Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Mormon Brothers?
Reformed Evangelist ^ | May 14th, 2007 | Jeff Fuller

Posted on 07/05/2007 3:00:33 AM PDT by Gamecock

Mormon Evangelists

The following draws from the book Is the Mormon My Brother by apologist James White. Earlier this year, Paul Kaiser reprinted a Worldview article titled 10 Mormonism Facts which generated a myriad of responses from visitors who stated that Mormons were being misrepresented and are simply our brothers & sisters in the Body of Christ. Let’s look at what Dr. White presents using LDS resources:

The First Vision

Without question the key revelation in Mormon Scripture regarding the nature of God is to be found in what is known as the First Vision of Joseph Smith. The vision itself is fundamental to all of LDS theology. Mormon Apostle Bruce R. McConkie described the vision:

That glorious theophany which took place in the spring of 1820 and which marked the opening of the dispensation of the fullness of times is called the First Vision. It is rated as first both from the standpoint of time and of pre-eminent importance. In it Joseph Smith saw and conversed with the Father and the Son, both of which exalted personages were personally present before him as he lay enwrapped in the Spirit and overshadowed by the Holy Ghost.

This transcendent vision was the beginning of latter day revelation; it marked the opening of the heavens after the long night of apostate darkness; with it was ushered in the great era of restoration, the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. (Acts 3:21.) Through it the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens, and because of it the truth about those Beings whom it is life eternal to know began again to be taught among men. (John 17:3.) With this vision came the call of that Prophet who, save Jesus only, was destined to do more for the salvation of men in this world, than any other man that ever lived in it. (D. & C. 135:3.) This vision was the most important event that had taken place in all world history from the day of Christ’s ministry to the glorious hour when it occurred.(1)

And Mormon Prophet Ezra Taft Benson said,

Joseph Smith, a prophet of God, restored the knowledge of God. Joseph’s first vision clearly revealed that the Father and Son are separate personages, having bodies as tangible as mans. Later it was also revealed that the Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit, separate and distinct from the personalities of the Father and the Son. (See D&C 130:22.) This all-important truth shocked the world even though sustained by the Bible. (2)

How is it that the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens and the knowledge of God was restored by this one vision? While the story is as familiar to Mormons as John 3:16 is to Christians, we present Joseph Smith’s own recounting of the story in full, taken from the LDS Scriptures (and hence carrying canonical authority). However, we note that the account that appears in the LDS Scriptures was written in 1838, eighteen years after the events described:

14 So, in accordance with this, my determination to ask of God, I retired to the woods to make the attempt. It was on the morning of a beautiful, clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred and twenty. It was the first time in my life that I had made such an attempt, for amidst all my anxieties I had never as yet made the attempt to pray vocally.

15 After I had retired to the place where I had previously designed to go, having looked around me, and finding myself alone, I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon bysome power which entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden destruction.

16 But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver me out of the power of this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the very moment when I was ready to sink into despair and abandon myself to destruction—not to an imaginary ruin, but to the power of some actual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being just at this moment of great alarm, I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.

17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!

18 My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)–and which I should join.

19 I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong;(3) and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.

20 He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself again, I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven. When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, Never mind, all is well I am well enough off. I then said to my mother, I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true. It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very early period of my life, that I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine against me? Why the opposition and persecution that arose against me, almost in my infancy? (Joseph Smith History 1:14-20).

What does this vision, recorded in LDS Scripture, teach concerning God? First and foremost, it presents to us the concept of a plurality of gods. This arises from the fact that God the Father is a separate and distinct physical entity from Jesus Christ, His Son. God the Father is possessed of a physical body, as is the Son. This is why McConkie can claim the creeds of Christendom were smashed to smithereens, for the vision has always been interpreted by the LDS leadership to teach that God the Father is a separate and distinct person and being from the Son. The unity of Being that is central to Christian theology is completely denied by Joseph Smith in the First Vision. Hence, you have one God, the Father, directing Smith to another God, the Son.

While it is not our intention to critique these teachings at this point, it should be noted that there are a number of problems with the First Vision, and with the entire development of the LDS concept of God as well. As we noted, this version of the First Vision was not written until 1838. Previous versions, however, differed in substantial details from this final and official account. Most significantly, the presence of both the Father and the Son as separate and distinct gods is not a part of the earlier accounts.(4)

————————————————-

(1) Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine,2nd ed., rev. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 284-285, LDSCL.

(2) Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988), p. 4, LDSCL. On page 101 of the same book, we read this strong statement:

The first vision of the Prophet Joseph Smith is bedrock theology to the Church. The adversary knows this and has attacked Joseph Smith’s credibility from the day he announced the visitation of the Father and the Son. You should always bear testimony to thetruth of the First Vision. Joseph Smith did see the Father and the Son. They conversed with him as he said they did. Any leader who, without reservation, cannot declare his testimony that God and Jesus Christ appeared to Joseph Smith can never be a true leader, a true shepherd. If we do not accept this truth if we have not received a witness about this great revelationwe cannot inspire faith in those whom we lead.

(3) One of Mormonism’s leading scholars, James Talmage (and a General Authority), said the following in the General Conference of April, 1920:

This Church, therefore, from its beginning, has been unique, for the organization of the Church was forecasted in this declaration that at the time of Joseph Smiths first vision there was no Church of Jesus Christ upon the earth; and I do not see why people should take issue with us for making that statement (CR1920Apr:103).

(4) I noted a number of the historical problems with Mormonism in Letters to a Mormon Elder, pp. 88-106. For a fuller treatment of this issue, see H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, Inventing Mormonism (Salt Lake: Smith Research Associates, 1994), pp.1-41, and Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Mormonism: Shadow or Reality? (Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1982), pp. 143-162.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: apologetics; boggsforgovernor; brothers; christianity; lds; mormon; mormonism; orthodoxy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,341 next last
To: topcat54
Externally speaking, a Christian is a person who has been baptized with water using the trinitarian formula,

Careful... Many of the anti Mormons here on FR are Christians who do not believe that baptism by water is nessisary.

161 posted on 07/05/2007 11:12:42 PM PDT by sevenbak (After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers... Acts 24:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
Mormons go only on what is in the Bible in regards to Mary.

Quite right, and we also have high regard for Mary, the mother of God.

Alma 7:

10 And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God.
11 And he shall go forth, suffering pains and affliction's and temptations of every kind; and this that the word might be fulfilled which saith he will cake upon him the pains and the sicknesses of his people.
12 And he will take upon him death, that he may loose the bands of death which bind his people; and he will take upon him their infirmities, that his bowels may be filled with mercy, according to the flesh, that he may know according to the flesh how to succor his people according to their infirmities.
13 Now the Spirit knoweth all things; nevertheless the Son of God suffereth according to the flesh that he might take upon him the sins of his people, that he might blot out their transgressions according to the power of his deliverance; and now behold, this is the testimony which is in me.

162 posted on 07/05/2007 11:21:57 PM PDT by sevenbak (After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers... Acts 24:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Enosh
Stressing Jesus in the name like that, “Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,” is about like John McCain jumping up and down shouting, “Look! That’s an ‘R’ next to my name! An ‘R!!!’”

Nice try!

2 Nephi 25:26
And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins.

163 posted on 07/05/2007 11:30:36 PM PDT by sevenbak (After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers... Acts 24:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
I was unaware that Mormons believed God "evolved" from being a mere man.

That's because it's not true. It's one of many things the anti Mormons put out there to distort our faith.

164 posted on 07/05/2007 11:36:01 PM PDT by sevenbak (After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers... Acts 24:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

Woah!!! Where do you get your info?


165 posted on 07/05/2007 11:37:16 PM PDT by sevenbak (After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers... Acts 24:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
"And there's another fib from Enosh."

When a couple of lost souls knock on my door, do you seriously think I would pass up the opportunity to preach the Gospel to them?

No way. Sometimes you win, sometimes not.

166 posted on 07/06/2007 5:03:53 AM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak
"2 Nephi 25:26"

What's that? It's not in my Bible.

See #122.

167 posted on 07/06/2007 5:05:45 AM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

If you’re going to call colorcountry a liar then you really ought to at least give some examples on what colorcountry has supposed lied about.

Oh God hear the words of my mouth.


168 posted on 07/06/2007 5:13:00 AM PDT by Degaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Why do they need to talk to a LDS missionary first? What special knowledge will they get from a LDS missionary?


169 posted on 07/06/2007 5:17:54 AM PDT by Degaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Logophile; Gamecock; Larry Lucido
Everyone is creedal whether they admit it or not. The only difference appears to be the source of your creed.

The creeds you had cited were all the result of a group of theologians getting together and arriving at a consensus concerning a theological issue. The earliest Christians were not governed by these creeds, but they were clearly followers of Jesus Christ.

170 posted on 07/06/2007 6:22:21 AM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: restornu; Bainbridge
That is your limited understanding and it is not acurate LDS doctrine!

Admittedly I do have a limited understanding of Mormonism. However, God in man Jesus preexisted from before the creation of the universe and did not "evolve" from his manhood into a God.

If as has been stated here that Mormons believe God was once a man and "evolved" into God that is clearly not Scriptural. If I'm in error about this Mormon belief please let me know what the actual belief is.

171 posted on 07/06/2007 6:32:35 AM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
The creeds you had cited were all the result of a group of theologians getting together and arriving at a consensus concerning a theological issue. The earliest Christians were not governed by these creeds, but they were clearly followers of Jesus Christ.

You raise some excellent points.

Frankly, I am surprised that no one here has commented on the three passages in the Bible where the word Christian actually appears. The first is found in Acts 11:26: "And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch."

So Christian was first used a synonym for disciple: "a follower of Jesus Christ."

172 posted on 07/06/2007 6:44:13 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

This is why Protestants have no ground for criticizing Mormonism.
173 posted on 07/06/2007 6:56:07 AM PDT by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
"Acts 11:26"

It Christianity was called "The Way" before that.

Acts 9:2

174 posted on 07/06/2007 7:05:57 AM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Degaston; colorcountry
If you’re going to call colorcountry a liar then you really ought to at least give some examples on what colorcountry has supposed lied about.

I clicked on colorcountry's posting history to find the latest example of one of her lies about the LDS Church and its beliefs, and I didn't have to scroll far to find Post #58 right here in this thread.

Colorcountry is constantly misrepresenting or flat out lying about the actual beliefs and doctrine of the LDS Church. She could just be happy in her new church, but she's got some obsession with bugging members of her old church and lying about it. You'd think that if she had such good reasons for leaving she wouldn't have to keep inventing more. But, that's what she does.

175 posted on 07/06/2007 7:08:17 AM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak
I was unaware that Mormons believed God "evolved" from being a mere man.
That's because it's not true. It's one of many things the anti Mormons put out there to distort our faith.

WHOA! That's gonna be a real disappointment to the mormons I went to church with for years. "As man is, God once was, as God is man may become" was taught over and over again. Boggles the mind that something this ingrained in mormonism is now being denied.

The first chapter of the edition (1992) of the Latter-day Saint teaching manual, Gospel Principles (Church of Jesus Christ Latter-day Saints,1992 ed., p. 9.), quotes from the above passage under the heading What Kind of Being Is God?:

The Prophet Joseph Smith said: "If the veil were rent today, and the great God who holds this world in its orbit, and who upholds all worlds and all things by his power, was to make himself visible — I say, if you were to see him today, you would see him like a man in form" (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 345). God is a glorified and perfected man, a personage of flesh and bones (see D&C 130:22).

God used to be a man on another planet, Mormon Doctrine, p. 321. Joseph Smith, Times and Seasons, Vol 5, pp. 613-614; Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol 2, p. 345, Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 7, p. 333.)

Now awaiting usual apologist's response discounting and twisting my sources as lies and my own memory as false...10...9....8....

176 posted on 07/06/2007 7:09:49 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 ("We don't want to open a box of Pandoras." - Bruce King former governor of NM, DEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Spiff; Degaston

That wasn’t a lie Spiff. It is easy to get confused when you are LDS and are taught the concept of pre-existence, eternal polygamy, spiritual offspring, .....

Either Heavenly Father had a child (Jesus) with his own spiritual daughter(incest)that he created with one of his eternal wives in the pre-existence, or Mary was one of his eternal wives. Which is it?

Don’t you wish I would go away and keep quiet?


177 posted on 07/06/2007 7:15:02 AM PDT by colorcountry (To pursue union at the expense of truth is treason to the Lord Jesus. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Spiff; colorcountry; Religion Moderator
She could just be happy in her new church, but she's got some obsession with bugging members of her old church and lying about it. You'd think that if she had such good reasons for leaving she wouldn't have to keep inventing more. But, that's what she does.

Since I have seen practically every point that colorcountry has posted also posted by others here, I wonder who has the obsession? I have seen you call her liar time after time.

I guess it has escaped your notice that personal attacks are expressly forbidden in the religion forum.

178 posted on 07/06/2007 7:23:38 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 ("We don't want to open a box of Pandoras." - Bruce King former governor of NM, DEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Enosh

Actually, it’s sort of funny. Nothing much like Mormon doctrine, but sort of funny. When was it “banned”? Who “banned” it?


179 posted on 07/06/2007 7:24:56 AM PDT by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
The creeds you had cited were all the result of a group of theologians getting together and arriving at a consensus concerning a theological issue. The earliest Christians were not governed by these creeds, but they were clearly followers of Jesus Christ.

Can you imagine if even our President, who is a Christian, decided for political reasons (just as Constantine did) to gather all the disagreeing leaders of various Christian churches, faiths and sects and crafted one single religion with an overarching creed out of what came out of that meeting? Would YOU want anything to do with that religion? And if you believe your current religion to be true, then what of this new religion? It changed some major tenants of your old religion, and compromised many others, so the new one can't be true, right? This is precisely what happened in the 4th Century, except that the guy behind it all was a Roman Emperor who may or may not have even been Christian at the time.

If the church established by Christ was even more altered and even warped then, and its true form and doctrine was lost, don't you think it necessary that it later be restored? It was. And it happened on April 6th, 1830 after God the Father and His son Jesus Christ visited and directed that it be restored after the long apostasy.

180 posted on 07/06/2007 7:24:57 AM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson