Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Shakespeare Code
National Catholic Register ^ | 5-14-06 | Fr. Andreas Kramarz LC

Posted on 05/13/2006 9:45:58 PM PDT by marshmallow

“When in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes / I all alone beweep my outcast state…”

What does William Shakespeare’s immortal Sonnet 29 really mean?

Was the melancholy Bard transmitting a coded message? The hypothesis that the playwright concealed his secret Catholic identity during the years of Elizabethan persecution has long been the subject of academic daydreams.

But startling revelations in a book that is so far available only in German may take the hypothesis out of the realm of dreams. In a previous issue of the Register (Feb. 5-11), Jennifer Roche wrote about recent textual discoveries.

Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s book The Hidden Existence of William Shakespeare: Poet and Rebel in the Catholic Underground covers recent historical discoveries. A centerpiece in the book is a hitherto unknown entry in the Pilgrims’ Book of the English College in Rome. On April 16, 1585, a Gulielmus Clerkue Stratfordienses (William, Secretary of Stratford) signed his name on arriving to the college. Was this the same William who was born in Stratford-on-Avon?

Shakespeare would have been 21 at the time. Similar entries are to be found in 1587 and 1589. Remarkably, these three visits in Rome coincide with the so-called seven “lost years” in Shakespeare’s official biography. It also coincides with the dates that English Catholics in exile met in Rome with their leaders Robert Parsons and William Allen to develop new strategies of resistance in the Protestant England of Queen Elizabeth I.

Scholars have long agreed that Shakespeare’s family background was staunchly Catholic, as Roche reported. Hammerschmidt now offers further details that support the thesis that Shakespeare held to the faith of his family, preferring to hide his true colors and work secretly rather than risk martyrdom.

For seven years, William was taught at the Latin school by Simon Hunt, a Catholic. In 1575, Hunt went to the Jesuit Collegium Anglicum in Douay, which in turn moved to Rheims, France, in 1578. Perhaps not coincidentally, Rheims figures as a place of study in Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew. Hammerschmidt claims that the young Shakespeare, on reaching college age in 1578, would have gone to study there.

Rheims was then the only English Catholic college, and represented the normal route for other English Catholics who desired to study humanities. This education there would have provided him with all necessary requisites for his later career in poetry.

Hammerschmidt cites a record of Shakespeare’s father John raising a major loan that year and surmises that its purpose may have been to finance these studies. As Ernst Honigmann points out in his book on Shakespeare’s “lost years,” William took a job as a private tutor in 1580 in the household of Alexander Hoghton in Lancashire under the name Shakeshafte, which had already been used by his grandfather. At that time, the place where he taught was a Catholic stronghold or even, as Richard Wilson writes in the Times Literary Supplement (Dec. 19, 1997), “nothing less than the secret college and headquarters of the English Counter Reformation,” equipped with a big library and dedicated to an intense apologetic work against the Anglican “heretics.”

Furthermore, Shakespeare is mentioned in Hoghton’s will. The same document, in what Hammerschmidt calls coded language, gives hints to Hoghton’s involvement in a secret organization for the protection of hiding Catholic priests.

In 1582, Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway and took up residence at Stratford. What would he have been doing in Rome three years later, then, in order to have signed the college’s guestbook? Hammerschmidt proposes that Shakespeare’s sudden departure from England may have been triggered by the embroilment of the Arden-Somerville family — his mother’s family — in a Catholic conspiracy. He may have feared that his own membership in a Catholic secret organization could have brought him into trouble, and might have preferred to disappear for a while. Only in 1592 does the historical record definitively resume as Shakespeare again surfaces in London at the beginning of his illustrious career.

Even then, Shakespeare may have remained secretly linked to the Catholic resistance. Shakespeare acquired part of the London Blackfriars building (though he himself never lived there). The Dominican facility was riddled with hidden tunnels and passages, and was a meeting place and refuge for persecuted priests. The building’s purpose came to light in 1623, after Shakespeare’s death, when a ceiling suddenly collapsed during a secret Catholic service, killing 99 of the faithful. They were denied Church burial by the Anglican archbishop of London. When Shakespeare bought this property, in the contract he gave indications that reveal, as Hammerschmidt writes, “an almost perfect arrangement of the Catholic underground: The poet contributed the lodging and the owner of the Mermaid Tavern the food provisions; a magnate of a ship secured the transportation and the business manager of Shakespeare’s company the organization. The nearby theater could provide costumes, wigs and false beards, if required.”

Shakespeare provided for the house’s upkeep even after his death.

Could he then have traveled once more to Rome? In October 1613, the presumed pseudonym Ricardus Stratfordus appears on the college’s guestbook — “Richard” was the name of Shakespeare’s paternal grandfather and also of the last of his brothers, buried in Stratford in February 1613. As Jennifer Roche and some Register readers already pointed out, not a few passages of Shakespeare’s work take on fresh meaning in the light of his crypto-Catholicism and the inner conflict of conscience occasioned by the high opinion in which London society held their most-esteemed poet.

Hammerschmidt reads sonnets 29 and 66 as bemoaning the desperate situation of the Catholic population of Elizabethan England.

Curiously, X-ray research now tells us that the poet’s famous flower-portrait was painted over a beautiful picture of the Blessed Virgin Mary with her child. Does that mirror the fact that Shakespeare himself led a double life?

If Hammerschmidt’s theories are true, Shakespeare’s genius is further reflected in his ability to so discreetly reflect on Catholic issues in public, that his true intentions are revealed only to the eye of the initiated.

And Elizabeth herself, one of Shakespeare’s greatest admirers, would have been shocked to learn his real intent in writing the concluding line of Sonnet 29: “I scorn to change my state with kings.”

Legionary Father Andreas Kramarz teaches at the Legionaries of Christ’s Novitiate and College of Humanities in Cheshire, Connecticut.


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion; History
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; shakespeare

1 posted on 05/13/2006 9:45:59 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Interesting theory; of course it's only fair that this pops up on the heels of the hopelessly-overrated daVinci thing. Still, it's a nice comeback, and it puts William Shakespeare on the side, if not of the angels, then of the True Faith. After all, Shakespeare did have a hand in translating the King James version of the Bible, and if Shakespeare is good enough for Jesus Christ, he's more than good enough for me!
Of course this will also resurrect (sorry) the old did-Bacon-write-Shakespeare thing; and did Shakespeare ever write Bacon back? (hee hee)


2 posted on 05/13/2006 10:58:21 PM PDT by PandaRosaMishima (she who tends the Nightunicorn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PandaRosaMishima

The English aristocracy has never been happy with the idea that the greatest practioner of the English tongue was a commomer; therefore the notion that Bacon wrote the plays. This is not a new proposition, his being Catholic, but it appears that there is new evidence to support it.


3 posted on 05/13/2006 11:20:36 PM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (Islam Schmislam blahblahblah, enough already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PandaRosaMishima
Some of the work on Shakespeare's alleged recusancy is indeed dismissed as "the Shakespeare Code." I hadn't heard about this researcher before, I'll have to take a look.
4 posted on 05/14/2006 12:32:27 AM PDT by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Scholars have long agreed that Shakespeare’s family background was staunchly Catholic, as Roche reported.

Not trying to be difficult, but at that time in England everyone's "family background" was "staunchly Catholic."

5 posted on 05/14/2006 2:31:48 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Not in the 1570's and 1580's. By then the Catholic faith had been overturned in England (despite the brief reign of Mary in the 1550's) for a generation. Those who remained Catholic throughout the 1540's, 50's, 60's and so on would have had to have been "staunch" to say the least.


6 posted on 05/14/2006 5:16:24 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

What is this famous "flower portrait" the article refers to?


7 posted on 05/14/2006 5:28:58 AM PDT by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eepsy; marshmallow

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4471515.stm

8 posted on 05/14/2006 6:29:56 AM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
"Jove!" --Twelfth Night
9 posted on 05/14/2006 8:55:03 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

It says, "family BACKGROUND."

Background IS one generation or more....and it was all catholic.

Technically, the Catholic faith, btw, was not overturned in England. The "Roman" variety of Catholicism was rejected.

The nation reverted to its Old English Catholic background that existed prior to William the Conqueror.


10 posted on 05/14/2006 11:31:58 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

So he wasn't preaching the gospel in India or Ireland?

(Just kidding... I don't mean to ridicule this, as I have long been interested in the proposed Catholicism of Shakespeare.)


11 posted on 05/15/2006 6:06:31 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Technically, the Catholic faith, btw, was not overturned in England. The "Roman" variety of Catholicism was rejected.

There is nothing "Catholic" about defacing sacred art; ruining monasteries and abbeys; executing monks; throwing out sacred vessels, altar linens, and other artifacts; banning practices like the veneration of the Cross upon pain of imprisonment, etc.

It's a nice little Anglican conceit that they were bringing England back to its true Catholic heritage, but if you look at what actually happened, it was a religious revolution.

12 posted on 05/15/2006 6:42:28 AM PDT by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Early Christianity in England looked farther east than to Rome. One of the reasons for Williams conquest was to bring England into the Roman fold it had previously resisted.


13 posted on 05/15/2006 8:17:13 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Canterbury


14 posted on 05/15/2006 8:36:44 AM PDT by Nihil Obstat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat; Campion

The following is a really well done site and fun to tool around in.

I don't know that you'll like the history in it, but the design has always impressed me, and I think the history is pretty good.

I'm sending you to a religion page on the site, but go to "home" as well

http://battle1066.com/faith.shtml


15 posted on 05/15/2006 6:29:46 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Psalm 46 and Shakespeare

Some believe that Psalm 46 may have been translated by Shakespeare. The King James version of the Bible was printed when Shakespeare was 46 years old. Moreover, the 46th word from the beginning of the psalm is "shake" and the 46th word from the end of the psalm is "spear."

Also, "WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE" is an anagram of "HERE WAS I, LIKE A PSALM".

16 posted on 05/15/2006 6:34:01 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
interesting web-site, thank you. I only read the religion page but I'll try to read more later. I think he has made too much of a rivalry between the Celtic church and the "Roman" church. Maybe he has embellished it for a little more intrigue?

The missal used by the Celts at that time includes prayers for the Pope in the Canon of their Mass. It's doubtful they would be praying for the Pope's intentions if they were bitter rivals with "Rome".

Stowe Missal - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stowe_Missal
17 posted on 05/15/2006 6:59:44 PM PDT by Nihil Obstat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat

Good stuff. Thanks.


18 posted on 05/15/2006 7:34:00 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Blast from the Past.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


19 posted on 08/26/2008 10:13:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


20 posted on 10/16/2017 6:22:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson