Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Again, Jews Fault Mormons Over Posthumous Baptisms
NY Times ^ | December 21, 2003 | IAN URBINA

Posted on 12/21/2003 4:41:40 AM PST by Pharmboy

Jewish group says it is considering legal action in an effort to stop the Mormon Church from posthumously baptizing many Jews, especially Holocaust victims.

Under the practice, known by Mormons as vicarious baptism — a significant rite of the church — the dead are baptized by living church members who stand in as proxies.

But in 1995, after evidence emerged that at least 380,000 names of Jewish Holocaust victims were on baptismal lists in the church's extensive archives in Salt Lake City, the church agreed to end vicarious baptism without consent from the descendants of the dead. Church officials also said the church would remove the names of Holocaust victims placed on the lists before 1995.

"For the last seven years, we've had entirely cordial relations with the Mormons," said Ernest Michel, who negotiated the agreement on behalf of the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors, which is based in New York and claims 180,000 members. "But the agreement is clear and they have not held up their end."

Last year, Helen Radkey, an independent researcher in Salt Lake City, gave Mr. Michel evidence that the Mormon lists still included the names of at least 20,000 Jews, many of them Holocaust victims and prominent figures like the philosopher Theodor Herzl and David Ben-Gurion, the first prime minister of Israel. Ms. Radkey also provided Mr. Michel with evidence that many of these Jews had been baptized after the 1995 agreement.

But Mormon officials say they remain in full compliance with the 1995 agreement.

"We have actually gone above and beyond," said D. Todd Christofferson, a church official involved with the negotiations. The church removed the names of Holocaust victims listed before 1995 and continues to instruct its members to avoid baptizing Jews who are not directly related to living Mormons or whose immediate family has not given written consent, Mr. Christofferson said.

But he said it was not the church's responsibility to monitor the archives to ensure that no new Jewish names appear. "We never had in mind that we would, on a continual basis, go in and ferret out the Jewish names," Mr. Christofferson said, adding that the labor involved in constantly sifting through an ever-expanding archive, which contains more than 400 million names, would represent an "intolerable burden."

"When the church is made aware of documented concerns, action is taken in compliance with the agreement," he said.

Some Jewish genealogists agree with the Mormon interpretation of the agreement. "I have a copy of the agreement," said Gary Mokotoff, the publisher of Avotaynu, the International Review of Jewish Genealogy. "The wording is vague in some places, but it definitely does not obligate the Mormons to scour their own archives on an ongoing basis."

But Mr. Michel, who said he became involved in the issue after reading about posthumous baptisms in the Jewish newspaper The Forward, contends that the agreement obliges the Mormon Church to monitor the post-1995 lists and remove the names of Jews that appear.

"They put the names in there, they should have to take them out, and the agreement says as much," he said. "Why should we have to do their job for them?" He said the group was considering legal action but would not provide details.

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom Mr. Michel contacted, said she planned to take up the matter with Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, a Republican and a Mormon. "Senator Hatch was immensely helpful in brokering the 1995 agreement, so we're hoping he can get involved again now," she said in a telephone interview.

With approximately 11 million members worldwide, the Mormon Church, known formally as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, is one of the fastest-growing in the world, partly because of a strong missionary effort. The importance of the family structure is central to church doctrine and is a reason for the extensive archives kept by the International Genealogical Index in Salt Lake City. The archives include detailed biographical information of 400 million people going back centuries. The names of those to be posthumously baptized are drawn from the archives.

According to Mormon theology, all people, living or dead, possess "free agency," and posthumous baptisms provide only an option, not an obligation, to join the religion in the afterlife. Church membership numbers do not include those baptized after death, Mr. Christofferson said.

Originally, the practice was reserved for ancestors of church members, but over the years many other people have been baptized posthumously. "There is no way to prevent overzealous members doing mission work from submitting names that don't belong," Mr. Christofferson said.

Ms. Radkey, an Australian-born Christian, said she began researching the Mormon practice in 1999 after discovering that the teenage diarist Anne Frank had been posthumously baptized.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 761 next last
To: Zionist Conspirator
I couldn't care less what Mormons do with the names they collect. It has no influence whatsoever on the judgement of these sould.

However, I belong to several geneaological groups whose members have travelled individually and in groups to the genealogy center in Salt Lake City (which I have not personally visited). Some people get very incensed over this whole posthumus conversion thing, even after making extensive use of the archives and the database which the Mormons have worked so hard to provide.

I say to them, get over it, it's not harming your ancestors.

BTW a cousin of mine converted to the LDS church (while still alive) after marrying a member. So I'm pretty sure that all my ancestors have been "baptized."

401 posted on 12/22/2003 2:37:45 PM PST by Alouette ("Who is for the LORD, come with me!" -- Mattisyahu ben Yohanon, father of Judah Maccabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Pharmboy,
Does not even beleive in the Afterlife
402 posted on 12/22/2003 2:39:12 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
It's clearly there for the literate and the unbiased to see.

Now, go ask someone to look up for you the meaning of the term "free agency," which is a gift from God to which is attached rewards, penalties, and consequences.

If you need to approach the topic slowly enough to be able to comprehend this transcendant principle, have the teacher of the junior Sunday School in your local congregation tell you the story of Adam and Eve.

And then, for the frosting on the cake, ask your pastor to direct you to Book of Genesis, wherein you might learn from God Himself how He deals with His sons and daughters who have entered the proving ground that is our earthly sojourn..............

403 posted on 12/22/2003 2:51:22 PM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
It amazes me that people think the DEAD whatever faith they died practicing are going to be judged by G-d by there political party there race, there religion, there creed, how utterly ridiculous.

G-d as I have said a hundred times is not a religion. I do not know what all faiths teach about the Afterlife, but I guarantee G-d does not seperate people by there organized faiths, he does judge the HEART and the way you lived life on earth and wether you loved G-d with all your heart and soul. RELIGION is for human beings not for the DEAD
404 posted on 12/22/2003 2:53:27 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: luvtheconstitution
"Additionally, the Mormon church does not have a paid clergy, and men, as well as women do the proxy work."

Thanks, and, BTW, it is largely baptized children and new members of the Church who serve as proxies for the vicarious baptismal and confirmation ordinances performed within our temples.

The dead on whose behalf the sacred ordinances are performed do in fact remain undisturbed in their graves after all, contrary to the claims of some....

405 posted on 12/22/2003 3:02:14 PM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I was raised to detest Catholics and Mormons alike.

I wasn't raised to detest anyone of any religion or race. Curiously, when I was a little girl, we used to go on weekend drives as a family. We visited Nauvoo back in the late 40's or early 50's and the only reaction on the part of my parents was my father when I asked him what happened to the gold plates. He smiled and said something like, "Why an angel took them back to heaven." Later as a family we visited Salt Lake City, more as a historical learning experience, than as a spiritual quest.

In my genealogical research, I found out that a great grand uncle fell in with a Giles Cook who had Mormon connections and evidently left Mormonism. When the uncle and Giles Cook went west in the gold rush, they had to give wide berth to Salt Lake because I believe Giles Cook was an apostate and Mormons occasionally used violence against apostates.

I think some of the appeal of Mormonism, apart from their family values and clean living, is that they purport to answer apiritual questions about pre-existence and the hereafter that traditional forms of Christianity are content to leave unanswered.

It seems to me that Mormons add confusion to the mix of already confused Christianity and world religions and in the end, it isn't necessarily a good thing. Other countries are beginning to resent proselytizing by Mormons and other sects because it just exacerbates the confusion. If the other denominations weren't already so splintered, I doubt Mormonism and other sects would have taken hold in America.

Jesus warned that his religion would split families and he was right on.

406 posted on 12/22/2003 3:02:19 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: luvtheconstitution
"Additionally, the Mormon church does not have a paid clergy, and men, as well as women do the proxy work."

Thanks, and, BTW, it is largely baptized children and new members of the Church who serve as proxies for the vicarious baptisms performed within our temples.

Contrary to the belief of some, the dead for which the vicarious ordinances are done do in fact remain undisturbed in their graves after all....

407 posted on 12/22/2003 3:02:38 PM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Romans 5:14
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses even over them that had not sinned after the similtude of Adam's trangressions who is the figure of him that was to come.

The DEAD belong to G-d
408 posted on 12/22/2003 3:06:55 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
more than any other group in the history of this nation,

What!?!?!

Obviously you've never had much contact with the history of the people of this continent who were here when the first European ships arrived....
409 posted on 12/22/2003 3:08:15 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Aliska
"He doesn't come right out and condemn it."

The context of the verse is that Paul is arguing against false teachers who claimed there would be no resurection. Paul points out the inconsistance of practicing baptism for the dead and denying resurection at the same time. It is very reasonable IMHO to assume that Paul would not reference baptism for the dead in this way if it too was a false practice.

"Now everybody (in the west at least and much of the rest of the world) knows about Jesus. "

Knowing ABOUT Jesus is one thing, knowing Jesus is another. Most people do not know Jesus, and billions have lived and died, and still live and die, without even knowing about Jesus. God's love and salvation is not limited to those who happen to be born in the right time/place to have access to the gospel durring their life.

"I think the Mormons rationalize it that they have the true Christian practices, as restored by Joseph Smith."

Sort of, we belive that the preisthood authority of God to perform ordinances was withdrawn due to apostacy, so we don't see the baptisms done by other churches as valid in God's eyes. We also belive that baptism is required, so it is important to extend to all mankind the opportunity to meet that requirement.

"How would Mormons react to having a Catholic mass said for them?"

I would not be offended in the least. In fact I would be touched that someoned cared enough about me to express it that way. I don't understand how someone who actually understands what we do (and disagrees with the validity of it) can feel offended by it. If there is no validity to it, then we are all wasting our own time and resources and not changing anything.
410 posted on 12/22/2003 3:08:39 PM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: CaliforniaOkie
Yeah..... you are.
411 posted on 12/22/2003 3:12:32 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: SaucyCranberry
They have every right to not want the names of their deceased loved ones in Mormon records.

Too bad........


Now if they were CHRISTIAN, then they'd DEFINITELY want their names on another record:

The Book of Life


412 posted on 12/22/2003 3:14:52 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
You are inserting "immediately after one dies" into your interpretation.

After one dies, one will be judged. No question about that. How long it takes for my turn in line, I don't know.

Not so.........


The implication of this passage is not time, but sequence.

It leaves no room for any other proselizn' to take place.


The fellow who wanted that water in Hades sure knew the facts of these things we seem to be confused about.
413 posted on 12/22/2003 3:19:28 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Thats what you are making it sound like, and thats incorrect.

no...

No..

NO!

That's what JS did with his ranting against 'creeds' and their followers!

He made the claim (or said the angel/Personage told him) that NONE were good; not me.

Has the LDS organization EVER published a rebuttal of this claim?


Show me THAT and THEN maybe your group will gain a bit of respect from the REST of us who have been put down by your founder.
414 posted on 12/22/2003 3:24:29 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and is the creator of this world under the direction of His Father.

Does the LDS organization teach that God the Father had actual physical intercourse with Mary?

415 posted on 12/22/2003 3:25:53 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Spiff; maui_hawaii
You guys must simply get your geussing on the same page...........


#278
416 posted on 12/22/2003 3:28:50 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Sort of, we belive that the preisthood authority of God to perform ordinances was withdrawn due to apostacy, so we don't see the baptisms done by other churches as valid in God's eyes.

The Book of Mormon didn't seem to think much of "priestcrafts", I guess their own being an exception. I doubt Joseph Smith was ever exposed to Catholic or Orthodox priests in the narrow confines of his existence.

I really wonder how it will all fall out on Judgement Day. I don't know and don't pretend to know, but the bible does say all liars will be excluded from heaven. Now if the person sincerely believes what he spreads as gospel is the truth, I don't know how it will be for them.

I once had a vision of a picture of Joseph Smith turned upsidedown surrounded by some lemons. Now make of that what you will. I was concerned about my Mormon friend who I think committed suicide because of several possible reasons. Her was a Mormon bishop and they had a bad marriage but stuck together seemingly because that was all they knew socially and religiously. After her death, the husband had a brief marriage with a new wife and my son saw them down at court one day for abuse. I don't know where my friend went in the hereafter, but I had a dream about her going up on an escalator somewhere. I don't presume to know what the dream meant and my vision with the lemons could have been a projection of my own disbelief towards the Mormon religion. So we are back to square one.

I am still a little upset about my friend because she wanted her body taken back to Salt Lake City for burial and they buried her here and then all left for Salt Lake. To this day I am sad that they didn't respect her wishes. They had several boys who were all Mormon missionaries. I guess the thing that never ceases to amaze me is how otherwise intelligent people can so stubbornly cling to whatever it is they believe in, myself included. I believe certain basics, but don't presume to know about the rest of it, and know at this point in my life that I am not going to know.

417 posted on 12/22/2003 3:30:04 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick
The arrest you are referring to was March 20, 1826, and he was found guilty of larceny and fraud. I may be mistaken, but with all the reading and net checking I've done on Joseph Smith and Brigham Young because of my son's involvment with the mormons, seems I remember it being part of the charges along with treason, and theft. I wish I could find the site so I could give you a better source that is a little more complete. He also was chased around for trying to seduce other wives for plural marriage. He was quite the con man from the stuff I read. The really single good thing he did was to come back to face the courts for the press burning and the other charges. Unfortunatley, he had a lot of people after him and they got him. One site says they put him up next to a tree to finish shooting him, one against a well. Who knows?

Merry Christmas
418 posted on 12/22/2003 3:34:01 PM PST by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
You might call him a fundamentalist polygamist or something like that, but Mormon would not be an appropriate label.
It's good to see that you parrot the 'official' party line!

This is the same stuff that gets sent to the media, illustrating how the LDS organization would like (respectfully, of course) these 'people' be described in the print or TV-radio.

419 posted on 12/22/2003 3:34:16 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: philetus

Usually?


420 posted on 12/22/2003 3:35:41 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 761 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson