn’t even get it . . . :(
Care to explain?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.