Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope: Other Christians not true churches
AP ^ | July 11, 2007 | NICOLE WINFIELD

Posted on 07/10/2007 8:57:47 AM PDT by f150sound

LORENZAGO DI CADORE, Italy - Pope Benedict XVI has reasserted the universal primacy of the Roman Catholic Church, approving a document released Tuesday that says Orthodox churches were defective and that other Christian denominations were not true churches.

In the latest document — formulated as five questions and answers — the Vatican seeks to set the record straight on Vatican II's ecumenical intent, saying some contemporary theological interpretation had been "erroneous or ambiguous" and had prompted confusion and doubt.

It restates key sections of a 2000 document the pope wrote when he was prefect of the congregation, "Dominus Iesus," which set off a firestorm of criticism among Protestant and other Christian denominations because it said they were not true churches but merely ecclesial communities and therefore did not have the "means of salvation."

"Christ 'established here on earth' only one church," the document said. The other communities "cannot be called 'churches' in the proper sense" because they do not have apostolic succession — the ability to trace their bishops back to Christ's original apostles.


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholics; exclusivefranchise; orthodox; quidestveritas; religion; truthisabsolute; vatican; viniusinvictus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 621-623 next last
To: never4get
So you believe the RCC as it stands today was the full extent of Christ’s Church and no longer does God call those to serve the the Church unless those employed by the Church agree they are acceptable.

I reiterate: the Catholic Church teaches that all the baptized are members of Christ's Church.

The Lord may call you but it is up to men whether you are worthy.

The Lord ordained that there is one Church, not men.

241 posted on 07/10/2007 12:53:18 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

So you would leave the Church, and all her Sacraments because of politcal pride? You would leave because you don’t agree with the Pope? I have to think that perhaps you and your spouse really don’t understand everything you’ve been teaching if you would leave because of pride.


242 posted on 07/10/2007 12:53:22 PM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: pacelvi

If you want to believe God commands you to hate Arabs in all times and all places, more power to you. I happen to believe in a God who measures us by the same measure we use against others.


243 posted on 07/10/2007 12:54:06 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: f150sound
Basically reiterates non-Catholics not eligible for salvation

So says the little man in the funny hat. What the pope says doesn't matter much does it?

244 posted on 07/10/2007 12:54:51 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

You do not know a direct quote from a paraphrase.
Goodbye.


245 posted on 07/10/2007 12:57:39 PM PDT by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP

You do not know a non sequitur from a direct quote.


246 posted on 07/10/2007 12:58:59 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
You have priests with direct succession from the Apostles and your Church dispenses saving grace through the sacraments?

I'm sorry, but the "sacraments" don't provide salvation. The only thing required for salvation was Jesus' sacrifice on the cross, and my repentance and acceptance of that sacrifice for my sins. The Communion table is a rite or ritual that we are commanded to follow after we have received salvation, so that we remember the sacrifice He made on our behalf. It has no role in salvation or sanctification in and of itself.

Furthermore, I can find nothing in the scripture to support a teaching that an "apostolic succession" is necessary for a group of believers to be a part of the Church of Christ. As you read the New Testament, virtually everywhere a group of believers existed, they were referred to as the church. The Church is not the RCC, the UMC, the SBC, or any other organization - the Church is comprised of everyone who bleieves in Christ and has accepted His gift of salvation, as explained in the bible, not in any denominational doctrine (and yes, for this purpose, I refer to the RCC as another denomination).

247 posted on 07/10/2007 1:03:42 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

Comment #248 Removed by Moderator

To: Stark_GOP
"The problem is that I DO believe what Catholics say. I am going to hell because I am not Catholic. Saying that my parents were living in sin because they were not married in a Catholic church. Saying that I am illegitimate because my parents were not married in a Catholic church."

Stark, you must have gone through some painful stuff. You really might find it valuable to talk to a knowledgeable Catholic or a priest, because you have gotten an earful of falsehood from somebody. I am grateful that you are starting to sort out what's true and what isn't.

This may provide some clarification:

(1) If anybody told you you are going to hell because you are not Catholic, they are liars. But now you know that.

(2) If anybody told you that all couples who are not married in the Catholic Church, are living in sin, they are liars too.

(3) The concept of "illegitimate child" or "bastard" is not found in canon law and the concept does not exist in the Catholic church. The term "natural child" is used in Canon law to refer to the child of unmarried parents. The entire context is to secure the child's right to his parents' support and nurturance whether they are married or not.

Do not let ignorant people inflict pain on you. And please do not abide in these falsehoods any more.

249 posted on 07/10/2007 1:04:39 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarfication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP
Catholics say that?

Why'd you pick all the gloomy stuff to believe? (and all the dumb bigoted Catholics to learn it from?)

Heck, my dad had a "wife still living", as they used to say, when he and mom got hitched,but somehow 48 years later, give or take, I became a Catholic and, if you leave out some of the worst and sappiest hymns ever inflicted by banal and maudlin musicians on an unsuspecting populace, it's been great! And recently my parish got a WONDERFUL organist with actual TASTE, so now the music is good too!

Being Catholic (or hanging around Catholics) is no excuse for not thinking. You gotta use the wits God gave you. And one way to do so is to make sure you go to a parish with priests who love Jesus and have two wits to rub together. Don't listen to that other B.S.! This whole world was made by "the Love that moves the sun and other stars" and if you were the only human in it, and you needed God's Son to die for you, He'd do it in a heartbeat!

There are still plenty of people who think I'm illegitimate, and on my own toot I AM! Completely! No intrinsic redeeming characteristics whatsoever! None that aren't tainted by sin, anyway.

But for some reason, I keep hearing God say, "Once you were no people, but now you are MY people!"

I bet if you keep listening, you'll hear it too.

Excuse me. I have these fits occasionally.

250 posted on 07/10/2007 1:05:14 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker

I’ll certainly agree with that.


251 posted on 07/10/2007 1:05:21 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
So, that's a "no" then?

So why all the crying when the Catholic church makes a distinction that Protestants agree with?

252 posted on 07/10/2007 1:07:41 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Should we go into the self interest of the Pope saying that the only true church on earth shall be that which believes in his primacy?


253 posted on 07/10/2007 1:08:29 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: pacelvi
Worse yet do we have to keep a little card, kind of like the warranty papers that come with a coffee maker? I don't think I got a card when I got baptized. And what kind of baptism counts? The Catholics sprinkle, Baptists dunk. Does one count the same as the other?

Now I'll agree that baptism can be the public profession of faith, as in some churches you don't go down front to get 'saved'. But is it necessary? Hmmmm, does requirement of baptism equate to works vs. faith? I think as a Southerner we sort of expect it down here but I'm not sure it's necessary. Always marked it up to a change in the heart as the defining moment

254 posted on 07/10/2007 1:08:34 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP

Does it trouble you that much when others try to correct your mistakes in fact and jumps in logic?


255 posted on 07/10/2007 1:09:26 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
On the other hand, the ecclesial communities which have not preserved the valid Episcopate

Oh, those people. The ones who have celibate, unmarried bishops in spite of the twice-stated New Testament requirement that bishops be married and have children.

256 posted on 07/10/2007 1:13:37 PM PDT by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: theanonymouslurker; Religion Moderator
Thank you. I know you didn't know. I never posted a thread. I accept your apology and I apologize for calling you a name.

When I read what you wrote I burst into tears because it hit me that I could never call him anything again. In answer to your question. When I was a little girl, I called him "Daddy." When I grew up, I always called him "Dad." If he were here today, I'd gladly call him anything. I'm sorry.

257 posted on 07/10/2007 1:15:16 PM PDT by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Patriotic1
You think Christ wants to see us divided and bickering??

Jesus? No.

But I know somebody who does! He goes by many names.....

258 posted on 07/10/2007 1:17:58 PM PDT by uglybiker (relaxing in a luxuriant cloud of quality, aromatic, pre-owned tobacco essence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
It is worth noting that at the Council in Jerusalem, chronicled in Acts of the Apostles, James chaired the meeting, not Peter.

It's also worth noting that when there were disagreements, in those early days, those involved deferred to Peter. Why would they have done that, if not for the fact that Jesus Himself put Peter in charge? After all, Paul was not one of those who were the first Apostles of Jesus; he had not spoken with him face to face as they had, so he deferred to them.

259 posted on 07/10/2007 1:18:00 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: billbears

When I (Catholic) got married to my (at that time Baptist) husband, he just has to get a document from the Baptist affirming that he was baptized with water “In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”


260 posted on 07/10/2007 1:22:18 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarfication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 621-623 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson