Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Mormon Brothers?
Reformed Evangelist ^ | May 14th, 2007 | Jeff Fuller

Posted on 07/05/2007 3:00:33 AM PDT by Gamecock

Mormon Evangelists

The following draws from the book Is the Mormon My Brother by apologist James White. Earlier this year, Paul Kaiser reprinted a Worldview article titled 10 Mormonism Facts which generated a myriad of responses from visitors who stated that Mormons were being misrepresented and are simply our brothers & sisters in the Body of Christ. Let’s look at what Dr. White presents using LDS resources:

The First Vision

Without question the key revelation in Mormon Scripture regarding the nature of God is to be found in what is known as the First Vision of Joseph Smith. The vision itself is fundamental to all of LDS theology. Mormon Apostle Bruce R. McConkie described the vision:

That glorious theophany which took place in the spring of 1820 and which marked the opening of the dispensation of the fullness of times is called the First Vision. It is rated as first both from the standpoint of time and of pre-eminent importance. In it Joseph Smith saw and conversed with the Father and the Son, both of which exalted personages were personally present before him as he lay enwrapped in the Spirit and overshadowed by the Holy Ghost.

This transcendent vision was the beginning of latter day revelation; it marked the opening of the heavens after the long night of apostate darkness; with it was ushered in the great era of restoration, the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. (Acts 3:21.) Through it the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens, and because of it the truth about those Beings whom it is life eternal to know began again to be taught among men. (John 17:3.) With this vision came the call of that Prophet who, save Jesus only, was destined to do more for the salvation of men in this world, than any other man that ever lived in it. (D. & C. 135:3.) This vision was the most important event that had taken place in all world history from the day of Christ’s ministry to the glorious hour when it occurred.(1)

And Mormon Prophet Ezra Taft Benson said,

Joseph Smith, a prophet of God, restored the knowledge of God. Joseph’s first vision clearly revealed that the Father and Son are separate personages, having bodies as tangible as mans. Later it was also revealed that the Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit, separate and distinct from the personalities of the Father and the Son. (See D&C 130:22.) This all-important truth shocked the world even though sustained by the Bible. (2)

How is it that the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens and the knowledge of God was restored by this one vision? While the story is as familiar to Mormons as John 3:16 is to Christians, we present Joseph Smith’s own recounting of the story in full, taken from the LDS Scriptures (and hence carrying canonical authority). However, we note that the account that appears in the LDS Scriptures was written in 1838, eighteen years after the events described:

14 So, in accordance with this, my determination to ask of God, I retired to the woods to make the attempt. It was on the morning of a beautiful, clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred and twenty. It was the first time in my life that I had made such an attempt, for amidst all my anxieties I had never as yet made the attempt to pray vocally.

15 After I had retired to the place where I had previously designed to go, having looked around me, and finding myself alone, I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon bysome power which entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden destruction.

16 But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver me out of the power of this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the very moment when I was ready to sink into despair and abandon myself to destruction—not to an imaginary ruin, but to the power of some actual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being just at this moment of great alarm, I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.

17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!

18 My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)–and which I should join.

19 I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong;(3) and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.

20 He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself again, I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven. When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, Never mind, all is well I am well enough off. I then said to my mother, I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true. It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very early period of my life, that I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine against me? Why the opposition and persecution that arose against me, almost in my infancy? (Joseph Smith History 1:14-20).

What does this vision, recorded in LDS Scripture, teach concerning God? First and foremost, it presents to us the concept of a plurality of gods. This arises from the fact that God the Father is a separate and distinct physical entity from Jesus Christ, His Son. God the Father is possessed of a physical body, as is the Son. This is why McConkie can claim the creeds of Christendom were smashed to smithereens, for the vision has always been interpreted by the LDS leadership to teach that God the Father is a separate and distinct person and being from the Son. The unity of Being that is central to Christian theology is completely denied by Joseph Smith in the First Vision. Hence, you have one God, the Father, directing Smith to another God, the Son.

While it is not our intention to critique these teachings at this point, it should be noted that there are a number of problems with the First Vision, and with the entire development of the LDS concept of God as well. As we noted, this version of the First Vision was not written until 1838. Previous versions, however, differed in substantial details from this final and official account. Most significantly, the presence of both the Father and the Son as separate and distinct gods is not a part of the earlier accounts.(4)

————————————————-

(1) Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine,2nd ed., rev. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 284-285, LDSCL.

(2) Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988), p. 4, LDSCL. On page 101 of the same book, we read this strong statement:

The first vision of the Prophet Joseph Smith is bedrock theology to the Church. The adversary knows this and has attacked Joseph Smith’s credibility from the day he announced the visitation of the Father and the Son. You should always bear testimony to thetruth of the First Vision. Joseph Smith did see the Father and the Son. They conversed with him as he said they did. Any leader who, without reservation, cannot declare his testimony that God and Jesus Christ appeared to Joseph Smith can never be a true leader, a true shepherd. If we do not accept this truth if we have not received a witness about this great revelationwe cannot inspire faith in those whom we lead.

(3) One of Mormonism’s leading scholars, James Talmage (and a General Authority), said the following in the General Conference of April, 1920:

This Church, therefore, from its beginning, has been unique, for the organization of the Church was forecasted in this declaration that at the time of Joseph Smiths first vision there was no Church of Jesus Christ upon the earth; and I do not see why people should take issue with us for making that statement (CR1920Apr:103).

(4) I noted a number of the historical problems with Mormonism in Letters to a Mormon Elder, pp. 88-106. For a fuller treatment of this issue, see H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, Inventing Mormonism (Salt Lake: Smith Research Associates, 1994), pp.1-41, and Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Mormonism: Shadow or Reality? (Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1982), pp. 143-162.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: apologetics; boggsforgovernor; brothers; christianity; lds; mormon; mormonism; orthodoxy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,341 next last
To: greyfoxx39

No, souls will not associate with Christ in the TELESTIAL Kingdom - this is different from the TERRESTRIAL Kingdom.

That is where those who reject Christ go. That is also where the wicked who haven’t committed unforgivable sins go after they complete their punishment in hell or “spirit prison.”

You see, for Mormons, God is not vindictive or sadistic - after the wicked pay for their sins, they are released from hell and obtain some happiness for all eternity. Sure, this is coupled with the knowledge that because of their choices they screwed up and could’ve had so much more, could’ve enjoyed companionship with Christ, and could’ve even been exalted; but they get what they deserve. They will be grateful for God’s mercy because he could’ve left them suffering in hell if he wanted to, or even cast them into outer darkness, together with the horribly evil and rebellious spirits.


901 posted on 07/12/2007 12:56:47 PM PDT by Edward Watson (Fanatics with guns beat liberals with ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
When you point to Rev 20:12 it is also important to note this Great Judgment has certain humans excluded from it, as in the Bride of Christ ... the Lambs Book of Life is not the book opened in Rev 20:12.
 
Huh???
 
Revelation 20:11-15
 11.  Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. Earth and sky fled from his presence, and there was no place for them.
 12.  And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books.
 13.  The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what he had done.
 14.  Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death.
 15.  If anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.
 
 
If 'christians' are not there, they WHY is the BoL opened to see if their name is in it?
 
 

902 posted on 07/12/2007 12:59:45 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

DU said: Why? what conclusions am I obliterating now?

[straight faced humor] None. I’m now convinced you may be related to Augustus Gloop.[/straight faced humor]


903 posted on 07/12/2007 12:59:49 PM PDT by Truth-Miner (The Child in us desires Truth to bend to our perspective, may we all be Adults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 892 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
I Said: BTW my point in said Post was that those Gods are only Gods over their creations, not our God which is in complete agreement with the commandment that we have no other Gods before our creator.

You Said: DU, please point me to the LDS scriptural source for that statement, please? I have not seen it put in that way (Gods over their creations) before, and I'm pretty sure I never HEARD it either. Enosh has asked for Biblical reference, but I'm curious about the LDS reference.

It's a logical construct, with Scripture that supports it, I can go look up scriptures, but the logic goes like this.
God is our God because:
  1. He is our creator.
  2. He is our Father (spiritually)
  3. He authored our salvation
  4. He has all power over us
  5. He has created all that we can see, and has all power over it, he even created time for us.
When we become Gods it will be by emulating him exactly, so we will Create, Father spirits, author salvation for our children, have all power over our creations, and be their God.

To me this was self evident logic, I can find scriptures, for one in the Doctrine and Covenants says that all truth is independent in the sphere in which God has placed it, we will likewise be independent in the sphere which God will give us.

If you want more, gimme a break, FM me while I catch up here and I will reply later, man this thread is like a runaway locomotive - - tough to catch up with!
904 posted on 07/12/2007 1:04:40 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
They just found the remains of one of them several weeks ago.

Oooh!

Got a link?

I'm REALLY interested in this!

Have you read the Tony Hillerman book that uses this episode? (Hunting Badger, IIRC)

905 posted on 07/12/2007 1:05:52 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies]

To: Enosh; MHGinTN
That is exactly correct, we'll already have been resurrected.

You guys'll have to prove this assertion to me!

906 posted on 07/12/2007 1:07:07 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson
TELESTIAL Kingdom - this is different from the TERRESTRIAL Kingdom.

OOps!

Did I get these mixed up when I relayed what I THOUGHT you had typed??

907 posted on 07/12/2007 1:08:24 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 901 | View Replies]

To: ComeUpHigher
I respectfully disagree with EW and you.

Legislation based upon morality is the foundation of western civilization. If you truly agree with EW, you favor de-criminalizing all laws based upon a moral code for human conduct. As I stated in post 757, “If your position were adopted, laws prohibiting theft, fraud, murder, bribery, perjury, embezzlement, forgery, domestic abuse, indecent exposure, and a myriad of other morally based crimes would be repealed because they are based on ‘a system of moral conduct.’”

Please tell me that isn’t what you really want.


You can legislate Justice, Fairness and you can legislate rules and regulations.

You cannot legislate morality no matter how you try.

I am not opposed to laws, just laws like Roe V Wade which attempt to legislate morality (and Roe V Wade was not a law, just a decision of the supreme court.)
908 posted on 07/12/2007 1:10:57 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

You’ve got mail


909 posted on 07/12/2007 1:12:02 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 906 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Found it!

http://www.gallupindependent.com/2007/june/060806bd_finallyover.html


910 posted on 07/12/2007 1:13:07 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

http://www.policeone.com/police-products/investigation/forensic-supplies/articles/1281412/


911 posted on 07/12/2007 1:13:59 PM PDT by colorcountry (To pursue union at the expense of truth is treason to the Lord Jesus. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; MHGinTN

Because Revelation 20:6 happens before Revelation 20:12.


912 posted on 07/12/2007 1:15:58 PM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Then your god could have died.

Mine can't and never was any danger of doing so.


And you call you yourself a Christian...

My God died for me on the cross....

Death is not an End, but an ending of this life...

DU
913 posted on 07/12/2007 1:16:27 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 848 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
I Said: I just responded to this as I was chewing my way though the thread, and used almost the same words, no wonder they think we are clones.

You Said: Spellcheck would NOT have found that you spelled CLOWNS wrong!

That just wasn't nice, go and wash your mouth out with water!

DU
914 posted on 07/12/2007 1:20:04 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Sometimes I feel like a nut!

Sometimes you don't

This is pathetic, but funny!
915 posted on 07/12/2007 1:23:33 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
God is. The great “I AM.” He was not born in time, then stepped out of time, then stepped back into time. First words of the Bible are “In the beginning God . . .” The multiverse concept makes nature the ultimate creator of God in the form of an uncreated universe, rather than reverse. Prior universes, extending back into infinities of other universes all creating Gods. Mormon theology has no first mover as I have been told by Edward, the chain of universes just extend back infinitely. Any created god is one the gods of wood and stone we are warned against in the Bible. Mormons do not worship God, but worship a god, a creation.

You are welcome to your opinion, however incorrect it may be.

However to state such a thing as a fact when you know it is in dispute by those who believe it to be true (and you have no concrete evidence either way) would be to state a lie because you would be stating a fact that is not so accepted. there for if you want to preface your statement with "In My opinion", people like myself and Edward will not call you out for lying for you will finally be speaking the truth, it's your opinion.

Good luck, have fun and don't state what you can't prove, or we'll have this little chat again and again you will look foolish. (and that's my opinion)
916 posted on 07/12/2007 1:36:56 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Did you hear about the haunted liquor store??

It had beer, wine and spirits!


The Mormon who got Caught robbing a liquor store?

They put him in spirit prison

One bad joke... Non Mormons may not get it...
917 posted on 07/12/2007 1:39:33 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 889 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
Caught up! Now I've got to go do some work, catch up again later...

Hey, not to make anyone mad or anything, this thread started to be fun about the time people started talking about food (is it just me?) anyway thanks.

DU
918 posted on 07/12/2007 1:46:35 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
Hey, not to make anyone mad or anything, this thread started to be fun about the time people started talking about food (is it just me?) anyway thanks. DU

Yeah, it was fun. Then you came back and stirred us all up again.....SEE what you did!!! Now go repent and sin no more [grin]

919 posted on 07/12/2007 1:49:03 PM PDT by colorcountry (To pursue union at the expense of truth is treason to the Lord Jesus. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Yes, Augustus but stay out of the river of chocolate or you might get stuck in a pipe and then the thread won’t be as fun. There will fewer to laugh at.


920 posted on 07/12/2007 1:49:30 PM PDT by Truth-Miner (The Child in us desires Truth to bend to our perspective, may we all be Adults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson